Author Topic: The Trump Presidency (Read 1048750 times)

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #11300 on:** October 29, 2019, 04:43:36 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on October 29, 2019, 04:40:54 PM

Dax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?

No, if Biden/Obama wasn't a quid pro quo than neither was this.

catastrophe · « **Reply #11301 on:** October 29, 2019, 04:44:36 PM »

But what if Biden/Obama was?

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #11302 on:** October 29, 2019, 04:51:15 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on October 29, 2019, 04:44:36 PM

But what if Biden/Obama was?

There are multiple Ukrainian parties who claim that a usual suspect Dem list of names were up to lots of no good in the Ukraine. But that's just a pissing match of arguing which Ukrainians are less corrupt.

Remember, the Ukranian leadership at the time of the election was helping Hillaries campaign. But that's been rendered meaningless by an onslaught of LibDerp explaining.

Next time you're at Taco Bell, try the Chalupa.

catastrophe · « **Reply #11303 on:** October 29, 2019, 04:54:50 PM »

Ok so now I’m wondering what do you think quid pro quo means?

steve dave · « **Reply #11304 on:** October 29, 2019, 05:01:11 PM »

Hey guys, did I miss anything today?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #11305 on:** October 29, 2019, 05:09:06 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on October 29, 2019, 04:54:50 PM

Ok so now I’m wondering what do you think quid pro quo means?

Oh I do.

In one case we have a discernible quid pro quo, in the other, that's not so certain.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #11306 on:** October 29, 2019, 05:15:13 PM »

Quote from: memphis on October 29, 2019, 04:59:14 PM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2019, 04:43:36 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 29, 2019, 04:40:54 PM
Dax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?

No, if Biden/Obama wasn't a quid pro quo than neither was this.

I mean the Biden one obviously was a quid pro quo for the removal of Shokin....it's just you apparently know the truth as to what Biden wanted and apparently the below article and ones like it are propaganda to stop djt from draining the swamp.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/03/what-really-happened-when-biden-forced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/

The flip side of that USA Today story is literally like the exact opposite. On one hand we have people who constantly talk about how corrupt the Ukraine is and on the other will believe anything that certain people in the Ukraine say as long as it fits the pre-approved narrative.

catastrophe · « **Reply #11307 on:** October 29, 2019, 05:17:29 PM »

I guess we won’t know until we weed through all these fraudulent, compromised, biased, and unreliable witnesses all saying the same thing and find someone to corroborate President Trump’s version of the story.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #11308 on:** October 29, 2019, 05:39:57 PM »

Quote from: memphis on October 29, 2019, 05:34:54 PM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2019, 05:15:13 PM
Quote from: memphis on October 29, 2019, 04:59:14 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on October 29, 2019, 04:43:36 PM
Quote from: catastrophe on October 29, 2019, 04:40:54 PM
Dax, do you think there was a quid pro quo?

No, if Biden/Obama wasn't a quid pro quo than neither was this.

I mean the Biden one obviously was a quid pro quo for the removal of Shokin....it's just you apparently know the truth as to what Biden wanted and apparently the below article and ones like it are propaganda to stop djt from draining the swamp.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/03/what-really-happened-when-biden-forced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/

The flip side of that USA Today story is literally like the exact opposite. On one hand we have people who constantly talk about how corrupt the Ukraine is and on the other will believe anything that certain people in the Ukraine say as long as it fits the pre-approved narrative.

So it would then be silly to ask the Ukraine to investigate Biden because facts are not able to be produced? What if like the thing of value was a public announcement that could be used as propaganda against Biden?