Man, another resident LibBot fapfest thread.
#stunned
Man, another resident LibBot fapfest thread.
#stunned
How many Hillary/Obama/ChiCom Threads have you started?
If you guessed 3 of the last 5 topics Dax has started you win!
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191101/a8af4807518a9a06ef97e6ed50a9b24b.png)
Do you rubes really feel comfortable playing Tomato-TomAHto with the American Presidency.... get a life.
not a very moderate position to assume the worst motive for our stud President :nono:
not a very moderate position to assume the worst motive for our stud President :nono:
Moderate position?
Yeah, I’ve said it a long time but the last thing dem leadership wants is to impeach and remove trump.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol
LMAO
https://twitter.com/neeratanden/status/1191819206276403200
https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1191824848978358274
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The whole investigation is a sham because the whistleblower complaint was based on hearsay. Doesn’t matter that the hearsay was corroborated by people who have first hand knowledge of the facts because the process was flawed from the start.READ THE TRANSCRIPT!
I thought it was only about protecting biden?
Only Hillary can calm these waters, dax
Lol, really scraping the bottom of the barrel now huh?
Dax going to the “I’m rubber and you’re glue” defense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Really weird path to a “slam dunk” impeachment.
Sadly, LibBot Nation, particularly those on here don’t care about Schiff’s lies or the numerous obvious conflicts.
But this should be expected from a fully assimilated band of hyper-partisans.
I only heard this in passing so I could be mistaken. But did I hear that in one poll 72% of LibBot respondents said that there’s nothing Trump could do (that’s Nothing) that would ever change their mind on his job performance?
If I heard that right, that’s about as useful idiot partisan as you can get. No surprise, but still amaze
Really weird path to a “slam dunk” impeachment.
Sadly, LibBot Nation, particularly those on here don’t care about Schiff’s lies or the numerous obvious conflicts.
But this should be expected from a fully assimilated band of hyper-partisans.
I only heard this in passing so I could be mistaken. But did I hear that in one poll 72% of LibBot respondents said that there’s nothing Trump could do (that’s Nothing) that would ever change their mind on his job performance?
If I heard that right, that’s about as useful idiot partisan as you can get. No surprise, but still amaze
lol @ the trump supporter worried about conflicts of interest with anything
Really weird path to a “slam dunk” impeachment.
Sadly, LibBot Nation, particularly those on here don’t care about Schiff’s lies or the numerous obvious conflicts.
But this should be expected from a fully assimilated band of hyper-partisans.
I only heard this in passing so I could be mistaken. But did I hear that in one poll 72% of LibBot respondents said that there’s nothing Trump could do (that’s Nothing) that would ever change their mind on his job performance?
If I heard that right, that’s about as useful idiot partisan as you can get. No surprise, but still amaze
ANOTHER deep state never trumper?
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1192828052348252160
SMDH just hate to hear that the former ambassador to the Ukraine (a very corrupt person) may have lied under oath.
Color me . . . not surprised.
Is there a bigger clown in Congress than Devin Nunes?
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?
When they had that lady prosecutor asking questions during the Kavanaugh stuff.
When was the last hearing on any subject that the Republicans didn't look like completely out of control clowns?
When they had that lady prosecutor asking questions during the Kavanaugh stuff.
I'm curious if Jim Jordan thinks he's helping Trump by doing this thing he's doing
this Jordan guy had a literal tantrum
this Jordan guy had a literal tantrum
All opposition to us is rage and tantrums (LibBot Nation)
Post the vids, purpledick
That is uncalled for, your username is a clear phallic reference, mine is not.Post the vids, purpledick
Because your memory is so short 8manprick?
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?
It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?
It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.
Tell us more about Benghazi
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?
It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.
Tell us more about Benghazi
Yes we all remember when an administration tried to claim a YouTube video killed an Ambassador (surrounded by CIA special operators, in a city filled with fresh recruits to be sent to Syria for the next regime change attempt).
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?
It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.
Tell us more about Benghazi
Yes we all remember when an administration tried to claim a YouTube video killed an Ambassador (surrounded by CIA special operators, in a city filled with fresh recruits to be sent to Syria for the next regime change attempt).
oh man i remember this
closed door depositions
hours and hours of private testimony
2 years of investigation
resulting in...
When is the last time the LibBot Leadership didn't go all in on something only to have it be a nothing causing even more :curse: because they didn't get the outcome they demanded?
It's been years, but the doubling, tripling . . . down will continue unabated.
Tell us more about Benghazi
Yes we all remember when an administration tried to claim a YouTube video killed an Ambassador (surrounded by CIA special operators, in a city filled with fresh recruits to be sent to Syria for the next regime change attempt).
oh man i remember this
closed door depositions
hours and hours of private testimony
2 years of investigation
resulting in...
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"
-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"
-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan
"Hearsay can be much better than real evidence" Rep. Mike Quigley
(https://media1.giphy.com/media/3o6vXR0zCclXmWTRfy/giphy.gif)That is uncalled for, your username is a clear phallic reference, mine is not.Post the vids, purpledick
Because your memory is so short 8manprick?
Please post the videos of the Democratic equivalent of the Jordan tantrum from either the Kavanaugh or Mueller hearings. Otherwise, do the honorable thing and acknowledge your tap out.
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"
-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan
"Hearsay can be much better than real evidence" Rep. Mike Quigley
We're on to whatabouting John Kerry now
:lol: :lol: (ftp://:lol: :lol:)(https://media1.giphy.com/media/3o6vXR0zCclXmWTRfy/giphy.gif)That is uncalled for, your username is a clear phallic reference, mine is not.Post the vids, purpledick
Because your memory is so short 8manprick?
Please post the videos of the Democratic equivalent of the Jordan tantrum from either the Kavanaugh or Mueller hearings. Otherwise, do the honorable thing and acknowledge your tap out.
"It's not a crime if you didn't get away with it"
-Actual quotes from Gym Jordan
"Hearsay can be much better than real evidence" Rep. Mike Quigley
it would be better to hear from direct sources
who is instructing them not to testify?
Both of Alaska's senators are republicans :confused:
:lol: :lol: (ftp://:lol: :lol:)
First thing my name is based off the football teams piece of wood that says, "family" weirdo. If you want to make into some phallic thing that's your biz. Second, I don't have the time to go back and prove to you that many dems had meltdowns at both those hearings. We both know they did. And to say Jordan had a tantrum is hilarious. That $!#* from Alaska was way worse in her so called grilling of Judge Kavanaugh than Jordan ever was. My god.
"That $!#*":
https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E
"That $!#*":
https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E
She almost raised her voice once.
"That $!#*":
https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E
She almost raised her voice once.
Not the piece I was referring to but nice try.
"That $!#*":
https://youtu.be/QaPPzgNJ37E
She almost raised her voice once.
Not the piece I was referring to but nice try.
Must have been this clip where she really ripped into him.
https://youtu.be/_AyP6ksRS1U
lol
Holy crap
https://twitter.com/jonlovett/status/1195104681325785088
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
nice tapoutThe burden of proof lies with the person making the claim, dumbass.
I defended Rudy? :confused:
I'm done going, gato27. You win with your overwhelming evidence to prove your point.
You won the internets today.
lmao
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
:lol: :lol: :lol:I'm done going, gato27. You win with your overwhelming evidence to prove your point.
You won the internets today.
Good for you, you're smarter than I thought you were. Why would I scour the internet to find the clip that may or may not be there to prove a point to you? And this after someone stating an assumption that was totally subjective in nature? So many people on this site don't provide footnotes but when it doesn't agree with you.....?..you need one badly. Such a joke. Not sure who gato27 is? I'm guessing because I don't agree with your view or because I called someone a $!#* that you're up in arms!! How old are you? Seriously, grow up my friend. I don't like Trump but I do back the Republican party. There are just as many eff-ups on the dem side as the the pub side, at least I can admit to that.
Glad Dax and I agree that Rudy is an idiot and liar.
:lol: :lol: :lol:I'm done going, gato27. You win with your overwhelming evidence to prove your point.
You won the internets today.
Good for you, you're smarter than I thought you were. Why would I scour the internet to find the clip that may or may not be there to prove a point to you? And this after someone stating an assumption that was totally subjective in nature? So many people on this site don't provide footnotes but when it doesn't agree with you.....?..you need one badly. Such a joke. Not sure who gato27 is? I'm guessing because I don't agree with your view or because I called someone a $!#* that you're up in arms!! How old are you? Seriously, grow up my friend. I don't like Trump but I do back the Republican party. There are just as many eff-ups on the dem side as the the pub side, at least I can admit to that.
You're asking for sources and footnotes but not only did you initially get the person you were calling a $!#* wrong, you can't provide a shred of evidence to the event in which you are describing. Take a lap, dude.
I can literally predict every incoming incel post. It’s a gift
Ambassador's serve at the leisure of the president.
Unfortunately the dumbass Republican's likely can't or won't get into what she was doing to protect the corrupt Dem operations in the Ukraine.
Sad
Ambassador's serve at the leisure of the president.
Unfortunately the dumbass Republican's likely can't or won't get into what she was doing to protect the corrupt Dem operations in the Ukraine.
Sad
:lol:
Why wouldn't they ask her, Einstein?
Ambassador's serve at the leisure of the president.
Unfortunately the dumbass Republican's likely can't or won't get into what she was doing to protect the corrupt Dem operations in the Ukraine.
Sad
:lol:
Why wouldn't they ask her, Einstein?
What part of "dumbass" is confusing you?
https://twitter.com/bretbaier/status/1195364536326541313
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m like the incel whisperer
https://twitter.com/hale_razor/status/1195381131488550913?s=21
Let’s out those people who don’t think Ukrainian corruption should be investigated!
:placeshandgentlyonmuzzle:
Yes, why not have Obama holdovers do the investigation?
Really just relying on Giuliani to do anything is a red flag.
this made me lol
https://twitter.com/maggieserota/status/1195192413796675584
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president(s) of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean :ROFL:
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean :ROFL:
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean :ROFL:
Not to be over obvious, but if Trump can get a excommie county to find corruption in the Dems it would be a boost in his 2020 reelection. It would be great for him to brag how he was innocent of corruption, but those Dems... :nono:
i'm all for looking into and investigating crazy crap. it's p fun. I just don't get why the president of the united states would try to get the Ukraine government to do it when he is the president of the united states of America. it would be like LeBron asking a third grader that's never played basketball before to sub for him in game 7. Ukraine intelleigence? I mean :ROFL:
Not to be over obvious, but if Trump can get a excommie county to find corruption in the Dems it would be a boost in his 2020 reelection. It would be great for him to brag how he was innocent of corruption, but those Dems... :nono:
Not to be over obvious, but if Trump can investigate corruption in Russia that'd be great.
holy crap
https://twitter.com/CarolLeonnig/status/1195533621177802756
Gym Jordan is just incapable of not embarrassing himself
This is the trump ringer, lmao
https://twitter.com/geoffrbennett/status/1196892235264077825
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Gym Jordan is just incapable of not embarrassing himself
:lol:
I just can’t believe that the Clintons were able to pay off Sondland to make all this up. I thought he was already rich?Sondland probably got scared they would suicide him.
lmao
https://twitter.com/Ike_Saul/status/1197177426272563202?s=19
That looks pretty damning :ohno:
(the getty image)
WHAT A WITCH HUNT
Holy crap Maloney.
WHAT A WITCH HUNT
Just noticed Nunes is a high hills'r
https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse/status/1197228427033612289
Got'em, Gym! :thumbs:
Nunes also said that Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, was testifying at the hearing “to be smeared” — not addressing any of the issues raised in Sondland's opening statement.
Live look-in to texags.com rn
(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/CautiousCreamyCat-size_restricted.gif)
Holy crap Sondland
:sdeek:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What model of bus has the most ground clearance? Because Sondland just threw a whole bunch of people under it.
lmao, he brought receipts. thank you for attending the Landon lecture series anyway Mike Pompeo.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just can’t believe that the Clintons were able to pay off Sondland to make all this up. I thought he was already rich?
https://twitter.com/mikescollins/status/1197170888753451010
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
well goddamn, mr. sondland.
Tubesock27 in this thread.I just bought $100 of kin so I could give it all to you
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191121/24864f3a8d23f5a4e9ce6ac5a3fc6ff1.jpg)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
he may be a complete criminal maga, but i like this sondland dude. he's a star.Yeah he seemed like a really likeable guy for a maga criminal. Like he would be the life of any party he's at.
https://twitter.com/Viror12/status/1197267704580890626
https://twitter.com/dandrezner/status/1197533817495588867?s=20
I'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.
Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!
It is going to be a sad day for some LibBots who just explode when (insert country/leader they don't like and or weird political dynamic in the U.S. they don't like which pretty much everything that doesn't agree with them 1000% on everything) just gets uncle sam peeling off Benjamin's.
This includes Tarmac Billions.
I'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.Not your best work.
Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!
It is going to be a sad day for some LibBots who just explode when (insert country/leader they don't like and or weird political dynamic in the U.S. they don't like which pretty much everything that doesn't agree with them 1000% on everything) just gets uncle sam peeling off Benjamin's.
This includes Tarmac Billions.
FTR I fully support the Executive Branch of our government investigating corruption on the part of current and form executive branch members in regards to their dealings with foreign governments as long as there's no quid-pro-quo.
Dax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?
No, if Biden/Obama wasn't a quid pro quo than neither was this.
I'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.
Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!
lmao, just self own after self own
https://twitter.com/shawnhils/status/1197581877437227009
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://twitter.com/woodruffbets/status/1197323818945175552
"would you agree that RT is putins propaganda outlet in the US?"Did you not notice that Dr. Hill is a huge libtard? She is just trying to discredit ‘pub sources.
