goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: steve dave on December 03, 2011, 08:47:27 PM

Title: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 03, 2011, 08:47:27 PM
cotton
 :frown:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 03, 2011, 08:48:50 PM
i still think sugar is possible.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kslim on December 03, 2011, 08:49:02 PM
no. denied, houston losing today opened huge holes. i dont think tcu will jump that much
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 03, 2011, 08:50:48 PM
guys.......
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 03, 2011, 08:51:12 PM
Just waiting for the KITN.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 08:51:47 PM
rough ridin' $!#* ass bitch tits santorum sandusky stoops'ing cockbags
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 08:52:31 PM
This would only make me more upset at Bob "K-State was our Super Bowl" Stoops. Man.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 03, 2011, 08:54:06 PM
heard sugar was more than possible with ksu and osu win and i am sticking to it and nobody is talking me out of it.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2011, 08:54:12 PM
I don't even..
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 08:55:32 PM
I think the Cotton Bowl will take OU. It's either BCS or Alamo for the Cats. :cry:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Panjandrum on December 03, 2011, 08:56:27 PM
heard sugar was more than possible with ksu and osu win and i am sticking to it and nobody is talking me out of it.

But if OSU jumps Bama, Sugar's going to take them.

I mean, we may end up in the Sugar against Bama, but yeesh.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: j-dub on December 03, 2011, 08:56:39 PM
This would only make me more upset at Bob "K-State was our Super Bowl" Stoops. Man.


same.  :curse:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 08:57:36 PM
If TCU gets in over us, I'm gonna be pissed. If Michigan gets in over us, I'm gonna be rough ridin' livid.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 08:57:49 PM
heard sugar was more than possible with ksu and osu win and i am sticking to it and nobody is talking me out of it.

But if OSU jumps Bama, Sugar's going to take them.

I mean, we may end up in the Sugar against Bama, but yeesh.

I hope this happens. I would love to beat Alabama.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 08:58:03 PM
heard sugar was more than possible with ksu and osu win and i am sticking to it and nobody is talking me out of it.

But if OSU jumps Bama, Sugar's going to take them.

I mean, we may end up in the Sugar against Bama, but yeesh.

Again, if OSU goes BCS, Cats go Fiesta.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Fitz Bath on December 03, 2011, 08:58:30 PM
Quote
rough ridin' $!#* ass bitch tits santorum sandusky stoops'ing cockbags

 :lol:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2011, 08:58:52 PM
OSU IS NOT JUMPING BAMA

not a chance in hell
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Kat Kid on December 03, 2011, 08:59:17 PM
heard sugar was more than possible with ksu and osu win and i am sticking to it and nobody is talking me out of it.

But if OSU jumps Bama, Sugar's going to take them.

I mean, we may end up in the Sugar against Bama, but yeesh.

Would not take.  (need a funny kornheiser here)
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 08:59:28 PM
OSU won't jump Alabama.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 03, 2011, 09:00:05 PM
dumbasses, osu is not jumping bama.  jfc.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 03, 2011, 09:00:25 PM
OSU IS NOT JUMPING BAMA

not a chance in hell

yes. as to the OP post, i'm assuming he's mad that we won't be playing in the cotton and won't be big12 champs. i agree.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2011, 09:00:55 PM
You don't lose to iowa state and play for the title.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Trim on December 03, 2011, 09:01:32 PM
Football season ends tonight anyway.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2011, 09:01:42 PM
my source said Kats to the Sugar too rick
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SdK on December 03, 2011, 09:03:18 PM
You don't lose to iowa state and play for the title.


I think we kept ISU around today to make them look better to help OSU's chances of moving up in the polls. OB scheming for OSU or OU win.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Panjandrum on December 03, 2011, 09:03:42 PM
OSU IS NOT JUMPING BAMA

not a chance in hell

yes. as to the OP post, i'm assuming he's mad that we won't be playing in the cotton and won't be big12 champs. i agree.

I am mad that we will not be Big 12 champs, yes.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: swish1 on December 03, 2011, 09:06:07 PM
What happens if Clemson beats VA tech, and osu wins?  Could we move ahead of ou, Houston, and tech into 8th guaranteeing us a bcs bowl?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Trim on December 03, 2011, 09:07:19 PM
OSU IS NOT JUMPING BAMA

not a chance in hell

yes. as to the OP post, i'm assuming he's mad that we won't be playing in the cotton and won't be big12 champs. i agree.

I am mad that we will not be Big 12 champs, yes.

I think we've still got it.  I mean Pickens sets it up so that OSU gets the Cats and Sooners at home this year, even though OU played there last year too?  I think the goEMAW Championship Committee will see though those irregularities.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: doom on December 03, 2011, 09:09:46 PM
What happens if Clemson beats VA tech, and osu wins?  Could we move ahead of ou, Houston, and tech into 8th guaranteeing us a bcs bowl?

We could but we won't.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: catzacker on December 03, 2011, 09:12:23 PM
Dear Brent,  

You are rough ridin' dead to me.

Sincerely,
Catzacker

p.s. you aren't good looking and you smell like a rough ridin' loser.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 03, 2011, 09:15:13 PM
guys.....
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2011, 09:16:01 PM
pm i'll keep a secret
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 03, 2011, 09:17:53 PM
cat was let out of the bag.....

http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/K-State_Bowl_Flap_Causes_Stir_134975653.html
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Panjandrum on December 03, 2011, 09:18:25 PM
guys.....

SD, we need time to grieve.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2011, 09:19:49 PM
Lockout is over, maybe the spurs will be in town :cry:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SdK on December 03, 2011, 09:21:30 PM
cat was let out of the bag.....

http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/K-State_Bowl_Flap_Causes_Stir_134975653.html


Do not want.


If we can't get a CC, I want a BCS game.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 09:22:56 PM
I was pretty sure Cotton would take OU over KSU, but OU has been complete dogshit the past few games. Might be just enough.

As for Sugar, Clemson could still eff things up, but KSU's chances actually look pretty good. Houston is out, and I'm not sure Michigan is going to make the top 14. That means 2 open spots for Boise, TCU, and KSU. VT takes one of those spots if Clemson wins.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 03, 2011, 09:24:00 PM
yeah...but no
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Trim on December 03, 2011, 09:24:10 PM
cat was let out of the bag.....

http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/K-State_Bowl_Flap_Causes_Stir_134975653.html

Jenn Bates was busting her $!#* to cover that story.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: bradleigh on December 03, 2011, 09:24:53 PM
B12 is a 2 bid league. I think the rest is pretty self explanatory.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 03, 2011, 09:25:48 PM
So.......we're cheering for VT, right? 
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Testy Westy on December 03, 2011, 09:27:06 PM
I was pretty sure Cotton would take OU over KSU, but OU has been complete dogshit the past few games. Might be just enough.

As for Sugar, Clemson could still eff things up, but KSU's chances actually look pretty good. Houston is out, and I'm not sure Michigan is going to make the top 14. That means 2 open spots for Boise, TCU, and KSU. VT takes one of those spots if Clemson wins.

I'm not sold on this.  If VT loses they'll probably drop to about 12 or 13....I doubt the ACC can get two teams in.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 09:28:10 PM
No way the ACC gets two teams.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 09:28:34 PM
No way the ACC gets two teams.

yeah, gotta root for the clemson tigerquatz
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: catzacker on December 03, 2011, 09:30:34 PM
So.......we're cheering for VT, right? 

I am cheering for bob and brent to get AIDS and die, but that is just me.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: pike on December 03, 2011, 09:30:50 PM
Go Badgerkhatz too right?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 09:31:11 PM
So this has to be the year the BCS breaks right?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 03, 2011, 09:31:30 PM
So...If these fagatroids from Blacksburg get in after getting trounced by a very very decent-at-best Clemson team I am going to be livid.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 09:32:44 PM
No way the ACC gets two teams.

Well, I'd agree, except why the eff is VT ranked so high to begin with? Makes me think a BCS bowl might take them anyway with two losses. They would still be in the top 14.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 09:33:00 PM
So...If these fagatroids from Blacksburg get in after getting trounced by a very very decent-at-best Clemson team I am going to be livid.

Yes, them and Michigan have no business seeing a BCS bowl
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 09:33:38 PM
:lol:

KSU gonna find a way to get a rule written this year.

THAT's the KITN
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Shacks on December 03, 2011, 09:35:10 PM
The ACC is 2-11 all time in BCS bowls, that dogshit conference does not deserve two BCS bids
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: wetwillie on December 03, 2011, 09:35:48 PM
Cats vs hogs  would have been great.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: pike on December 03, 2011, 09:35:57 PM
:lol:

KSU gonna find a way to get a rule written this year.

THAT's the KITN

Just another rule that will be mentioned on our 30 for 30 in ten years  :excited:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2011, 09:39:23 PM
I am starting to angry about this....
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 09:39:41 PM
:lol:

KSU gonna find a way to get a rule written this year.

THAT's the KITN

OSU is the team that will have the rule written. This team getting left out of the championship game is a rough ridin' joke.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 09:41:26 PM
The joke was OSU losing in Ames, but no title shot for OSU would be close 2nd.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 03, 2011, 09:41:51 PM
:lol:

KSU gonna find a way to get a rule written this year.

THAT's the KITN

OSU is the team that will have the rule written. This team getting left out of the championship game is a rough ridin' joke.

The rule should state that a team can not be held accountable for losing on the day a head coach at their school dies.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 09:42:58 PM
Really, though, I don't care what bowl we go to. We could go to the Pinstripe and I would feel no different. This sucks.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Shacks on December 03, 2011, 09:46:16 PM
The joke was OSU losing in Ames, but no title shot for OSU would be close 2nd.

The joke would be the second Alabama/LSU game.  The first one was absolutely terrible, we don't need another boring field goal fest.  I don't want to listen to every idiot talking head spend the next month blowing the defenses of those teams while ignoring that they have very mediocre offenses.  Western Kentucky and Georgia Southern could score TDs against Alabama and LSU yet they held each other to field goals.  What a joke.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: RAZORBACK REVEREND on December 03, 2011, 09:47:30 PM
Cats vs hogs  would have been great.

If you get the Cotton, your wish will come true!!!

Per Chris Low from ESPN...

Hawgs in the COTTON!!!!

WPS!
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 03, 2011, 09:49:08 PM
we must refuse the invite.  eff this crap bowl and playing this crap arkansas meth redneck stupid eff team. 
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 09:49:47 PM
Clemson rolling VT now...
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 09:50:35 PM
Clemson rolling VT now...

Not surprising. VT sucks ass.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2011, 09:50:40 PM
Cats will move up to #9 won't they?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 09:51:19 PM
Cats will move up to #9 won't they?

this is exactly how things will go. it is exactly how things were always going to go.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: catzacker on December 03, 2011, 09:54:04 PM
Rape victims have put up more of a fight than bob and brent.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 09:56:32 PM
Cats will move up to #9 won't they?

this is exactly how things will go. it is exactly how things were always going to go.

We should jump OU, Houston, and VT... will anyone jump us is the question.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 09:57:35 PM
How high in the Human do the Cats go?  13th?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 10:01:12 PM
Cats will move up to #9 won't they?

this is exactly how things will go. it is exactly how things were always going to go.

We should jump OU, Houston, and VT... will anyone jump us is the question.

I bet Mich St will if they win. Wisconsin I'm not so sure about
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2011, 10:02:05 PM
Cats will move up to #9 won't they?

this is exactly how things will go. it is exactly how things were always going to go.

We should jump OU, Houston, and VT... will anyone jump us is the question.

I bet Mich St will if they win. Wisconsin I'm not so sure about
compus hate msu though.... so hope?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 10:05:14 PM
So, does this mean KSU finishes #8 in the BCS tomorrow? If one of the AQ conferences only gets 1 team in the BCS despite having 2 teams in the top 8, that's a crock of crap.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 10:06:54 PM
So, does this mean KSU finishes #8 in the BCS tomorrow? If one of the AQ conferences only gets 1 team in the BCS despite having 2 teams in the top 8, that's a crock of crap.

if we're #8, we're in to the BCS automatically

Cats will move up to #9 won't they?

this is exactly how things will go. it is exactly how things were always going to go.

We should jump OU, Houston, and VT... will anyone jump us is the question.

I bet Mich St will if they win. Wisconsin I'm not so sure about
compus hate msu though.... so hope?

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 10:10:46 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2Fwhomovedmysugarbowl.gif&hash=2b673b272f498d181a60994acb03b4a6cd727782)
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 10:11:28 PM
So, does this mean KSU finishes #8 in the BCS tomorrow? If one of the AQ conferences only gets 1 team in the BCS despite having 2 teams in the top 8, that's a crock of crap.

if we're #8, we're in to the BCS automatically

Sorry, I'm not seeing this rule. I thought the top-8 rule only applied to Notre Dame.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SdK on December 03, 2011, 10:12:33 PM
Can you imagine OSU beating LSU and KSU beating Bama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Kat Kid on December 03, 2011, 10:19:25 PM
Can you imagine OSU beating LSU and KSU beating Bama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi27.tinypic.com%2F29c1gdw.gif&hash=e88f5008253249fd6b4c1863b287fa47ad5e617f)
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 10:23:08 PM
So, does this mean KSU finishes #8 in the BCS tomorrow? If one of the AQ conferences only gets 1 team in the BCS despite having 2 teams in the top 8, that's a crock of crap.

if we're #8, we're in to the BCS automatically

Sorry, I'm not seeing this rule. I thought the top-8 rule only applied to Notre Dame.

I believe it's the K-State Rule (really)
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SdK on December 03, 2011, 10:23:42 PM
Can you imagine OSU beating LSU and KSU beating Bama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi27.tinypic.com%2F29c1gdw.gif&hash=e88f5008253249fd6b4c1863b287fa47ad5e617f)

That guy is hideous.  :barf:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: pike on December 03, 2011, 10:25:44 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 10:25:51 PM
So, does this mean KSU finishes #8 in the BCS tomorrow? If one of the AQ conferences only gets 1 team in the BCS despite having 2 teams in the top 8, that's a crock of crap.

if we're #8, we're in to the BCS automatically

Sorry, I'm not seeing this rule. I thought the top-8 rule only applied to Notre Dame.

I believe it's the K-State Rule (really)

Top 3, or Top 4 if 3rd is a conference Champ.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 10:26:09 PM
Cats will move up to #9 won't they?

this is exactly how things will go. it is exactly how things were always going to go.

We should jump OU, Houston, and VT... will anyone jump us is the question.

Seeing as how the human voters are already screwing us over about as much as they can (#15 and #16), I just can't see anybody jumping us. The computers love us.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 10:26:33 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 10:26:44 PM
So, does this mean KSU finishes #8 in the BCS tomorrow? If one of the AQ conferences only gets 1 team in the BCS despite having 2 teams in the top 8, that's a crock of crap.

if we're #8, we're in to the BCS automatically

Sorry, I'm not seeing this rule. I thought the top-8 rule only applied to Notre Dame.

I believe it's the K-State Rule (really)

Where is it?

Quote
Automatic qualification

1. The top two teams in the final BCS Standings shall play in the National Championship Game.

2. The champions of the Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, and Southeastern conferences will have automatic berths in one of the participating bowls through the 2013 regular season.

3. The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, or the Western Athletic Conference will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

  A. Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or,
  B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

No more than one such team from Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, and the Western Athletic Conference shall earn an automatic berth in any year. (Note: a second team may be eligible for at-large eligibility as noted below.) If two or more teams from those conferences satisfy the provisions for an automatic berth, then the team with the highest finish in the final BCS Standings will receive the automatic berth, and the remaining team or teams will be considered for at-large selection if it meets the criteria.

4. Notre Dame will have an automatic berth if it is in the top eight of the final BCS Standings.

5. If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 4, and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier, provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.

6. If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 5, and if no team qualifies under paragraph No. 5 and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 4 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At-large eligibility

If there are fewer than 10 automatic qualifiers, then the bowls will select at-large participants to fill the remaining berths. An at-large team is any Football Bowl Subdivision team that is bowl-eligible and meets the following requirements:

  A. Has won at least nine regular-season games, and
  B. Is among the top 14 teams in the final BCS Standings.

No more than two teams from a conference may be selected, regardless of whether they are automatic qualifiers or at-large selections, unless two non-champions from the same conference are ranked No. 1 and No. 2 in the final BCS Standings.

If fewer than 10 teams are eligible for selection, then the Bowls can select as an at-large team any Football Bowl Subdivision team that is bowl-eligible, has won at least nine regular-season games and is among the top 18 teams in the final BCS Standings subject to the two-team limit noted above and also subject to the following: (1) if any conference has two or more teams in the top 14, then two of those teams must be selected and (2) from the teams ranked 15-18, a bowl can select only a team from a conference that has fewer than two teams in the top 14.

If expansion of the pool to 18 teams does not result in 10 teams eligible for selection, then the pool shall be expanded by blocks of 4 teams until 10 eligible teams are available subject to the two-team limit noted above and also subject to the following: (1) if any conference has two or more teams in the top 14, then two of those teams must be selected and (2) from the teams ranked 15 or lower, a bowl can select only a team from a conference that has fewer than two teams in the top 14.

Relative to the two preceding paragraphs, all teams ranked in the top 14, other than those from conferences which have already had two teams selected, must be included in the bowl selections.

Note: in order to participate in a BCS Bowl game, a team (i) must be eligible for post-season play under the rules of the NCAA and, if it not an independent, under the rules of its conference and (ii) must not have imposed sanctions upon itself prohibiting participation in a post-season game for infractions of the rules of the NCAA or the rules of its conference.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 03, 2011, 10:26:58 PM
so, like go down for new years and then stick around for the game? thoughts? i mean new years in new orleans? wow.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 10:27:28 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

They are done, no chance.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 10:28:40 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

Nobody wants Houston now. Boise has a slim chance. TCU might be an AQ if they can crack the top 16.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: MadCat on December 03, 2011, 10:29:37 PM
Can you imagine OSU beating LSU and KSU beating Bama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi27.tinypic.com%2F29c1gdw.gif&hash=e88f5008253249fd6b4c1863b287fa47ad5e617f)

That guy is hideous.  :barf:
that's not as important as what he's doing.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 10:30:15 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

They are done, no chance.

Don't disagree.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 10:30:29 PM
So, does this mean KSU finishes #8 in the BCS tomorrow? If one of the AQ conferences only gets 1 team in the BCS despite having 2 teams in the top 8, that's a crock of crap.

if we're #8, we're in to the BCS automatically

Sorry, I'm not seeing this rule. I thought the top-8 rule only applied to Notre Dame.

I believe it's the K-State Rule (really)

Top 3, or Top 4 if 3rd is a conference Champ.

Yeah. I just looked up the rules and I see nothing about the top 8 unless you are Notre Dame.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Panjandrum on December 03, 2011, 10:30:37 PM
Cats will move up to #9 won't they?

this is exactly how things will go. it is exactly how things were always going to go.

We should jump OU, Houston, and VT... will anyone jump us is the question.

I bet Mich St will if they win. Wisconsin I'm not so sure about

The computers don't like the Big Ten.  They love us.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 03, 2011, 10:31:48 PM
We will move up to #5 in the Computer polls and a minimum of #12 with a potential of #10 in the human polls. This could push us over Oregon or Boise (#9 & #10 in computers), and I don't think Sparty or Wisc will gain enough in the computers to pass us in the BCS. In other words, I think we'll be #8 in the next rankings...

Current Computer Avgs:
1   LSU
2   Alabama
3   Oklahoma State
4   Stanford
5   Oklahoma
6   Arkansas
6   Kansas State

We will pass the following 3 loss teams in the Human Polls:
(Harris/USA Today)
#12/14 Georgia - 3 losses
#10/11 Oklahoma - 3 losses
#13/12 Wisky or #11/9 Sparty - either with 3 losses

Teams we might pass:
#6 Houston - exposed 1 loss posers
#4/3 Va Tech - worst SOS ever, but unlikely we pass


Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 10:32:39 PM
Does it matter if we are #8, though? I could easily see a BCS bowl taking Virginia Tech over us.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 10:33:29 PM
So, does this mean KSU finishes #8 in the BCS tomorrow? If one of the AQ conferences only gets 1 team in the BCS despite having 2 teams in the top 8, that's a crock of crap.

if we're #8, we're in to the BCS automatically

Sorry, I'm not seeing this rule. I thought the top-8 rule only applied to Notre Dame.

I believe it's the K-State Rule (really)

Top 3, or Top 4 if 3rd is a conference Champ.

Yeah. I just looked up the rules and I see nothing about the top 8 unless you are Notre Dame.

Yeah, and I wasn't trying to call you out - these rules are all mumped up. I won't pretend to totally understand them.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kcchiefdav on December 03, 2011, 10:35:18 PM
Does it matter if we are #8, though? I could easily see a BCS bowl taking Virginia Tech over us.

