0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2013, 11:47:53 AMI understand why it's a non starter, but I really kind of wish it wasn't. Just a lot of space over there to build a full service football complex.Meh, I don't see the need. There is ~ 140,000 sf between BSFS and Kimball and the E & W parking lots. This would be plenty large enough for Vanier2.0 + connected indoor facility. Displaced Vanier parking simply goes into E or W parking lot. If we deemed it necessay to also connect the outdoor fields to BSFS, simple switcharoo between the fields and 1/3 of either the E or W parking lot.
I understand why it's a non starter, but I really kind of wish it wasn't. Just a lot of space over there to build a full service football complex.
This is a stupid question and probably deserves a hit on the head for asking it, but what would be the financial impact if we were to just take half of the west side parking lot and turn it into the facility/practice fields? How much impact are we talking? Is that even doable?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
Quote from: sunny_cat on November 20, 2013, 11:05:43 AMQuote from: Belvis Noland on November 20, 2013, 10:58:16 AMAthletics isn't developing anything north of Kimball. So, moot point here, fellas. What does this mean then?Quote from: Headinjun on November 19, 2013, 09:23:59 PMWord on the street is that weights, offices, team complex etc, is going across the street and current endzone area will be suites, and video boards. Source is A -. Company prez is BFF with a top 15 donor. He sits with this donor in his box pretty much every game. Headinjun's guy is full of crap. Any ITK person I've talked to says North of Kimball is a non-starter for the reasons listed above.
Quote from: Belvis Noland on November 20, 2013, 10:58:16 AMAthletics isn't developing anything north of Kimball. So, moot point here, fellas. What does this mean then?Quote from: Headinjun on November 19, 2013, 09:23:59 PMWord on the street is that weights, offices, team complex etc, is going across the street and current endzone area will be suites, and video boards. Source is A -. Company prez is BFF with a top 15 donor. He sits with this donor in his box pretty much every game.
Athletics isn't developing anything north of Kimball. So, moot point here, fellas.
Word on the street is that weights, offices, team complex etc, is going across the street and current endzone area will be suites, and video boards. Source is A -. Company prez is BFF with a top 15 donor. He sits with this donor in his box pretty much every game.
Quote from: Belvis Noland on November 20, 2013, 01:10:04 PMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2013, 11:47:53 AMI understand why it's a non starter, but I really kind of wish it wasn't. Just a lot of space over there to build a full service football complex.Meh, I don't see the need. There is ~ 140,000 sf between BSFS and Kimball and the E & W parking lots. This would be plenty large enough for Vanier2.0 + connected indoor facility. Displaced Vanier parking simply goes into E or W parking lot. If we deemed it necessay to also connect the outdoor fields to BSFS, simple switcharoo between the fields and 1/3 of either the E or W parking lot. I know bro, but the concept means the LHC Bill Snyder "I can't be bothered" factor is less in play, and then opens up NEZ for seating/elite gameday recruiting center.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2013, 11:47:53 AMI understand why it's a non starter, but I really kind of wish it wasn't. Just a lot of space over there to build a full service football complex.It solves a lot of problems and makes a lot of sense.You see this gigantic field across the street from the football stadium and complex and think, "Hey, why can't we build something nice over there?"Then you find out some seed nerds are using it and they won't let it go because they want to do more seed things.This is a stupid question and probably deserves a hit on the head for asking it, but what would be the financial impact if we were to just take half of the west side parking lot and turn it into the facility/practice fields? How much impact are we talking? Is that even doable?
Quote from: Emo EMAW on November 20, 2013, 10:46:18 AMQuote from: MadCat on November 20, 2013, 10:45:29 AMQuote from: KITNfury on November 20, 2013, 10:43:43 AMI just would prefer they move the animals that poop further away from stadium.The TCU game was fairly smelly.When that happens I just breathe in deep and say "love the smell of money." Agrotuck
Quote from: MadCat on November 20, 2013, 10:45:29 AMQuote from: KITNfury on November 20, 2013, 10:43:43 AMI just would prefer they move the animals that poop further away from stadium.The TCU game was fairly smelly.When that happens I just breathe in deep and say "love the smell of money."
Quote from: KITNfury on November 20, 2013, 10:43:43 AMI just would prefer they move the animals that poop further away from stadium.The TCU game was fairly smelly.
I just would prefer they move the animals that poop further away from stadium.
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!
There would be zero financial impact with a practice field/parking lot switcharoo. Keep reserved spots close to stadium. Switch GA parking with practice fields. Cake.
Fact: there is a waiting list for .north end zone tickets! Long list. Would sell any new seats!
Quote from: Belvis Noland on November 20, 2013, 11:19:09 AMps, the "friend is friends with a top [insert number] donor" line is basically a dead giveaway that you're not ITK. I always at what some people consider as being a "top 10" or "top 25" donor.
ps, the "friend is friends with a top [insert number] donor" line is basically a dead giveaway that you're not ITK.