"yes"
Lol, this is one of dax's main sources on Russian issues
The EU ambassador is a hotel tycoon who got his job by giving Trump $1 million, dax.
"drain the swamp" :emawkid:
It's the same every time. They all need a bit of time to huddle in order to formulate talking points and get on the same page.
The EU ambassador is a hotel tycoon who got his job by giving Trump $1 million, dax.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Love the EU ambassador writing a 25 page 45 minute opening statement but leaving out the fact that he talked to Trump directly about the issue.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
That's the kind of lifetime bureaucrat poster boy LibBot Nation can rub a few out to . . .
There is no way Trump is getting removed based on this. It’s bad but nowhere near the standard that the senate Republicans would have needed. He’ll be impeached and not removed, the exact same as we all knew when the inquiry was announced.I agree but hopefully centrists are swayed enough by the proceedings to not reelect the rough rider.
Yeah this is about putting Pubs on the record than removing donald trump.
None of this would have come out without the impeachment inquiry.
What are the Dems on the record for Dax?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Opposing corruption, very bad in daxpublicanland
None of this would have come out without the impeachment inquiry.
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt. As a team. Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain.
You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.
We can do this.
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt. As a team. Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain.
You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.
We can do this.
Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.
I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired. Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt. As a team. Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain.
You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.
We can do this.
Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.
I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired. Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.
I am all in for outing those posters here who are against investigating Biden's corruption. Let's do this together! We will ride into this battle as a team. Me, driving the 1000cc motorcycle wide open in a full speed charge at those fools who point out that only a week ago the trumpers claimed a quid pro quo was impeachable but now have deleted that as a bench mark. You, riding in the side car due to your arthritic hip and sitting on a donut pillow to relieve the pain from chronic hemorrhoids.
This will be an easy fight for us.
I am seeing a resistance to this plan of attack. I am concerned that you possibly just come here to gripe about made up "libs" who are simply boogey men that you and fellow olds have fabricated to give you a faux target for your fear/uncertainty.
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt. As a team. Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain.
You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.
We can do this.
Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.
I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired. Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.
I am all in for outing those posters here who are against investigating Biden's corruption. Let's do this together! We will ride into this battle as a team. Me, driving the 1000cc motorcycle wide open in a full speed charge at those fools who point out that only a week ago the trumpers claimed a quid pro quo was impeachable but now have deleted that as a bench mark. You, riding in the side car due to your arthritic hip and sitting on a donut pillow to relieve the pain from chronic hemorrhoids.
This will be an easy fight for us.
Dax,You'll have to subpoena him to secure his testimony.
Did you delete old posts?
imagine being so fluid in ones beliefs that you have to frequently delete old posts as they now contradict the current position you are trying to stake out.
all the while screaming "I know you are but what am I!!!!" as you await the next set of talking points to parrot
imagine being so fluid in ones beliefs that you have to frequently delete old posts as they now contradict the current position you are trying to stake out.
all the while screaming "I know you are but what am I!!!!" as you await the next set of talking points to parrot
Dax does complete 180’s all the time. It’s one of the funnier of his complete lack of self awareness qualities.
Deleting old posts?
Weird takes from some really angry weirdos.
Not surprised though.
It's the famous oscar Lee water technique.Deleting old posts?
Weird takes from some really angry weirdos.
Not surprised though.
Now he's doing the thing he always does where he skates around the issue but never actually addresses the question head on. It's one of dax's most frequent go-to strategies.
He restates the question, feigns being aghast at the accusation, insinuates it's a weird and ridiculous accusation, but never actually answers yes or no because he knows that somehow, if he says definitively that he didn't delete posts, Saul is going to prove that he did.
Pfft, did I delete posts?
Really telling that LibBotNation9.0 would rather focus on weird theories like post deletion rather than coming to grips with their sordid history of ignoring war crimes. I guess it's weird, but then again it's entirely unsurprising when you realize that all of this board's Dem Obama minions get their marching orders from mega corrupt ChiComJoe. Extremely sad.
dax, let's out the total idiots who don't want Biden investigated for being corrupt. As a team. Me, super young and aggressive with a razor like analytical brain.
You old and fading, scared of technology and change but still with a vast catalog of crazy af conspiracy theories of which a solid 1% have a shred of proof.
We can do this.
Well Dug, it's literally like you don't follow along with anything and never see how out of their minds LibBot Nation gets whenever Biden is brought up in these proceedings.
I actually sell all of the technology that facilitates your ability to participate in this blog, so that "go to" is a little old and tired. Please try and come up with something original . . . for once.
MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . . :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?What world are you living in that you interpreted that interview as a threat? You weirdo
MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . . :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?What world are you living in that you interpreted that interview as a threat? You weirdo
So you were joking, then you weren't? I'm beginning to think Slow Dug is right about your brain turning into mush. All ChiCom Joe is saying is that Lindsey is going to regret his actions later because it exposes him as a partisan hack/shill just like the rest of them. That should be easy to see for any remotely intelligent person.MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . . :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?What world are you living in that you interpreted that interview as a threat? You weirdo
What part of "?" confuses you?
Waks: Zero to meltdown in .03 seconds (as usual)
But :lol: "But Lindsey is about to go down in a way that I think he's going to regret his whole life"
Not a threat, tho
So you were joking, then you weren't? I'm beginning to think Slow Dug is right about your brain turning into mush. All ChiCom Joe is saying is that Lindsey is going to regret his actions later because it exposes him as a partisan hack/shill just like the rest of them. That should be easy to see for any remotely intelligent person.MegaCorrupt (but apprently shouldn't be investigated at all according to LibBot Nation) ChiCom Joe going on with Don Lemon (I mean Don Lemon . . . :lol:) and cryptically threatening Lindsey Graham?What world are you living in that you interpreted that interview as a threat? You weirdo
What part of "?" confuses you?
Waks: Zero to meltdown in .03 seconds (as usual)
But :lol: "But Lindsey is about to go down in a way that I think he's going to regret his whole life"
Not a threat, tho
:jeffy:
Lol, grandax is at it again. We love our putin propaganda, don't we folks?
Dax, have you ever deleted posts?
Dax, have you ever deleted posts?
Yes, about 10 minutes ago when I realized I posted something in the wrong thread.
Nunez, Graham, Jordan et al know that they took a eff load of dirty Russian money through the NRA/Giulianis best buds.What does it say about the Republican party to know that Russians really want them in power? Wouldn't they prefer President Stand Down's party and several more decades of the Great Bend Over? Dax?
What’s daxs excuse?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
he may be a complete criminal maga, but i like this sondland dude. he's a star.
They can (and should) drag it out as long as they want.
Dems misfired, I'm afraid. Look at the receding support from Independents.
DisagreeDems misfired, I'm afraid. Look at the receding support from Independents.
I expect support to increase when he actually gets impeached.
Have his numbers improved? Please share all polls in this thread.
I like turnbull, I would love to get his take in about 2-3 months.Most likely just another of your socks.
Your assessment about not moving the national average for impeachment is correct. The framing of the impeachment being done by a particular news channel is very dishonest and downright a middle finger to everyone. So in essence even if Trump came out and said this exact line "F*ck yea I did it...and I did it to hurt Biden/protect Russia because I owed them for helping me get elected with a mandate to destroy the US from within", you'd have this news channel declaring so what that he did it....not impeachable and he's truly a patriot for defeating Hillary Clinton which could have destroyed the US. This is actually kinda where we are now essentially where we are now with several members of the GOP saying it was inappropriate but not impeachment worthy, though oddly enough Bill Clinton was impeached over a BJ and denying it under oath. We've reached the point where their members will straight up lie to people's faces and get away with it because they dont respect them and know for a fact they'll believe whatever tinfoil hat project Hannity or Carlson present at the night (south african farmers, mueller was connected to the mob, "i'm rooting for russia", Ukraine really hacked the 2016 election (despite all 17 Intel Agencies saying they didnt, and clearly stating that the Ukraine blame is coming directly from Russia), Hillary Clinton murdered Seth Rich, Tan Suit Gate, Dinnergate in NYC for Obama, Obama went Golfing, or a good one "white house job gate in 2010", Obama took 34% of the US Navy on a trip to India, etc. However, there is a really good site that tracks a lot of numbers and polls from various sources. It weights polls based on results, survey methods, and sample sizes.
This good website to monitor polls is https://fivethirtyeight.com/
They also have good projections on other stuff such as sports teams, who will win the elections, projections, presidential approval ratings.Have his numbers improved? Please share all polls in this thread.
support for impeachment went up a bit and also trump's approval numbers ticked up a very tiny bit. macro-level, nothing has changed.
i think he's a maniac. i think adam schiff is a deranged human being. i think he grew up with a complex for lots of reasons that are obvious. i think he's a very sick man, and he lies. adam schiff made up my conversation with the president of ukraine. and one of the reasons people keep talking about it is because that's what they saw. we have a perfectly beautiful 3-4 page transcription, then in the other case a 2 page transcription of the conversation. but a lot of people didn't read that. how many people call you? a friend of mine called up, a top person in new york called up, great friend of mine, very successful: 'gee, i didn't like what was said,' i said, oh where did you see it, did you read it? 'no i didn't read it, i heard adam schiff give it." i said, well that's not what was said. and i sent him a copy of what was said, and he said 'this is like, this is great, this isn't what he said.' this guy is sick! he made up the conversation, he lied. if he didn't do that in the halls of congress, he'd be thrown in a jail. but he did it in the halls of congress, and he's given immunity. this is a sick person; he's a liar. and by the way, nancy pelosi knew he was lying, and she went on her show, stephanapolous, and she said he told the truth, so she was lying too. these people are deranged.
There could be disruptions from Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), the Fox News favorite who led a conservative revolt against impeachment in mid-October by storming the secure room where depositions were taking place.
There could be conspiracy theories from Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.), who nearly named the intelligence community whistleblower during a recent speech on the House floor.
And there could be antics from Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), a vocal Trump critic who brought a bucket of fried chicken to a hearing in May to highlight the absence of Attorney General William P. Barr, who was scheduled to testify.
...
“It’s a bunch of brawlers sometimes on the Judiciary Committee, so it should get pretty hot under the collar as we go along,” said Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), a member of the panel, during an interview on Fox News’s “Sunday Morning Futures.”
“I don’t think things have been done the way they’ve been done in the past .?.?. so it causes some rancor and it should be much more feisty, I would say, than the Intel Committee was,” he said.
Little Jerry Nadler told Dems yesterday he ain't taken any crap, so I'm sure that news has got LibBot Nation all jizzed up.
Yeah why not just listen to the president and be done with this whole thing.
QuoteThere could be conspiracy theories from Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.)
Yeah why not just listen to the president and be done with this whole thing.
You guys listen to a dude who admitted by his very :lol: report that he's basically spying on people.
Yeah why not just listen to the president and be done with this whole thing.
You guys listen to a dude who admitted by his very :lol: report that he's basically spying on people.
Trump admits he did it, you just think it's okay. Great bendover indeed
Area 51
Area 51
:love:
I thought Turley was pretty great.
You found his arguments to be convincing, or enjoyed his contrarian position?
boy who is this Matt Gaetz guy? Sure seems stud like......
Do you think he should be impeached?I believe I answered your question in the post immediately preceding yours.
Do you think he should be impeached?I believe I answered your question in the post immediately preceding yours.
Am I the only one who never hears actual people out in the wild discussing impeachment? Seems like I've been overserved this particular tonic for months, and yet I never hear folks out in the world discussing it. The majority of Americans (who are too busy working jobs that don't involve being on the internet all day) are like (a) of course he did that, and (b) my conscience is not shocked, because (c) he does selfish crap all the time and still got elected.
The Senate will not remove. That said, I think it would be best for the House to impeach, just for precedential value.
It's dumb that all of this hearing crap happens during the day during the work week. If they really wanted to change minds, they'd do it uncut in primetime or on the weekends. The way it is now, most folks just tune into their drug of choice in the evening and get the special blend they crave.
Am I the only one who never hears actual people out in the wild discussing impeachment? Seems like I've been overserved this particular tonic for months, and yet I never hear folks out in the world discussing it. The majority of Americans (who are too busy working jobs that don't involve being on the internet all day) are like (a) of course he did that, and (b) my conscience is not shocked, because (c) he does selfish crap all the time and still got elected.
The Senate will not remove. That said, I think it would be best for the House to impeach, just for precedential value.
It's dumb that all of this hearing crap happens during the day during the work week. If they really wanted to change minds, they'd do it uncut in primetime or on the weekends. The way it is now, most folks just tune into their drug of choice in the evening and get the special blend they crave.
Politics is one of the last things I want to have a conversation about. Maybe other people feel the same way :dunno:
Fair point re: coworkers, but my observation is not limited to the workplace. Also, I began with a question, inviting responses from others regarding their personal non-line experiences. It doesn't come up in conversations with friends, I haven't overheard anything in any of the hipster coffee shops I frequent, and I've received no chain emails from relatives regarding same.
I feel like most people feel politics today (especially trump) is more decisive than ever and really try and avoid the topic more than ever. Any haha comment about some dumb thing Trump said is quickly dismissed as "yeah yeah he is dumb let's move on before a trump person (or overly anti-trump) overhears and goes nuts and runs the evening"
I'd rather talk about the cats or your week than the pro's and con's of medicare for all. Even after a productive conversation regarding politics it still feels like a waste of time and isn't fun.
on a mission to “destroy” the Democrats’ impeachment narrative
...
he met Tuesday with Yuriy Lutsenko, a discredited former Ukrainian prosecutor general who has emerged as a key figure in the impeachment inquiry. Giuliani is filming the three-part program, Ukrainian Witnesses Destroy Schiff’s Case for OAN, hosted by Chanel Rion, inside a series of “undisclosed safe houses” for no discernible reason.