No BCS bowl wants 1 ACC team, I can't imagine 2 bowls want an ACC team.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 10:37:04 PM
VT got beat by 4 touchdowns, they are done for the BCS. The BCS does plenty of stupid things, but not that stupid.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 10:38:20 PM
We will pass the following 3 loss teams in the Human Polls:
(Harris/USA Today)
#12/14 Georgia - 3 losses
#10/11 Oklahoma - 3 losses
#13/12 Wisky or #11/9 Sparty - either with 3 losses

Teams we might pass:
#6 Houston - exposed 1 loss posers
#4/3 Va Tech - worst SOS ever, but unlikely we pass

We will pass both Houston and VT. The Top 8 of the BCS tomorrow will be:
LSU
Alabama
OSU
Stanford
Oregon
Boise State
Arkansas
KSU

I don't see the winner of Wiscy/MSU cracking this top 8 because of their terrible computer rankings.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Kornheiser on December 03, 2011, 10:38:58 PM
heard sugar was more than possible with ksu and osu win and i am sticking to it and nobody is talking me out of it.

But if OSU jumps Bama, Sugar's going to take them.

I mean, we may end up in the Sugar against Bama, but yeesh.

Would not take.  (need a funny kornheiser here)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fy2z9e.jpg&hash=49f486ce79674b34a174deaa2ea1833e86125013)
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: goldenticket on December 03, 2011, 10:39:00 PM
VT got beat by 4 touchdowns, they are done for the BCS. The BCS does plenty of stupid things, but not that stupid.

yeah they said at the end of that game VT is prob going to the chick-fil-a bowl
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 03, 2011, 10:41:52 PM
Does it matter if we are #8, though? I could easily see a BCS bowl taking Virginia Tech over us.

No being #8 doesn't matter.  We'd have to go all the way to 4 to get an autobid (assuming OSU is #3).

At this point things that really matter:

Does Michigan move into the top 14 making them a eligible

Does TCU get to 16 making them an automatic qualifier.  
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 03, 2011, 10:45:17 PM
well i'm somewhat sure that none of that crap matters/mattered and that if ksu cats won and osu won that it's ksu cats to the sugar bowl, but i guess we'll see. far from 100%.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on December 03, 2011, 10:46:50 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: wes mantooth on December 03, 2011, 10:48:27 PM
We will move up to #5 in the Computer polls and a minimum of #12 with a potential of #10 in the human polls. This could push us over Oregon or Boise (#9 & #10 in computers), and I don't think Sparty or Wisc will gain enough in the computers to pass us in the BCS. In other words, I think we'll be #8 in the next rankings...

Current Computer Avgs:
1   LSU
2   Alabama
3   Oklahoma State
4   Stanford
5   Oklahoma
6   Arkansas
6   Kansas State

We will pass the following 3 loss teams in the Human Polls:
(Harris/USA Today)
#12/14 Georgia - 3 losses
#10/11 Oklahoma - 3 losses
#13/12 Wisky or #11/9 Sparty - either with 3 losses

Teams we might pass:
#6 Houston - exposed 1 loss posers
#4/3 Va Tech - worst SOS ever, but unlikely we pass




thanks, theprideofwildcatland
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 10:49:01 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.

Not that it matters because they won't be picked, but all you have to do to be an at-large is be top 14 with 9 wins.  Hence the theoretically possible to be an at-large.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: CHONGS on December 03, 2011, 10:49:29 PM
well i'm somewhat sure that none of that crap matters/mattered and that if ksu cats won and osu won that it's ksu cats to the sugar bowl, but i guess we'll see. far from %100.
I heard the same rd.  I hope we are right.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: pike on December 03, 2011, 10:49:54 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.

But they're not DQ'd are they? This is what I was confused about. Obviously nobody wants a loser smoke and mirrors Conf USA team tho.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 10:50:52 PM
Does it matter if we are #8, though? I could easily see a BCS bowl taking Virginia Tech over us.

No being #8 doesn't matter.  We'd have to go all the way to 4 to get an autobid (assuming OSU is #3).

At this point things that really matter:

Does Michigan move into the top 14 making them a eligible

Does TCU get to 16 making them an automatic qualifier.  

I think TCU only gets to 17 unless Wisconsin loses. It also appears that Baylor, with their ridic computer rankings, will jump Michigan and stop them at 15.

It's looking more and more like K-State is going to the Sugar Bowl, which actually kinda blows for me because Cotton's the only one I can make it to.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 03, 2011, 10:51:08 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.

Should be.  Their best win is home UCLA.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 03, 2011, 10:58:29 PM
Also, MSU's loss will slightly ding Michigan's computer numbers. More significanty, Baylor's thumping today has to get them ahead of Michigan. I don't see how they make the top 14. I also think this guarantees KSU the Sugar Bowl unless TCU somehow got to 16 and the Sugar Bowl wanted both TCU and Boise State.

Sugar Bowl... Trying to get my head around this.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 03, 2011, 10:59:34 PM
Cats vs hogs  would have been great.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 10:59:52 PM
No way the Sugar takes TCU over us. They can't even fill up their tiny stadium, what makes anyone think they'd travel worth a damn?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on December 03, 2011, 11:00:03 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.

Not that it matters because they won't be picked, but all you have to do to be an at-large is be top 14 with 9 wins.  Hence the theoretically possible to be an at-large.

Don't see how.  If TCU has to make #16 to get picked, how can Houston get picked at #14?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:00:59 PM
Who will we play? I'm hoping for Stanford at this point. I would rather have Alabama, but I can't see a scenario where we would play them.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:01:40 PM
No way the Sugar takes TCU over us. They can't even fill up their tiny stadium, what makes anyone think they'd travel worth a damn?

TCU gets an auto-bid if they move into the top 16 because they won their conference and the Big East is so shitty.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 11:02:24 PM
I would rather have Alabama, but I can't see a scenario where we would play them.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-iNBEDqr6H8Y%2FToElaNPJKtI%2FAAAAAAAACOw%2FAIdGaXMG5EA%2Fs640%2Fmichael-scott-no.gif&hash=c528d4ea7490721b7e33e6715f7d8ea95e5e042a)

No way the Sugar takes TCU over us. They can't even fill up their tiny stadium, what makes anyone think they'd travel worth a damn?

TCU gets an auto-bid if they move into the top 16 because they won their conference and the Big East is so shitty.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-iNBEDqr6H8Y%2FToElaNPJKtI%2FAAAAAAAACOw%2FAIdGaXMG5EA%2Fs640%2Fmichael-scott-no.gif&hash=c528d4ea7490721b7e33e6715f7d8ea95e5e042a)
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:05:00 PM
I would rather have Alabama, but I can't see a scenario where we would play them.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-iNBEDqr6H8Y%2FToElaNPJKtI%2FAAAAAAAACOw%2FAIdGaXMG5EA%2Fs640%2Fmichael-scott-no.gif&hash=c528d4ea7490721b7e33e6715f7d8ea95e5e042a)


Alabama would deliver fantastic ratings and they would be completely disheartened if they missed out on the title game. What's not to like? It's not like bowl wins actually matter or anything.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Kat Kid on December 03, 2011, 11:05:06 PM
heard sugar was more than possible with ksu and osu win and i am sticking to it and nobody is talking me out of it.

But if OSU jumps Bama, Sugar's going to take them.

I mean, we may end up in the Sugar against Bama, but yeesh.

Would not take.  (need a funny kornheiser here)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fy2z9e.jpg&hash=49f486ce79674b34a174deaa2ea1833e86125013)

 :lol:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 11:05:27 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.

Not that it matters because they won't be picked, but all you have to do to be an at-large is be top 14 with 9 wins.  Hence the theoretically possible to be an at-large.

Don't see how.  If TCU has to make #16 to get picked, how can Houston get picked at #14?

TCU at 16 would be an autobirth because they're a conference champion ahead of a BCS league champ.  Houston in top 14 could happen(but won't) because all you have to do to be an at large pick is be top 14 and win 9 games, regardless of conference.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 11:07:15 PM
I would rather have Alabama, but I can't see a scenario where we would play them.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-iNBEDqr6H8Y%2FToElaNPJKtI%2FAAAAAAAACOw%2FAIdGaXMG5EA%2Fs640%2Fmichael-scott-no.gif&hash=c528d4ea7490721b7e33e6715f7d8ea95e5e042a)


Alabama would deliver fantastic ratings and they would be completely disheartened if they missed out on the title game. What's not to like? It's not like bowl wins actually matter or anything.

I'd take a Cotton Bowl win over a 49-10 loss to 'Bama any day
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:08:59 PM
I would rather have Alabama, but I can't see a scenario where we would play them.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-iNBEDqr6H8Y%2FToElaNPJKtI%2FAAAAAAAACOw%2FAIdGaXMG5EA%2Fs640%2Fmichael-scott-no.gif&hash=c528d4ea7490721b7e33e6715f7d8ea95e5e042a)


Alabama would deliver fantastic ratings and they would be completely disheartened if they missed out on the title game. What's not to like? It's not like bowl wins actually matter or anything.

I'd take a Cotton Bowl win over a 49-10 loss to 'Bama any day

They play to our strengths. It would be a nice matchup.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 11:09:11 PM
I would rather have Alabama, but I can't see a scenario where we would play them.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-iNBEDqr6H8Y%2FToElaNPJKtI%2FAAAAAAAACOw%2FAIdGaXMG5EA%2Fs640%2Fmichael-scott-no.gif&hash=c528d4ea7490721b7e33e6715f7d8ea95e5e042a)


Alabama would deliver fantastic ratings and they would be completely disheartened if they missed out on the title game. What's not to like? It's not like bowl wins actually matter or anything.

I'd take a Cotton Bowl win over a 49-10 loss to 'Bama any day

Eh, Arkansas is gonna be in Dallas.  I'd rather get blown out in a BCS bowl than get blown out in the Cotton Bowl.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Katpappy on December 03, 2011, 11:11:05 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.

Not that it matters because they won't be picked, but all you have to do to be an at-large is be top 14 with 9 wins.  Hence the theoretically possible to be an at-large.
NO Denied, they must be conference champions to be considered. :nono:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:11:21 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: joda on December 03, 2011, 11:11:46 PM
Know what is ridiculous in this whole thing? That the conference that could be the best in the country probably won't have its 1 loss champ in the BCS championship game and its 2 loss runner-up is about 50/50 to even get into a BCS bowl
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Kat Kid on December 03, 2011, 11:12:03 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:12:15 PM
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.

Not that it matters because they won't be picked, but all you have to do to be an at-large is be top 14 with 9 wins.  Hence the theoretically possible to be an at-large.
NO Denied, they must be conference champions to be considered. :nono:

They have to be conference champions to become an automatic bid. They only have to be in the top 14 to be eligible.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 03, 2011, 11:12:47 PM
Know what is ridiculous in this whole thing? That the conference that could be the best in the country probably won't have its 1 loss champ in the BCS championship game and its 2 loss runner-up is about 50/50 to even get into a BCS bowl

i think cats to sugar is quite a bit higher than 50/50.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:12:55 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: joda on December 03, 2011, 11:14:38 PM
Know what is ridiculous in this whole thing? That the conference that could be the best in the country probably won't have its 1 loss champ in the BCS championship game and its 2 loss runner-up is about 50/50 to even get into a BCS bowl

i think cats to sugar is quite a bit higher than 50/50.

Ok, so better than 50/50, but still, should it really even be a question at this point
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Panjandrum on December 03, 2011, 11:14:46 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 03, 2011, 11:15:43 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

Yes, this.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:15:51 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

We would be the second best team they have played all year.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Shacks on December 03, 2011, 11:16:47 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

Our only hope would be if Alabama showed up flat and uninspired and didn't care about the game because they thought they would play for all the marbles while K-State treats it like the Super Bowl, like what happened to Bama against Utah in 2008
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:17:09 PM
Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: jtksu on December 03, 2011, 11:18:42 PM
Yeah, we wouldn't be able to do crap offensively against Bama but their offense isn't good.  Could see us getting beat like 27-7.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Katpappy on December 03, 2011, 11:19:20 PM
Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.
+1  :ohno:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Cartierfor3 on December 03, 2011, 11:19:30 PM
Quit being scared of teams.  We're awesome.

Teams that scare me:
Oklahoma State, LSU.  We will destroy any other possible foe.  
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Shacks on December 03, 2011, 11:19:35 PM
Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.

He probably would, but the thing about Stanford is their receivers aren't that good.  They are pretty slow, pretty much all possession receivers.  Luck has to throw into tight windows (which he definitely can) but at least there's a chance to deflect the pass or get a pick if he has to throw the ball within inches of Garrett's or Malone's hands.  Stanford's receivers would not be torching 2Y and the rest of the secondary from start to finish like Broyles and his buddies did to us.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:19:44 PM
Yeah, we wouldn't be able to do crap offensively against Bama but their offense isn't good.  Could see us getting beat like 27-7.

They would have to successfully convert two field goals to get to 27.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: bradleigh on December 03, 2011, 11:20:01 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

I had so much fun at that OU game.  And even though I enjoyed myself thoroughly on a day on which we lost,  We still almost won the big 12.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: j-dub on December 03, 2011, 11:20:13 PM
Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.

we would rack up 48 minutes of possession. maybe keep the ripped assholes in the 1.5 range
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 03, 2011, 11:20:22 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

Our only hope would be if Alabama showed up flat and uninspired and didn't care about the game because they thought they would play for all the marbles while K-State treats it like the Super Bowl, like what happened to Bama against Utah in 2008

We won't play Bama. The only way we would play Bama is if they weren't in the NC because OSU replaced them. In that case, we are in the Fiesta Bowl and everyone says Stanford is a lock for the Fiesta Bowl...

Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:21:27 PM
Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.

we would rack up 48 minutes of possession. maybe keep the ripped assholes in the 1.5 range

I think we would win, but the defense would look horrible in the process.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 03, 2011, 11:21:58 PM
Have I mentioned how terrible it is discussing which team would kick our ass the most in a BCS game?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: CatMission on December 03, 2011, 11:22:39 PM
Yeah, we wouldn't be able to do crap offensively against Bama but their offense isn't good.  Could see us getting beat like 27-7.

They would have to successfully convert two field goals to get to 27.
Well played sir.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Cartierfor3 on December 03, 2011, 11:24:18 PM
Have I mentioned how terrible it is discussing which team would kick our ass the most in a BCS game?

i know because it's a waste of time.  we'll win.  we already beat the best quarterback (RGIII) the best coach (Mack) and a bunch of other teams.  maybe you should buy in.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 03, 2011, 11:26:24 PM
Oh man, imagine how great it would be to play TCU in the Sugar Bowl.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 03, 2011, 11:27:26 PM
The Dr. will have to scheme like he has never schemed before. 
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Shacks on December 03, 2011, 11:27:38 PM
Oh man, imagine how great it would be to play TCU in the Sugar Bowl.

I would rather not because TCU will be in the Big 12 starting next season.  I want to see us play a team/conference we rarely face, not a team that we will be playing every year starting in 2012.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SdK on December 03, 2011, 11:28:33 PM
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.  :flush: at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.


THANK YOU!!!!!

The upside is so great. There is no downside.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:29:56 PM
Oh man, imagine how great it would be to play TCU in the Sugar Bowl.

That's the worst case scenario. I want to play somebody who at least deserves to be in the BCS.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 11:30:07 PM
Have I mentioned how terrible it is discussing which team would kick our ass the most in a BCS game?

i know because it's a waste of time.  we'll win.  we already beat the best quarterback (RGIII) the best coach (Mack) and a bunch of other teams.  maybe you should buy in.

We played one really bad half of football all year.

Otherwise top 5 schedule, won 4 road games and only 2 teams we played finished with fewer than 6 wins.

We're pretty good.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kcchiefdav on December 03, 2011, 11:33:44 PM
There's no real shot of OSU jumping to the Championship game, right? So all the Bama talk and Fiesta talk is moot, right?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 03, 2011, 11:34:20 PM
I think it will be KSU vs Michigan in the Sugar.  TCU won't get to 16.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:34:49 PM
There's no real shot of OSU jumping to the Championship game, right? So all the Bama talk and Fiesta talk is moot, right?

If at least 25% of the human voters vote them 2nd and everyone else votes them 3rd, they will get in.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Cartierfor3 on December 03, 2011, 11:35:34 PM
There's no real shot of OSU jumping to the Championship game, right? So all the Bama talk and Fiesta talk is moot, right?

If at least 25% of the human voters vote them 2nd and everyone else votes them 3rd, they will get in.

I'm sure some hick in alabama will vote them 12th or something
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:35:56 PM
I think it will be KSU vs Michigan in the Sugar.  TCU won't get to 16.

I think TCU might have a better shot at 16 than Michigan has at 14. I don't think either school will make it, though.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 03, 2011, 11:40:46 PM
I think it will be KSU vs Michigan in the Sugar.  TCU won't get to 16.

I dunno...

TCU would have to jump Georgia, Houston, OU, and Sparty. Could happen.

UMich needs to jump, Georgia, Houston and/or Oklahoma. Could def. happen.

Houston staying ranked high and Clemson making a huge jump help us. We need Va Tech to FALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 03, 2011, 11:41:44 PM
I don't think TCU has much of a chance.  Clemson has a good shot at jumping them.  Even if they don't both Georgia and Michigan St would have to fall below them.  

I think Michigan moves ahead of at least Georgia.  Then all they need to do is move ahead of Michigan St, or OU.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 03, 2011, 11:43:24 PM
I think it will be KSU vs Michigan in the Sugar.  TCU won't get to 16.

I dunno...

TCU would have to jump Georgia, Houston, OU, and Sparty. Could happen.

UMich needs to jump, Georgia, Houston and/or Oklahoma. Could def. happen.

Houston staying ranked high and Clemson making a huge jump help us. We need Va Tech to FALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

TCU only need to move up two spots not 4.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: KITNfury on December 03, 2011, 11:44:50 PM
I think it will be KSU vs Michigan in the Sugar.  TCU won't get to 16.
I would love this but I would run the risk of eating the poop I talked on them today on their board. I think we'd win so I still want this.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: pike on December 03, 2011, 11:47:59 PM
I think it will be KSU vs Michigan in the Sugar.  TCU won't get to 16.
I would love this but I would run the risk of eating the poop I talked on them today on their board. I think we'd win so I still want this.

But my goodness it could pay dividends...
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:49:42 PM
I don't think TCU has much of a chance.  Clemson has a good shot at jumping them.  Even if they don't both Georgia and Michigan St would have to fall below them.  

I think Michigan moves ahead of at least Georgia.  Then all they need to do is move ahead of Michigan St, or OU.

You are forgetting that Baylor will probably jump Michigan after their big win today.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kso_FAN on December 03, 2011, 11:54:45 PM
Just imagine what it would be like if we were waiting to see if we made it into an 8 team playoff field...
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 03, 2011, 11:56:20 PM
Just imagine what it would be like if we were waiting to see if we made it into an 8 team playoff field...

Oh man. . . We would be rushing out to get tickets for next week's game in Baton Rouge. :love:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Pendergast on December 04, 2011, 12:00:28 AM
Just imagine what it would be like if we were waiting to see if we made it into an 8 team playoff field...

Was thinking about this too.  KSU vs. LSU  :sdeek:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 12:03:12 AM
Just imagine what it would be like if we were waiting to see if we made it into an 8 team playoff field...

Was thinking about this too.  KSU vs. LSU  :sdeek:

It would be glorious.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: jmlynch1 on December 04, 2011, 12:05:52 AM
Oh my. Sugar against Michigan? Getting hot in here.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 12:06:33 AM
Just imagine what it would be like if we were waiting to see if we made it into an 8 team playoff field...

Was thinking about this too.  KSU vs. LSU  :sdeek:

It would be glorious.

Would get sick of duel hunny badger jokes (had to spell it wrong to trick the world filter).
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Testy Westy on December 04, 2011, 12:07:58 AM
Oh my. Sugar against Michigan? Getting hot in here.

 :lick:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 12:09:13 AM
Oh my. Sugar against Michigan? Getting hot in here.

it'd be the baylor game all over again but on a much bigger stage :love:
Title: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: The Manhatter on December 04, 2011, 12:09:40 AM
to play a VERY pissed off 'Bama team in New Orleans in front of all of their fans.  They probably wouldn't want to show Okie Lite up w/ compare scores against us or something.

 :runaway:
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 12:10:13 AM
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2011, 12:11:17 AM
would watch
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 12:14:40 AM
We would beat them. :ksu:
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2011, 12:14:53 AM
Alabama won't be pissed, they will be apathetic.
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: Shacks on December 04, 2011, 12:16:20 AM
Alabama won't be pissed, they will be apathetic.

They will either be super :chainsaw: :curse: :shakesfist: and win their bowl game by six touchdowns (like last year against Michigan State) or they will be apathetic and not give a damn and get embarrassed (Sugar Bowl vs Utah)
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 12:17:47 AM
Alabama won't be pissed, they will be apathetic.

They will either be super :chainsaw: :curse: :shakesfist: and win their bowl game by six touchdowns (like last year against Michigan State) or they will be apathetic and not give a damn and get embarrassed (Sugar Bowl vs Utah)

Utah was just a better team than Alabama that year, and Michigan State sucked ass last year. I think Saban would keep the team on an even keel and we would come in and beat them by 4.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: WildcatPower on December 04, 2011, 12:26:29 AM
Oh my. Sugar against Michigan? Getting hot in here.