Quote from: TownieCat on November 20, 2013, 11:58:34 AMQuote from: Belvis Noland on November 20, 2013, 11:19:09 AMps, the "friend is friends with a top [insert number] donor" line is basically a dead giveaway that you're not ITK. I always at what some people consider as being a "top 10" or "top 25" donor.Stanion Tool guy. I'm sure you've seen the name plastered over the WSC. It's in the know. Does it come true? Who rough ridin' knows, but it's not impossible. I myself prefer the idea of the complex being next to the OOD and close to the practice fields.
Quote from: Headinjun on November 20, 2013, 09:47:18 PMQuote from: TownieCat on November 20, 2013, 11:58:34 AMQuote from: Belvis Noland on November 20, 2013, 11:19:09 AMps, the "friend is friends with a top [insert number] donor" line is basically a dead giveaway that you're not ITK. I always at what some people consider as being a "top 10" or "top 25" donor.Stanion Tool guy. I'm sure you've seen the name plastered over the WSC. It's in the know. Does it come true? Who rough ridin' knows, but it's not impossible. I myself prefer the idea of the complex being next to the OOD and close to the practice fields.you mean Stanion Electric?
Quote from: SEK_EMAW on November 18, 2013, 10:26:24 AMNot sure if it was 94 or 95 but they would give out PowerBars to the students. Many were turned into projectiles that made it to the Cats bench. The PowerBar give away only lasted a few games IIRC.I was there for that. Those things were terrible.
Not sure if it was 94 or 95 but they would give out PowerBars to the students. Many were turned into projectiles that made it to the Cats bench. The PowerBar give away only lasted a few games IIRC.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on November 18, 2013, 10:40:27 AMQuote from: SEK_EMAW on November 18, 2013, 10:26:24 AMNot sure if it was 94 or 95 but they would give out PowerBars to the students. Many were turned into projectiles that made it to the Cats bench. The PowerBar give away only lasted a few games IIRC.I was there for that. Those things were terrible.Yes, those things were terrible. Rumor has it that the projectile PowerBars that were thrown at the POWL dented some instruments.
Quote from: Belvis Noland on November 20, 2013, 08:01:06 PMThere would be zero financial impact with a practice field/parking lot switcharoo. Keep reserved spots close to stadium. Switch GA parking with practice fields. Cake.
Quote from: rick daris on November 20, 2013, 08:41:56 AMQuote from: Emo EMAW on November 20, 2013, 08:32:24 AMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2013, 07:27:45 AMI am pretty sure that K-State Athletics would have to buy that land from either the Foundation or the university. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkDoesn't the "rules" of the foundation or whatever say that land can't be sold or repurposed? It was donated to be what it is; it shall always be what it is.no i don't think that is true. i mean the foundation was building a new building on the corner of kimball and denison and then the market tanked and the stopped and i heard sold it to something involved with nbaf or something. i can check into this but i'm pretty sure there is no rule. I'm not sure under which circumstances a previous owner could influence the purpose of property sold. I suppose a conservation easement might be possible.
Quote from: Emo EMAW on November 20, 2013, 08:32:24 AMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2013, 07:27:45 AMI am pretty sure that K-State Athletics would have to buy that land from either the Foundation or the university. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkDoesn't the "rules" of the foundation or whatever say that land can't be sold or repurposed? It was donated to be what it is; it shall always be what it is.no i don't think that is true. i mean the foundation was building a new building on the corner of kimball and denison and then the market tanked and the stopped and i heard sold it to something involved with nbaf or something. i can check into this but i'm pretty sure there is no rule.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2013, 07:27:45 AMI am pretty sure that K-State Athletics would have to buy that land from either the Foundation or the university. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkDoesn't the "rules" of the foundation or whatever say that land can't be sold or repurposed? It was donated to be what it is; it shall always be what it is.
I am pretty sure that K-State Athletics would have to buy that land from either the Foundation or the university. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: MadCat on November 20, 2013, 09:57:53 AMQuote from: rick daris on November 20, 2013, 08:41:56 AMQuote from: Emo EMAW on November 20, 2013, 08:32:24 AMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on November 20, 2013, 07:27:45 AMI am pretty sure that K-State Athletics would have to buy that land from either the Foundation or the university. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkDoesn't the "rules" of the foundation or whatever say that land can't be sold or repurposed? It was donated to be what it is; it shall always be what it is.no i don't think that is true. i mean the foundation was building a new building on the corner of kimball and denison and then the market tanked and the stopped and i heard sold it to something involved with nbaf or something. i can check into this but i'm pretty sure there is no rule. I'm not sure under which circumstances a previous owner could influence the purpose of property sold. I suppose a conservation easement might be possible. I heard that whenever land is donated to K-State, either through pure donations or land that is donated to the university in a will, it is just immediately auctioned off. Granted, obviously this changes if it's land that the university actually wants.
I'm on board with whatever thing moves the animal farms as far away as possible. Also, if there are big tall odor repellant trees, we should plant those as well.