...
He is expected to meet with Viktor Shokin and Kostiantyn Kulyk, two other former Ukrainian prosecutors who were fired for poor performance and alleged corruption.
Shokin, Kulyk, and Lutsenko have helped Giuliani push a bogus conspiracy theory that Ukraine — not Russia — interfered in the 2016 election and have spread unfounded corruption accusations against former vice president Joe Biden and his son
...
He declined to say where Giuliani was staying and didn’t want to disclose their plans. Instead, Telizhenko wanted to talk about how “Soros people”— a common refrain from conspiracy theorists — at the US Embassy in Kyiv are trying to “block” his return to Washington
How long until Dax adopts the Ukraine interfered made up theory?
so obvs slow to the party on this one (my assumption that Dax was just being a racist got me here)
ppl are angry at this Chalupa lady for trying to prove that Trump was working with the Russians?
is that it?
Because you're utterly unaware of who the operatives are in this situation, makes me a racist? It's not my fault you're an idiot.
i said i assumed you were a racist (while that may or may not be true i was clearly mistaken concerning the Chalupa thing)
is this part accurate
ppl are angry at this Chalupa lady for trying to prove that Trump was working with the Russians?
obviously i haven't read the epoch times enough lateley
No one is mad, they're :lol: because she's lying about her work for the Dems, or at least telling a series of half-truths.
In addition, it's always :lol: when everything that's Anti-Trump that comes out of a Ukrainian or Russian is absolute fact, but anything that sounds bad for the LibBots from sources in the same countries is all lies.
Of course, while all the fingers are pointing at Trump and the Ukraine, there's a reason why the then sitting government of the Ukraine tried the instant mea culpa route with Trump after he won, because they were trying to get Hillary elected.
so is the Chalupa lady central to the Ukrainian counter interference narrative?
Interference of what? Ukraine is central to multiple so called "interference" narratives.
How long until Dax adopts the Ukraine interfered made up theory?
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
Wait you really are? That’s rough ridin' awesomely looney
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran
the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin
maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
Wait you really are? That’s rough ridin' awesomely looney
What is a fact, looney?
Slow Dug, just as admit (that as usual) you didn't even know this. :lol:
He’s trolling you dorks. No one is dumb enough to switch to this just recently manufactured fake conspiracy
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran
the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin
maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev
He’s trolling you dorks. No one is dumb enough to switch to this just recently manufactured fake conspiracy
When are you going to admit that you're absolutely clueless?
He’s trolling you dorks. No one is dumb enough to switch to this just recently manufactured fake conspiracy
When are you going to admit that you're absolutely clueless?
Tapout DECLINED.
Put up a fight at least.
Adam "spies on Congress" Schiff.
Reason: Devin Nunes Supports Secret Surveillance of Americans, Finds Himself Under Surveillance.
https://reason.com/2019/12/05/devin-nunes-secret-surveillance/
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran
the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin
maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev
. . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446 (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers)
Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so :lol: (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran
the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin
maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev
. . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446 (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers)
Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so :lol: (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)
directly from the article you link
Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.” Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known. Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down
There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race. Here we go with the unilateral proclamations from Lick :jerk: :jerk: Yet we know that for example I'll Take Two Chalupa's is lying straight out of her ass in regards to her activities in the Ukraine, and her role in the Ukraine while she was (and still may be) on the DNC payroll, that's just one person. In no way have I even implied that this was some sort of massive concentrated effort on the part of the Ukrainian governmental apparatus to interfere in the U.S. elections on par with what Russia was doing (and what we do to them). But I do appreciate all of your Captain Obvious talking points about the state of corruption in Ukraine. That was hammered home months ago by the Mega Corrupt Democratic Front Runner Joe Biden and I suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg in regards to the things that he and Dem operatives were up to in the Ukraine . . . USAID money cough . . . cough. The sad thing is, your party now quite clearly extols the virtues of foreign aid without question or expectations of a change in course in this case, corruption, sad
impressive self own
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran
the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin
maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev
. . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446 (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers)
Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so :lol: (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)
directly from the article you link
Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.” Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known. Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down
There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race. Here we go with the unilateral proclamations from Lick :jerk: :jerk: Yet we know that for example I'll Take Two Chalupa's is lying straight out of her ass in regards to her activities in the Ukraine, and her role in the Ukraine while she was (and still may be) on the DNC payroll, that's just one person. In no way have I even implied that this was some sort of massive concentrated effort on the part of the Ukrainian governmental apparatus to interfere in the U.S. elections on par with what Russia was doing (and what we do to them). But I do appreciate all of your Captain Obvious talking points about the state of corruption in Ukraine. That was hammered home months ago by the Mega Corrupt Democratic Front Runner Joe Biden and I suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg in regards to the things that he and Dem operatives were up to in the Ukraine . . . USAID money cough . . . cough. The sad thing is, your party now quite clearly extols the virtues of foreign aid without question or expectations of a change in course in this case, corruption, sad
:lol: :lol:
Why don't LibDerps never want to understand why the previous Ukrainian regime tried to kiss and make-up almost immediately after Trump got elected?
well they are at war with Russia and in need of US military support to not be overran
the new president was the choice of Moscow who received the support of a considerable influence campaign from the Kremlin
maybe, just maybe (hear me out) they were nervous that the new President may show preferrence to Moscow over Kiev
. . .and maybe (well not maybe) they knew that Trump knew that they were working with the Clinton Campaign.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446 (this isn't election interference pearl clutchers)
Or are you talking about Zelinksky, if so :lol: (Why are you always so far behind the curve?)
directly from the article you link
Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.” Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known. Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down
There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral in the race. Here we go with the unilateral proclamations from Lick :jerk: :jerk: Yet we know that for example I'll Take Two Chalupa's is lying straight out of her ass in regards to her activities in the Ukraine, and her role in the Ukraine while she was (and still may be) on the DNC payroll, that's just one person. In no way have I even implied that this was some sort of massive concentrated effort on the part of the Ukrainian governmental apparatus to interfere in the U.S. elections on par with what Russia was doing (and what we do to them). But I do appreciate all of your Captain Obvious talking points about the state of corruption in Ukraine. That was hammered home months ago by the Mega Corrupt Democratic Front Runner Joe Biden and I suspect that's just the tip of the iceberg in regards to the things that he and Dem operatives were up to in the Ukraine . . . USAID money cough . . . cough. The sad thing is, your party now quite clearly extols the virtues of foreign aid without question or expectations of a change in course in this case, corruption, sad
dude again i straight copied and pasted this out of your article if you read it
Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known. Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down
Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known. Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/24/580171396/biden-mcconnell-refused-to-sign-bipartisan-statement-on-russian-interference
What is happening to Dax's brain? :frown:
Dax when you wake up in the mirning, what are the first websites you go to to get your news? Just curious.
Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known. Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/24/580171396/biden-mcconnell-refused-to-sign-bipartisan-statement-on-russian-interference
I'll take things we already knew for $1000, Alex
What does that have to do with the Ukraine?
Lick You are the master of the obvious and what is already well known. Your guy, Barack Obama, aka President Stand Down was well aware of Russia's efforts and told his cyber security directory to . . . stand down
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/24/580171396/biden-mcconnell-refused-to-sign-bipartisan-statement-on-russian-interference
I'll take things we already knew for $1000, Alex
What does that have to do with the Ukraine?
Wait, so now you're saying there was election interference by Ukraine and President Stand Down knew about it and did nothing about it?
Old people and technology :frown:
What is happening to Dax's brain? :frown:
Why are you weirdo's trying to come at me with things that are already known and completely irrelevant.
:lol: :lol: FFS, you guys have melted down for 3 years about Russian interference, your guys own people told him repeatedly and his response to them was to stand down. You don't need to make any public statements in regards to anything when you're talking cyber-security or operations of that nature. Does the cyber-security command of the DOD make a public statement every time they do something? Biden, Obama, McConnell's public statements or lack of public acknowledgement are irrelevant to the stand down order.
What is happening to Dax's brain? :frown:
Why are you weirdo's trying to come at me with things that are already known and completely irrelevant.
:lol: :lol: FFS, you guys have melted down for 3 years about Russian interference, your guys own people told him repeatedly and his response to them was to stand down. You don't need to make any public statements in regards to anything when you're talking cyber-security or operations of that nature. Does the cyber-security command of the DOD make a public statement every time they do something? Biden, Obama, McConnell's public statements or lack of public acknowledgement are irrelevant to the stand down order.
what could Obama have done that you wouldn't have absolutely freaked out about?
And no . . . in regards to the Ukraine, I'm talking about certain individuals in the Ukraine trying to help the Clinton campaign.It is hard to keep up with your mental gymnastics.
You guys are at least 4 laps down here, as usual.
And no . . . in regards to the Ukraine, I'm talking about certain individuals in the Ukraine trying to help the Clinton campaign.It is hard to keep up with your mental gymnastics.
You guys are at least 4 laps down here, as usual.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don’t actually know the context but I assume she’s talking about climate change that our President refuses to acknowledge.
so why would bucket bother posting it
Lol Castor keeps insisting on speaking to clarify crap and Collins clearly doesn't think it's a good use of time because he's so bad.
The Republicans are 100% just winging this entire thing. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE!?!?!?
https://twitter.com/jiveDurkey/status/1204068431454232580?s=20
The Republicans are 100% just winging this entire thing. HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE!?!?!?
They are the same people who campaigned for 6 years to repeal and replace Obamacare and then couldn't do it with control of the House, Senate, and Presidency.
This is a total power move that I 1000% endorse btw.
This is a total power move that I 1000% endorse btw.
yeah, that dude's a stud (i realize available evidence indicates he's not very good at his job, but there it is).
Nadler has hated Trump for decades? Oh, well I can't get behind that. Everyone knows Trump only recently became a piece of crap. :sdeek:
Nadler has hated Trump for decades? Oh, well I can't get behind that. Everyone knows Trump only recently became a piece of crap. :sdeek:
Like I said in another thread. Don’t worry, you’ll get somebody in there soon and you can go back to not giving a crap about immigrants, overthrowing defenseless countries, refugee’ing hundreds of thousands of people etc etc all over again. Just like you did from 2008 to 2016.
Nadler has hated Trump for decades? Oh, well I can't get behind that. Everyone knows Trump only recently became a piece of crap. :sdeek:
Like I said in another thread. Don’t worry, you’ll get somebody in there soon and you can go back to not giving a crap about immigrants, overthrowing defenseless countries, refugee’ing hundreds of thousands of people etc etc all over again. Just like you did from 2008 to 2016.
It'll be nice not to have to be concerned about how much of a eff up our president is again. I miss those days.
Congress has been pretty toothless from the beginning, tbh. Trump is actually doing a great job of exposing problems in our system. Just not sure it’s fixable other than maybe recognizing the electoral college is a joke and allowing the people to actually vote on a president.
Congress has been pretty toothless from the beginning, tbh. Trump is actually doing a great job of exposing problems in our system. Just not sure it’s fixable other than maybe recognizing the electoral college is a joke and allowing the people to actually vote on a president.
Disgraceful
Congress has been pretty toothless from the beginning, tbh. Trump is actually doing a great job of exposing problems in our system. Just not sure it’s fixable other than maybe recognizing the electoral college is a joke and allowing the people to actually vote on a president .
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression
People that praise the electoral college for giving a voice to smaller communities seem completely oblivious to the fact that everyone really only talks about like 5 states each election cycle.
People that praise the electoral college for giving a voice to smaller communities seem completely oblivious to the fact that everyone really only talks about like 5 states each election cycle.
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression
It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.
But here we are.
More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression
It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.
But here we are.
More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression
It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.
But here we are.
More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.
The electoral college disenfranchises voters who live in heavily populated areas. Why are rural voters disenfranchisement more important to you? What's the difference?
It really is sad that the US still has constitutionally sanctioned voter suppression
It really is sad to LibBot idiots wanting to completely disenfranchise voters because they live in less populated areas and allow politicians to only pay attention to a select and very small grouping of meccas to urban sprawl.
But here we are.
More surprising that someone that has been utterly marginalized by his own party wants this.
The electoral college disenfranchises voters who live in heavily populated areas. Why are rural voters disenfranchisement more important to you? What's the difference?
It disenfranchises rural voters, too. Nobody living in Kansas needs to bother voting for president.
This is getting pretty OT. My point is that if we can’t rein in the power of the President we need a system where the public actually elects one.
It was a big deal in 2000.
There's no big push because it's not something that will ever happen. You would need 2/3 of the states to vote to kill the EC. So basically, the states who benefit the most from the EC would have to agree to concede that power that they have. And they won't. But, when a president is elected by the EC and not the popular vote, people are reminded what a mumped up stupid system it is.
When winning the popular vote is less than 30% of eligible voters, that's not a solution either. 70% of the country would have a direct claim of "I didn't vote for them."
Gerrymandering is a way bigger problem than the EC
I’ll bet Dax was rough ridin' pissed when they started allowing the direct election of senators.
I’ll bet Dax was rough ridin' pissed when they started allowing the direct election of senators.
When winning the popular vote is less than 30% of eligible voters, that's not a solution either. 70% of the country would have a direct claim of "I didn't vote for them."
A lot of people in deep red and blue states don’t vote for president because they know their vote won’t get counted.
You say this with certainty, perhaps I took this article at face value too much.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/9/17/20868790/republicans-lose-popular-vote-win-electoral-college
It was a big deal in 2000.