Would Take.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 12:30:38 AM
If Michigan doesn't move up to 14 and TCU doesn't move up to 16, who would we play? I'd have a hard time getting excited about playing Virginia Tech or Boise State.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 12:32:40 AM
Crushing Boise would be amazing :love:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: doom on December 04, 2011, 12:35:18 AM
ESPN seems to think we suck.  On Final they were talking TCU and Mich getting the at larges.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 12:37:07 AM
ESPN seems to think we suck.  On Final they were talking TCU and Mich getting the at larges.

Well, if TCU moves up to 16, they are getting in automatically. People keep forgetting that Clemson and Baylor both won in convincing fashion, though. I don't think either team will be eligible because I think Michigan will be jumped by Baylor, finishing 15th and TCU will be jumped by Clemson, finishing 17th. I'm no expert, though.
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: nicname on December 04, 2011, 12:39:13 AM
no way OSU gets in.  They dont deserve to either
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: doom on December 04, 2011, 12:39:33 AM
ESPN seems to think we suck.  On Final they were talking TCU and Mich getting the at larges.

Well, if TCU moves up to 16, they are getting in automatically. People keep forgetting that Clemson and Baylor both won in convincing fashion, though. I don't think either team will be eligible because I think Michigan will be jumped by Baylor, finishing 15th and TCU will be jumped by Clemson, finishing 17th. I'm no expert, though.
 

I just hope the voters vote TCU out on purpose.  No one wants to see a team that lost to SMU in a BCS bowl. 
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: doom on December 04, 2011, 12:42:14 AM
no way OSU gets in.  They dont deserve to either

I disagree.  OSU has better wins.   LSU is the #1 team, why would I want to see them take on a team they already beat on the road instead of the other one loss team with better wins?  I'd rather see LSU route OSU than Bama sneak out a title against a team they lost to, or get beat again, and go well duh, should have made them play that other one loss team. 
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 12:51:50 AM
to play a VERY pissed off 'Bama team in New Orleans in front of all of their fans.  They probably wouldn't want to show Okie Lite up w/ compare scores against us or something.

 :runaway:

Pretty sure we go to Fiesta Bowl in that case...
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: sys on December 04, 2011, 12:52:08 AM
if kstate goes to the sugar bowl because baylor blocks michigan from 14th, it will be just like the ending of the lord of the rings with the misshapen, deformed hobbit burning to death.
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: Gantz9 on December 04, 2011, 12:52:42 AM
If OSU gets into the championship we are going to the fiesta not the sugar bowl.  Bring on Stanford.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: FP TC etc. on December 04, 2011, 12:53:44 AM
Rivals has us in Sugar. Sorry is this is Luke'd

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ys-college_football_bowl_projections_120311 (http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ys-college_football_bowl_projections_120311)
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: Testy Westy on December 04, 2011, 12:54:14 AM
If OSU gets into the championship we are going to the fiesta not the sugar bowl.  Bring on Stanford.

Welcome! Thanks for creating an account to tell us that.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 12:58:39 AM
Interesting....

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt11.htm?loc=interstitialskip (http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt11.htm?loc=interstitialskip)

We moved to #5 in this poll. OSU did not move up.

TCU didn't budge. UMich jumps 5 spots

Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 01:01:18 AM
if kstate goes to the sugar bowl because baylor blocks michigan from 14th, it will be just like the ending of the lord of the rings with the misshapen, deformed hobbit burning to death.

So true. :lol:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Testy Westy on December 04, 2011, 01:03:45 AM
Rivals has us in Sugar. Sorry is this is Luke'd

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ys-college_football_bowl_projections_120311 (http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ys-college_football_bowl_projections_120311)

All the BCS games on there would be awesome match ups with similar styled teams.  I vote we do it that way.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: j-von on December 04, 2011, 01:06:59 AM
Oh my. Sugar against Michigan? Getting hot in here.

it'd be the baylor game all over again but on a much bigger stage :love:

They aren't as good as Baylor, we would crush them.  Gotta be the dream scenario here.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 01:16:30 AM
So like, what do we do when Baylor gets picked over us for the Sugar Bowl cause of RG3 and fan base local?

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/ (http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/)
Quote
Here's the projected final BCS Standings:

1. LSU, 2. Oklahoma State, 3. Alabama, 4. Stanford, 5. Oregon, 6. Boise State, 7. Arkansas, 8. Kansas State, 9. South Carolina, 10. Wisconsin, 11. Baylor, 12. Virginia Tech, 13. Michigan, 14. Houston, 15. Oklahoma, 16. Michigan State, 17. Clemson, 18. TCU, 19. Georgia, 20. Nebraska.

Title: Re: cotton
Post by: doom on December 04, 2011, 01:19:27 AM
So like, what do we do when Baylor gets picked over us for the Sugar Bowl cause of RG3 and fan base local?

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/ (http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/)
Quote
Here's the projected final BCS Standings:

1. LSU, 2. Oklahoma State, 3. Alabama, 4. Stanford, 5. Oregon, 6. Boise State, 7. Arkansas, 8. Kansas State, 9. South Carolina, 10. Wisconsin, 11. Baylor, 12. Virginia Tech, 13. Michigan, 14. Houston, 15. Oklahoma, 16. Michigan State, 17. Clemson, 18. TCU, 19. Georgia, 20. Nebraska.


That idiot has osu, #2.  Irrelevant
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 01:22:23 AM
So like, what do we do when Baylor gets picked over us for the Sugar Bowl cause of RG3 and fan base local?

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/ (http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/)
Quote
Here's the projected final BCS Standings:

1. LSU, 2. Oklahoma State, 3. Alabama, 4. Stanford, 5. Oregon, 6. Boise State, 7. Arkansas, 8. Kansas State, 9. South Carolina, 10. Wisconsin, 11. Baylor, 12. Virginia Tech, 13. Michigan, 14. Houston, 15. Oklahoma, 16. Michigan State, 17. Clemson, 18. TCU, 19. Georgia, 20. Nebraska.



Every Baylor fan in America could go to the game and Baylor still wouldn't be able to sell their allotment.
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 01:23:10 AM
If OSU gets into the championship we are going to the fiesta not the sugar bowl.  Bring on Stanford.

Informed and confident first post!
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: WildcatPower on December 04, 2011, 01:33:34 AM
So like, what do we do when Baylor gets picked over us for the Sugar Bowl cause of RG3 and fan base local?

http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/ (http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/)
Quote
Here's the projected final BCS Standings:

1. LSU, 2. Oklahoma State, 3. Alabama, 4. Stanford, 5. Oregon, 6. Boise State, 7. Arkansas, 8. Kansas State, 9. South Carolina, 10. Wisconsin, 11. Baylor, 12. Virginia Tech, 13. Michigan, 14. Houston, 15. Oklahoma, 16. Michigan State, 17. Clemson, 18. TCU, 19. Georgia, 20. Nebraska.



The way I understand it, and I'm no expert by any means, that if OSU gets the #2, they're going to the NC game, which in theory, the Fiesta should be awarded to Kansas State.
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: Gantz9 on December 04, 2011, 01:33:34 AM
If OSU gets into the championship we are going to the fiesta not the sugar bowl.  Bring on Stanford.

Informed and confident first post!

I've been lurking for a while.  Just wanted to help assuage any unfounded fears.  I think we can play with Stanford if we stop their run.  Alabama would be difficult.  Our team speed is just not good enough to match up with Bama.
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: hemmy on December 04, 2011, 01:42:12 AM
I can only imagine fatty would be an absolute delight if we got to play Stanford.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Testy Westy on December 04, 2011, 01:43:32 AM
If OSU going to the MNC means we go to the Fiesta over the Sugar than bring on the rematch!
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: jmlynch1 on December 04, 2011, 01:51:33 AM
If OSU going to the MNC means we go to the Fiesta over the Sugar than bring on the rematch!
agreed
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: SnillByder on December 04, 2011, 01:52:33 AM
Interesting....

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt11.htm?loc=interstitialskip (http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt11.htm?loc=interstitialskip)

We moved to #5 in this poll. OSU did not move up.

TCU didn't budge. UMich jumps 5 spots



We were already 5th. I am surprised that not only did Ok State not jump up to 2nd, they didn't even close the gap a bit. Oklahoma didn't drop either. Ridiculous.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 01:52:57 AM
If OSU going to the MNC means we go to the Fiesta over the Sugar than bring on the rematch!

Yes. I'm looking at hotels in NOLA from Dec. 31 - Jan. 4. :crossfingers:
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: felix rex on December 04, 2011, 07:24:05 AM
"we want green bay"
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: gokatgo on December 04, 2011, 08:05:22 AM
Projections

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2011/12/bowl-projections-lsu-oklahoma-state-alabama-title-game/1 (http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2011/12/bowl-projections-lsu-oklahoma-state-alabama-title-game/1)

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/stewart_mandel/12/04/final-bowl-projections/index.html (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/stewart_mandel/12/04/final-bowl-projections/index.html)

 :cheers: <-----except with hurricanes
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:11:33 AM
rub Denard's mistake right in his stupid face  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 08:11:56 AM
Projections

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2011/12/bowl-projections-lsu-oklahoma-state-alabama-title-game/1 (http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2011/12/bowl-projections-lsu-oklahoma-state-alabama-title-game/1)

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/stewart_mandel/12/04/final-bowl-projections/index.html (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/stewart_mandel/12/04/final-bowl-projections/index.html)

 :cheers: <-----except with hurricanes

I like the second one.  
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 08:18:52 AM
CBSSportsNetwork Inside College Football just said "K-State does travel remarkably well."  (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2Fwhomovedmysugarbowl.gif&hash=2b673b272f498d181a60994acb03b4a6cd727782)
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 08:19:56 AM
I hope Cotton takes Baylor and OU gets dropped down to Alamo.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:21:08 AM
I hope Cotton takes Baylor and OU gets dropped down to Alamo.

I bet they do
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 08:22:50 AM
rub Denard's mistake right in his stupid face  :horrorsurprise:

 :love:
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 08:22:58 AM
I can only imagine fatty would be an absolute delight if we got to play Stanford.

Oh man, I didn't even think about this!  :love:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 08:25:46 AM
I hope Cotton takes Baylor and OU gets dropped down to Alamo.

stupid, bad smelling, ugly losers like brent deserve the alamo.  i'll be surprised if san antonio lets someone as disgustlingly ugly as brent into their city (again). 
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 08:27:17 AM
Does Baylor have enough fans to sell half of Jerryworld?
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:28:51 AM
 :pray:
Title: Re: Watch Okie Lite get in MNC game and KSU get selected...
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:30:37 AM
http://bcsguru.blogspot.com/2011/12/no-rematch.html

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 08:30:53 AM
So how long do we have to wait to get the leak of who's in the Cotton?  It's gonna be a long day if I have to wait until 7:30.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 08:32:42 AM
Have I mentioned how much a piece of crap Pat Forde is?  After saying before game OSU needs to win by 40 to sway him, he wakes up this morning saying how bad OU sucks.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:39:09 AM
Andy_Staples Andy Staples
Got e-mail containing Wolfe rankings (another part of BCS formula): 1. LSU, 2. Bama, 3. Ok State, 4. Arkansas, 5. Kansas State, 6. Oregon
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 04, 2011, 08:39:54 AM
Interesting....

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt11.htm?loc=interstitialskip (http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt11.htm?loc=interstitialskip)

We moved to #5 in this poll. OSU did not move up.

TCU didn't budge. UMich jumps 5 spots



Michigan actually dropped to 23rd in the part used by the BCS.  Look at the ELO_Chess column.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kcchiefdav on December 04, 2011, 08:40:10 AM
Have I mentioned how much a piece of crap Pat Forde is?  After saying before game OSU needs to win by 40 to sway him, he wakes up this morning saying how bad OU sucks.

THIS!
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:41:35 AM
jppalm jppalm
nothing final RT @mattblanchette: The latest, and perhaps, final bowl projection from @jppalm has K-State OUT of the BCS.

 :pray:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:43:24 AM
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions

it's going to be amazing
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 08:45:34 AM
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions

it's going to be amazing

 :love: :love:

those would all be fantastic match ups (except the orange, but, i mean, who ever cares about the orange bowl?)
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 08:46:00 AM
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions

it's going to be amazing

 :love: :love:

those would all be fantastic match ups (except the orange, but, i mean, who ever cares about the orange bowl?)

KU fans.  :lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: felix rex on December 04, 2011, 09:14:11 AM
Would love to pay Michigan.

Also, this is the first I've heard of the "or Baylor" scenario and it is creeping me the eff out.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 09:14:49 AM
Would love to pay Michigan.

Also, this is the first I've heard of the "or Baylor" scenario and it is creeping me the eff out.

yeah, I'm not really worried about Baylor
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Cartierfor3 on December 04, 2011, 09:23:04 AM
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions

it's going to be amazing

If this doesn't happen I will murder someone
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 09:24:26 AM
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions

it's going to be amazing

If this doesn't happen I will murder someone

Baylor/Arkansas would be a fantastic game.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on December 04, 2011, 09:25:16 AM
I will love to see us an a 10 point dog going in, which we most certainly will be.
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on December 04, 2011, 10:04:40 AM
jppalm jppalm
nothing final RT @mattblanchette: The latest, and perhaps, final bowl projection from @jppalm has K-State OUT of the BCS.

 :pray:

Palm's 12/4 update has us IN against Michigan.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: bws on December 04, 2011, 10:14:10 AM
Yahoo, ESPN, and Si.com all have us in vs Michigan

 :cheers:  :pray:
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 10:15:14 AM
jppalm jppalm
nothing final RT @mattblanchette: The latest, and perhaps, final bowl projection from @jppalm has K-State OUT of the BCS.

 :pray:

Palm's 12/4 update has us IN against Michigan.

yeah, you may have noticed that I linked to it after that
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on December 04, 2011, 10:21:14 AM
jppalm jppalm
nothing final RT @mattblanchette: The latest, and perhaps, final bowl projection from @jppalm has K-State OUT of the BCS.

 :pray:

Palm's 12/4 update has us IN against Michigan.

yeah, you may have noticed that I linked to it after that

yup, just clarifying for those that didn't connect the 2....
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 10:38:21 AM
jppalm jppalm
nothing final RT @mattblanchette: The latest, and perhaps, final bowl projection from @jppalm has K-State OUT of the BCS.

 :pray:

Palm's 12/4 update has us IN against Michigan.

yeah, you may have noticed that I linked to it after that

yup, just clarifying for those that didn't connect the 2....

from his cbs sports thing...
Quote
Jerry Palm always wanted to be involved with sports, but wasn't blessed with natural athletic ability. So he found other ways to be involved in the games.

He has a very unique story...wish I or any other non-professional athlete could relate.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 04, 2011, 11:32:09 AM
TCU up two spots to 15 in coaches
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 04, 2011, 11:38:36 AM
jpalm: based on current computer projections (OSU 2 in 4 of 6), OSU must now pass Bama in Harris poll by 5 points to be #2 overall.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 11:42:56 AM
Quote
slmandel Stewart Mandel
Per @jppalm: Clemson passed TCU in the coaches poll, doesn't help them getting to top 16 in BCS.
2 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply

:emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: scottwildcat on December 04, 2011, 11:57:33 AM
Quote
slmandel Stewart Mandel
Per @jppalm: Clemson passed TCU in the coaches poll, doesn't help them getting to top 16 in BCS.
2 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply

:emawkid:

TCU is still in the top 15 of the coaches poll...it is still going to be close folks
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: Tobias on December 04, 2011, 12:02:49 PM
if kstate goes to the sugar bowl because baylor blocks michigan from 14th, it will be just like the ending of the lord of the rings with the misshapen, deformed hobbit burning to death.

this post did not get nearly enough love  :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PowercatPat on December 04, 2011, 12:03:38 PM
ESPN hates us

http://espn.go.com/college-football/bowls
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on December 04, 2011, 12:10:36 PM
Palm's BCS predictions have been almost perfect the last few weeks:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs (http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PowercatPat on December 04, 2011, 12:14:01 PM
Palm's BCS predictions have been almost perfect the last few weeks:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs (http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs)

Why would South Carolina be ranked ahead of us?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 12:42:14 PM
Phil Steele loving the Cats
http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/11-12/bowlprojections.html (http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/11-12/bowlprojections.html)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi44.tinypic.com%2F1z3xwg8.png&hash=29d0aa4bab39f158ad1a4353dee56c748541f7b7)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on December 04, 2011, 12:50:45 PM
Palm's BCS predictions have been almost perfect the last few weeks:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs (http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs)

Why would South Carolina be ranked ahead of us?

Looks like he just updated it again, KSU #8, S. Carolina #9  :lynchmob:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 12:51:12 PM
Palm's BCS predictions have been almost perfect the last few weeks:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs (http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/rankings/bcs)

Why would South Carolina be ranked ahead of us?

most likely because they play in the greatest conference on the planet and also because we were outgained in 7 of our 10 wins, so really we acutally were only better than 3 of the teams we played.  We're ranked waaaaaay to high because the national media loves sucking old balls old balls.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 'taterblast on December 04, 2011, 12:54:06 PM
 :dubious:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: skycat on December 04, 2011, 01:11:42 PM
Quote
fivethirtyeight Nate Silver   
How about Alabama plays Oklahoma State for #2? LSU can play the Indianapolis Colts.

 :)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wabash909 on December 04, 2011, 01:19:31 PM
“@valeroalamobowl: @jppalm says "nothing final" but he is only projecting one Big 12 team (#OkState) in the BCS.”
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Cire on December 04, 2011, 01:26:00 PM
We're effed this is leonardo all over again
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 01:27:35 PM
“@valeroalamobowl: @jppalm says "nothing final" but he is only projecting one Big 12 team (#OkState) in the BCS.”

Quote
jppalm jppalm
actually, have KSU too RT @valeroalamobowl jppalm says "nothing final" but he is only projecting one Big 12 team (#OkState) in the BCS.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 01:28:20 PM
“@valeroalamobowl: @jppalm says "nothing final" but he is only projecting one Big 12 team (#OkState) in the BCS.”

Quote
jppalm jppalm
actually, have KSU too RT @valeroalamobowl jppalm says "nothing final" but he is only projecting one Big 12 team (#OkState) in the BCS.

 :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 01:30:37 PM
 :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: joda on December 04, 2011, 01:32:29 PM
Guys, now that we don't have a co-dr pepper, I really want a BCS bowl. Mainly because if we win it will finally end the stupid Jayhawk talking point that KU has won a BCS bowl and KState hasn't (even though we won a BCS bowl when it was called an Alliance bowl).
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 01:37:15 PM
Guys, now that we don't have a co-dr pepper, I really want a BCS bowl. Mainly because if we win it will finally end the stupid Jayhawk talking point that KU has won a BCS bowl and KState hasn't (even though we won a BCS bowl when it was called an Alliance bowl).

As long as we get in, you will get your wish. Stanford and Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeechigan can't hang with the Cats.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Kat Kid on December 04, 2011, 01:37:53 PM
Guys, now that we don't have a co-dr pepper, I really want a BCS bowl. Mainly because if we win it will finally end the stupid Jayhawk talking point that KU has won a BCS bowl and KState hasn't (even though we won a BCS bowl when it was called an Alliance bowl).

As long as we get in, you will get your wish. Stanford and Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeechigan can't hang with the Cats.



Humiliating either trash team would be a pleasure.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 01:39:43 PM
:emawkid:

@dennisdoddcbs Dennis Dodd
EMAW, Cats projected to play Michigan in Sugar Bowl.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 01:44:12 PM
:emawkid:

@dennisdoddcbs Dennis Dodd
EMAW, Cats projected to play Michigan in Sugar Bowl.


Wish I would have known the Sugar was an option yesterday.  Would have been great to throw 5lb bags of Sugar on the field.


 :emawkid: + (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Fbzzagent-bzzscapes-prod%2Fc-h-granulated-sugar-lrg.png&hash=e45806b53efa28029db57a1385c3bf1fa99f6209)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 01:52:06 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.koshervitamins.com%2Fimages%2Fimages_101%2Fpictures%2FSugar%2520in%2520the%2520Raw%2520100%2520Packets.jpg&hash=3584cf2ae1e4b3d2830f5383f4db5582948430f0)


Always been partial to this. Also as KSU people we are  :kstategrad: so we should display that in our sugar choices.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 01:52:46 PM
Quote
Snyder knew all about rebuilding. Before Fry's arrival in 1979, Iowa hadn't had a winning season in 18 years, but since then it had averaged nearly eight wins per season and had played in three Rose Bowls. Snyder also knew offense. His passing game had given fits to Neanderthal Big Ten defenses. When Miller called Bo Schembechler of Michigan to ask about Snyder, Schembechler said, "Hire him, get him the f--- out of this conference."

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 01:53:16 PM
Idiot question: Why don't we have the actual BCS rankings yet? What polls or computers are we waiting on?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stupid Fitz on December 04, 2011, 01:56:27 PM
 
Idiot question: Why don't we have the actual BCS rankings yet? What polls or computers are we waiting on?

