Author Topic: Impeachment Inquiry thread  (Read 109158 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1350 on: February 06, 2020, 10:01:44 AM »
Dax is so broken he doesn’t understand how two people can have agreeing viewpoints if they’re from different parties.

catastrophe is so obtuse that he actually believes that Mitt Romney voted because of his ideals.


Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15225
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1351 on: February 06, 2020, 10:01:57 AM »
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1352 on: February 06, 2020, 10:05:17 AM »
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.




Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64050
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1353 on: February 06, 2020, 10:58:38 AM »
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him  :lol:

Link? 

I'll help you out LibDork.9, I made fun of Doug Jones because that period was another high point in LibDork Nation identity politics and Doug Jones was and is a rich white Mountain Brook living lawyer with a large gun collection.     

LibDork.9, always 4 laps down.

So is doug jones a homegrown racist or a transplant racist?

The darling of the DNC and Hollywood.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9561
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1354 on: February 06, 2020, 11:32:42 AM »
I have a feeling this noon press conference is going to be batshit.

Lots of adlibbing

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1355 on: February 06, 2020, 12:25:27 PM »
I was wondering what any of this had to do with impeachment. Now I get it. It's payback time for dax and his fellow Trumpers.

https://twitter.com/jdawsey1/status/1225484708705898496

2008 or 2012?

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6067
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1356 on: February 06, 2020, 12:26:37 PM »
obvs talking about 2008

finishing third to Huckabee is a rough riding embarassment

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3442
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1357 on: February 06, 2020, 12:35:03 PM »
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1358 on: February 06, 2020, 01:34:34 PM »
Lol, just remembering when dax spent an entire special election shitting all over doug jones and calling him an out of touch Hollywood liberal. No one believes you will (or did) vote for him  :lol:

Link? 

I'll help you out LibDork.9, I made fun of Doug Jones because that period was another high point in LibDork Nation identity politics and Doug Jones was and is a rich white Mountain Brook living lawyer with a large gun collection.     

LibDork.9, always 4 laps down.

So is doug jones a homegrown racist or a transplant racist?

The darling of the DNC and Hollywood.

I know you’re not smart, but crap tons of money was flowing in from Hollywood to his campaign.   So discussing reality isn’t shitting on anybody or anything.   

C for effort, solid F for execution. 

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6067
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1359 on: February 06, 2020, 01:44:26 PM »
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.

good luck with that...

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15225
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1360 on: February 06, 2020, 02:10:46 PM »
I’m pretty sure Dax thinks Mitt is just jealous of Kellyanne’s success.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1361 on: February 06, 2020, 02:29:00 PM »
Utah has been unusually tepid on Trump considering how GOP the state typically is.  I'd imagine Romney feels like he can more safely survive the vote than other GOP senators.

A quick google just now indicates Utah is coming around on Trump recently so we'll have to see if it hurts him.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64050
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1362 on: February 06, 2020, 02:36:21 PM »
Romney doesn't run again until 2024 and is a god in Utah, he'll be just fine electorally. Sounds like his niece is no longer allowed to speak to him though.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1363 on: February 06, 2020, 02:39:21 PM »
Plus Mitt will be 76 years old in 2024 and senators serve 6 year terms. Running for president seems more likely.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21466
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1364 on: February 06, 2020, 02:44:38 PM »
Plus Mitt will be 76 years old in 2024 and senators serve 6 year terms. Running for president seems more likely.

Mitt Romney is an ageless wonder and will probably live past 100, barring an accidental death situation. He looks exactly the same as he did 20 years ago. Mormons and clean livin' and whatnot.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15225
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1365 on: February 06, 2020, 02:51:27 PM »
I like Mitt. I thought he was the wrong candidate to run against Obama in 2008, though.

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3442
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1366 on: February 06, 2020, 03:15:17 PM »
I like Mitt. I thought he was the wrong candidate to run against Obama in 2008, though.
  :D

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1367 on: February 06, 2020, 10:03:41 PM »
Mitt really doesn’t need the job. I think it’s pretty obvious he voted to convict because he cared about being on the right side of history.

Okay . . .  :lol:

Well one of the right sides of history that a long time Romneiac (and former CIA Agent . . . the Mormons and the CIA, a match made in Morman heaven) sits on the board of directors of Burisma . . . a very corrupt Ukranian energy company.

What’s the implication here? He cast a completely futile vote to convict as part of a cover up?

Oh cat . . . don't be a simpleton.
Just answer the question. You've dodged it twice.

You're a rolling ball of rage  :curse:

Yeah, I think Mitt his former campaign guy (ex-CIA), Biden, Kerry were up to no good in the Ukraine with Burisma and funding from either the U.S. or the IMF, if not both.   


Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3442
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1368 on: February 07, 2020, 02:11:16 AM »
Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6067
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1369 on: February 07, 2020, 07:27:54 AM »
Dax I feel it would be appropriate for you to use the term cabal more frequently.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1370 on: February 07, 2020, 07:41:07 AM »
 :love:

one is an act of a war mongering junta of which the Democratic party turned out 63 million strong and tried to keep them in the White House and this time around another member of the cabal is the democratic front runner.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64050
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1371 on: February 07, 2020, 07:47:20 AM »
Also use coffers more
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1372 on: February 07, 2020, 08:03:22 AM »
Lol, you think. That still doesn't explain why he would cast a futile vote but hey, at least you tried to answer the question.

You’ve done zero research and only know what LibDerp Leadership tells you to think.




Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1373 on: February 07, 2020, 08:11:48 AM »
I completely agree on "cabal" and "coffers." What I'd like to see from dax is less Alex Jones and more Steve Bannon.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Impeachment Inquiry thread
« Reply #1374 on: February 07, 2020, 08:49:28 AM »
I completely agree on "cabal" and "coffers." What I'd like to see from dax is less Alex Jones and more Steve Bannon.

The resident expert on Alex Jones is LibDork.9


But this is like rapid fire tap outs.