How hard has the push for system change been since 2000? Maybe I missed it.
It was a big deal in 2000.
How hard has the push for system change been since 2000? Maybe I missed it.
I mean, were you paying attention around that time? Because the push was big and has been ever since. It was a big rough ridin' deal.
I don't see anything wrong with it.
She thinks he should be impeached, doesn't mean he will and if he isn't he will absolutely be the candidate in 2020, going against (more than likely) another absolutely terrible candidate (probs Biden).
Hey, there will be 2 complete crap candidates, so I can't rule anything out.
LMAO
He's polling in the 20's by democrats in his district. He's desperate because he knows he won't make it out of the primary
Shooter being full MAGA was a shock to me when I realized it. Was I not paying attention before?
Oh, the ironyI don't see anything wrong with it.
She thinks he should be impeached, doesn't mean he will and if he isn't he will absolutely be the candidate in 2020, going against (more than likely) another absolutely terrible candidate (probs Biden).
Hey, there will be 2 complete crap candidates, so I can't rule anything out.
LMAO
Shooter, you know as well as I do that LibBot Nation is going to put on their arm bands, shine up those jackboots and goose step all the way to the polls for their guy, the mega corrupt-war mongering-racist, ChiCom Joe.
Oh, the ironyI don't see anything wrong with it.
She thinks he should be impeached, doesn't mean he will and if he isn't he will absolutely be the candidate in 2020, going against (more than likely) another absolutely terrible candidate (probs Biden).
Hey, there will be 2 complete crap candidates, so I can't rule anything out.
LMAO
Shooter, you know as well as I do that LibBot Nation is going to put on their arm bands, shine up those jackboots and goose step all the way to the polls for their guy, the mega corrupt-war mongering-racist, ChiCom Joe.
:lol:
What would dax's Lib sock be :confused:daughterofmotherjones
cancel culture, lmao
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just want to thank Chuckie Schumer for contradicting almost word for word what he said about the 1999 impeachment.
Just want to thank Chuckie Schumer for contradicting almost word for word what he said about the 1999 impeachment.
He's just trying to keep up with McConnell who has done the same.
the MAGA in the wild
https://twitter.com/thedailyshow/status/1206945558679707649
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
the MAGA in the wild
https://twitter.com/thedailyshow/status/1206945558679707649
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rubes... :ROFL:
the MAGA in the wild
https://twitter.com/thedailyshow/status/1206945558679707649
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm sure dax is quite concerned about this unilateral draconian proclamation of a dictatorial nature that draws simpletons like a moth to light :Chirp:
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1207028418656768000
Cancel culture is just morally wrong. We should all continue contributing time and money to people we find repugnant. It's not like any of us have anything better to do.
I'm sure dax is quite concerned about this unilateral draconian proclamation of a dictatorial nature that draws simpletons like a moth to light :Chirp:
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1207028418656768000
Hey NBD, just our President wishing for a Member of Congress to be executed.
Yeah, I missed that
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm sure dax is quite concerned about this unilateral draconian proclamation of a dictatorial nature that draws simpletons like a moth to light :Chirp:
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1207028418656768000
Hey NBD, just our President wishing for a Member of Congress to be executed.
Schiff could barely bring himself to acknowledge the FISA court abuses he adamantly dismissed out of hand a few weeks back. The same guy who said he had “concrete evidence” of Trump-Russian COLUSION.
In an unprecedented letter, the FISA court excoriated the FBI yesterday. I’m sure you guys missed it.
Lmaoooooo
https://twitter.com/owillis/status/1207061939106566150
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lmaoooooo
https://twitter.com/owillis/status/1207061939106566150
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Her reaction was fantastic
lmao
https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1207401283390279680
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sort of abused his power some
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well that's what people with certain opinions operating off of 2nd and 3rd hand information believe.
Very strong opinions about this from certain people, ya know.
Very strong . . . opinions.
Well that's what people with certain opinions operating off of 2nd and 3rd hand information believe.
Very strong opinions about this from certain people, ya know.
Very strong . . . opinions.
https://twitter.com/translaterealdt/status/1195523329513406464
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good thing we never let things get to a point here at gE where SMF was testifying their opinions of us.
Good thing we never let things get to a point here at gE where SMF was testifying their opinions of us.
Thank god
:Woot:Pelosi gonna give you the stink eye for that.
dax, sorry your boy became #3 tonight :frown:
yes, you clearly love it and think it’s fantastic
Yes, that’s what’s happening
Smdh at all this image shaming:
https://mobile.twitter.com/SheilaGaston200/status/1207360431569825792
https://twitter.com/numbersmuncher/status/1207387098136940556
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.
Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing.
Just need to get this straight now. Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine). You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.
Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing.
Just need to get this straight now. Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine). You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.
You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP. But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ. Just shows rubes are all over the place.
The American people would be doing the influencing on if the Senate is going to go with a bipartisan agreement or a partisan one pushed through by Mitch for how the Senate wants to hold their trial.
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.
Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing.
Just need to get this straight now. Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine). You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.
You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP. But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ. Just shows rubes are all over the place.
Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.
Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing.
Just need to get this straight now. Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine). You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.
You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP. But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ. Just shows rubes are all over the place.
Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?
Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.
Agree to convict the accused and we’ll send over the charges (LibDerp Leadership).
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.
Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing.
Just need to get this straight now. Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine). You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.
You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP. But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ. Just shows rubes are all over the place.
Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?
Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.
That you lil Jerry Nadler?
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.
Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing.
Just need to get this straight now. Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine). You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.
You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP. But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ. Just shows rubes are all over the place.
Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?
Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.
That you lil Jerry Nadler?
Your hero Ken Starr got the ugly rube to get the BJ dress so he could have a case that they spent millions on. Talk about a fibrinous rough ridin' reason to impeach a sitting president. Pubs were constant whinnying crybaby fucks the whole time that Clinton was President, even thou we had a very thriving economy. Maybe that's why Pubs are so jealous of the man.
The American people would be doing the influencing on if the Senate is going to go with a bipartisan agreement or a partisan one pushed through by Mitch for how the Senate wants to hold their trial.
Yes, now that’s in the Senate we demand bipartisanship (LibBot Nation)
What W was telling at least some substantial half truths about was/is kind of a big deal.
Problem is, a lot of favorite in LibBot Leadershp like the current Dem front runner were all for the same thing.
Just need to get this straight now. Pelosi et. al. didn't move on Bush for a really big deal that cost the nation trillions of dollars, but now they want to impeach Don because in their eyes he sort of abused his power some (asking about all the Mega Corrupt Joe Biden dealings in the Ukraine). You all know the reason why this is, if you don't, you're an idiot, okay we know that, so make it bigger idiots.
You're right, Bush should have been impeached for war crimes along with oil CEO VP. But no, they impeached Bill for a lousy BJ. Just shows rubes are all over the place.
Wasn’t Bill guilty of perjury?
Yes, lying about the rough ridin' blow job that an ugly Rube clerk that the old sex raping approving Baylor President Ken Star got a the gossip from.
That you lil Jerry Nadler?
Your hero Ken Starr got the ugly rube to get the BJ dress so he could have a case that they spent millions on. Talk about a fibrinous rough ridin' reason to impeach a sitting president. Pubs were constant whinnying crybaby fucks the whole time that Clinton was President, even thou we had a very thriving economy. Maybe that's why Pubs are so jealous of the man.
Dax will mention it in 3 days
when you do blatant crimes it's not very hard tbh
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1178989254309011456
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20191219/0deee02ae28a1063e2a2e87a00f6e4cd.jpg)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dax will mention it in 3 days
Oh no, when it comes to seeing what fringe whack-a-doos and idiots are saying, I just have to come here and read what weirdo's like you are posting.
Albeit the Rush updates are pretty sparse these days.
Dax will mention it in 3 days
Oh no, when it comes to seeing what fringe whack-a-doos and idiots are saying, I just have to come here and read what weirdo's like you are posting.
Albeit the Rush updates are pretty sparse these days.
Dax will mention it in 3 days
Oh no, when it comes to seeing what fringe whack-a-doos and idiots are saying, I just have to come here and read what weirdo's like you are posting.
Albeit the Rush updates are pretty sparse these days.
Says dax who pours through Twitter replies and amplifies the one idiotic fringe post as "libtard nation" or whatever cutsie nickname he was told to brand everybody not in lockstep with DJT
Just hoping it’s a fair process in the senate and not a partisan crap show.
The country deserves better than that.
Liberal rag National Review calls for removal from office
https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2019/12/31/four-tests-for-impeachment/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dax will need some time to review the new marching order talking points on how this is ok.
Devout Trumpers will abandon anything they stand for personally to agree with and appease their dear leader.
Kinda disappointed they are passing over our guy dax.
:sdeek:
https://twitter.com/CMSeeberger/status/1215646456637480962
The ability to go at Democrats for drinking and speech and at the same time backing every second of the literal dumbest president we've ever seen in person is a special gift.
The ability to go at Democrats for drinking and speech and at the same time backing every second of the literal dumbest president we've ever seen in person is a special gift.
I'm sorry this process is so :lol: and you're angry that people are :lol: at this process.
Good.
Executive privilege.
Good.
Executive privilege.
Good.
Executive privilege.
Good.
Executive privilege.
(https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/static.funnyshirts.org/images/design_easy_customization/678edba37ee9c286d66c22dbded68ef3_2667703_0_75d1d002a7a333eee9434bd6edf23d55_bigger.jpg?t=1578891202)
Good.
Executive privilege.
(https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/static.funnyshirts.org/images/design_easy_customization/678edba37ee9c286d66c22dbded68ef3_2667703_0_75d1d002a7a333eee9434bd6edf23d55_bigger.jpg?t=1578891202)
LibBot Parrot Person nation never had a problem with regurgitating what the supreme commander told them to say during the previous administration . . . to the point LibBot Goose Steppers actually believed and parroted the notion repeatedly that a YouTube video killed a U.S. Ambassador.
Good.
Executive privilege.
(https://s3.dualstack.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/static.funnyshirts.org/images/design_easy_customization/678edba37ee9c286d66c22dbded68ef3_2667703_0_75d1d002a7a333eee9434bd6edf23d55_bigger.jpg?t=1578891202)
LibBot Parrot Person nation never had a problem with regurgitating what the supreme commander told them to say during the previous administration . . . to the point LibBot Goose Steppers actually believed and parroted the notion repeatedly that a YouTube video killed a U.S. Ambassador.
Bold to attempt to play this note with me. I've been the biggest Obama critic on this board. I actually have coherent arguments other than beige man bad.
:lol:
:lol:
She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.
:lol:
She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.
Do you even know what Hillary was doing at the time???
Meanwhile Yova was blocking Visa’s of those seeking to come to the US to discuss corruption.(https://media1.giphy.com/media/gj0QdZ9FgqGhOBNlFS/giphy.gif)
I love how Dax is such a good boy and never leaves his masters side
I love how Dax is such a good boy and never leaves his masters side
I love how Da Big Dummy only parrots what he’s told.
I love how Dax is such a good boy and never leaves his masters side
I love how Da Big Dummy only parrots what he’s told.
Oh my the irony :lol: :lol: :lol:
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Dax are you saying you think it was terrible judgment for Trump and Rudy to trust this guy to help in their quest to fight corruption?
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
He gains what for lying at this point? What does he gain telling the truth?
Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
He gains what for lying at this point? What does he gain telling the truth?
Leniency. You’re beyond dumb. The truth, LOL.
Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
He gains what for lying at this point? What does he gain telling the truth?
Leniency. You’re beyond dumb. The truth, LOL.
Lying is HELPING his indictment and telling the truth is HURTING his case. That's some sound logic you got there such a good boy.
Sure, sure. IDK of any other than Butina, but whatever. Just remember, this spy is American raised and educated. It's disingenuous to call him a Ukrainian, but you know that. It's just a game you play.Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Rudy is 100% American but sold his soul to the Ukrainians so obviously he should be trusted 100%.
Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Rudy is 100% American but sold his soul to the Ukrainians so obviously he should be trusted 100%.
Who said anything about believing Rudy?
Sure, sure. IDK of any other than Butina, but whatever. Just remember, this spy is American raised and educated. It's disingenuous to call him a Ukrainian, but you know that. It's just a game you play.Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
Rudy is 100% American but sold his soul to the Ukrainians so obviously he should be trusted 100%.
Who said anything about believing Rudy?
:lol: :lol: REALLY?! Oh my. :lol: :lol:
:lol:
She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.
I didn't say a single word about Russia. I just talked about the guy who moved away from the current Ukraine in 1975 as a toddler (and AFAIK hasn't lived there again), that you keep calling a Ukrainian.Sure, sure. IDK of any other than Butina, but whatever. Just remember, this spy is American raised and educated. It's disingenuous to call him a Ukrainian, but you know that. It's just a game you play.Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
You know the whole of the Soviet Union wasn’t Russia proper, right?? The guy had massive dealings in the region.
But all Russians are spies per you guys, so until further notice this guy is Russian spy/Disinformation agent. Those are your rules.
:lol:
She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.
I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap
I didn't say a single word about Russia. I just talked about the guy who moved away from the current Ukraine in 1975 as a toddler (and AFAIK hasn't lived there again), that you keep calling a Ukrainian.Sure, sure. IDK of any other than Butina, but whatever. Just remember, this spy is American raised and educated. It's disingenuous to call him a Ukrainian, but you know that. It's just a game you play.Soviet-American.You know Parnas is an American citizen who moved here when he was three years old, right? Of course you do
He’s a Ukrainian-American , with massive ties to his homeland. LOL, please. He’s also been indicted. Remember a few weeks ago he was the super corrupt dude working for Rudy. Now you believe every word he says.