Waiting on TV assholes to drag it out for an hour during a show with 400 commercials at 7.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: That_Guy on December 04, 2011, 01:57:19 PM
Idiot question: Why don't we have the actual BCS rankings yet? What polls or computers are we waiting on?

 :facepalm:

Oh, I don't know probably because they're NEVER released until 7:15 on Sundays.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PowercatPat on December 04, 2011, 01:58:23 PM
Guys, now that we don't have a co-dr pepper, I really want a BCS bowl. Mainly because if we win it will finally end the stupid Jayhawk talking point that KU has won a BCS bowl and KState hasn't (even though we won a BCS bowl when it was called an Alliance bowl).

As long as we get in, you will get your wish. Stanford and Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeechigan can't hang with the Cats.



I hate to say it, but Stanford would probably destroy us. Would much rather play Michigan.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PoetWarrior on December 04, 2011, 01:59:35 PM
One more game!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 02:01:17 PM
we beat stanford, michigan, alabama or anyone else by 87 points.  I would be fine playing an allstar team of their best players if need be.  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 02:01:28 PM
Idiot question: Why don't we have the actual BCS rankings yet? What polls or computers are we waiting on?

 :facepalm:

Oh, I don't know probably because they're NEVER released until 7:15 on Sundays.

Yeah, but does the BCS use some sort of top-secret forumla or something? I mean, I thought you basically just needed the Harris poll, Coaches poll, and computer rankings, and you run the numbers, right?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 04, 2011, 02:03:55 PM
 Harris is the biggest part I haven't seen released yet.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 04, 2011, 02:08:55 PM
:emawkid:

@dennisdoddcbs Dennis Dodd
EMAW, Cats projected to play Michigan in Sugar Bowl.


fairly certain he is looking at the linked projections, like the rest of us.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Kat Kid on December 04, 2011, 02:09:29 PM
:emawkid:

@dennisdoddcbs Dennis Dodd
EMAW, Cats projected to play Michigan in Sugar Bowl.


fairly certain he is looking at the linked projections, like the rest of us.

Yeah, no crap.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stupid Fitz on December 04, 2011, 02:12:09 PM
Guys, now that we don't have a co-dr pepper, I really want a BCS bowl. Mainly because if we win it will finally end the stupid Jayhawk talking point that KU has won a BCS bowl and KState hasn't (even though we won a BCS bowl when it was called an Alliance bowl).

As long as we get in, you will get your wish. Stanford and Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeechigan can't hang with the Cats.



Denard will have 400 rushing yards, but it will all still be glorious. 
I hate to say it, but Stanford would probably destroy us. Would much rather play Michigan.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 02:17:27 PM
We will end up playing Michigan, and all we will hear about his how similar the QBs numbers are, but how different they are. It will be very  :opcat: but im sure the wording will be fun.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 04, 2011, 02:19:09 PM
:emawkid:

@dennisdoddcbs Dennis Dodd
EMAW, Cats projected to play Michigan in Sugar Bowl.


fairly certain he is looking at the linked projections, like the rest of us.

Yeah, no crap.

i don't think it was obvious to everyone here. TORTUGA
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 02:22:22 PM
rumblings the team is meeting at 4 and will find out then  :ohno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EMAW4life-JHL on December 04, 2011, 02:24:15 PM
rumblings the team is meeting at 4 and will find out then  :ohno:
rumblings i will kill bob stoops with a dull axe if we dont get  a BCS bowl.
also can confirm: will kill his family and an innocent person or two as well.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 02:24:45 PM
So if the elitest assholes at ESPN are correct and the BCS wants any team they can get their hands on as long as it's not K-State (meaning Boise or maybe TCU), what are the chances that Cotton chooses us over OU and Baylor?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 02:26:27 PM
So if the elitest assholes at ESPN are correct and the BCS wants any team they can get their hands on as long as it's not K-State (TCU or Boise), what are the chances that Cotton chooses us over OU and Baylor?

They aren't correct. The BCS bowls don't want anything to do with TCU or Boise, but they would be forced to take TCU if they can worm their way into the top 16.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 02:28:23 PM
rumblings the team is meeting at 4 and will find out then  :ohno:

This can't be good news can it?  You wouldn't think they'd(BCS/ESPN) release that information to a bunch of kids 3 hours before the show right?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: "storm"nut on December 04, 2011, 02:29:32 PM
rumblings the team is meeting at 4 and will find out then  :ohno:

This can't be good news can it?  You wouldn't think they'd(BCS/ESPN) release that information to a bunch of kids 3 hours before the show right?

But releasing that they are not in is the same.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2011, 02:30:02 PM
rumblings the team is meeting at 4 and will find out then  :ohno:

i bet everybody already pretty much knows that the cats are sugarbowling. this meeting just gives them a chance to pick what restaurants they're going to get po boys and hurricanes at and decide roommates for the non starters.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 02:32:54 PM
Probably just finding out that they won't be finding out that they won't be playing in a bcs game.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sunny_cat on December 04, 2011, 02:33:47 PM
Probably just finding out that they won't be finding out that they won't be playing in a bcs game.
:emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: CNS on December 04, 2011, 02:34:28 PM
 :katpak:
rumblings the team is meeting at 4 and will find out then  :ohno:

Twitter hints
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2011, 02:36:55 PM
:lol: now Brad Edwards is saying either Va Tech or Boise St vs Michigan in Sugar. 

If Va Tech gets this, man I will be not a happy person.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 02:38:47 PM
:lol: now Brad Edwards is saying either Va Tech or Boise St vs Michigan in Sugar. 

If Va Tech gets this, man I will be not a happy person.

No goddamn way the rough ridin' ACC gets 2 bids. 
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2011, 02:39:52 PM
RUMBLINGS THE SUGAR, QUOTE "WANTS US"
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 02:40:25 PM
 :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 04, 2011, 02:41:29 PM
Anybody know when the actual selections are happening.  I'm not talking about the selection show but the actual conference call.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 02:42:55 PM
RUMBLINGS THE SUGAR, QUOTE "WANTS US"


http://www.youtube.com/embed/AQ4xwmZ6zi4 (http://www.youtube.com/embed/AQ4xwmZ6zi4)



 :ksu: :emawkid:  :pray: :D
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SabiNation on December 04, 2011, 02:43:14 PM
:lol: now Brad Edwards is saying either Va Tech or Boise St vs Michigan in Sugar. 

If Va Tech gets this, man I will be not a happy person.

I will be not a happy person
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Kat Kid on December 04, 2011, 02:43:52 PM
:lol: now Brad Edwards is saying either Va Tech or Boise St vs Michigan in Sugar. 

If Va Tech gets this, man I will be not a happy person.

I will be not a happy person

not a happy person!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 02:45:04 PM
:lol: now Brad Edwards is saying either Va Tech or Boise St vs Michigan in Sugar. 

If Va Tech gets this, man I will be not a happy person.

I will be not a happy person

not a happy person!

not a person!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 04, 2011, 02:45:38 PM
Maybe the 4pm meeting is so the players can listen to the call from the Sugar Bowl reps?  

Sugar Bowl Reps:  We would like to congratulate you with an offer to play in our bowl in the greatest city of the world.  :love:

(Team Goes Crazy, Sams does his dance)  

Snyds calms the team down and thanks the Sugar Bowl reps, but says they are more interested in Cotton because it will help recruiting.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 02:46:06 PM
FWIW my last two posts in this thread may be my favorite goEMAW moment of all time. I can't stop laughing.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2011, 02:46:22 PM
rumblings the team is meeting at 4 and will find out then  :ohno:

Want a SAMs Sugar bowl dance.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 02:49:43 PM
So if the elitest assholes at ESPN are correct and the BCS wants any team they can get their hands on as long as it's not K-State (TCU or Boise), what are the chances that Cotton chooses us over OU and Baylor?

They aren't correct. The BCS bowls don't want anything to do with TCU or Boise, but they would be forced to take TCU if they can worm their way into the top 16.

Good point. I'm not so worried about TCU, because I don't see how they get to 16 (but then again, people are projecting Michigan will easily crack the top 14 after sitting on their asses this weekend, so what the eff do I know?)

The one that really pisses me off is Boise State. I mean, really, what the hell kind of person thinks Boise State goes ahead of K-State? And then there's Virginia rough ridin' Tech. Same deal. Maybe even worse than Boise.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2011, 02:50:05 PM
FWIW my last two posts in this thread may be my favorite goEMAW moment of all time. I can't stop laughing.
there were very good
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on December 04, 2011, 02:51:43 PM
We will end up playing Michigan, and all we will hear about his how similar the QBs numbers are, but how different they are. It will be very  :opcat: but im sure the wording will be fun.


With AB speed if we play Michigan, He would spy Dennard  the entire day and I'm confident we could shut them down. :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 03:16:00 PM
@jppalm jppalm
that's who I hear the Sugar wants. RT @joe_depaolo: LOL. Ok. Forget Edwards. Why KSU over Boise for you?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2011, 03:30:14 PM
guys- it's the sugar and it has been ever since osu got up by thirty on ou.






http://www.nola.com/bcs/index.ssf/2011/12/trending_alabama_coaches_poll.html

"Another team not making as much progress in the coaches poll as it needed Sunday was Texas Christian.The Horned Frogs have to finish no worse than 16th in the standings to become an automatic BCS bowl qualifier as the highest-ranked conference champion from the five non-BCS conferences.But despite coming in at No. 15 the coaches poll the Horned Frogs are still projected by Palm to finish 18th in the standings because of their No 19 spot in the computer rankings.TCU had been projected to play in the Sugar Bowl, but the Sugar's attention now turns towards No. 8 Kansas State as a matchup with Michigan, based on an LSU-Alabama championship game."
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2011, 03:30:43 PM
The Animal has got this guys.  Rumblings he called Sugar bowl gave them the Lew treatment.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 03:31:15 PM
McMurphyCBS Brett McMurphy
Source: Rutgers to Pinstripe Bowl. Opponent TBA because waiting to see if K-State gets BCS bid. Most likely:: Texas or Iowa State
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2011, 03:31:52 PM
remember when we were happy to be playing in that garbage bowl? :lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Skipper44 on December 04, 2011, 03:37:01 PM
McMurphyCBS Brett McMurphy
Source: Rutgers to Pinstripe Bowl. Opponent TBA because waiting to see if K-State gets BCS bid. Most likely:: Texas or Iowa State
will be poised pissed if we don't send a traitor to pinstripe
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: CNS on December 04, 2011, 03:42:35 PM
Rumblings he called Sugar bowl gave them the Lew treatment.

Want this to be true soooo bad.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 03:48:46 PM
:lol:  :lol:


@sptwri Mike DeArmond
If baylor gets cotton bowl over k-state will cat fans complain about b 12 bowl system? Assuming no bcs for ksu
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: AbeFroman on December 04, 2011, 03:49:01 PM
Currie is an SEC guy. Don't worry guys


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstopsugarcravingseasily.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F05%2Fsugar-addiction.jpg&hash=daaf057136d58fbb679aa68a79bc691744f5471e)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2011, 04:14:33 PM
well?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2011, 04:16:25 PM
:lol:  :lol:


@sptwri Mike DeArmond
If baylor gets cotton bowl over k-state will cat fans complain about b 12 bowl system? Assuming no bcs for ksu



 :lol:

it's going to be 2016 and mu will have been in the sec for five years and dearmond will be long retired and he'll still be tweeting out butthurt big12 comments.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 04:19:09 PM
Some stupid ass Boise fan posting on the Michigan broad
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=162&f=2019&t=8382199 

Quote from: thespywhozaggedme
RE: Looks Like UM vs. K-State in Sugar Bowl
Brad Edwards is actually projecting us vs you guys in the Sugar Bowl, others are projecting us vs Stanford in the Fiesta Bowl. Shocked that K-State would be picked over us,they're ranked below us, have more losses than us, they get really low ratings, plus they lost to OU by 40 points, and barely beat a Sun Belt team. Our national games get HUGE ratings. We'll see what happens, but if I had to predict, the Wildcats get in.

    BayouWolverine wrote: Seems unlikely that a committee would take them, but they'll be eligible. Just don't want to count our chickens before they've hatched. My heart says we're a lock, but my head says to not get my hopes up just in case.

        GoBlue810 wrote: Only way boise has a chance is if tcu don't get in

        ---------------------------------------------
        --- BayouWolverine wrote:

        Boise State is still eligible for an at-large spot.

Boise is a 1 loss team (OVERRATED BIG TIME) in a Mountain West Conference & has a SOS of 85th (around that range) in the country. The OU loss point differential was a fluke. Why would the strongest conference in the country not get 2 teams? Why do some Michigan fans think they deserve a BCS bowl bid, because of their name? They suck & we will beat them in the Sugar! :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2011, 04:21:42 PM
:lol:  :lol:


@sptwri Mike DeArmond
If baylor gets cotton bowl over k-state will cat fans complain about b 12 bowl system? Assuming no bcs for ksu



 :lol:

it's going to be 2016 and mu will have been in the sec for five years and dearmond will be long retired and he'll still be tweeting out butthurt big12 comments.

He will make a butthurt comment towards the Big 12 on his deathbed. 

"Gabe, come closer, I am afraid the cirrohsis is finely taking me.  Can you believe how crappy the ratings are for the LHN?....."
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 04:24:01 PM
The delusion of this Boise State fan would be cute, except that there are morons who work for ESPN who actually agree with them.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TheProdigiousTalent on December 04, 2011, 04:28:58 PM
Somehow our fanbase's exceptional modesty has kept the world from realizing that we travel all over the world and spend loads of cash.  The good news is that the bowl representatives know all about our elite fanbase and are fighting each other for the right to profit from our lives of excess.

Will be pretty funny when the following scene plays out 87 times across NOLA prior to Cats-Wolverines Bloodbath '11:

UM fan: "Waiter, I see that your cheapest beer is $6.50.  Do you serve Coors Light?"
KSU fan: "Bartender, another round for everybody.  But please...don't tell anyone I'm buying.  Don't want to rub it in."
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Skipper44 on December 04, 2011, 04:30:33 PM
:lol:  :lol:


@sptwri Mike DeArmond
If baylor gets cotton bowl over k-state will cat fans complain about b 12 bowl system? Assuming no bcs for ksu



 :lol:

it's going to be 2016 and mu will have been in the sec for five years and dearmond will be long retired and he'll still be tweeting out butthurt big12 comments.

He will make a butthurt comment towards the Big 12 on his deathbed. 

"Gabe, come closer, I am afraid the cirrohsis is finely taking me.  Can you believe how crappy the ratings are for the LHN?....."
was hoping goEMAW would bring Mike D on in a Andy Rooney type roll, you know he could use the money to pay down his tab at Harpo's
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 04:31:12 PM
mu to holiday
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SnillByder on December 04, 2011, 04:32:40 PM
@DannySheridan1 Danny Sheridan
sorry misunderstood, source said Michigan-VaTech in Sugar NOT K.State. Ala-LSU rematch set, didn't misunderstand that one!

 :flush:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 04:32:49 PM
ATTCottonBowl AT&T Cotton Bowl
This just in: #ATTCBC will be the only @Big12Conference vs. @SECSportsUpdate matchup; 2 best conf. in the nation! Announcement coming soon!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 04:33:34 PM
A&M to Meineke

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 04:34:51 PM
Dave_Matter Dave Matter
If that's accurate about Texas to Holiday Bowl, probably means K-State not getting into BCS and #Mizzou not getting a Big 12 bowl
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 04:35:01 PM
 :frown:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TheProdigiousTalent on December 04, 2011, 04:35:41 PM
@DannySheridan1 Danny Sheridan
sorry misunderstood, source said Michigan-VaTech in Sugar NOT K.State. Ala-LSU rematch set, didn't misunderstand that one!

 :flush:

Danny Sheridan?!  Pfffftt!  I'm gonna go ask my neighbor (who may or may not follow football) who he's got in the Sugar Bowl.  BRB.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 04:35:50 PM
 :curse: :chainsaw: :curse: :curse: :curse: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :chainsaw: :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 04:40:42 PM
VT is getting in over us.  We just got shafted again.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SnillByder on December 04, 2011, 04:42:20 PM
VT is getting in over us.  We just got shafted again.

It gets worse if the Baylor to Alamo and OU to Cotton rumors are true. 10-2 and the Insight Bowl would be on par with 98.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 04:43:41 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer Nope, they're going to ChickFilA. RT @tjbasalla: @BryanDFischer What about the rumor of Va Tech in Sugar?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: j-dub on December 04, 2011, 04:45:54 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer Nope, they're going to ChickFilA. RT @tjbasalla: @BryanDFischer What about the rumor of Va Tech in Sugar?

please let this be so.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TheProdigiousTalent on December 04, 2011, 04:46:24 PM
VT is getting in over us.  We just got shafted again.

Dear god.  Chill the eff out, brother.  Nobody knows anything.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2011, 04:46:54 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer Nope, they're going to ChickFilA. RT @tjbasalla: @BryanDFischer What about the rumor of Va Tech in Sugar?
:ksu:

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EMAWmeister on December 04, 2011, 04:50:50 PM
Iowa writer saying we're insight bound against the hawks.  I swear to God I'll kill somebody.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 04:52:04 PM
Hey guys we've got Currie and Shulzy on this. Don't worry  :cool:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 04:52:19 PM
slmandel Stewart Mandel
Based on some of these Big 12 announcements, it may be no second BCS berth. Everyone's slipping a spot.

 :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 04:54:19 PM
kbohls kbohls
Texas expects to go to Holiday Bowl, DeLoss Dodds says.

 :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 04:55:06 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Sounds like Kansas State to the Cotton Bowl, TCU made it to the Sugar.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 04:56:21 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Sounds like Kansas State to the Cotton Bowl, TCU made it to the Sugar.

 :curse:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 04:56:28 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Sounds like Kansas State to the Cotton Bowl, TCU made it to the Sugar.

fire everyone
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: j-dub on December 04, 2011, 04:56:33 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Sounds like Kansas State to the Cotton Bowl, TCU made it to the Sugar.

 :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 04:57:01 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Sounds like Kansas State to the Cotton Bowl, TCU made it to the Sugar.

fire everyone

Fire Currie banner?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 04:57:36 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Sounds like Kansas State to the Cotton Bowl, TCU made it to the Sugar.

fire everyone

Fire Currie banner?

i don't care, i just want everyone associated with college football out of a job if this happens
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 04:58:32 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Sounds like Kansas State to the Cotton Bowl, TCU made it to the Sugar.

JFC.  Even in a season when we got every break you could almost ask for, we still end up in the cotton against f'ng deliverance U.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 04:58:46 PM
Bryan Fischer
@BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Boise in Sugar then, not TCU. RT @Schrotenboer: TCU not in BCS, instead headed to Poinsettia Bowl vs. Louisiana Tech
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 04:59:05 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Sounds like Kansas State to the Cotton Bowl, TCU made it to the Sugar.

fire everyone

Fire Currie banner?

i don't care, i just want everyone associated with college football out of a job if this happens

Hopefully the outcry for a playoff will be stronger than ever this year.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 04:59:19 PM
If the Big XII is the second best conference, getting one team in is absolutely Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 04:59:54 PM
Bryan Fischer
@BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Boise in Sugar then, not TCU. RT @Schrotenboer: TCU not in BCS, instead headed to Poinsettia Bowl vs. Louisiana Tech


 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :emawkid: :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:00:39 PM
Bryan Fischer
@BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Boise in Sugar then, not TCU. RT @Schrotenboer: TCU not in BCS, instead headed to Poinsettia Bowl vs. Louisiana Tech


 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :emawkid: :horrorsurprise:

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 05:01:21 PM
IDS_BroncoBeat Bronco Beat
Reports have TCU to San Diego, Va. Tech to Atlanta and K-State to Cotton. ... If all that's true, Boise is in.

 :lynchmob:

Bryan Fischer
@BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Boise in Sugar then, not TCU. RT @Schrotenboer: TCU not in BCS, instead headed to Poinsettia Bowl vs. Louisiana Tech


 :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :ksu: :emawkid: :horrorsurprise:

 :facepalm:

LET ME HAVE THIS MOMENT bad person
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: "storm"nut on December 04, 2011, 05:01:46 PM
Bryan Fischer
@BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Boise in Sugar then, not TCU. RT @Schrotenboer: TCU not in BCS, instead headed to Poinsettia Bowl vs. Louisiana Tech

This guy is just guessing
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 05:02:22 PM
oh, right.

reading comprehension is for squawks :comeatme:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 05:03:58 PM
guys....OU has cotton rumblings....  :frown:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2011, 05:05:40 PM
guys....OU has cotton rumblings....  :frown:

good for them. ksu is going to the sugar.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 05:06:08 PM
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Cotton isn't K-State another source says.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:06:54 PM
IS THIS GOOD NEWS OR BAD NEWS?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: FP TC etc. on December 04, 2011, 05:07:08 PM
None of these guys has any idea what the eff is going on.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 05:07:17 PM
@Schrotenboer Brent Schrotenboer
Boise State and TCU are not in the BCS. Boise to Vegas. TCU to Poinsettia. Possible late deal to get Air Force into Military.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 05:07:38 PM
The bowls know we are eligible, correct?  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 05:07:46 PM
WTF IS GOING ON
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 05:08:06 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 05:08:18 PM
@Schrotenboer Brent Schrotenboer
Boise State and TCU are not in the BCS. Boise to Vegas. TCU to Poinsettia. Possible late deal to get Air Force into Military.


:emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 05:08:34 PM
DaveSittler Dave Sittler
Baylor beat OU again - this time for Alamo Bowl bid.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 05:08:41 PM
hahaha

@boonepickens T. Boone Pickens
My bags are packed and I am ready to go to New Orleans. Already have my reservations at Holiday Inn Express. #okstate #bcs
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 05:08:45 PM
 
The bowls know we are eligible, correct?  

 :lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 05:09:46 PM
 :emawkid: :excited:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 05:10:06 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F12%2Fwhomovedmysugarbowl.gif&hash=2b673b272f498d181a60994acb03b4a6cd727782)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 05:10:21 PM
:runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway::runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 05:11:20 PM
ChuckCarltonDMN Chuck Carlton
Crazy day. Latest Big 12 bowls: K-State vs. Arkansas in Cotton, Baylor in Alamo, Texas to Holiday and Texas A&M to Meineke Car Care.

 :dubious:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 05:11:57 PM
ChuckCarltonDMN Chuck Carlton
Crazy day. Latest Big 12 bowls: K-State vs. Arkansas in Cotton, Baylor in Alamo, Texas to Holiday and Texas A&M to Meineke Car Care.

 :dubious:
Who goes to Sugar then?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 05:12:36 PM
Nobody has any rough ridin' clue what they're talking about.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 05:13:12 PM
ChuckCarltonDMN Chuck Carlton
Crazy day. Latest Big 12 bowls: K-State vs. Arkansas in Cotton, Baylor in Alamo, Texas to Holiday and Texas A&M to Meineke Car Care.

 :dubious:

Ou to insight?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 05:13:16 PM
ChuckCarltonDMN Chuck Carlton
Crazy day. Latest Big 12 bowls: K-State vs. Arkansas in Cotton, Baylor in Alamo, Texas to Holiday and Texas A&M to Meineke Car Care.

 :dubious:
Who goes to Sugar then?

OU doesn't make it to BCS so that douche is wrong with KSU/Ark in Cotton.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 05:13:46 PM
@KellisRobinett Kellis Robinett
All signs currently pointing to K-State in the BCS. If TCU didn't make it and Baylor is headed to Alamo as reported, probably means Sugar.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: FP TC etc. on December 04, 2011, 05:14:24 PM
Nobody has any rough ridin' clue what they're talking about.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kim carnes on December 04, 2011, 05:14:45 PM
@KellisRobinett Kellis Robinett
All signs currently pointing to K-State in the BCS. If TCU didn't make it and Baylor is headed to Alamo as reported, probably means Sugar.


Kellis knows
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: j-dub on December 04, 2011, 05:15:04 PM
guys, wtf is going on
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: MadCat on December 04, 2011, 05:15:27 PM
c'mon, scheme doctor needs a sugar bowl jacket
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:15:54 PM
guys, wtf is going on

NO ONE KNOWS.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2011, 05:16:52 PM
Kellis?!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 05:17:46 PM
Kellis?!

I know where his wife works ;)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:17:56 PM
TCU confirmed for poinsettia.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 05:18:08 PM
It's Kellis!

p.s. #teamangel should change its name to #teamilikebadbasketballplayers
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on December 04, 2011, 05:18:22 PM
kiss of death from kellis

dallas-ft worth is a fine town guys, we'll have an above average time
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: bruce on December 04, 2011, 05:18:36 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft.qkme.me%2F35ev1i.jpg&hash=316399955bdc3eb4a3f93db91c655f704ad0f784)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: MadCat on December 04, 2011, 05:19:50 PM
Kellis?!

I know where his wife works ;)
are the cookies and bj's still delicious?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 05:22:19 PM
Kellis?!

I know where his wife works ;)
are the cookies and bj's still delicious?

she's a nurse
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:22:41 PM
Kellis?!

I know where his wife works ;)
are the cookies and bj's still delicious?

she's a nurse

soooo......?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wabash909 on December 04, 2011, 05:22:52 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12638
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
Sounds as if ...   Reply
Sugar took Michigan vs. Virginia Tech. We'll see.
Posted from Rivals Mobile





Posted on 12/4 5:17 PM | IP: Logged
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: FP TC etc. on December 04, 2011, 05:23:04 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft.qkme.me%2F35ev1i.jpg&hash=316399955bdc3eb4a3f93db91c655f704ad0f784)

I enjoyed this.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 05:23:24 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12638
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
Sounds as if ...   Reply
Sugar took Michigan vs. Virginia Tech. We'll see.
Posted from Rivals Mobile





Posted on 12/4 5:17 PM | IP: Logged


 :lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:24:44 PM
Confidence rising
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 05:25:53 PM
Sean_Callahan Sean Callahan
It's sounds like Sugar may take Michigan vs. Virginia Tech and that would push Kansas State to the Cotton.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 05:26:19 PM
VT to the chicken samich bowl
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 05:27:06 PM
virginia tech.  virginia f'ing tech.  you have got to be f'ing kidding me.  two teams from the 2nd worst bcs conference, and that's only because of the big east.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 05:27:44 PM
va tech taken over ksu.  you heard it here first last

fmp
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 05:28:19 PM
there are pieces of dog sh*t in my backyard that play in a better conference than the ACC.  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 05:29:06 PM
My source tells me KSU a lock for BCS.

Source grade: A+

We are God's team. This is our time in the desert, don't let Satan tempt you with false information.

Go State!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kim carnes on December 04, 2011, 05:29:19 PM
I would be upset if this happens.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 05:30:13 PM
VA TV station:

@WHSVdstoltzfus Daren Stoltzfus
I'm hearing Virginia Tech vs. Auburn in Chick-fil-a Bowl, UVA vs. Mississippi State in Music City Bowl
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: The1BigWillie on December 04, 2011, 05:30:32 PM
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions?fb_xd_fragment#?=&cb=f28ca7ac1d6a948&relation=parent&transport=fragment&frame=f3562d941397072http://

Palm hasVaTech "INBOLD" at CHick-Fil-A.  IN BOLD!!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 05:31:24 PM
My source tells me KSU a lock for BCS.

Source grade: A+

We are God's team. This is our time in the desert, don't let Satan tempt you with false information.

Go State!

I'm gonna disagree but i hope you are right.  my source is pretty good...says va tech got the nod over ksu.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KITNfury on December 04, 2011, 05:31:32 PM
Starting to get furious.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 05:31:45 PM
Quote
Chick-Fil-A Bowl 2011: Virginia Tech To Accept Bid, According To Report
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wabash909 on December 04, 2011, 05:32:13 PM
Sean_Callahan Sean Callahan
It's sounds like Sugar may take Michigan vs. Virginia Tech and that would push Kansas State to the Cotton.

Theoretically.

It's going to be interesting to see what our stalwart Big XII leadership has to say when the BCS fucks us.

Alamo or Insight wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: felix rex on December 04, 2011, 05:32:20 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft.qkme.me%2F35ev1i.jpg&hash=316399955bdc3eb4a3f93db91c655f704ad0f784)

I enjoyed this.

I did, too.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: The1BigWillie on December 04, 2011, 05:32:55 PM
Sean_Callahan Sean Callahan
It's sounds like Sugar may take Michigan vs. Virginia Tech and that would push Kansas State to the Cotton.

Theoretically.

It's going to be interesting to see what our stalwart Big XII leadership has to say when the BCS fucks us.

Alamo or Insight wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.

Alamo vs. Baylor???  We are going to the BCS. What team would be taking our spot now???
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ChiComCat on December 04, 2011, 05:33:05 PM
Baylor accepted Alamo.  That tells me OU to Cotton us to BCS, no?  Or we get really mumped...
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 05:34:34 PM
Baylor accepted Alamo.  That tells me OU to Cotton us to BCS, no?  Or we get really mumped...

hope you're right but could be ou to insight, ksu cotton?????
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:34:38 PM
D. Scott Fritchen
RT @sleePonMe87 hey world i kno something that u dont kno, but u wanna kno. you'll find out on the selection show i suppose hahaha. #iloveit
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 05:34:43 PM
@IDS_BroncoBeat Bronco Beat
Reports have Temple-Wyoming, presumably in New Mexico.....That puts Boise State in Vegas
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 05:35:06 PM
Baylor accepted Alamo.  That tells me OU to Cotton us to BCS, no?  Or we get really mumped...

If this happens we need to accept our long-standing SEC offer, like, tomorrow. :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: "storm"nut on December 04, 2011, 05:35:19 PM
Baylor accepted Alamo.  That tells me OU to Cotton us to BCS, no?  Or we get really mumped...

We could get dotcomed
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: J on December 04, 2011, 05:35:31 PM
 :peek:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 05:35:37 PM
holy crap  :runaway:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: felix rex on December 04, 2011, 05:35:42 PM
Baylor accepted Alamo.  That tells me OU to Cotton us to BCS, no?  Or we get really mumped...

If we get a bad bowl, I hope we at least get mumped so bad we inspire another rule. Like a BCS Amber alert or Meghan's law or whatever.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Kat Kid on December 04, 2011, 05:35:48 PM
D. Scott Fritchen
RT @sleePonMe87 hey world i kno something that u dont kno, but u wanna kno. you'll find out on the selection show i suppose hahaha. #iloveit

 :driving:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2011, 05:38:07 PM
guys- kstate was in the sugar the second the clocked ticket to zero in the ou/osu game last night. we got this.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 05:38:40 PM
Quote
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Virginia Tech to Sugar, Virginia to Chick-Fil-A.

makes sense...Va Tech is playing in both bowls cause the ACC is so bad.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: "storm"nut on December 04, 2011, 05:38:52 PM
Tumor, OU to insight
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 05:39:34 PM
Doubt this means anything though.

@DScottFritchen D. Scott Fritchen
Just stuck a fork in my eye.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 05:39:37 PM
guys- kstate was in the sugar the second the clocked ticket to zero in the ou/osu game last night. we got this.

i want to believe this
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on December 04, 2011, 05:40:03 PM
goddammit.  goddammit.  I can't take this.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:40:09 PM
Not good...
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 05:40:41 PM
KellisRobinett Kellis Robinett
Nothing official yet, but I'm hearing K-State is headed to the Cotton Bowl. Seems likely considering Missouri is headed to non Big 12 bowl.


pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 05:40:50 PM
LifeofFitz Tim Fitzgerald
Looks like the Sugar took Michigan vs. Virginia Tech, thus rewarding the ACC for its mediocre football.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 05:41:06 PM
robcassidy22 Rob Cassidy
Holy crap.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 05:41:14 PM
D Scott and Fitz are sticking forks in their eyes over the same bull crap everyone else is spewing. Still don't think anyone knows what they're talking about.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wabash909 on December 04, 2011, 05:41:23 PM
Cotton Bowl or Insight.

Can't believe the Insight is even a possibility, but the K-State fan in me knows it is.




Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 05:41:53 PM
mizzou is going to 'the independece bowl vs north carolina
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 05:42:16 PM
Quote
Sugar Bowl 2012: Virginia Tech Making Shocking Appearance, According To Report

For the first time in ACC history, the conference will put two teams into BCS games, according to CBS Sports. The Virginia Tech Hokies will reportedly head to the 2012 Sugar Bowl, where they'll face another at-large opponent, likely the Michigan Wolverines.

Mother Fuckers!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 05:43:49 PM
Quote
Cotton Bowl 2012: Houston, Penn State Set To Square Off
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 05:43:56 PM
pretty sure my source knew what he was talking about...va tech over ksu.  crap
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wabash909 on December 04, 2011, 05:44:07 PM
ESPN got their Hokies in the Sugar.

What a rough ridin' joke.

 :flush:
Title: washington vs baylor in alamo
Post by: pencat on December 04, 2011, 05:44:33 PM
i still think sugar is possible.

Confirmed in local press :fatty:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 05:45:06 PM
Quote
Cotton Bowl 2012: Houston, Penn State Set To Square Off

:lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 05:45:31 PM
What if it's Va Tech vs Katz  :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: dontfeedthebear on December 04, 2011, 05:46:08 PM
With this thread, I started out  :peek:

then :users:

then  :pray:

there was a little  :excited:

quickly becoming  :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 05:46:12 PM
We are not going to the Sugar.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 05:47:33 PM
Quote
BryanDFischer Bryan Fischer
Virginia Tech to Sugar, Virginia to Chick-Fil-A.

makes sense...Va Tech is playing in both bowls cause the ACC is so bad.

who the eff is Bryan Fischer?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 05:47:43 PM
So, was Sheldon Smith happy about the Cotton or what?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 05:47:51 PM
I don't want the Cotton. I either want to be extremely disrespected or greatly rewarded. I don't want a fence riding Cotton bowl birth.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on December 04, 2011, 05:48:04 PM
This is rough ridin' horseshit if the Big 12 only gets one in, and the ACC gets 2.  Horseshit.  Horseshit.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 05:48:26 PM
I don't want the Cotton. I either want to be extremely disrespected or greatly rewarded. I don't want a fence riding Cotton bowl birth.

Agree
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 05:49:06 PM
cotton bowl sucks.  the acc and big east battle every year to see who has the sh*ttiest conference.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 05:49:33 PM
Quote
Little Caesars Bowl 2011: Purdue, Western Michigan Engage In Rust Belt Action
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dub on December 04, 2011, 05:51:51 PM
Cotton.  Seriously.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 05:52:23 PM
Sugar waiting on winner of bball game to make decision for them?   :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 05:52:31 PM
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions?fb_xd_fragment#?=&cb=f28ca7ac1d6a948&relation=parent&transport=fragment&frame=f3562d941397072http://

Palm hasVaTech "INBOLD" at CHick-Fil-A.  IN BOLD!!

Va Tech is now unbolded...
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 05:52:38 PM
UPDATE: In an unforeseen development, it appears as though Virginia Tech will get a bid to play in the Sugar Bowl - the first time the ACC has sent two teams to the BCS.  The Hokies' jump to the BCS changes the following bowl scenarios.

Clemson - Orange
Virginia Tech - Sugar
Virginia - Chick Fil-A
Florida State - Champs
Georgia Tech - Sun
NC State - Belk
Wake Forest - Music City
North Carolina - Independence
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 05:52:58 PM
Sugar waiting on winner of bball game to make decision for them?   :dunno:


hahahahha
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 05:53:10 PM
Virginia Tech is dogshit and does not deserve the Sugar Bowl, but bowl selection isn't about fair, it's about money.

Cotton Bowl would be a great destination. I'd take. There's still a very real chance we drop all the way to Insight. Again, it is not about fair.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 05:54:02 PM
horseshit. this is total rough ridin' horseshit.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PowercatPat on December 04, 2011, 05:54:25 PM
This is unbelievable.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 05:54:40 PM
Virginia Tech is dogshit and does not deserve the Sugar Bowl, but bowl selection isn't about fair, it's about money.

Cotton Bowl would be a great destination. I'd take. There's still a very real chance we drop all the way to Insight. Again, it is not about fair.

well...hopefully the players don't "love" going to the insight.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 05:57:52 PM
I would be very, very happy with Cotton...and so would anyone else who isn't a rough ridin' dumb ass.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 05:58:41 PM
Blame ESPN and the rest of the sports media. They sucked on VaTech' nuts all year, despite them playing in a weak conference. Media exposure = national interest = better bowls.

The media perpetuates a certain eschelon of programs whether they are good or not. eff ESPN
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 05:58:41 PM
lol at cbs website.  had va tech bolded and wake forest bolded in independence.  made me question my source, but now they are both unbolded.  jeezus.  cbs is a joke.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 05:59:07 PM
RalphGuidry Raphael Guidry
Heading to the mcdonalds bowl. bowl gift includes unlimited mc doubles w/ mac sauce for an entire year. #I'M LOVING IT.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 06:00:00 PM
I would be very, very happy with Cotton...and so would anyone else who isn't a rough ridin' dumb ass.

Agreed.Great bowl, and we get to keep our snuggly blanket of no respect.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: GoodForAnother on December 04, 2011, 06:01:04 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 06:01:19 PM
I would be very, very happy with Cotton...and so would anyone else who isn't a rough ridin' dumb ass.

Agreed.Great bowl, and we get to keep our snuggly blanket of no respect.

Disagree. Cotton would be nice, but it's the principle of the whole thing. Why do we deserve to get ass mumped?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:01:44 PM
Cotton is the second to last bowl game of the year, on a Friday night, in a world class venue, in our most important recruiting city.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 06:02:17 PM
eff the shitty loser cotton bowl
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 06:02:43 PM
We are better than Virginia Tech.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 06:03:12 PM
shut the eff up pete
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:03:35 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 06:04:02 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:

Because they play in a dog crap conference
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:04:13 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:

 :dubious:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 06:04:27 PM
My christmas wish:  another asian guy goes crazy in blacksburg, specifically at the VT football practice facility.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ChiComCat on December 04, 2011, 06:05:05 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:

I think getting blown out by 28 your last game drops you a spot in bowl selection with figuring that fans may not travel as well, jmo
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 06:05:10 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:

KSU is 5-2 vs top 30.

VT? 0-2

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wes mantooth on December 04, 2011, 06:05:51 PM
didn't know pete was such a dumbass about college football  :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pufiZzle on December 04, 2011, 06:06:02 PM
Zero wins vs ranked teams. Zero rough ridin' wins.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:06:22 PM
How are we more deserving than OU?  We aren't, dumbasses.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: StayOutOfTrees on December 04, 2011, 06:06:35 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:

VT hasn't even beat a ranked team this year. You got to be kidding me.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dub on December 04, 2011, 06:07:43 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:

KSU is 5-2 vs top 30.

VT? 0-2



Since when did bowl games care about records?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:08:03 PM
How are we more deserving than OU?  We aren't, dumbasses.

Just stop.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 06:08:30 PM
WHAT IS THE rough ridin' POINT OF THE BCS

I thought it was supposed to make sure all the good teams played each other at the end of the year?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 06:08:57 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:

KSU is 5-2 vs top 30.

VT? 0-2



Since when did bowl games care about records?

Since when are we talking about what bowl games care about? I was arguing who was most deserving.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kim carnes on December 04, 2011, 06:09:09 PM
WHAT IS THE rough ridin' POINT OF THE BCS

I thought it was supposed to make sure all the good teams played each other at the end of the year?

Nope, its to make money
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 06:09:22 PM
WHAT IS THE rough ridin' POINT OF THE BCS

I thought it was supposed to make sure all the good teams played each other at the end of the year?

It needs to be trashed ASAP. It's rough ridin' bull crap.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 06:09:42 PM
vt will probably bring more asians that will go crazy and kill massive amounts of people, so I could see why the Sugar would take them over KSU.  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:09:47 PM
yeah the cotton bowl is great but that doesn't mean we didn't deserve sugar over va tech

I really don't get how we are so much more deserving than VaTech. :dunno:

KSU is 5-2 vs top 30.

VT? 0-2


Since when did bowl games care about records?

Exactly.  Go back to your rough ridin' small town shantys, if you are honestly surprised in the least about this.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 06:09:54 PM
Dumb question-

What are the odds of VT vs KSU in the Sugar?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 06:10:08 PM
I would be very, very happy with Cotton...and so would anyone else who isn't a rough ridin' dumb ass.

Agreed.Great bowl, and we get to keep our snuggly blanket of no respect.

Disagree. Cotton would be nice, but it's the principle of the whole thing. Why do we deserve to get ass mumped?

How long have you been a K-State fan? Are you reall surprised? Just bend over and accept it. Think Cotton Bowl... Cotton Bowl... its the lube that will make things so much easier.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:11:16 PM
floodaggy is officially in the Pinstripe Bowl, whatever that means.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 06:11:43 PM
I would be very, very happy with Cotton...and so would anyone else who isn't a rough ridin' dumb ass.

Agreed.Great bowl, and we get to keep our snuggly blanket of no respect.

Disagree. Cotton would be nice, but it's the principle of the whole thing. Why do we deserve to get ass mumped?

How long have you been a K-State fan? Are you reall surprised? Just bend over and accept it. Think Cotton Bowl... Cotton Bowl... its the lube that will make things so much easier.

I will not accept it. I will continue to hold grudges. We thrive on grudges.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 06:12:10 PM
Why the eff should we accept it?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:12:22 PM
floodaggy is officially in the Pinstripe Bowl, whatever that means.



It means that Mizzou is shut out of Big 12 associated bowls...they now have to go shopping for the leftover bowls.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:13:04 PM
floodaggy is officially in the Pinstripe Bowl, whatever that means.



It means that Mizzou is shut out of Big 12 associated bowls...they now have to go shopping for the leftover bowls.

methaggy twitter ppl are saying independence bowl. shreveport :lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 06:13:41 PM
Dumb question-

What are the odds of VT vs KSU in the Sugar?

Less than 0
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 06:13:43 PM
Are we seriously going to the Cotton? or are we still freaking out over word of mouth?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:13:51 PM
Why the eff should we accept it?

