The Trump Presidency

[bucket]

 

[sonofdaxjones]

Did the DOJ fully disclose the source of the evidence and who presented the evidence?

Dax, why would the DOJ do that considering the person in charge of the House Intelligence Committee is in cahoots with the President? It's an active investigation.

Was the evidence political opposition research?

Main source? No. Supporting evidence? Sure.

What was the main source?  Who presented the evidence to the court?

George Papadopoulos. Australia. Not to the court, but to US intelligence.

Who represented the DOJ in front of the court? Who presented the evidence?  Did the tell the court that “supporting” (which is bullshit, it was the main evidence) was paid for by the DNC, was sourced through foreign entities who used Russian sources?

[sonofdaxjones]

Clapper to Trapper.  Thoughts on Clapper talking his way out of his latest lie, Bucket?

[bucket]

Did the DOJ fully disclose the source of the evidence and who presented the evidence?

Dax, why would the DOJ do that considering the person in charge of the House Intelligence Committee is in cahoots with the President? It's an active investigation.

Was the evidence political opposition research?

Main source? No. Supporting evidence? Sure.

What was the main source?  Who presented the evidence to the court?

George Papadopoulos. Australia. Not to the court, but to US intelligence.

Who represented the DOJ in front of the court? Who presented the evidence?  Did the tell the court that “supporting” (which is bullshit, it was the main evidence) was paid for by the DNC, was sourced through foreign entities who used Russian sources?

I don't know what you mean by who represented the DOJ in front of the court. The FISA court? Who presented the evidence? The evidence to the FISA court?

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Congressman who say the fisa warrants were improper = cahoots

FISA judges, administrative staff and james rough ridin' comey = bipartisan agreement

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Bucket is a bbs'ing clown show. It's like watching maddow malfunction

[sonofdaxjones]

Did the DOJ fully disclose the source of the evidence and who presented the evidence?

Dax, why would the DOJ do that considering the person in charge of the House Intelligence Committee is in cahoots with the President? It's an active investigation.

Was the evidence political opposition research?

Main source? No. Supporting evidence? Sure.

What was the main source?  Who presented the evidence to the court?

George Papadopoulos. Australia. Not to the court, but to US intelligence.

Who represented the DOJ in front of the court? Who presented the evidence?  Did the tell the court that “supporting” (which is bullshit, it was the main evidence) was paid for by the DNC, was sourced through foreign entities who used Russian sources?

I don't know what you mean by who represented the DOJ in front of the court. The FISA court? Who presented the evidence? The evidence to the FISA court?

Yes

[sonofdaxjones]

Again, was Trump President when the warrant(s) were obtained?

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Of course not.

[bucket]

Congressman who say the fisa warrants were improper = cahoots

FISA judges, administrative staff and james rough ridin' comey = bipartisan agreement

The guy who is in charge of the investigation is meeting with the guy who is being investigated with intelligence reports on the guy being investigated. Ala, Obama wiretapped me! Nothing to see here folks.

[bucket]

Did the DOJ fully disclose the source of the evidence and who presented the evidence?

Dax, why would the DOJ do that considering the person in charge of the House Intelligence Committee is in cahoots with the President? It's an active investigation.

Was the evidence political opposition research?

Main source? No. Supporting evidence? Sure.

What was the main source?  Who presented the evidence to the court?

George Papadopoulos. Australia. Not to the court, but to US intelligence.

Who represented the DOJ in front of the court? Who presented the evidence?  Did the tell the court that “supporting” (which is bullshit, it was the main evidence) was paid for by the DNC, was sourced through foreign entities who used Russian sources?

I don't know what you mean by who represented the DOJ in front of the court. The FISA court? Who presented the evidence? The evidence to the FISA court?

Yes

Does anyone know who represents the DOJ in front of the FISA court? FFS, Dax.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

And finally, deflection

[bucket]

And finally, deflection

You have to elaborate. You're not getting off the hook that easy.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

LOL, do you even realize you're arguing it's okay for federal law enforcement to spy on US citizens on the basis of known a fictional report??

Nevermind the obvious political motivations and the unmasking campaign.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

So rough ridin' dense.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I'm so rough ridin' bored with useful idiots like bucket.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

These secret court wherr anonymous people obtain open ended search warrants to spy on anyone for virtually any reason is great!!! Did I mention I'm a "bleeding heart" liberal who treasures civil liberties above all else.

Facepalm City, USA

[bucket]

LOL, do you even realize you're arguing it's okay for federal law enforcement to spy on US citizens on the basis of known a fictional report??

Nevermind the obvious political motivations and the unmasking campaign.

I wonder how they got foreign wire taps? Hmm... Well Trump's campaign manager also happens to be a Russian puppet. Weird coincidence. Oh man, did Americans get tangled up in that. I wonder how that happened?

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Completely incoherent.

[bucket]

Completely incoherent.

That stings coming from FSD whose strongest take away is "tard."

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

NYT, just a right-winged parnoid DEEP STATE conspiracy theory tabloid

One way to referee competing claims about how the FBI got a warrant under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act would be to release the agency’s application. Such a disclosure would be unprecedented, but the New York Times is asking the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to make it, anyway.

“This motion that we filed on Monday, we think, is the first time anybody’s ever asked the court to actually unseal a specific warrant application,” said David Schulz, co-director of the Media Freedom & Information Access Clinic at Yale Law School and one of the attorneys representing the Times. “Those are typically very, very closely kept secrets because the government obviously doesn’t want people to know who they’re after.”

Quote from WaPo, ftr

[sonofdaxjones]

They won’t say who presented the politically driven evidence to the court because they know it’s going to look awful, Bucket.

It’s cute that you actually believe that this is all on the up and up. 

Typically when you’re covertly surveilling someone at some point you’re gonna either have them dead to rights or you ultimately obtain nothing at all.  We’re two years into this and still nothing meeting the mandate of the original investigation that being COLUSION with a foreign entity to influence the outcome of a US election.

If meeting with foreign entities and doing business with foreign entities is grounds for this kind of an investigation, then we should have had a second special counsel investigating a laundry list of Democrats 18 months ago including the entirety of the Clinton campaign.

[bucket]

They won’t say who presented the politically driven evidence to the court because they know it’s going to look awful, Bucket.

Australia for beginners.

It’s cute that you actually believe that this is all on the up and up. 

Typically when you’re covertly surveilling someone at some point you’re gonna either have them dead to rights or you ultimately obtain nothing at all.  We’re two years into this and still nothing meeting the mandate of the original investigation that being COLUSION with a foreign entity to influence the outcome of a US election. 

Cohen is pleading the fifth, five other people have already been indicted, Don Jr met with Russians for help in the campaign and never alerted the FBI, etc.

Bill got a blowjob though

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Bucket legit thinks Carter Page is a Russisn spy

[bucket]

Bucket legit thinks Carter Page is a Russisn spy

No reason to think otherwise