Remember, LibBot rules dictate that all “Russians” are spies.
You know the whole of the Soviet Union wasn’t Russia proper, right?? The guy had massive dealings in the region.
But all Russians are spies per you guys, so until further notice this guy is Russian spy/Disinformation agent. Those are your rules.
:lol:
She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.
I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap
Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt.
Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
:lol:
She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.
I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap
Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt.
Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.
Ya, I think I was thinking of Shokin. My bad.
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
:lol:
She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.
I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap
Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt.
Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.
Ya, I think I was thinking of Shokin. My bad.
Oh yeah, the guy that was retroactively and unilaterally declared “corrupt” by LibBots.
:lol:
She blocked Lutsenko and others ChumDummy.
I'm pretty sure only crazy people don't think Lutsenko wasn't corrupt as crap
Yes, only Lib preferred Ukrainians aren’t corrupt.
Look at this guy, two weeks ago corrupt AF (and indicted) now 1000% telling the truth. Lol.
Ya, I think I was thinking of Shokin. My bad.
Oh yeah, the guy that was retroactively and unilaterally declared “corrupt” by LibBots.
Sane Republicans have too
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Stay strong, bud. You'll get that sweet acquittal in a few weeks.
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev? L.O.L. if so. Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic :frown:
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev? L.O.L. if so. Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic :frown:
I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are. Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.
But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass, Lol.
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev? L.O.L. if so. Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic :frown:
I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are. Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.
But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass, Lol.
Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion. Yikes on the comprehension indicator.
https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev? L.O.L. if so. Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic :frown:
I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are. Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.
But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass, Lol.
Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion. Yikes on the comprehension indicator.
https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753
LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . . now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.
Try to keep up here, for once.
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev? L.O.L. if so. Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic :frown:
I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are. Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.
But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass, Lol.
Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion. Yikes on the comprehension indicator.
https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753
LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . . now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.
Try to keep up here, for once.
Umm... Ok, Dax. I'm sorry this is so hard, but I guess it's expected.
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev? L.O.L. if so. Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic :frown:
I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are. Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.
But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass, Lol.
Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion. Yikes on the comprehension indicator.
https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753
LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . . now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.
Try to keep up here, for once.
Umm... Ok, Dax. I'm sorry this is so hard, but I guess it's expected.
There's that Da Big Dummy go to when he just can't follow along, which is all the time.
I'm pretty sure the Daxbot is about to explode. It's called the same "2 weeks ago" method almost 10 times in the past 10 posts :ohno:
Some people can’t follow timelines beyond a few minutes. Case in point
Or someone is confused about the last time he brought up the last provided talking point. :frown:
Or someone, as usual, just can’t remember that just a few weeks back this guy was declared corrupt by LibBots #frown (and indicted).
Wait a second...do you think I have still been talking about Lev? L.O.L. if so. Holy crap! Talk about being weeks behind the current topic :frown:
I’ve been using Lev as an example of how LOL desperate you guys are. Again, just a few weeks ago he was a mega corrupt guy (and indicted) helping Rudy. Now he’s the agent of truth.
But LOL at you doin the ol “that’s not what I’m talkin about” shtick, my lawd you’re such a dumb ass, Lol.
Bud, I've been talking about Rudy explicitly since you replied to the below thread, in pretty obvious fashion. Yikes on the comprehension indicator.
https://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=41775.msg1951753#msg1951753
LOL, and for the 100th time, you guys were saying this corrupt Ukranian was not to be believed because he was working with Rudy . . now he's a Ukrainian (Russian) American just trying to get the truth out there.
Try to keep up here, for once.
Umm... Ok, Dax. I'm sorry this is so hard, but I guess it's expected.
There's that Da Big Dummy go to when he just can't follow along, which is all the time.
If only you could observe your posting from an outside unbiased party. I mean, I have nothing because I have explained this as clear as day, and you just don't get it. :frown: :lol:
Lmao
The talking point is
All the grifters, criminals, felons, and monsters that I am bff with and do all my business all the time with just aren’t being truthful about the dear leader.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of course Yova claimed she wasn’t blocking Visa’s and that the unilaterally declared bad Ukrainians are lying (while the unilaterally declared good Ukrainians are telling the truth) about the visa issue.
Remembering that this is the same person coached to refer all inquiries about the Biden’s in the Ukraine to Biden’s office.
Lmao
The talking point is
All the grifters, criminals, felons, and monsters that I am bff with and do all my business all the time with just aren’t being truthful about the dear leader.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOL, The talking point is that until last night this guy was a mega corrupt henchman for Rudy and the gang and can’t be believed.
Now he’s the pinnacle of truth and justice because he went on Rachel “new Alex Jones” Maddow’s show and spun a fantastic OrangeMan bad tale (as he and his wife face more Federal charges).
Of course Yova claimed she wasn’t blocking Visa’s and that the unilaterally declared bad Ukrainians are lying (while the unilaterally declared good Ukrainians are telling the truth) about the visa issue.
Remembering that this is the same person coached to refer all inquiries about the Biden’s in the Ukraine to Biden’s office.
When you put it that way, I can definitely see how this whole impeachment thing is ultimately just a hoax.
I mean, from my news watching parnas was funneling money back and forth and setting up meetings between the trump gang and the Ukrainians. Essentially the back channel guy.
And he just went public with all his stuff and he's got a lot, A LOT of receipts.
Impeach Obama then
Evidence? Witnesses?
I think I probably said this in the Russia thread, but it's amazing how a guy like dax who loves the crap out of discussing batshit conspiracy theories has zero interest in discussing ACTUAL conspiracies. No interest at all! None!
Oh, man. Lol.
https://twitter.com/svdate/status/1217810946162339840
I think I probably said this in the Russia thread, but it's amazing how a guy like dax who loves the crap out of discussing batshit conspiracy theories has zero interest in discussing ACTUAL conspiracies. No interest at all! None!
No way these guys should be trusted just on their word. Aren't they handing over you know, actual evidence ?
No way these guys should be trusted just on their word. Aren't they handing over you know, actual evidence ?
Impeach Obama then
Evidence? Witnesses?
Oh no, in the case of blocked visas the bad Ukrainians (for today anyway) said she blocked visas so (for today) they’re liars. It’s also pretty well known about the coaching she received to refer all inquiries about the Bidens in the Ukraine to his office.
Got a link on that Lib?
You stood by and let your guy destroy entire countries with no approval from any other congressional body at all. Nor any explanation as to why.
I’m talking about me supporting that, dumbass.Got a link on that Lib?
You stood by and let your guy destroy entire countries with no approval from any other congressional body at all. Nor any explanation as to why.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/dMt8qCl5fPk[/youtube]
BUT LIBYA
Dax you were def on board with withholding aid if that’s what you’re asking.
BUT LIBYA
In the context of a president can do whatever he/she wants, it’s perfectly applicable. Lib only gets mad if a Pub does it, while most get mad if any do it.
BUT LIBYA
In the context of a president can do whatever he/she wants, it’s perfectly applicable. Lib only gets mad if a Pub does it, while most get mad if any do it.
after 8 years of "DOES OBAMA THINK HE IS A KING" it is interesting to hear pubs extoll the virtues of expansive executive power
the guy has openly suggested personally and through his campaign that he should serve beyond term limits
not a big deal but the conservative outrage had Obama even joked about it would have been insane
"Everyone is familiar with William Blackstone’s famous aphorism, “That the king can do no wrong, is a necessary and fundamental principle of the English constitution.” But what does that have to do with us on this side of the Atlantic — we who revolted against a “God-King” with the words “all men are created equal,” broke free, and created a constitutional republic?
As it turns out, precious little. In 1996, Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that sovereign immunity is a judge-made doctrine that has been “thoroughly discredited” because it is founded on the notion “that a divinely ordained monarch ‘can do no wrong.’ ” Not surprisingly, “Sovereign immunity is a right that cannot be found in the text or the framers’ intent,” wrote recognized legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky."
Dax you were def on board with withholding aid if that’s what you’re asking.
The US has repeatedly demanded something in return for aid over the decades. For example Joe Biden demanded that the Ukraine do something before he would release the aid. Just in this case, it was to protect his families corruption.
Otherwise the US has historically quid pro quo’d almost all forms of aid.
Now apparently Libs want no questions asked, outcomes sought or behaviors changed foreign aid. Sad
Dax you were def on board with withholding aid if that’s what you’re asking.
The US has repeatedly demanded something in return for aid over the decades. For example Joe Biden demanded that the Ukraine do something before he would release the aid. Just in this case, it was to protect his families corruption.
Otherwise the US has historically quid pro quo’d almost all forms of aid.
Now apparently Libs want no questions asked, outcomes sought or behaviors changed foreign aid. Sad
everyone knows that the executive branch has the power of the purse
it seems that the GAO knows this
BUT LIBYA
In the context of a president can do whatever he/she wants, it’s perfectly applicable. Lib only gets mad if a Pub does it, while most get mad if any do it.
"Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law," the opinion said. "[The Office of Management and Budget] OMB withheld funds for a policy reason ... not a programmatic delay. Therefore, we conclude that the OMB violated the ICA [Impoundment Control Act]."
"The President has narrow, limited authority to withhold appropriations under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, OMB told GAO that it withheld the funds to ensure that they were not spent 'in a manner that could conflict with the President’s foreign policy.' The law does not permit OMB to withhold funds for policy reasons."
Lick I’ve read a ton congressional testimony
https://twitter.com/dsamuelsohn/status/1217843762644357120
Not understanding twitter or thinking that twitter is the source of news/et al is VERY MAGA
Not understanding twitter or thinking that twitter is the source of news/et al is VERY MAGA
It enrages them
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not understanding twitter or thinking that twitter is the source of news/et al is VERY MAGA
It enrages them
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
scares tf out of them too
Dax that makes it look like you have no idea how twitter works
Geez Chum, where do you find these websites?
Geez Chum, where do you find these websites?
That one, probably Lawfare. George Conway and other stupid idiots also retweet her stuff.
But Trump thinks Dershowitz is magnificent on TV, a White House official told me.
https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1218509666231169025
Oh Dax :lol:
https://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1218509666231169025
Good. But you know in your dumb little heads that if “I’m afraid of Bob Barr” hadn’t gone on Rachel “new Alex Jones” Maddow’s show and made those allegations. Any information dug up on the Biden’s or claims about the Biden’s made by this guy would have been immediately dismissed as a Russian conspiracy or Russian disinformation.
But now, just a great American seeking truth and justice . . . and being indicted by Bob Barr.
We all know, well you guys don’t, but the rest of us know why Barr is under attack from Slurs “this is a solemn occasion, here have a pen” Pelosi on down.
I think he means AG William Barr and not former Congressman Bob Barrhttps://twitter.com/adamgoldmanNYT/status/1218509666231169025
Good. But you know in your dumb little heads that if “I’m afraid of Bob Barr” hadn’t gone on Rachel “new Alex Jones” Maddow’s show and made those allegations. Any information dug up on the Biden’s or claims about the Biden’s made by this guy would have been immediately dismissed as a Russian conspiracy or Russian disinformation.
But now, just a great American seeking truth and justice . . . and being indicted by Bob Barr.
We all know, well you guys don’t, but the rest of us know why Barr is under attack from Slurs “this is a solemn occasion, here have a pen” Pelosi on down.
Who’s Bob Barr?
I'm no expert and am totally biased, but it seems like the President's lawyers are kinda shitty at this.
fwiw, I think Sekulow is a pretty good attorney.
fwiw, I think Sekulow is a pretty good attorney.
Did I? If so, I was temporarily insane and not responsible for my actions.fwiw, I think Sekulow is a pretty good attorney.
Didn’t you also think Giuliani was some sort of 4D chess player a little while back?
https://twitter.com/mattmfm/status/1220555307916677120
But if it happened, definitely bad or no?
Apparently ambassadors are threatened, surveilled, and publicly smeared at the pleasure of the president as well. Just how Washington works.
The great daxover continues
No doubt part of the vast left wing conspiracy to overturn the 2016 election and protect papa frontrunner Biden
The Epoch Times?
I don't believe conspiracy theories, you believe conspiracy theories.
Anyway, I should get back to explaining how Obama orchestrated 9/11 from a marxist re-education camp in Kenya
I don't think it's a big surprise that this is a contest of political power to the detriment of the US Constitution. It's being treated like toilet paper and I don't think there's much of a loss felt about it tbh
lol
https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1221789190725283840
Imagine thinking your party was cruising to an easy impeachment trial win and then having to figure out how to deal with this story that is basically the same as the like 14 others who testified under oath.
Not sure how the GOP will be able to circle the wagons here.
Imagine thinking your party was cruising to an easy impeachment trial win and then having to figure out how to deal with this story that is basically the same as the like 14 others who testified under oath.
Not sure how the GOP will be able to circle the wagons here.
John Bolton knows the game. Anything substantial that's Anti-Trump immediately makes you a LibDork Nation hero.
He'll use the John McCain method. McCain went from a war loving bomb everybody guy hated by the majority of LibDork Nation to instant LibDork Nation icon and beloved hero based on one vote.
Bolton knows that if mega corrupt war monger Joe Biden gets elected, that he'll likely find a new voice via proxies somewhere within the massive NSC infrastructure that war monger Joe Biden will rebuild. His old boss, mega war monger Barrack Obama had nearly 800 on his NSC staff (many of whom are holdovers who are really pissed off the U.S. is out of the regime change business, and want somebody like Obama back so they can begin regime changing and refugee'ing again).
John Bolton knows the game. Anything substantial that's Anti-Trump immediately makes you a LibDork Nation hero.