Us "accepting it" or "not accepting it" amounts to exactly the same thing to college football, the BCS, and the Sugar Bowl.  Jack rough ridin' crap.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 06:14:10 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 06:15:02 PM
I would be very, very happy with Cotton...and so would anyone else who isn't a rough ridin' dumb ass.

Agreed.Great bowl, and we get to keep our snuggly blanket of no respect.

Disagree. Cotton would be nice, but it's the principle of the whole thing. Why do we deserve to get ass mumped?

How long have you been a K-State fan? Are you reall surprised? Just bend over and accept it. Think Cotton Bowl... Cotton Bowl... its the lube that will make things so much easier.

I will not accept it. I will continue to hold grudges. We thrive on grudges.

Oh, totally agree with that. Grudge on, brother, grudge on.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 06:15:25 PM
This is the BCS punishing the selfish, greedy, egomaniacal, self-destructive, bipolar Big XII for these off season charades.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 06:15:40 PM
Quote
2012 Fiesta Bowl: Oklahoma State, Stanford Reportedly Up
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rams on December 04, 2011, 06:16:13 PM
floodaggy is officially in the Pinstripe Bowl, whatever that means.



It means that pedophile Rhoads will get a contract extension and have a street named after him.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 06:16:18 PM
the handwritings been on the wall for the last hour guys.  when mu accepted the independence bowl, there were 2 open bowls (cotton and insight) and only 2 big 12 teams (OU and KSU)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ksucrcoop on December 04, 2011, 06:16:23 PM
Quote
ColFootballNews CFN
Kansas State must be out of the BCS mix ... the Big 12 is running out of bowl slots up top
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:16:54 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:17:36 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

Well then, they should've beaten Texas Tech ( :lol: ) and Baylor.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ChiComCat on December 04, 2011, 06:18:48 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

3 losses and the way the last one happened, turnout may suck.  Though the closeness of the Cotton may of helped
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 06:18:51 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

From a slotting standpoint, they are where they should be.  Behind KSU and Baylor.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:19:01 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

Well then, they should've beaten Texas Tech ( :lol: ) and Baylor.

Frankly, it's a big deal if the Cotton passed on OU and Baylor to take us...I appreciate that.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wes mantooth on December 04, 2011, 06:19:05 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

I'd be more furious they lost at home to Tech.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 06:19:38 PM
Quote
Orange Bowl 2012: West Virginia-Clemson Looks To Be Official Matchup
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:19:45 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

From a slotting standpoint, they are where they should be.  Behind KSU and Baylor.

I get that, but that, obviously, doesn't guarantee anything.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 06:21:45 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

From a slotting standpoint, they are where they should be.  Behind KSU and Baylor.

I get that, but that, obviously, doesn't guarantee anything.

but you said you'd be furious for not going Cotton when you got 4th place in the league.  why?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 06:22:34 PM
I'll have mad respect for Cotton if they "do the right thing."
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:23:30 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

From a slotting standpoint, they are where they should be.  Behind KSU and Baylor.

I get that, but that, obviously, doesn't guarantee anything.

but you said you'd be furious for not going Cotton when you got 4th place in the league.  why?

Because OU knows that Cotton "can" take them.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 06:23:37 PM
Quote from: Chris Harper, aka The Catata-fish, on Facebook
Chris Harper
These bowl projections Im seeing are killing me right now! lol Im seeing some names I've never heard of lol
Like · · 7 minutes ago ·


Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PowercatPat on December 04, 2011, 06:25:14 PM
Arkansas is going to rough ridin' destroy us.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 06:25:37 PM
Quote
Hawaii Bowl 2011: Southern Miss, Nevada Square Off In Paradise
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: tdaver on December 04, 2011, 06:25:45 PM
Michigan needed a name opponent they could beat to validate their spot in the BCS.  VT fit the bill.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:26:03 PM
Arkansas is going to rough ridin' destroy us.

Yeah, this is the other reason why I'm melting down. Michigan would've been a much easier matchup.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:27:31 PM
Arkansas is going to rough ridin' destroy us.

No one cares.  No one cares who wins BCS bowls either.  It's just about going to them, not who wins. 
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: FP TC etc. on December 04, 2011, 06:27:40 PM
Quote
KnowSportsLand Tanner Knowland
The #vtech to Sugar Bowl rumor originated from a blog where a guy says he has a friend at ESPN... I do not believe it.

 :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:28:12 PM
slmandel
That means VT to Sugar. RT @DDoughtyOnAir: UVa has advised TV outlets of media coordinates for Chick-fil-A news conference.

welp
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: OlatheWildcat on December 04, 2011, 06:29:11 PM
Arkansas struggled against Troy. Their passing game isn't as good as Ok St. or Baylor. #teammeh
Edit: Only beat Ole Miss by 5/
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Kat Kid on December 04, 2011, 06:30:10 PM
Quote from: Chris Harper, aka The Catata-fish, on Facebook
Chris Harper
These bowl projections Im seeing are killing me right now! lol Im seeing some names I've never heard of lol
Like · · 7 minutes ago ·



 :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 06:30:16 PM
Quote
KnowSportsLand Tanner Knowland
The #vtech to Sugar Bowl rumor originated from a blog where a guy says he has a friend at ESPN... I do not believe it.

 :dunno:

that's just some stupid townie.  it's over.  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 06:30:57 PM
We struggled against EKU.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 06:31:16 PM
Quote from: Chris Harper, aka The Catata-fish, on Facebook
Chris Harper
These bowl projections Im seeing are killing me right now! lol Im seeing some names I've never heard of lol
Like · · 7 minutes ago ·



 :surprised:

he's saying that a bunch of townies are messaging him about which bowl they got
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Tobias on December 04, 2011, 06:33:18 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 06:33:30 PM
Considering the the Q@atz haven't announced that they've accepted a bowl, that's saying something....      :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 06:34:04 PM
Not really any more worried about Arkansas than I was about Baylor, Tech, OU, OSU, etc.  Sure, they can air it out but I think it will be closer to the OSU game than the OU game.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: OlatheWildcat on December 04, 2011, 06:34:24 PM
Hey Virginia Tech, at least our campus is safe  :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: bws on December 04, 2011, 06:34:44 PM
DanWetzel Dan Wetzel
Sugar: Michigan-Va Tech. Remember Delany went to wall for Sugar, got Pryor et al eligible. No way going to make UM play Boise. Quid pro quo
4 minutes ago Favorite Undo Retweet Reply

 DanWetzel Dan Wetzel
Not a TV draw RT @Sports_Idiots @DanWetzel Doesn't explain K-State getting snubbed.
32 seconds ago Favorite Retweet Reply

Jim Delaney (big 10 commish) runs CFB, he wants Michigan to play VT not us or Boise. Therefore it happens. No one should be surprised the BCS operates this way. It has for years.

Enjoy the Cotton. If you want a villain, delaney is your man and the main obstacle to a playoff.
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:35:58 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 06:37:15 PM
Tim Fitzgerald
Big 12 isn't done fighting for #KState to Sugar.

HOPE!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: hemmy on December 04, 2011, 06:37:38 PM
eff the BCS in its rough ridin' bad person.
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KITNfury on December 04, 2011, 06:37:58 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:
good point, I have no doubt recruits are more impressed by us playing a bowl in their home state than they would if we were in the sugar rough ridin' bowl.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 06:38:22 PM
I really like the Cotton Bowl.  Would have loved a BCS but the Cotton has tons of good things going for it.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ChiComCat on December 04, 2011, 06:38:27 PM
Yea, I'm a little upset but Cotton is about what I expected at the beginning of the day and I'm not sure why I should be so pissed now.  Its prob the easiest one to get to also.  Would've like the extra sacks of money for our school/conference
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: doom on December 04, 2011, 06:38:50 PM
Tim Fitzgerald
Big 12 isn't done fighting for #KState to Sugar.

HOPE!

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 06:38:58 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:


Can you tell us more about how pissed off OU should be for not getting the Cotton bowl invite over us?
Title: Re: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kitten_mittons on December 04, 2011, 06:39:37 PM
Quote
2011 Insight Bowl: Oklahoma Vs. Iowa In Arizona, According To Report

If I am an OU fan, I'm rough ridin' furious.  They beat us head to head, and have only been to the Cotton once since 1995.

Well then, they should've beaten Texas Tech ( :lol: ) and Baylor.

Frankly, it's a big deal if the Cotton passed on OU and Baylor to take us...I appreciate that.
Can't believe they would pass on the #3 and 4 teams to take the #2 team.  We really lucked out!

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: hemmy on December 04, 2011, 06:40:16 PM
Currie is no Lew Perkins, that stupid rough ridin' bitch.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 06:41:59 PM
Quote
Sugar Bowl 2012: Virginia Tech, Michigan Headed To Superdome

The Sugar Bowl matchup for 2012 is official, according to Stewart Mandel of SI.com. The Michigan Wolverines will take on the Virginia Tech Hokies.

Mandel also reports that the Sugar Bowl may have passed on at least two top 10 teams in order to select Virginia tech and Michigan.

The Sugar Bowl is one of the oldest bowls in college football as it was first played on New Year's Day in 1935, trailing only the Rose Bowl which began annual play in 1916. The game has racked up quite a bit of history since its inception, too, having hosted the BCS National Championship game in 2000 and again in 2004.

The 2011 Sugar Bowl featured the Ohio State Buckeyes defeating the Arkansas Razorbacks with a 31-26 final score, but that victory has since been vacated by Ohio State due to a scandal at the school. Terrelle Pryor also ended up losing his MVP award from that game, keeping him from joining a Sugar Bowl MVP class that has included Tim Tebow, JaMarcus Russell, Jason Campbell and Ken Dorsey in the past.

eff you Stewie...
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 06:43:07 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:

they haven't announced us yet pete...  :frown:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 06:43:47 PM
cbs now has VT in Sugar, OU in Cotton and us in Insight.    :chainsaw:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 06:43:57 PM
So, the ACC gets two bids and the Big 12 only gets one?  That's mumped up.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: hemmy on December 04, 2011, 06:44:36 PM
cbs now has VT in Sugar, OU in Cotton and us in Insight.    :chainsaw:

you have got to be rough ridin' me
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:45:28 PM
cbs now has VT in Sugar, OU in Cotton and us in Insight.    :chainsaw:

'grats, pete.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 06:46:44 PM
WE NEED LSU v. tbpOSU
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 06:47:14 PM
OMFG.


I hope we don't go. What's the point. Say we're going to go, get all the practice time, and then just not actually show up.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 06:47:54 PM
So we may have ended up in the #4 spot?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 06:48:13 PM
cbs now has VT in Sugar, OU in Cotton and us in Insight.    :chainsaw:

wrong.  cbs has ou accepted in insight
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 06:48:33 PM
Team should boycott if we get dropped to the Insight. I'm not even rough ridin' kidding.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 06:48:55 PM
So we may have ended up in the #4 spot?

We are due for a BIG K IT N this year.  Here you go.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: felix rex on December 04, 2011, 06:49:38 PM
I'm gonna get all email-campaign embarrassing kind of angry. Dammit.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 06:52:45 PM
Quote
AT&T Cotton Bowl Classic
Announcement coming very shortly!

 :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: AbeFroman on December 04, 2011, 06:53:29 PM
I'm gonna get all email-campaign embarrassing kind of angry. Dammit.

I can't wait to let out my anger on sports talk radio
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 06:53:54 PM
Quote
Military Bowl 2011: Toledo, Air Force To Wage Aerial Combat

 :jerk:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: j-dub on December 04, 2011, 06:54:16 PM
guys, i'm not handling this very well.  :frown:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EuroCat on December 04, 2011, 06:54:58 PM
BITB is going to be incredible tomorrow :love:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 06:55:51 PM
So we may have ended up in the #4 spot?

We are due for a BIG K IT N this year.  Here you go.


I know.  Thought we were gonna get away with our only real KITN being OU losing to TT and costing us GameDay, but I knew the other shoe would drop (right on our nuts) today.
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:56:52 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:
good point, I have no doubt recruits are more impressed by us playing a bowl in their home state than they would if we were in the sugar rough ridin' bowl.

Which one will get more coverage in the Dallas news paper?  Which one will be on the local news?  Which one is the one that families all over DFW have a tradition of attending each year?  Which one will Jerry Jones hyping the crap out of?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: RAZORBACK REVEREND on December 04, 2011, 06:57:17 PM
Cotton.....

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: The1BigWillie on December 04, 2011, 06:57:32 PM
Will not watch a single rough ridin' bowl game and this entire season will have gone for not.  :drink:  :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 06:58:16 PM
cbs now has VT in Sugar, OU in Cotton and us in Insight.    :chainsaw:

'grats, pete.

Now THAT would be a true kick in the nuts.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 06:58:37 PM
ESPNU Crew about to debate whether VaTech or K-State is more deserving of an at-large.  This ought to be good
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 06:58:54 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:
good point, I have no doubt recruits are more impressed by us playing a bowl in their home state than they would if we were in the sugar rough ridin' bowl.

Which one will get more coverage in the Dallas news paper?  Which one will be on the local news?  Which one is the one that families all over DFW have a tradition of attending each year?  Which one will Jerry Jones hyping the crap out of?

We get a decent amount of 'cruits from NOLA too.  :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 06:59:03 PM
guys, i'm not handling this very well.  :frown:

+1

Big 12 rated the toughest conference & they only get 1 team in the BCS while the rough ridin' ACC & Big 10 gets 2. eff that.

ESPNU is going to debate who is deserves it more K-State or VTech coming up.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Perry on December 04, 2011, 06:59:24 PM
Cotton.....



Go eat a dick
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 06:59:46 PM
CBS has put us into Cotton.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:00:02 PM
Odd that Cotton hasn't announced yet. Sugar must still be standing there giggling at all the fun.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WildCatzPhreak on December 04, 2011, 07:00:25 PM
 :barf:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Skipper44 on December 04, 2011, 07:01:06 PM
I am sure Sugar people want KSU and TV wants VT, TV usually wins
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:01:50 PM
Quote
Las Vegas Bowl 2011: Boise State Returns To Vegas To Take On Arizona State
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 07:02:47 PM
Jesus, ESPNU just pouring salt knowing VT is in.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dub on December 04, 2011, 07:02:57 PM
Cotton.....



Go eat a dick

He's correct.
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:04:05 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:
good point, I have no doubt recruits are more impressed by us playing a bowl in their home state than they would if we were in the sugar rough ridin' bowl.

Which one will get more coverage in the Dallas news paper?  Which one will be on the local news?  Which one is the one that families all over DFW have a tradition of attending each year?  Which one will Jerry Jones hyping the crap out of?

We get a decent amount of 'cruits from NOLA too.  :dunno:

We get none, outside of Sams.  None.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 07:04:17 PM
Doesn't Michigan have to be top 14 to get to Sugar? Maybe they whiffed.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 07:04:32 PM
Quote
Dari Noka (Sp?)

I'm kind of surprised the discussion is even there (re: VaTech in a BCS)

Quote
Guy with Dracula hair

VaTech got run by a mile by their only good competition all season
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:04:58 PM
Quote
Capital One Bowl 2012: Nebraska, South Carolina Make January Game
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Perry on December 04, 2011, 07:05:14 PM
Cotton.....



Go eat a dick

He's correct.

Does not change my feelings
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 07:05:23 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:
good point, I have no doubt recruits are more impressed by us playing a bowl in their home state than they would if we were in the sugar rough ridin' bowl.

Which one will get more coverage in the Dallas news paper?  Which one will be on the local news?  Which one is the one that families all over DFW have a tradition of attending each year?  Which one will Jerry Jones hyping the crap out of?

We get a decent amount of 'cruits from NOLA too.  :dunno:

We get none, outside of Sams.  None.

eff you Pete, I have a great pipeline in Louisiana in my KSU Dynasty in NCAA 12 :angry:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:05:55 PM
I am so on edge, Jesus this is rough ridin' killing me. We are the # 2 team in the Big rough ridin' 12
Title: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 07:06:07 PM
you people that are okay with the cotton bowl are a bunch of rough ridin' pussies.  what a garbage bowl

Jerry dome, on a Friday night in our most recruited city.

Shut the eff up.  Seriously.   :facepalm:
good point, I have no doubt recruits are more impressed by us playing a bowl in their home state than they would if we were in the sugar rough ridin' bowl.

Which one will get more coverage in the Dallas news paper?  Which one will be on the local news?  Which one is the one that families all over DFW have a tradition of attending each year?  Which one will Jerry Jones hyping the crap out of?

We get a decent amount of 'cruits from NOLA too.  :dunno:

We get none, outside of Sams.  None.

(And the surrounding area, of which Baton Rouge counts.)  Apparently you have forgotten about KEITHEN VALENTINE?????? (Sp?)  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: CHONGS on December 04, 2011, 07:06:23 PM
I am so on edge, Jesus this is rough ridin' killing me. We are the # 2 team in the Big rough ridin' 12
its over man.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: goCats101 on December 04, 2011, 07:06:30 PM
Just realized how much I'd rather have us just be in a bowl we are capable of winning if not the Sugar.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on December 04, 2011, 07:06:45 PM
I am sure Sugar people want KSU and TV wants VT, TV usually wins

Fitz says  ESPN and Big 12 fighting for KSU in Sugar
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 07:06:55 PM
Mich one win over a ranked NU team.  lost to an unranked team.  VT no wins over ranked teams.  destroyed twice by only decent team they played.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:06:59 PM
I am so on edge, Jesus this is rough ridin' killing me. We are the # 2 team in the Big rough ridin' 12
its over man.

I know
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 07:07:20 PM
Wow, that was one hell of a "debate."  "Nobody knows who K-State is."  Pretty mush sums it up.  The only thing they left out is "...because we in the media don't cover anyone from the Big 12 unless they're from Texas or Oklahoma."
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 04, 2011, 07:07:28 PM
I am sure Sugar people want KSU and TV wants VT, TV usually wins

Fitz says  ESPN and Big 12 fighting for KSU in Sugar

pffft
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 07:07:39 PM
CaptainCrap?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ArchE_Cat on December 04, 2011, 07:07:50 PM
 :curse: :shakesfist: :angry: :chainsaw:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Spaces on December 04, 2011, 07:08:18 PM
Fitz  :facepalm:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU-Krazie on December 04, 2011, 07:08:32 PM
Which one is worse?

VT, Michigan, or Boise taking our spot?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 07:08:47 PM
I am sure Sugar people want KSU and TV wants VT, TV usually wins

Fitz says  ESPN and Big 12 fighting for KSU in Sugar

:lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: hemmy on December 04, 2011, 07:08:53 PM
CaptainCrap?

He won't be showing his face after this crap :frown:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:08:59 PM
I am sure Sugar people want KSU and TV wants VT, TV usually wins

Fitz says  ESPN and Big 12 fighting for KSU in Sugar

pffft

We've been "Patterson"d again....      :curse:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 07:09:13 PM
I am sure Sugar people want KSU and TV wants VT, TV usually wins

Fitz says  ESPN and Big 12 fighting for KSU in Sugar

Good god Fitz. Can you be any more of a joke? Yes, apparently you can.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:09:40 PM
Quote
Outback Bowl 2012: Georgia, Michigan State Meet In Runners-Up Fest
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on December 04, 2011, 07:09:53 PM
Fitz  :facepalm:

"Its Sugar!"
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 07:10:24 PM
Doesn't Michigan have to be top 14 to get to Sugar? Maybe they whiffed.

Can someone answer this? Pan? Fan?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 07:11:17 PM
Doesn't Michigan have to be top 14 to get to Sugar? Maybe they whiffed.

Can someone answer this? Pan? Fan?

We'll know in about 5 minutes the final standings...
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Tobias on December 04, 2011, 07:11:26 PM
just because a bowl game happens to be situationally better in dallas doesn't make me more excited about just getting an arm chopped off rather than getting shot in the face.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Spaces on December 04, 2011, 07:11:31 PM
What if Fitz is right and redeems himself!?!  :excited: :excited:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kim carnes on December 04, 2011, 07:11:39 PM
Doesn't Michigan have to be top 14 to get to Sugar? Maybe they whiffed.

Can someone answer this? Pan? Fan?

Yes, they have to be top 14.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:11:50 PM
Quote
TicketCity Bowl 2012: Penn State Vs. Houston In The Oddball Matchup
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 07:12:22 PM
WE ARENT EVEN ON ESPNUS BOARD PREDICTOR??????????????????
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: colsanders718 on December 04, 2011, 07:13:09 PM
Insidery source at the Cotton Bowl says KState Arkansas in the Cotton Bowl  :chainsaw:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:13:14 PM
ESPNU didn't even have the K-State logo when picking :flush:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:13:23 PM
What BCS bowl has ever, or would ever, "change their mind???"  LOL
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:13:31 PM
 :frown:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 07:13:36 PM
Pete.  Stop trying to make the Cotton seem better than the Sugar.  It's not.

 
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU-Krazie on December 04, 2011, 07:13:52 PM
WE ARENT EVEN ON ESPNUS BOARD PREDICTOR??????????????????