He'll use the John McCain method. McCain went from a war loving bomb everybody guy hated by the majority of LibDork Nation to instant LibDork Nation icon and beloved hero based on one vote.
Bolton knows that if mega corrupt war monger Joe Biden gets elected, that he'll likely find a new voice via proxies somewhere within the massive NSC infrastructure that war monger Joe Biden will rebuild. His old boss, mega war monger Barrack Obama had nearly 800 on his NSC staff (many of whom are holdovers who are really pissed off the U.S. is out of the regime change business, and want somebody like Obama back so they can begin regime changing and refugee'ing again).
Imagine believing this lmao
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
John Bolton knows the game. Anything substantial that's Anti-Trump immediately makes you a LibDork Nation hero.
He'll use the John McCain method. McCain went from a war loving bomb everybody guy hated by the majority of LibDork Nation to instant LibDork Nation icon and beloved hero based on one vote.
Bolton knows that if mega corrupt war monger Joe Biden gets elected, that he'll likely find a new voice via proxies somewhere within the massive NSC infrastructure that war monger Joe Biden will rebuild. His old boss, mega war monger Barrack Obama had nearly 800 on his NSC staff (many of whom are holdovers who are really pissed off the U.S. is out of the regime change business, and want somebody like Obama back so they can begin regime changing and refugee'ing again).
Imagine believing this lmao
Imagine being so desperate to get back into the White House that you'll (once again) make a guy your movement absolutely despises a hero based on some accusations.
lmao
https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1221831515346214912
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
He'll be beloved by mainstream LibDork Nation far and wide, just like John "bomb everybody" McCain.
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists. It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists. It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.
Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists. It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.
Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists. It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.
Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.
Geezus Dude. It’s like you’re utterly incapable of following anything.
Conservative media was absolutely insensed by the pen thing when it happened. I think dax has angerly referred to it a few times.
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Everything "pro" Trump, particularly on the world stage and/or anti LibDork is "Russian Propaganda" or "Russian Disinformation" according to LibDork Nation and Fake Centrists. It's quite disturbing, but not the least bit unexpected.
Please cite an example of something pro trump that fits what you describe.
Geezus Dude. It’s like you’re utterly incapable of following anything.
Tapped out straight away
PENS.
DISTRIBUTED.
To the impeachment managers.
[Video of old people frowning.]
A celebratory moment.
Think about that.
Think about this.
A poignant moment.
Man, I bet those "Untied States Senator" pens are quite the collector's item.
How is that pro trump?
Remind me why you hate the vindman guy (other than his testimony was bad for trump)? Iirc you thought he's a sleeper agent or something.
You didn't answer the question
So you hate him because other people find him credible and because of Susan Rice?
Well that's certainly on-brand for ol' grandax.
Do you no longer think he's a secret double agent traitor?
You didn't answer the question
lmao
https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1221831515346214912
lmao
https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1221819309628035072
Why are you dodging this so much? If you no longer believe he's a double agent then just say it and crush this false narrative. Really rub it in my face.
both of you are so ground in your beliefs that there's not even really any point in arguing with one another The truth probably lies in the middle maybe more tilted against MAGA cause he should shut his dick holster but hey it's still amusing that neither of you can see the flaws in your respective arguments :bwpopcorn:
lmao
https://twitter.com/UrbanAchievr/status/1221831515346214912
lmao
https://twitter.com/revrrlewis/status/1221819309628035072
my goodness.
September DaxFTR I fully support the Executive Branch of our government investigating corruption on the part of current and form executive branch members in regards to their dealings with foreign governments as long as there's no quid-pro-quo.
October DaxDax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?
No, if Biden/Obama wasn't a quid pro quo than neither was this.
November DaxI'm looking forward to the error of unquestioned foreign aid given with no stipulation, demand or expectation of change.
Let's make it rain U.S. dollars across the world!!
Again, they know they can't dispute or defend any facts but can only attack the process.
Or just unilaterally declare the personal feelings and opinions of individuals are absolute fact and wholly objective in order to fit an agenda.
Can you decipher who or what you're referring to here? I was referring to Vindman, surely you're not gullible enough to believe that crap about a decorated veteran and foreign policy expert is making crap up and whose testimony isn't reliable. Right?
He's testifying based on his opinion of what occurred. We have the transcript of the call. You just like just about everyone else didn't know this guy existed until about 15 minutes ago, but now in typical LibDerp fashion you've decided to wrap yourself in the flag of service, when the vast majority of time your movement makes fun of such things (Full Assimilation).
Does anyone else have difficulty with answering if they think vindman is a double agent?
Personally, I do not.
If I would have come into this impeachment supporting Trump, there is no way that dax's effort in this thread would have failed to change my mind.
If I would have come into this impeachment supporting Trump, there is no way that dax's effort in this thread would have failed to change my mind.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Like I'm going to change the mind of some of the most hardcore LibDork whackjobs on the planet :lol: :lol:
If I would have come into this impeachment supporting Trump, there is no way that dax's effort in this thread would have failed to change my mind.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Like I'm going to change the mind of some of the most hardcore LibDork whackjobs on the planet :lol: :lol:
Switch sides and you might.
I think the elected officials know that nothing is there, but the daxags.com'rs of the world are going all in on hunter testifying. There are multiple threads every day asking why the Republicans won't call witnesses when they so obviously would prove this is a sham and throw hunter, papa frontrunner Joe, and Obama in jail.
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1221906260045574149
https://twitter.com/costareports/status/1221914289189138432
I think the elected officials know that nothing is there, but the daxags.com'rs of the world are going all in on hunter testifying. There are multiple threads every day asking why the Republicans won't call witnesses when they so obviously would prove this is a sham and throw hunter, papa frontrunner Joe, and Obama in jail.
I couldn't care less if Hunter Biden testifies or not. Everyone already knows that Biden(s) are super corrupt, except you, clearly. Everyone knows that LibDork Nation stands ready, willing and wanting to protect Joe Biden at all costs. Once again, a mega corrupt Democrat is the Dem Presidential Front Runner, nothing ever really changes.
John Bolton should tetify = lib hero?
Anyone who talks bad about Trump is a libtard never trumper according to an incredibly disturbing percentage of our population. It’s not just Dax.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
YES! Anyone who reads Facebook knows this. Why these rubes think this despicable person is such a great hero is a mystery to me.
omg lol this video
https://twitter.com/TPMLiveWire/status/1221875345302937600
I was watching Ken Starr try to make his case over lunch and all I could think about is that this is the guy who thinks rape is ok. I associate him more with Baylor than Clinton at this point.
We’re now entering “we got’em” Phase 5 or is it 6?
It’s going to be sad watching LibDork Nation: The Most Useful of Idiots now go all in on John Bolton.
A man they use to hate with the power of a 1000 suns.
We’re now entering “we got’em” Phase 5 or is it 6?
It’s going to be sad watching LibDork Nation: The Most Useful of Idiots now go all in on John Bolton.
A man they use to hate with the power of a 1000 suns.
As a witness? Sure, why not? :dunno:
Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption. Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.
You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).
But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption. Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.
You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).
But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption. Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.
You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).
But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption. Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption. Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.
You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).
But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption. Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption. Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.
You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).
But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption. Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight. That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS.
Pathetic
is it true that Giulianni was working to oust the new prosecutor who was targeting his associates interests in corruption investigations?
Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption. Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.
You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).
But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption. Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight. That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS.
Pathetic
Where was the tap out, exactly? You're deranged. Sorry that the cool kids are picking on you. Maybe if you shut up for once everyone wouldn't know you to be the miserable, old fool that you are.Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption. Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.
You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).
But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption. Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight. That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS.
Pathetic
And I’m only pointing out an ongoing pattern of your stupidity and rage. So much rage that you’re literally jizzing yourself that I was wrong about a QB pick based on results 3 or 4 years later and then equating it to this discussion, LOL.
Tap out accepted.
is it true that Giulianni was working to oust the new prosecutor who was targeting his associates interests in corruption investigations?
Is it true that LibDorks want to believe a guy who is already under indictment by this administration?
Rhetorical question wants to know
Where was the tap out, exactly? You're deranged. Sorry that the cool kids are picking on you. Maybe if you shut up for once everyone wouldn't know you to be the miserable, old fool that you are.Just pointing out a pattern, friend. Don't worry, when you go back and delete those posts, most won't remember them.:lol: Please continue. You look worse than you did in the Mahomes thread.Lol, you're just making things up. The US, the EU and the IMF all wanted Shokin gone. Or do you not know what unilateral means?Quid pro quo is fine when using my tax dollars to assist the us in advancing the us taxpayer interests.
Djt used my tax dollars to help him win an election if the allegations are true.
LOL, you’re own rough ridin' party literally had whole commissions about the corruption in the Ukraine and then when ChiCom Joe became point man on the Ukraine suddenly there was a lot less concern about corruption. Until of course the unilaterally declared “corrupt” Ukrainian prosecutor started doing some uncomfortable things in regards to Burisma and all of sudden corruption was a big deal again and (clearly) inextricably tied to the receipt of US foreign aid.
You can’t ask questions about our corruption (LibDork Nation).
But for Trump: You can’t have any concerns about corruption.
Lol, they literally went off their own decelerations of corruption. Singling our individuals in the Ukraine and declaring that they (alone) were corrupt is positively LOL’able and only total idiots like you actually believe that.
Lol, you’re literally declaring victory 3 years in hindsight. That’s how sad you are Waks, FFS.
Pathetic
And I’m only pointing out an ongoing pattern of your stupidity and rage. So much rage that you’re literally jizzing yourself that I was wrong about a QB pick based on results 3 or 4 years later and then equating it to this discussion, LOL.
Tap out accepted.
:bwpopcorn:
https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1222572116257787904
Dersh bringing back the "if the president does it, it's not illegal" defense. Dax obviously nods in agreement (if the president is a republican)I think A.D. has been effective today. It doesn't help that the Dems keep honorifically referring to him as "Professor"
Forgot to mention the ability to shakedown foreign governments without fear of repercussions.
SlowDug, looks like QPQ’s are just a Dem administration thing from here on out, so hopefully our guy Bloomberg is going to get elected.
Also good to know that Bloomie’s VP is gonna be able to load up his kids and travel the world getting investments from foreign countries for the kid and/or installing the kid on boards of mega corrupt corporations out of Cyprus, The Caymans and similar.
Gonna be pretty great.
Forgot to mention the ability to shakedown foreign governments without fear of repercussions.
Do you think that's a bad thing?
SlowDug, looks like QPQ’s are just a Dem administration thing from here on out, so hopefully our guy Bloomberg is going to get elected.
Also good to know that Bloomie’s VP is gonna be able to load up his kids and travel the world getting investments from foreign countries for the kid and/or installing the kid on boards of mega corrupt corporations out of Cyprus, The Caymans and similar.
Gonna be pretty great.
https://www.gq.com/story/trump-kids-profit-presidency
i think the Trump kids agree
https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1222583748450975746
Pretty :facepalm: from cryin' chuck, but I wonder if Ted knows the circumstances around those serious felonies and who they were in service of?
Expand on that thought dax, tell me where you're going with it.
Is this a roundabout way of alledging a deep state plot? Rogue fbi coup?
https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1222583748450975746
Pretty :facepalm: from cryin' chuck, but I wonder if Ted knows the circumstances around those serious felonies and who they were in service of?
Is this a roundabout way of alledging a deep state plot? Rogue fbi coup?
No, you’re an amazing weirdo, tho
Is this a roundabout way of alledging a deep state plot? Rogue fbi coup?
No, you’re an amazing weirdo, tho
Well it's either that or you think it's impossible that trump and his surrogates are involved (despite evidence otherwise) because Lev was caught by the FBI.
Just say what you mean bud.
https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1222583748450975746
Pretty :facepalm: from cryin' chuck
Twitter thread that will likely require an update to the dax meltdown thread after he sees it.
https://twitter.com/HeidiNBC/status/1222912159165841410
your link is dead Dax and i cant find the article
The (one of the) real reasons why LibDork Leadership and ChiCom Joe The Shakedown King don't want many questions being asked:
This did not begin under President Trump but under President George W. Bush, when then Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko’s “Orange Revolution” began rehabilitating Ukraine’s wartime killers of Jews, and it grew under President Obama, who, along with Vice President Joseph Biden, were deeply complicit in the Maidan coup and what followed.
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/americas-COLUSION-with-neo-nazis/
also wouldn't this line of logic neuter Republicans recent attacks on Obama policy
“We put up a lot of money. I gave you anti-tank busters that, frankly, President Obama was sending you pillows and sheets,” Trump said.
so Trump is giving Neo-Nazis weapons and Obama gave them pillows and sheets???
oh Dax
from your article...
That the Azov Battalion of some 3,000 well-armed fighters, which has played a major combat role in the Ukrainian civil war and now is an official component of Kiev’s armed forces, is avowedly “partially” pro-Nazi, as evidenced by its regalia, slogans, and programmatic statements, and well-documented as such by several international monitoring organizations. Congressional legislation recently banned Azov from receiving any US military aid, but it is likely to obtain some of the new weapons recently sent to Kiev by the Trump Administration
Congrats everyone we have crowned a king
You might have missed the republican that said he doesn't need witnesses because trump is guilty but so what Heil trump.
Daxflection!
Damn I thought you guys had him this time....
Damn I thought you guys had him this time....
You might have been the only one who thought so.
https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1223290847200010241
As a side note, between this, the mueller report, and various other scandals, it's amazing to me how many people in this administration just ignore direct orders from the president. No one has any respect for him at all
Lol, right
Lol, right
I think lots of people are going to get in trouble (in addition to those who already have). It's just that Trump won't be one be one of them.
Dax, can you please post the Warren quote you keep obviously twisting? I don't even see this talking point on texags so I'm sure it's fantastic
So is that a no on the link?
linking to google dot com when you got nothing is a classic wacky move
I think dax points out that one as opposed to a hundred others because he is offended by the idea that anyone would want to undo Trump.
Any link for that?
https://twitter.com/DocJackGriffin/status/1224420411049500673?s=20
https://twitter.com/DocJackGriffin/status/1224420411049500673?s=20
Hell Ya! Why do you think he authorized the Space Farce. :lol:
was Air Force Space Command not being held accountable in some way?
was Air Force Space Command not being held accountable in some way?
Just admit you've never heard of the "black budget", and we can all agree with you and move on.
was Air Force Space Command not being held accountable in some way?
Just admit you've never heard of the "black budget", and we can all agree with you and move on.
Isn't it believed that Trump asked for a significant increase in black budget spending?
I wonder why they needed an increase with all of this space force money now being accounted for
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
:ROFL:
or...
now here me out,
the party has changed significantly to align itself with a grifter and you are all like :Take the Bait:
:confused:Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
:confused:Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
He ran in 2012 dude:confused:Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
You missed Mitt's run for president?
it's okay
i would also be embarassed if i whined for 8 years about Obama care, Deficit Spending, and Executive Overreach and then was forced to do 180's to lick a boot
He ran in 2012 dude:confused:Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2012 dude:confused:Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2008 and we got John "the old guy" McCain. Good lawd . . .
Lol that's not what you meant. Go ahead and delete that post, I'll delete my replies to it so you can save face.He ran in 2012 dude:confused:Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2008 and we got John "the old guy" McCain. Good lawd . . .
Lol that's not what you meant. Go ahead and delete that post, I'll delete my replies to it so you can save face.He ran in 2012 dude:confused:Good one, got his assRomney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which state is Mitt representing this week?
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
But then again, they way Mitt half assed his way to 2008 (as you guys bought Hope and Change hook-line-sinker) you guys should like him.
You missed Mitt's run for president?
He ran in 2008 and we got John "the old guy" McCain. Good lawd . . .
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
Ok, so why should we like Romney because of the way he half assed his way to 2008 and not because of his 2012 loss?
The fact that LibDork Nation is clearly on the verge (if they haven't already) of calling Mitt one of their own is the most LOL'able of them all :lol:
This is pretty much the opposite of what is happening. It’s neocon nation who is calling Mitt a libdork.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries
Huckabee secured more delegates
It's okay dax, put the Sharpie down and be honest with us. I promise we're not mad at you.
Romney is the first US Senator in American history to vote to remove a president of his own party
Have fun being on the wrong side of history.
Congrats everyone we have crowned a king
Don’t worry Da Big Dummy, Bernie’s already got an executive order list that’s only missing “dictator for life” and they’re just ironing out some wording on that one.
Liz is gonna toss all political opponents in jail, even if you were just some wonk paper pusher who worked on the same level as George Conway’s job offer, Liz is gonna prosecute your ass.
She’s also gonna unilaterally declare people disinformation agents and prosecute them. What’s next? The revival of Obama’s indefinite detention thought balloon?
You’ll get your chance to put the Brownshirt and armband on again soon enough. Keep those jackboots polished.
Congrats everyone we have crowned a king
Don’t worry Da Big Dummy, Bernie’s already got an executive order list that’s only missing “dictator for life” and they’re just ironing out some wording on that one.
Liz is gonna toss all political opponents in jail, even if you were just some wonk paper pusher who worked on the same level as George Conway’s job offer, Liz is gonna prosecute your ass.
She’s also gonna unilaterally declare people disinformation agents and prosecute them. What’s next? The revival of Obama’s indefinite detention thought balloon?
You’ll get your chance to put the Brownshirt and armband on again soon enough. Keep those jackboots polished.
I didn’t even read Dax’s reply but the moment Trump is acquitted he posts this. Pretty Kingy to me as Dax continues his high step salute.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1225174713992990721
How long until all of them realize that Biden isn't the nominee?
https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1225183166677299200
How long until all of them realize that Biden isn't the nominee?
https://twitter.com/kathrynw5/status/1225183166677299200
mitt romney is a genuinely courageous patriot, and i appreciate it. thank you, senator.
mitt romney is a genuinely courageous patriot, and i appreciate it. thank you, senator.
Not entirely convinced courageous is the right word, but he’s definitely a guy with enough self respect that he’s not gonna get bullied by party leadership, and that means something.
Oh Chum . . .
Oh Chum . . .
You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.
How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.Oh Chum . . .
You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.
If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump. But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.Oh Chum . . .
You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.
If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump. But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right
But Romney obviously knew Trump wouldn't be removed from office. He had literally nothing to gain from voting to remove. And if he had such motivations, why would he only vote to remove on one of the articles and not the other?How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.Oh Chum . . .
You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.
If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump. But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right
I'll take the latter first. I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example). I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub.
If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.
But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence.
Listen, do i defend literally every single contemptible action of this objectively awful human being on this message board? Yes. But will I be voting for him? Also yes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But Romney obviously knew Trump wouldn't be removed from office. He had literally nothing to gain from voting to remove. And if he had such motivations, why would he only vote to remove on one of the articles and not the other?How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.Oh Chum . . .
You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.
If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump. But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right
I'll take the latter first. I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example). I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub.
If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.
But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence.
Congrats on not voting for a sexual predator (for the Senate). You are aware that Jones voted to remove Trump, right?
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him :lol:
What did he have to gain other than scorn from his party and why didn't he vote to remove on both articles?But Romney obviously knew Trump wouldn't be removed from office. He had literally nothing to gain from voting to remove. And if he had such motivations, why would he only vote to remove on one of the articles and not the other?How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.Oh Chum . . .
You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.
If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump. But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right
I'll take the latter first. I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example). I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub.
If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.
But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence.
Congrats on not voting for a sexual predator (for the Senate). You are aware that Jones voted to remove Trump, right?
Of course Jones voted to remove Trump. But unlike the always enraged extremely low intelligence LibDorks around here, I can separate matters of national and local import and I feel like Doug Jones (even though he is a rich white gun loving lawyer who lives in Mountain Brook .. . . but that never bothers LibDork Nation cus for you it's all about the D) has been very good at his job. I'll excuse the sexual predator remark even though LibDork Nation voted 63 million strong to put a known sexual predator and his enabling wife back inside the walls of the White House for a 3rd time.
LOL, he had nothing to gain, good one Waks :lol: :lol: :lol:
What did he have to gain other than scorn from his party?But Romney obviously knew Trump wouldn't be removed from office. He had literally nothing to gain from voting to remove. And if he had such motivations, why would he only vote to remove on one of the articles and not the other?How is voting to remove Trump (an action that is not going to end with the desired result) going to protect his guy on the board of Burisma? It seems that it would more likely do the exact opposite.Oh Chum . . .
You're not fooling anyone except maybe yourself. You'll be voting for Trump.
If you idiots nominate the super corrupt racist war monger, or one of the two complete whack jobs, you bet I’ll be voting for Trump. But what does that have to do with Mitt trying to protect one of his own sitting on the board of Burisma?
Also, for clarification's sake, the whack jobs are Warren and Sanders? You would vote for Pete or Klo? Yeah, right
I'll take the latter first. I vote for Dems all the time, barring something very weird happening, Doug Jones has my vote . . . again (one example). I voted for Walt Maddox for Gub.
If Trump is out of office, there's a strong chance the questions about Burisma subside substantially.
But I sure am glad that Mitt was so ardent about getting witnesses, because clearly he was on the fence.
Congrats on not voting for a sexual predator (for the Senate). You are aware that Jones voted to remove Trump, right?
Of course Jones voted to remove Trump. But unlike the always enraged extremely low intelligence LibDorks around here, I can separate matters of national and local import and I feel like Doug Jones (even though he is a rich white gun loving lawyer who lives in Mountain Brook .. . . but that never bothers LibDork Nation cus for you it's all about the D) has been very good at his job. I'll excuse the sexual predator remark even though LibDork Nation voted 63 million strong to put a known sexual predator and his enabling wife back inside the walls of the White House for a 3rd time.
LOL, he had nothing to gain, good one Waks :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think this helps Mitt if Trump loses reelection. It's very possible it was a calculated vote playing the odds that Trump won't win. He's not the sort of person who is going to remain popular as a loser.
I think this helps Mitt if Trump loses reelection. It's very possible it was a calculated vote playing the odds that Trump won't win. He's not the sort of person who is going to remain popular as a loser.
I don't believe Mittens is going to run in 2024.
Self serving Mitt voting to impeach a republican president as a senator from an overwhelmingly republican state. This is the dumbest talking point I’ve heard today and Dax has posted like 40 times.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.
Dax is so broken he doesn’t understand how two people can have agreeing viewpoints if they’re from different parties.
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.
Okay . . . :lol:
Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.
Okay . . . :lol:
Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.
What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him :lol:
Link?
I'll help you out LibDork.9, I made fun of Doug Jones because that period was another high point in LibDork Nation identity politics and Doug Jones was and is a rich white Mountain Brook living lawyer with a large gun collection.
LibDork.9, always 4 laps down.
So is doug jones a homegrown racist or a transplant racist?
The darling of the DNC and Hollywood.
I have a feeling this noon press conference is going to be batshit.
I was wondering what any of this had to do with impeachment. Now I get it. It's payback time for dax and his fellow Trumpers.
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.
Okay . . . :lol:
Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.
What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?
Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him :lol:
Link?
I'll help you out LibDork.9, I made fun of Doug Jones because that period was another high point in LibDork Nation identity politics and Doug Jones was and is a rich white Mountain Brook living lawyer with a large gun collection.
LibDork.9, always 4 laps down.So is doug jones a homegrown racist or a transplant racist?
The darling of the DNC and Hollywood.
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.
Okay . . . :lol:
Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.
What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?
Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
Plus Mitt will be 76 years old in 2024 and senators serve 6 year terms. Running for president seems more likely.
I like Mitt. I thought he was the wrong candidate to run against Obama in 2008, though.:D
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.
Okay . . . :lol:
Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.
What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?
Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
one is an act of a war mongering junta of which the Democratic party turned out 63 million strong and tried to keep them in the White House and this time around another member of the cabal is the democratic front runner.
Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.
I completely agree on "cabal" and "coffers." What I'd like to see from dax is less Alex Jones and more Steve Bannon.
You can't answer a simple question and your research consists of whack-a-do (to borrow a phrase) conspiracy blogs and tweets.Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.
You’ve done zero research and only know what LibDerp Leadership tells you to think.
You can't answer a simple question and your research consists of whack-a-do (to borrow a phrase) conspiracy blogs and tweets.Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.
You’ve done zero research and only know what LibDerp Leadership tells you to think.
You can't answer a simple question and your research consists of whack-a-do (to borrow a phrase) conspiracy blogs and tweets.Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.
You’ve done zero research and only know what LibDerp Leadership tells you to think.
Just let the fact that one of Romney's top advisors is on the Burisma Board of Directors sink in for awhile. Of course, you wouldn't have the first clue that was the case unless I told you.
So, you continue rage on in your constant state of being clueless, and the conspiracy tap out is way over used around here, find something new.
Oh Trump also said that his impeachment should be expunged. Totally normal. That's just the first step towards him claiming it never even happened. Seriously, he will end up saying this at the Republican convention this summer.
Oh Trump also said that his impeachment should be expunged. Totally normal. That's just the first step towards him claiming it never even happened. Seriously, he will end up saying this at the Republican convention this summer.
That's fantastic.
Oh Trump also said that his impeachment should be expunged. Totally normal. That's just the first step towards him claiming it never even happened. Seriously, he will end up saying this at the Republican convention this summer.
That's fantastic.
You're right, it's so fantastic he won't be able to wait until the summer to bust it out. He just floated it out there today so it needs about a week or so to marinate.
wait, do people really think something happened?
Plus Mitt will be 76 years old in 2024 and senators serve 6 year terms. Running for president seems more likely.
Mitt Romney is an ageless wonder and will probably live past 100, barring an accidental death situation. He looks exactly the same as he did 20 years ago. Mormons and clean livin' and whatnot.
Vindman’s brother got canned too? Goodness.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Vindman’s brother got canned too? Goodness.Totally normal
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I guess I missed what his brother said. Do you have a link?Vindman’s brother got canned too? Goodness.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sedition shouldn't pay . . .
Told the truth.
Check this out
https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1226583703146713089
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bumpWhat are the possible scenarios here?
They aren't required to have an impeachment trial. Just impeach, send it to the senate, and let them vote. Get the senators who support treason on record.7 of them already are.
Waste of time
Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk
Waste of timeYes. Should censure and mute him. Do what the social media platforms have done but irl until the finish line.
Sent from my Pixel 4 using Tapatalk
Which one says FU to MAGA the hardest?25th Amendment
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.
His poor physical condition will do that all on its own, anyway.
Same for the 25th.
And yeah, to me impeachment seems like a no brainer for Republicans to back this time around.
1) It would prevent him from holding public office and therefore they could go into 2024 without having to worry about him blustering about potentially making a run at it. For the record I don't think he will actually run, but if he's still legally allowed to he'll talk it up for years and at the very least keep it up for the grift. If Trump is prevented from ever running again due to impeachment and conviction in the senate, all the 'pubs who have presidential ambitions could make a clean break from Trumpism and throw their hat in the ring without actually having to worry much about making MAGAs mad.
if there are enough republican senators willing to convict him now, then impeach him asap. no need to impeach him in the house just for show, though.
https://twitter.com/danabashcnn/status/1347289959577825280How brave he is now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
if there are enough republican senators willing to convict him now, then impeach him asap. no need to impeach him in the house just for show, though.We all know there isn't, so it's pointless.
Also, I would like to see Ben Sasse vote against removal and embarrass steve dave.Why would you say something so hurtful?
Also, I would like to see Ben Sasse vote against removal and embarrass steve dave.
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.
I think impeachment would prevent him from holding public office in the future, for what it's worth.
I don't think this is true given he's already been impeached.
A lot of reports were saying that Pence is pretty pissed off at Trump, so it's probably worth reporting that he's still too big of a pussy to make himself President over the whole thing.It’s not a scoop because even if Pence really was on board with invoking the 25th he’d say the same thing.
Mr. Kellyanne Conway says 67 Senators are on board so far. This could happen if the turtle will let it.
Mr. Kellyanne Conway says 67 Senators are on board so far. This could happen if the turtle will let it.
Narrator: "He won't"
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1347542947580010498Assuming I’m inferring correctly from that tweet, what a juicy scenario.
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1347542947580010498Crosspost to truth and reconciliation thread
Also I’ve decided impeachment is definitely worthwhile, even if only to have the articles passed and the prospect of a quick removal vote hanging over Trump’s head the final weeks.
Yeah, it would be nice to have an actual record of which Senators will officially recognize that Trump is a deranged lunatic that tried to overthrow a fair election by sending a mob of incels to storm the Capitol.
Wonder if Republicans in Congress now see an incentive to bar Trump from future office (obvi some individuals will) aside from you know doing the right thing for the country.
Wonder if Republicans in Congress now see an incentive to bar Trump from future office (obvi some individuals will) aside from you know doing the right thing for the country.
I keep seeing this but I haven't seen anything indicating that this is an actual thing that's possible.
Why wait?
I mean, getting trump away from any sort of power or even limelight is objectively positive for the country. But, as a solely Dem strategy play, they probably want him running roughshod over the GOP more rather than less over the next 4 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, that was the sowing stageI mean, getting trump away from any sort of power or even limelight is objectively positive for the country. But, as a solely Dem strategy play, they probably want him running roughshod over the GOP more rather than less over the next 4 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
well this was kind of the thought process a bunch of dems had when he was running way back in 2015.
The funniest narrative of all are those who continue on with the Coup talk.
It’s unnerving to see such a lack of intellect.
The funniest narrative of all are those who continue on with the Coup talk.
It’s unnerving to see such a lack of intellect.
Question for you Dax as you are closer to these people than I.
What do you think those who breached the US capitol with zip ties on them trying to find Pelosi/Schumer were? The maced lady literally said "This was a revolution"
TIA for your non-response
Yeah it wasn't really a big deal until social media ProgLibs made it such a big deal. Good point.
If true, that is horrifying that Dax’s information bubble does not include an event that was breaking news in basically every country in the world.
If true, that is horrifying that Dax’s information bubble did not include an event that was breaking news in basically every country in the world.
If true, that is horrifying that Dax’s information bubble did not include an event that was breaking news in basically every country in the world.
It would be, but he's lying again. He does this "never even heard about it" routine for anything that makes Trump look bad. He also claimed to have no idea about trump clearing out protesters for the bible photo op.
https://twitter.com/JohnBerman/status/1347523188721393666Great chance for our new crop of KS House Reps to distinguish themselves.
Graham called Trump yesterday and explained that there were enough Republican votes in the Senate to remove Trump from office unless he conceded the election and diffused tensions. “He told Trump that he had to say there would be a ‘peaceful transition.’
Like I don't even know what impeachment would be for if it isn't for this situation.
You can impeach someone who longer holds office?
You can impeach someone who longer holds office?
Yes
If it's not going to happen before the 20th, might as well wait for more damning evidence. I'm pretty confident there will be some. Maybe a lot.
https://twitter.com/AlexThomp/status/1348290044474359813
I would be in favor of impeaching all the living presidents and then executing them on the mall.You can impeach someone who longer holds office?
Yes
Lets do Don and Hilary at the same time
Even Jimmy Carter?I would be in favor of impeaching all the living presidents and then executing them on the mall.You can impeach someone who longer holds office?
Yes
Lets do Don and Hilary at the same time
he has made clear in private discussions that he believes now is the moment to move on from the weakened lame duck, whom he blames for causing Republicans to lose the Senate.
ThankfullyIt's sad that is news. Isn't this how they should all vote for everything?
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1349012715734499337
IMO they should vote based on the pressure of their constituents but that's a bit of an oversimplification.ThankfullyIt's sad that is news. Isn't this how they should all vote for everything?
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1349012715734499337
In my fan fiction, people would vote based on the representative’s conscience and then the representative would apply it to everything.
10 Republicans voted to impeach.
Wonder how many didn't vote yes because they truly fear for their own and family's lives.
Were their any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?
If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.
Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation. Certainly death threats.
Were their any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?
If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.
Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation. Certainly death threats.
lol so dumb
No way they get even close to the amount of votes needed in the Senate.
Were there any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?
If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.
Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation. Certainly death threats.
Were there any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?
If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.
Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation. Certainly death threats.
Nothing is confirmed. So anyone saying it’s made up doesn’t have the first rough ridin' clue if it is or not.
LOLYou can ignore posts with TapaTalk?
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210113/9f44f411f7a9f29e7dc9a003d1170e56.jpg)
It applies in TapaTalk too if you do thisLOLYou can ignore posts with TapaTalk?
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210113/9f44f411f7a9f29e7dc9a003d1170e56.jpg)
The unflushable Big Turd expanded the posts and read them.
Little dude does have mental issues and is extremely unstable.
Were their any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?
If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.
Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation. Certainly death threats.
lol so dumb
What I described is just BAU for ProgFascistNeoCon nation, apparently you haven't been paying close attention to your orders or the news.
SMDH
Were their any Dems who didn't vote to impeach?
If so, I can only imagine the onslaught of outrage they're going to face from ProgFascistNeoCon Nation.
Probably be deplatformed across the entire spectrum of politics, sustenance, livelihood and financial/monetary participation. Certainly death threats.
lol so dumb
What I described is just BAU for ProgFascistNeoCon nation, apparently you haven't been paying close attention to your orders or the news.
SMDH
You're right, I'm sure Dems are concerned about death threats from their base as opposed to your "trespassers" that were roaming the halls with nooses and restraints asking where the Democratic leadership was. Makes a whole lot of rough ridin' sense.
Also lol at you pretending to be concerned about them receiving what you classified as "mean phone calls" when MAGAs were threatening Michigan state government.
Not scared of people overrunning the Capitol but scared of lists. Got it.
https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1349514160749633536?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://twitter.com/mtgreenee/status/1349514160749633536?s=21
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, we aren’t ever going to be one happy family, are we?
I agree with Mitch here tbh.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Southern District of New York should be able to hang enough felonies on him to prohibit future office considerations.Apparently being a felon does not exclude you from public office.
He'll be dead before he leaves prison.Southern District of New York should be able to hang enough felonies on him to prohibit future office considerations.Apparently being a felon does not exclude you from public office.
As time goes by, his brains are going to continue to get mushier and he's going to continue to sound crazier. I'm honestly kinda curious to see that.
As time goes by, his brains are going to continue to get mushier and he's going to continue to sound crazier. I'm honestly kinda curious to see that.
https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1352359178355011586
Less embarrassing though because she’s not from Ks.https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1352359178355011586
it's like if kobach had gotten through. unbelievable.
Sad commentary on the state of our democracy that someone this uncoupled from reality could make it to Congress.Less embarrassing though because she’s not from Ks.https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1352359178355011586
it's like if kobach had gotten through. unbelievable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Crazy ass people make it to the house all the time. It's more concerning when senators do.True.
Does she represent a district that would be considered crazy?
Does she represent a district that would be considered crazy?
Her district borders Alabama so....
Well he did basically rape our democracy for the last four years so I think it fits.
I’m all for accountability, but this impeachment trial to nowhere while the Biden agenda stalls out before it even gets started is peak Democrats.
Does she represent a district that would be considered crazy?
Her district borders Alabama so....
I think they should drag it out for a couple years like the Benghazi investigation. And when pubs scream about the length, scream at them for being traitors.I agree, committee investigations that allow people to grandstand on their own time won’t really accomplish much either but that’s fine. They absolutely should table the impeachment, pass the stimulus, and get their committee chairs seated. Right now McConnell is trying to hold them hostage by playing hardball on the rules but he knows that manchin won’t go along with him for too long so it is just a short term play to delay Biden’s agenda and see if the Dems eff it up and start working the “problem solvers caucus” to stall
I think they should drag it out for a couple years like the Benghazi investigation. And when pubs scream about the length, scream at them for being traitors.I agree, committee investigations that allow people to grandstand on their own time won’t really accomplish much either but that’s fine. They absolutely should table the impeachment, pass the stimulus, and get their committee chairs seated. Right now McConnell is trying to hold them hostage by playing hardball on the rules but he knows that manchin won’t go along with him for too long so it is just a short term play to delay Biden’s agenda and see if the Dems eff it up and start working the “problem solvers caucus” to stall
momentum for stimulus. So far so good for Mitch.
I can kind of appreciate Mitch's stance/play on rules. Like why not ask the majority to put themselves in a negotiationing position with less power and leverage straight up before you have to negotiate/message for 2 years? It even falls within a priority of giving them less time to govern as a majority.
The Florida bar told Lin wood he needs a psych eval :frown:
The Florida bar told Lin wood he needs a psych eval :frown:
The Georgia Bar’s proceedings are the latest consequence Wood has faced for his post-election actions. The attorney has been removed from a separate case in Delaware where he represented former Trump advisor Carter Page over his “toxic” post-election litigation. Nicholas Sandmann, an 18-year-old from Covington Catholic High School who gained attention for his viral standoff with a Native American elder, also fired Wood as his attorney on Tuesday. MSNBC host Joy Reid has asked a New York federal court to remove Wood from a defamation case against her, and Mercer Law School is facing pressure to remove Wood’s name from a courtroom at the school. Dominion Voting Systems, which has already filed two $1.3 billion lawsuits against attorneys Powell and Rudy Giuliani, has suggested it may pursue litigation against Wood for spreading baseless election fraud claims involving the company’s voting machines, though nothing has yet been filed.
Somewhere in the equation is McConnell and a bunch of non-MAGA senators who actually don't want to see a shitshow from Trump's side.
No chance he will now. That was a stupid move if they wanted him to testify.
No chance he will now. That was a stupid move if they wanted him to testify.
Does he still have executive privilege or could be arrested for contempt of Congress if he doesn't testify?
From what I can tell from texags, the democrats have really stepped in it now. Trump is going to 4d chess this and expose all the election fraud from the stand.
If they could still drag him in though there is no way he’d take counsel’s advice to shut up.No chance he will now. That was a stupid move if they wanted him to testify.
Does he still have executive privilege or could be arrested for contempt of Congress if he doesn't testify?
Certainly still has his 5th amend rights.
https://twitter.com/wthrockmorton/status/1359231836266856451?s=20
https://twitter.com/jonstewart/status/1359241142131437570?s=20Les Miles-esqe. He starts off explaining to the Senate what the 1st Amendment is and "trading liberty for security."
I didn’t realize they were actually doing this. Is anyone there listening to the talkers and taking it all in and then weighing all that to decide if trump should be convicted, or is this a thing where everyone gets a turn to make their speech for their audience of voters and then everyone votes in whatever way will be best for their own electability?
I didn’t realize they were actually doing this. Is anyone there listening to the talkers and taking it all in and then weighing all that to decide if trump should be convicted, or is this a thing where everyone gets a turn to make their speech for their audience of voters and then everyone votes in whatever way will be best for their own electability?
Every single juror has already made up their mind
67 senators to vote yes seems like a breeze.Not sure if you are being sarcastic. Siobahn Hughes says not a chance:
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?
I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.
Hey hey, only we can tell our people to get in their faces!! (ProgFascist Nation)
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?
I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?
I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.
How about tazing your own unit until you are dead in a pool of pee? Does that sound fun?
How many resident ProgFascists would storm the capitol building if Joey Biden told us to?
I have mountains of pto banked but it doesn't really appeal to me personally.
How about tazing your own unit until you are dead in a pool of pee? Does that sound fun?
That does not sound like fun to me but different strokes ya'know?
Perhaps some of the dozens of lawyers on here can weigh in on this question, but is it bad when a room full of people openly laughs at you? TIA.Not if you're a cat.
Perhaps some of the dozens of lawyers on here can weigh in on this question, but is it bad when a room full of people openly laughs at you? TIA.Not if you're a cat.
Perhaps some of the dozens of lawyers on here can weigh in on this question, but is it bad when a room full of people openly laughs at you? TIA.Not if you're a cat.
Mr. Pickles, Esq. can be very persuasive.
But to answer the questions yes, team Drumpf was handing out free lols. Literally free because he will never pay them
RIP those 7 pubs
RIP those 7 pubs
I think they all voted with political expediency.
Look at the balls on Murkowski
Look at the balls on Murkowski
She got primaried as a pub incumbent, ran in the general election anyway as an independent, and won. (Something like that.) So, she does whatever the eff she wants.
Cross post to conservative self owns:lmao
https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1360710601497063424?s=20
Say what you want but no president in history has ever been acquitted of incredibly heinous impeachable offenses twice. Most innocent president ever?Everybody knows that his innocence is the strongest innocence. Just huge.
This had to have been the best outcome for the democrats, right? Make the republicans publicly vote against America and also keep Trump around to raise money for them...