Wow, TCU is up there but not us
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 07:14:01 PM
Who is this red headed dolt on the ESPNU?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: The1BigWillie on December 04, 2011, 07:14:17 PM
Insidery source at the Cotton Bowl says KState Arkansas in the Cotton Bowl  :chainsaw:

WILLTAKE
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KITNfury on December 04, 2011, 07:14:24 PM
I can't even put into words how butt hurt I am right now.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:14:43 PM
Well, I hope all of our shithead fans who were rooting for OSU last night are happy.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Skipper44 on December 04, 2011, 07:15:15 PM
pollstalking after this will be fun
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:15:17 PM
I can't even put into words how butt hurt I am right now.

THIS X100000000000000000000000
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:15:22 PM
No crap, Pete.  Stop trying to make the Cotton seem better than the Sugar.  It's not.

 


Jesus rough ridin' Christ, it's obviously not better than the Sugar Bowl, but we are not getting mumped here.  Missing out on the Cotton is getting mumped.  

It would have been nice to go to Sugar, but Cotton is great.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 07:15:38 PM
Well, I hope all of our shithead fans who were rooting for OSU last night are happy.

Yeah no kidding
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:15:51 PM
Well, I hope all of our shithead fans who were rooting for OSU last night are happy.

Ya, cause that mattered.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 07:16:09 PM
Jesus rough ridin' Christ, it's obviously not better than the Sugar Bowl, but we are not getting mumped here.  

You're out of your rough ridin' mind.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 07:16:46 PM
The only reason  I still have hope is Chris Harper is way to positive about it.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: zackole1 on December 04, 2011, 07:16:58 PM
I want to shoot ESPN right in the rough ridin' face.....................
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:17:11 PM
Pete must have battered wife syndrome or something. VT over us is an even bigger ass rough ridin' than Boise would have been.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:17:18 PM
Jesus rough ridin' Christ, it's obviously not better than the Sugar Bowl, but we are not getting mumped here.  

You're out of your rough ridin' mind.

You all just need to shut your mouths and take what you are given.  You cannot make any difference in the process either way.  Accept your places in the world.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: hemmy on December 04, 2011, 07:17:28 PM
Time to blow some crap up
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2011, 07:17:41 PM
Craig James?  The Pirate just tossed a slipper at the TV set.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:17:57 PM
I want to shoot ESPN right in the rough ridin' face.....................

Ya, you guys got completely mumped.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Skipper44 on December 04, 2011, 07:18:24 PM
No crap, Pete.  Stop trying to make the Cotton seem better than the Sugar.  It's not.

 


Jesus rough ridin' Christ, it's obviously not better than the Sugar Bowl, but we are not getting mumped here.  Missing out on the Cotton is getting mumped.  

It would have been nice to go to Sugar, but Cotton is great.
no skipping any steps on the ladder of acceptance Pete, you can not skip out on anger
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:18:26 PM
#8  :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PowercatPat on December 04, 2011, 07:18:44 PM
Another KITN. No Big 12 Championship or BCS bowl.

 :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:19:38 PM
eff Bama & the voters
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:19:54 PM
I hope T. Boone buys the NCAA and burns their headquarters to the ground.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:20:03 PM
Cotton bowl has #6 vs #8.   :gocho:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2011, 07:20:16 PM
The SEC invitational . . . it was a boring as $hit game Herbie.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 07:20:45 PM
Jesus rough ridin' Christ, it's obviously not better than the Sugar Bowl, but we are not getting mumped here.  

You're out of your rough ridin' mind.

You all just need to shut your mouths and take what you are given.  You cannot make any difference in the process either way.  Accept your places in the world.

eff you. You're not taking away my meltdown.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Perry on December 04, 2011, 07:20:53 PM
I would like Kornheiser guy to weigh in on this.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ew2x4 on December 04, 2011, 07:21:01 PM
Why do crazy fucks shoot up churches and schools and let injustices like this go free? (not condoning, but come on).
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:21:35 PM
Both Boise and Arkansas should get a BCS spot ahead of us, right?  If things were "fair" they would both get an at large before us, right?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:21:44 PM
eff the SEC
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: zackole1 on December 04, 2011, 07:22:31 PM
If Game Day ever comes to K-State .....I say we kill them all................




...not kidding....
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 07:22:37 PM
@ATTCottonBowl AT&T Cotton Bowl
We are happy to announce that the @ArkRazorbacks will be our SEC team in the 2012 #ATTCBC! Big 12 announcement coming soon!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:22:57 PM
Both Boise and Arkansas should get a BCS spot ahead of us, right?  If things were "fair" they would both get an at large before us, right?

If things were "fair" Boise, Arkansas, and Kansas State would all be in the BCS because they are all in the rough ridin' top 10.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 07:23:17 PM
On the plus side I am LOVING how that big purple powercat is smack dab in the middle of the wide shots of the desk.  :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:23:28 PM
Both Boise and Arkansas should get a BCS spot ahead of us, right?  If things were "fair" they would both get an at large before us, right?

That is where the voters are stupid, the only way Boise should get in is if they were undefeated & they are not. Their strength of schedule sucks period.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:23:37 PM
Back door dealings going on???
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2011, 07:23:47 PM
Really Mark May . . . Penn State, Bama beating Penn State?

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 07:24:21 PM
sleePonMe87 Sheldon Smith
OK ST. got robbed. dont nobody wanna see that wacc ass championship game....I wanted to see those recievers vs. that LSU secondary.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: k-state87 on December 04, 2011, 07:24:50 PM
Really Mark May . . . Penn State, Bama beating Penn State?



Bama's best win was losing at HOME to #1 LSU in OT
Title: Re: cotton
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 07:24:56 PM
cat was let out of the bag.....

http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/K-State_Bowl_Flap_Causes_Stir_134975653.html

^^
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:25:10 PM
Both Boise and Arkansas should get a BCS spot ahead of us, right?  If things were "fair" they would both get an at large before us, right?

That is where the voters are stupid, the only way Boise should get in is if they were undefeated & they are not. Their strength of schedule sucks period.

Agreed
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 07:25:10 PM
Playing Ark in the Cotton is actually pretty sweet.  BCS would obviously be better but to say the Cotton is a KITN is pretty silly.  The Insight would be a KITN.  Nobody expected us to be here, so we're not going to get the same respect as a Va Tech.  crap ain't exactly fair but it's the way things work.  Can't see any reason for you retards to be melting down over a Cotton bid.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: zackole1 on December 04, 2011, 07:25:42 PM
Is that one of the three stooges sitting next to the LSU coach?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 07:26:25 PM
I hope BAMA beats the crap out of LSU.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:27:00 PM
LSU will demolish Bama. This is going to be one of the most lopsided championsip games ever.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 07:27:19 PM
I hope BAMA beats the crap out of LSU.


I hope they lose by 100,  they do not belong
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:27:28 PM
If we don't go to the Cotton, which b12 does?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 07:27:32 PM
it's looking like KSU v Ark in the cotton.   :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 07:27:41 PM
I hope BAMA beats the crap out of LSU.


Why? That would validate the people who picked them over OSU?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 07:28:05 PM
Seems like Bama played em pretty close the first time.  :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU176 on December 04, 2011, 07:28:13 PM
ou iowa in insight on scroll.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:28:27 PM
Playing Ark in the Cotton is actually pretty sweet.  BCS would obviously be better but to say the Cotton is a KITN is pretty silly.  The Insight would be a KITN.  Nobody expected us to be here, so we're not going to get the same respect as a Va Tech.  crap ain't exactly fair but it's the way things work.  Can't see any reason for you retards to be melting down over a Cotton bid.

Yep.  #6 vs #8.  

We DO recruit against Arkansas.  Kids will be watching.   Even if we lose, kids see we are on the same stage.  It's positive association.  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 07:28:37 PM
If we don't go to the Cotton, which b12 does?

what the eff is wrong with you?  i mean i guess i get the total denial and endless hopefulness but jeezus dude.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:28:54 PM
Seems like Bama played em pretty close the first time.  :dunno:

They were at home. LSU is going to score 50 points.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TBL on December 04, 2011, 07:29:50 PM
If we don't go to the Cotton, which b12 does?

what the eff is wrong with you?  i mean i guess i get the total denial and endless hopefulness but jeezus dude.

Ya..ya...ya.....eff off douche nozzle.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 07:30:20 PM
Seems like a game featuring #6 v #8 would be better than the Orange Bowl.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dirty Deeds on December 04, 2011, 07:30:41 PM
Is Les Myles married to a dude?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 07:31:06 PM
I hope BAMA beats the crap out of LSU.


Why? That would validate the people who picked them over OSU?

This system is mumped. I don't know how you could name Bama the National Champion after they and LSU split the series. Both have 1 loss, to each other. I think it would be comical.

Bama beating LSU would prove nothing. OSU didn't play LSU, no way that Bama beating LSU would mean they were better than  OSU.

I am now rooting for chaos.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:31:13 PM
Seems like a game featuring #6 v #8 would be better than the Orange Bowl.

It seems like it would, but it's not.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:31:31 PM
For a month, a rough ridin' month, pundits will talk about how the Cotton bowl is a better matchup than the Sugar Bowl.

All of the SEC will chattering about how the Cotton is better than the Sugar (their own god damn bowl).



Will take.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 07:32:46 PM
Love Gundy's shirt.  Really highlights the orange in his skin tone.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:33:14 PM
For a month, a rough ridin' month, pundits will talk about how the Cotton bowl is a better matchup than the Sugar Bowl.

All of the SEC will chattering about how the Cotton is better than the Sugar (their own god damn bowl).



Will take.

I don't think the pundits will even mention the Cotton Bowl more than 2 or 3 times.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:33:19 PM
Seems like a game featuring #6 v #8 would be better than the Orange Bowl.

It seems like it would, but it's not.

Oh yeah?  Listen in to Paul Finebaum tomorrow...   :gocho:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Skipper44 on December 04, 2011, 07:33:39 PM
For a month, a rough ridin' month, pundits will talk about how the Cotton bowl is a better matchup than the Sugar Bowl.

All of the SEC will chattering about how the Cotton is better than the Sugar (their own god damn bowl).



Will take.
you cannot jump to rationalization this soon PETE
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:33:55 PM
For a month, a rough ridin' month, pundits will talk about how the Cotton bowl is a better matchup than the Sugar Bowl.

All of the SEC will chattering about how the Cotton is better than the Sugar (their own god damn bowl).



Will take.

I don't think the pundits will even mention the Cotton Bowl more than 2 or 3 times.

Paul rough ridin' Finebaum.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 07:34:04 PM
So according to the BCS rankings, the Cotton Bowl is the third best bowl this year?

FakePIONship Game:  #2 Bama v. #1 LSU

Fiesta:  #3 tbpOSU v. #4 Stanford

Cotton:  #6 Ark v. #8 K-State

Rose:  # 5 Oregon v. #10 Wisky

Sugar:  will not watch, sham

Orange:  who gives a eff? really, why is this bowl part of the BCS?


eff I'm guessing the Peach Bowl will have higher ranked teams than the Sugar and Orange
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 07:34:19 PM
Love Gundy's shirt.  Really highlights the orange in his skin tone.

I didn't hear them announce the Fiesta matchup, but Gundy just said they are playing Stanford.

Unless I was out of the room when they said, Gundy just stole their thunder.....a bit.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:35:20 PM
So according to the BCS rankings, the Cotton Bowl is the third best bowl this year?

FakePIONship Game:  #2 Bama v. #1 LSU

Fiesta:  #3 tbpOSU v. #4 Stanford

Cotton:  #6 Ark v. #8 K-State

Rose:  # 5 Oregon v. #10 Wisky

Sugar:  will not watch, sham

Orange:  who gives a eff? really, why is this bowl part of the BCS?


eff I'm guessing the Peach Bowl will have higher ranked teams than the Sugar and Orange

Correct.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2011, 07:35:43 PM
While it's obviously his home, Kirk sounds like he's in an undisclosed location.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2011, 07:36:17 PM
LSU 5 Bama 3 F
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:37:06 PM
LSU 5 Bama 3 F

LSU 50 Bama 3
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 07:37:19 PM
I know that ESPN-bashing is considered extremely tuck-like on here (and most of the time it is), but it's blatantly obvious that they're shaping the narrative to their own interests by sucking off the SEC so much. crap's mumped up.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KSU-Krazie on December 04, 2011, 07:37:24 PM
LSU 5 Bama 3 F

We could only hope they score this much.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:38:12 PM
I know that ESPN-bashing is considered extremely tuck-like on here (and most of the time it is), but it's blatantly obvious that they're shaping the narrative to their own interests by sucking off the SEC so much. crap's mumped up.

We come out on the long end of the stick when we play an SEC team.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 07:38:26 PM
Kirk: SEC is clearly the best top to bottom.

jfc...
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 07:38:33 PM
I know that ESPN-bashing is considered extremely tuck-like on here (and most of the time it is), but it's blatantly obvious that they're shaping the narrative to their own interests by sucking off the SEC so much. crap's mumped up.

It's not "tuck". ESPN is ruining college football.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on December 04, 2011, 07:38:36 PM
The whole bowl system is rough ridin' filthy. eff college football.  :bball:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 07:38:52 PM
Quote
slmandel Stewart Mandel
Sugar Bowl officially announces Michigan vs. Virginia Tech.
15 seconds ago Favorite Retweet Reply
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 07:39:13 PM
Quote
slmandel Stewart Mandel
Sugar Bowl officially announces Michigan vs. Virginia Tech.
15 seconds ago Favorite Retweet Reply

eff THIS crap
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:39:35 PM
Do you realize that if we beat Arkansas, we could finish as high as top 4.   :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 07:39:47 PM
I'm not watching any bowls. Not joking.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: AbeFroman on December 04, 2011, 07:40:27 PM
LSU 5 Bama 3 F
Would love. Might finally kill the sec lovefest and maybe bcs
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:40:50 PM
I'm not watching any bowls. Not joking.

I wouldn't watch any, except for ours, even if we made it into the Sugar.  No different than any other year.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jbkx on December 04, 2011, 07:41:16 PM
Mark May would love the SEC as a whole to fist him.  

That dildo is the worst commentator in sports. (Apologies to Craigie James ... a close 2nd).
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:41:46 PM
I'm not watching any bowls. Not joking.

I wouldn't watch any, except for ours, even if we made it into the Sugar.  No different than any other year.

Yeah, that's usually how it goes for me, too. I would have watched OSU vs LSU if that would have happened, though. I also would have actually gone to New Orleans for the Sugar Bowl.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2011, 07:42:06 PM
ACC getting two bids is indefensible. I am very pleased with the cotton though.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:42:18 PM
Mark May would love the SEC as a whole to fist him.  

That dildo is the worst commentator in sports. (Apologies to Craigie James ... a close 2nd).

Agreed, but he's a Pitt grad...not that big of an SEC homer.  Watch for him to suck off Va Tech, however.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2011, 07:42:25 PM
cotton is at least easily driveable.  :dunno:

that's the best I can do. this one kind of hurts. really wanted sugar.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 07:42:55 PM
The big 12 just lost a shitload of money.  shitload. 
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: smith1051 on December 04, 2011, 07:43:11 PM
@ATTCottonBowl AT&T Cotton Bowl
It's official: Kansas State vs. Arkansas in the 2012 #ATTCBC!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 07:43:20 PM
#boycottbcs
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on December 04, 2011, 07:43:29 PM
Conference USA has the same number of BCS top 25 teams as the ACC and one more than the Big East.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: hemmy on December 04, 2011, 07:43:48 PM
I am never consuming sugar again.  eff sugar.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EuroCat on December 04, 2011, 07:43:58 PM
I know that ESPN-bashing is considered extremely tuck-like on here (and most of the time it is), but it's blatantly obvious that they're shaping the narrative to their own interests by sucking off the SEC so much. crap's mumped up.
They've used this whole show to lobby for a playoff system.....
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2011, 07:44:11 PM
Once you get past Arkansas the SEC falls off a cliff.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: KITNfury on December 04, 2011, 07:44:24 PM
I'm so mad I'm calm. I might kill my dog if anything sets me off.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Saulbadguy on December 04, 2011, 07:44:46 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.attcottonbowl.com%2Fhome%2F_ufiles%2Fimages%2Fhome%2Fimg_index_masthead_kstate-arkansas.jpg&hash=ad2852384b3e2b4c0c0278e299c7d26e5f2a9d37)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 07:44:52 PM
dax, how much money did the conference lose in this fuckjob?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 04, 2011, 07:45:09 PM
The big 12 just lost a shitload of money.  shitload.  

yeah.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 07:45:13 PM
I am not displeased with the Cotton Bowl, aside from it being on Fox and I hated having NFL announcers for our last Cotton Bowl.

I just think it is complete BS if Va Tech gets in there instead of us. I would be more ok with Boise getting in. Hell, I think Michigan getting in is also bullshit.

How we don't get picked in a 2 out of three between Michigan, Va Tech, and us, is what pisses me off.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:45:16 PM
Once you get past Arkansas the SEC falls off a cliff.



SC is good, but ya, it drops off fast.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:45:31 PM
Once you get past Arkansas the SEC falls off a cliff.



We are about to expose Arkansas, too.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 07:45:55 PM
The big 12 just lost a shitload of money.  shitload. 

Yes but at least pete is happy that we get to play in dallas where we recruit. Cause the city of dallas doesn't have tv antaneas that could get the sugar bowl.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:46:08 PM
dax, how much money did the conference lose in this fuckjob?

$14M
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 07:46:21 PM
I'm so mad I'm calm. I might kill my dog if anything sets me off.

I'm calm. Like, want to fall into a deep sleep calm.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 07:46:46 PM
We keep talking about VT. Why the eff is Michigan in it?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 07:47:29 PM
14 million.  huh.  welp.  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 07:47:49 PM
va tech got blown out by #19 twice.  no wins over ranked teams.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mocat on December 04, 2011, 07:47:57 PM
The big 12 just lost a shitload of money.  shitload. 

Yes but at least pete is happy that we get to play in dallas where we recruit. Cause the city of dallas doesn't have tv antaneas that could get the sugar bowl.

lol
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:48:17 PM
14 million.  huh.  welp.  

Divided by 10, $1.4 per school.  Meh, not going to change much on campus.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 07:48:31 PM
va tech got blown out by #19 twice.  no wins over ranked teams.

They might be able to beat Michigan.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2011, 07:48:57 PM
dax, how much money did the conference lose in this fuckjob?

$14M

Yes, forgot about SC, but they are so freaking medicore at times.

Yeah, that's about right, the 2nd team chosen used to get less than the first, but I may be dated on that.

LOL at the Big East, come on.



Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pissclams on December 04, 2011, 07:50:10 PM
well folks it's not everyday that a mid-major program like arkansas gets to play against one of college football's blue bloods such as kstate.  oh well.  look at it as charity.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2011, 07:50:46 PM
I could have stomached Boise, Va Tech to sugar was clearly a direct message to the public.  The BCS is untouchable and they just flaunted it right in our fat face.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:51:53 PM
The big 12 just lost a shitload of money.  shitload. 

Yes but at least pete is happy that we get to play in dallas where we recruit. Cause the city of dallas doesn't have tv antaneas that could get the sugar bowl.

lol

First, Sugar is clearly better.  

Second, going to the Cotton is an amazing consolation prize.  For a week the jerk off local news and papers in DFW will be on our nuts....you think Jerry Jones will let it be otherwise?????  Really.  Jerry rough ridin' Jones' alma mater is playing KSU in HIS rough ridin' stadium....and you think that is not going to move the meter in that town?  Come on.  It goes Jerry Jones, Jesus Christ, Rick Perry...in that rough ridin' order, to those people.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: j-dub on December 04, 2011, 07:52:38 PM
I'm so mad I'm calm. I might kill my dog if anything sets me off.

I'm calm. Like, want to fall into a deep sleep calm.

strangely, i feel the same. eerie kind of calm.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 07:53:53 PM
JERRY JONES' ALMA MATER IS PLAYING KSU IN HIS rough ridin' BUILDING
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sysdax on December 04, 2011, 07:54:06 PM
[email protected]


Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PowercatPat on December 04, 2011, 07:54:15 PM
eff this.

 :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 07:55:19 PM
I'm so mad I'm calm. I might kill my dog if anything sets me off.

I'm calm. Like, want to fall into a deep sleep calm.

strangely, i feel the same. eerie kind of calm.

The gin will help. But it's about as much as a band-aid would help an amputated arm.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 07:57:07 PM
ericstonestreet Eric Stonestreet
Happy 4 the KSU football team and very excited 4 the Cotton Bowl, but the ACC and the BCS can eat a bag of mixed Dix. #KSU #WILDCATS!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 07:57:14 PM
well folks it's not everyday that a mid-major program like arkansas gets to play against one of college football's blue bloods such as kstate.  oh well.  look at it as charity.


Thanks for jinxing us, dipshit. (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=17186.0)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 04, 2011, 07:57:52 PM
Lot of youngsters being outed in this thread.

Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Gooch on December 04, 2011, 07:57:53 PM
ericstonestreet Eric Stonestreet
Happy 4 the KSU football team and very excited 4 the Cotton Bowl, but the ACC and the BCS can eat a bag of mixed Dix. #KSU #WILDCATS!
So blessed
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 07:58:01 PM
[email protected]

you tell 'em, sysdax!
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 07:58:06 PM
Mixd dix is one of the best things I have ever heard.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on December 04, 2011, 07:58:50 PM
I don't know how we could call it another DOD if the BCS wasn't rough ridin' us :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jbkx on December 04, 2011, 07:59:18 PM
One positive ...  a lot less chance of staggering into a Dallas strip club crap blasted drunk not knowing it's full of female impersonators until after you've bought your required $10 one drink minimum.  

That crap will happen in the French Quarter.  Don't ask me how I know this.

NOLA smells like Bea Aurthur's panties on it's cleanest air day.  
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on December 04, 2011, 07:59:53 PM
eff the BCS. I didn't want Sugar anyway, it's just the disrespect to K-State and the Big 12 that pisses me off. I'm excited for Jerryworld!!!  :ksu:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: BostonPancake on December 04, 2011, 08:00:25 PM
S.S.D.D
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 08:00:34 PM
I don't know how we could call it another DOD if the BCS wasn't rough ridin' us :dunno:

Reading this made me smile for the first time in the past half an hour or so.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 04, 2011, 08:00:42 PM
ericstonestreet Eric Stonestreet
Happy 4 the KSU football team and very excited 4 the Cotton Bowl, but the ACC and the BCS can eat a bag of mixed Dix. #KSU #WILDCATS!

lmao
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 08:00:53 PM
Quote
kstater, EllToPay, DeoKat, Breakfast, K-S-U-Wildcats!, highway61, 8manpick, woodpecker, john "teach me how to" dougie, Pete, BW, outofstate, Stevesie60, SkinnyBenny, mortons toe, david, thunderbowlt, Lefty, Lurker, Sundance_Kid, Johnny Thunderbone, treysolid, Fedor, EMAWmeister, chum1, bigwillie20, PowercatPat, jbkx, sonofdaxjones, Trim, Cackle, prome05, ArchE_Cat, powercat13, EuroCat, Fldermaus, TBL, Mike Ahearn, CloneBroChill, wes mantooth, zackole1, yadig?, EMAFW, IStater, penncat, WolfKnifeLaserTorch, RU4KSU2, catzacker, WabashCannibal, makesmehappy, jtksu, oscar, KSU-Krazie, pike, Gooch, darreno, gokatgo, sysdax, smith1051, BostonPancake, Kleinstone, KSUTOMMY, KSUBrian, Pexikan, _33, bigwilliestyle1407, kim carnes, FranklyFrankYou, k-state87, HawaiiCat, Bookcat, MidnightOil82, Chico, colsanders718, Holdin Manutz, cats2win, kat_dad, Deez Nutz, 114Hickory, goCats101, WildcatNkilt, yoEMAW, Nuts Kicked, Boakai, Fitz Bath, 42, AppleJack, Mikeyis4dcats, Pendergast, stunted, yoman, oneeyedwillie, j-dub, The Minister, Rumsfield, ChiCat, jdagg2003, jc_jax, KSUME, jrod_06, cvmcat, craigmj73, TheProdigiousTalent, 7NationalTitles, OlatheWildcat, Ging, BackPayne, purplefreak42, powercat_62, Kermit, Denver, Christer, CNS Casey, StayOutOfTrees, Houcat, Skipper44, Brocktune, KSU176, PandaXpanda, ednksu, Booze_Cat, FP TC etc., unleashthemob, ascentofstan, ksucrcoop, BMWWcat, KITNfury, felix rex, Dub and 745 Guests are viewing this board.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 8manpick on December 04, 2011, 08:01:45 PM
lol at Mizzou
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2011, 08:01:50 PM
Has ANY team EVER ran away from another team like Michigan ran away from KSU?

I guess NU from Texas....
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 08:02:08 PM
Quote
kstater, EllToPay, DeoKat, Breakfast, K-S-U-Wildcats!, highway61, 8manpick, woodpecker, john "teach me how to" dougie, Pete, BW, outofstate, Stevesie60, SkinnyBenny, mortons toe, david, thunderbowlt, Lefty, Lurker,Sundance_Kid, Johnny Thunderbone, treysolid, Fedor, EMAWmeister, chum1, bigwillie20, PowercatPat, jbkx, sonofdaxjones, Trim, Cackle, prome05, ArchE_Cat, powercat13, EuroCat, Fldermaus, TBL, Mike Ahearn, CloneBroChill, wes mantooth, zackole1, yadig?, EMAFW, IStater, penncat, WolfKnifeLaserTorch, RU4KSU2, catzacker, WabashCannibal, makesmehappy, jtksu, oscar, KSU-Krazie, pike, Gooch, darreno, gokatgo, sysdax, smith1051, BostonPancake, Kleinstone, KSUTOMMY, KSUBrian, Pexikan, _33, bigwilliestyle1407, kim carnes, FranklyFrankYou, k-state87, HawaiiCat, Bookcat, MidnightOil82, Chico, colsanders718, Holdin Manutz, cats2win, kat_dad, Deez Nutz, 114Hickory, goCats101, WildcatNkilt, yoEMAW, Nuts Kicked, Boakai, Fitz Bath, 42, AppleJack, Mikeyis4dcats, Pendergast, stunted, yoman, oneeyedwillie, j-dub, The Minister, Rumsfield, ChiCat, jdagg2003, jc_jax, KSUME, jrod_06, cvmcat, craigmj73, TheProdigiousTalent, 7NationalTitles, OlatheWildcat, Ging, BackPayne, purplefreak42, powercat_62, Kermit, Denver, Christer, CNS Casey, StayOutOfTrees, Houcat, Skipper44, Brocktune, KSU176, PandaXpanda, ednksu, Booze_Cat, FP TC etc., unleashthemob, ascentofstan, ksucrcoop, BMWWcat, KITNfury, felix rex, Dub and 745 Guests are viewing this board.

Hey bro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1


Also, who are all of those people?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 08:02:40 PM
Yeah, the whole butthurt here is not that we're bumped down to Cotton from Sugar.  The butthurt is from the Big 12 being rough ridin' disrespected in favor of two crap teams, one of which is a complete rough ridin' joke, in a system that is a complete rough ridin' joke.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: PoetWarrior on December 04, 2011, 08:03:01 PM
All men will hate you...
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 08:03:38 PM
All men will hate you...

wut
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 08:04:00 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 08:04:20 PM
Michigan ended up 16th. Thought they had to be 14th unless no other teams were available.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on December 04, 2011, 08:04:48 PM
Michigan ended up 16th. Thought they had to be 14th unless no other teams were available.
Thats MSU
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 04, 2011, 08:04:53 PM
Eventually the BCS will pull this crap one too many times.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 04, 2011, 08:05:00 PM
projected by beyondthebets

Quote
COTTON BOWL
Kansas State +10.5 (-110)
Arkansas -10.5 (-110)

 :surprised:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 08:05:31 PM
So.....if OU had won by the margin OSU did....would we have gone to the Insight?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 08:05:49 PM
projected by beyondthebets

Quote
COTTON BOWL
Kansas State +10.5 (-110)
Arkansas -10.5 (-110)

 :surprised:

eff it. We're going to destroy WalmartAggy.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 08:05:49 PM
So the Doctor has a month and 2 days to prep for Pigaggie?  This one's a lock folks.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 08:06:12 PM
projected by beyondthebets

Quote
COTTON BOWL
Kansas State +10.5 (-110)
Arkansas -10.5 (-110)

 :surprised:

That's it?  pfft
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 08:06:33 PM
So.....if OU had won by the margin OSU did....would we have gone to the Insight?

That scenario is 100000x better than this one.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 08:07:04 PM
projected by beyondthebets

Quote
COTTON BOWL
Kansas State +10.5 (-110)
Arkansas -10.5 (-110)

 :surprised:

It was cute for a while. Forget college football. Bunch of fat faces. It won't be seeing me for a while.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kim carnes on December 04, 2011, 08:07:38 PM
Michigan ended up 16th. Thought they had to be 14th unless no other teams were available.

13th
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: TheProdigiousTalent on December 04, 2011, 08:08:27 PM
It's not that KSU absolutely deserves to be there.  It's that Michigan and Va Tech don't.  I mean...we got clobbered by top-15ish OU a while ago, but Va Tech got clobbered by top-15ish Clemson LAST NIGHT.  No quality wins.  It's ridiculous that they were ever in the top 5, really.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:08:40 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 08:09:39 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

We would be Big 12 champs and that is better than any bowl appearance.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:09:52 PM
So.....if OU had won by the margin OSU did....would we have gone to the Insight?

Yes.  If OU had won, we would have been in the Insight....we would have had a ring, though.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 08:10:16 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

we'd have a big 12 title, pete. think about that.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: bigwillie20 on December 04, 2011, 08:11:19 PM
Go eff yourself Craig James
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 08:12:22 PM
Go eff yourself Craig James

what'd he say? i stopped watching
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Trim on December 04, 2011, 08:12:36 PM
projected by beyondthebets

Quote
COTTON BOWL
Kansas State +10.5 (-110)
Arkansas -10.5 (-110)

 :surprised:

It was cute for a while. Forget college football. Bunch of fat faces. It won't be seeing me for a while.

LOL.

projected by beyondthebets
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 08:13:05 PM
Go eff yourself Craig James

what'd he say? i stopped watching

Said Brady rough ridin' Hoke should be COTY not LHC Bill Snyder
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jbkx on December 04, 2011, 08:13:18 PM
Go eff yourself Craig James

This!!!

Hope he dies of cancerous AIDS.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 08:13:52 PM
Go eff yourself Craig James

what'd he say? i stopped watching

Said Brady rough ridin' Hoke should be COTY not LHC Bill Snyder

i mean this is just :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:18:18 PM
Go eff yourself Craig James

This!!!

Hope he dies of cancerous AIDS.

Reece called him out on that one.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: AbeFroman on December 04, 2011, 08:19:37 PM
Craig james needs to be put in a shed
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 08:20:01 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

if we got a big 12 trophy they could have put us in the dick sucking bowl for all I care.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 08:20:10 PM
Michigan ended up 16th. Thought they had to be 14th unless no other teams were available.

13th

You're thinking of Michigan State.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:20:29 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

we'd have a big 12 title, pete. think about that.


Jesus rough ridin' christ, you retards, I rough ridin' know.


I'm merely having the audacity to suggest that despite being upset about the Sugar, we should be pleased to be in the Cotton.


Get bent out of shape about the Sugar and see what rough ridin' good it does you...
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:21:11 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

if we got a big 12 trophy they could have put us in the dick sucking bowl for all I care.

Agreed.  OU ass mumped us.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: catzacker on December 04, 2011, 08:22:15 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

if we got a big 12 trophy they could have put us in the dick sucking bowl for all I care.

Agreed.  OU ass mumped us.

Brent is dead to me.  I told my dad we're no longer friends too.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EuroCat on December 04, 2011, 08:22:52 PM
 :bball:

VaTech may have the BCS bowl, but we dunked on their faces tonight.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: doom on December 04, 2011, 08:23:30 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

we'd have a big 12 title, pete. think about that.


Jesus rough ridin' christ, you retards, I rough ridin' know.


I'm merely having the audacity to suggest that despite being upset about the Sugar, we should be pleased to be in the Cotton.


Get bent out of shape about the Sugar and see what rough ridin' good it does you...

You used to be so angry... wtf happened to you??   :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:24:01 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

if we got a big 12 trophy they could have put us in the dick sucking bowl for all I care.

Agreed.  OU ass mumped us.

Brent is dead to me.  I told my dad we're no longer friends too.

We'll toast their demise this Thursday.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 08:25:31 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

if we got a big 12 trophy they could have put us in the dick sucking bowl for all I care.

Agreed.  OU ass mumped us.

Brent is dead to me.  I told my dad we're no longer friends too.

We'll toast their demise this Thursday.

 :cheers:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: j-dub on December 04, 2011, 08:25:54 PM
All men will hate you...

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 08:26:27 PM
I'm merely having the audacity to suggest that despite being upset about the Sugar, we should be pleased to be in the Cotton.


The thing about it is that it's bullshit, though.  We're second in the league.  We deserve the Cotton Bowl at the very least.  We had a very good year, better than expectations, but to think that we should be grateful to get a bowl we absolutely deserve is ridiculous.  We're second place in the toughest league in the country and we couldn't get two teams in the BCS?  It's 100% bullshit, and I refuse to find any silver lining in, "hey, at least we only got raped once!"
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: OregonSmock on December 04, 2011, 08:27:42 PM
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-eCWIJZCrZm4/Ttwr25KZsaI/AAAAAAAAAZk/ynpGII1iZ8E/s640/ku_orange_bowl_04_t640.jpg)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:28:03 PM
I'm merely having the audacity to suggest that despite being upset about the Sugar, we should be pleased to be in the Cotton.


The thing about it is that it's bullshit, though.  We're second in the league.  We deserve the Cotton Bowl at the very least.  We had a very good year, better than expectations, but to think that we should be grateful to get a bowl we absolutely deserve is ridiculous.  We're second place in the toughest league in the country and we couldn't get two teams in the BCS?  It's 100% bullshit, and I refuse to find any silver lining in, "hey, at least we only got raped once!"

I know, bro.  I know.  :frown:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:29:15 PM
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-eCWIJZCrZm4/Ttwr25KZsaI/AAAAAAAAAZk/ynpGII1iZ8E/s640/ku_orange_bowl_04_t640.jpg)

If NOT going to a BCS bowl gets us as good of recruits that you guys got GOING to a BCS bowl, I'll be pissed.  You guys going to one proves how very little it means in the long run.  Very, very, very little.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 08:31:04 PM
beems, you're like a good 30 minutes late.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 08:32:09 PM

If NOT going to a BCS bowl gets us as good of recruits that you guys got GOING to a BCS bowl, I'll be pissed.  You guys going to one proves how very little it means in the long run.  Very, very, very little.


Excellent point, Pete is back on track.   :thumbs:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WillieWatanabe on December 04, 2011, 08:32:32 PM
appreciate the support BMW.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EuroCat on December 04, 2011, 08:32:52 PM
(https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-eCWIJZCrZm4/Ttwr25KZsaI/AAAAAAAAAZk/ynpGII1iZ8E/s640/ku_orange_bowl_04_t640.jpg)
It is shameful that Va Tech got picked before us. Any scrub team could run up 50+ on them.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:33:21 PM
hahahaha.  the bcs decision just cost KU well over a million dollars and BMW celebrates  :lol: 
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 04, 2011, 08:33:50 PM
Ben, this hurts you too.   :dubious:

You need the $$ more than us.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:34:36 PM
hahahaha.  the bcs decision just cost KU well over a million dollars and BMW celebrates  :lol: 

That's 25% of the amount they owe Turner!  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 08:35:22 PM
I'm mostly just pissed because I was looking forward to the New Orleans trip. We get to play Arkansas, which is nice. At least we don't have to play some shitty team like Michigan or Virginia Tech.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jmlynch1 on December 04, 2011, 08:35:45 PM
hahahaha.  the bcs decision just cost KU well over a million dollars and BMW celebrates  :lol: 
KSU so far into KU's head they can't even pronounce TSC.  :blindfold:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mocat on December 04, 2011, 08:36:32 PM
Quote
547 Guests are viewing this board.
  :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Pete on December 04, 2011, 08:36:39 PM
I'm mostly just pissed because I was looking forward to the New Orleans trip. We get to play Arkansas, which is nice. At least we don't have to play some shitty team like Michigan or Virginia Tech.

Well put.  I agree.  Partying in NOLA would have been great.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: steve dave on December 04, 2011, 08:38:54 PM
Quote
547 Guests are viewing this board.
  :sdeek:

page hits today: 101128
 :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 08:39:36 PM
It's funny that Beems is talking crap on us for the fact that we should be in a BCS bowl.  
Title: Re: Re: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kitten_mittons on December 04, 2011, 08:41:21 PM
So.....if OU had won by the margin OSU did....would we have gone to the Insight?

Yes.  If OU had won, we would have been in the Insight....we would have had a ring, though.
Doubtful, OU in fiesta and OSU would have gotten an at-large.  We'd have the trophy and this same match-up.

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 04, 2011, 08:48:20 PM
Really starting to get excited about this Cotton Bowl match-up.   :excited:


 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 04, 2011, 08:49:53 PM
So.....if OU had won by the margin OSU did....would we have gone to the Insight?

Yes.  If OU had won, we would have been in the Insight....we would have had a ring, though.
Doubtful, OU in fiesta and OSU would have gotten an at-large.  We'd have the trophy and this same match-up.

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk


OSU and OU's resume's would be similar to ours currently though. And we got left out? I'm guessing OSU would have slid to Cotton. I would have taken Insight + CC anyday.

I'm over it though. Id much rather play Arkansas than Michigan or Va-Tech. The shitty party is UM and VTU both suck so bad that neither will probably be embarrassed and shown that they do not belong.

The only thing I care about is if the team is happy to be in the Cotton. If the team is as upset about being snubbed as some of us are, it may turn into an Alamo Bowl experience.
Go Cats! Beat the Hogs! Funny how an SEC SEC NC doesn't allow for them to get shown up, its so safe for the SEC. So...we've the only chance to put the SEC down. That along with Bama getting owned and OSU tearing the crap out of Stanford.

I don't know what happened in the second half against OU (I stopped watching) but aside from that, there's no reason we can't play with anyone. We will. Go Cats! 


:lynchmob:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Panjandrum on December 04, 2011, 08:53:37 PM
I get Michigan receiving the invite.  I'm still a little flummoxed on the VT invite.

I think people are really overstating their ability to travel and the TV ratings, but I could be wrong there.  I think we probably draw just as well as they would (if not better) in person, and I'm pretty sure the TV draw would be marginal at best.

This baffles me.  I'm not sure what just happened here.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Paul Moscow on December 04, 2011, 08:55:31 PM
Really starting to get excited about this Cotton Bowl match-up.   :excited:

  • 3rd best bowl match-up behind the National Championship and Fiesta
  • Last major Bowl Game before the National Championship
  • Only Bowl Game of the night with a 7pm kickoff on FOX on Friday
  • Jerry World

 :emawkid:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_Bowl_Classic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_Bowl_Classic)

Quote
Texas A&M played Louisiana State University in the 2011 AT&T Cotton Bowl Classic on January 7, 2011. Time ran out with LSU ahead 41 - 24. This was the first Cotton Bowl Classic to be played in prime time, as well as the latest calendar date for the game. In 2012 the Cotton Bowl will be Kansas State University against the University of Arkansas, Two teams that got mumped over by the BCS. ref>http://www.attcottonbowl.com/news/news-releases/2010/12/lsu-accepts-invitation-to-play-texas-am-in-att-cotton-bowl-classic/</ref>
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: powercat_62 on December 04, 2011, 08:56:47 PM
Really wished I had an Allstate insurance policy right now, so I could call up and cancel the policy in the morning.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 08:57:54 PM
bowl "season"  :zzz:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Stevesie60 on December 04, 2011, 09:01:25 PM
Really starting to get excited about this Cotton Bowl match-up.   :excited:

  • 3rd best bowl match-up behind the National Championship and Fiesta
  • Last major Bowl Game before the National Championship
  • Only Bowl Game of the night with a 7pm kickoff on FOX on Friday
  • Jerry World

 :emawkid:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_Bowl_Classic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_Bowl_Classic)

Quote
Texas A&M played Louisiana State University in the 2011 AT&T Cotton Bowl Classic on January 7, 2011. Time ran out with LSU ahead 41 - 24. This was the first Cotton Bowl Classic to be played in prime time, as well as the latest calendar date for the game. In 2012 the Cotton Bowl will be Kansas State University against the University of Arkansas, Two teams that got mumped over by the BCS. ref>http://www.attcottonbowl.com/news/news-releases/2010/12/lsu-accepts-invitation-to-play-texas-am-in-att-cotton-bowl-classic/</ref>

Arkansas did not. They were 3rd in their conference. They did it to themselves.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 09:07:37 PM
OU would have been a much better selection than Virginia Tech.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: pike on December 04, 2011, 09:08:01 PM
I get Michigan receiving the invite

I don't. It's bull crap. Their conference blows ass.


Also, 'grats beems. He's the biggest winner in all of this.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Panjandrum on December 04, 2011, 09:09:11 PM
OU would have been a much better selection than Virginia Tech.

VT makes no sense.  I'd love to know more about how this all went down.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: doom on December 04, 2011, 09:12:17 PM
OU would have been a much better selection than Virginia Tech.

VT makes no sense.  I'd love to know more about how this all went down.

apparently our pamphlets sucked.   :dubious:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kso_FAN on December 04, 2011, 09:12:28 PM
Is VT the worst BCS at large ever?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on December 04, 2011, 09:13:42 PM
OU would have been a much better selection than Virginia Tech.

VT makes no sense.  I'd love to know more about how this all went down.

$$$$$$$$$$ BLUE BLOOD DICK SUCKERS ........were scared of the Cats
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 09:14:28 PM
Is VT the worst BCS at large ever?

Michigan is just as bad. They only make sense because of name recognition.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: EllToPay on December 04, 2011, 09:17:18 PM
fyi, gus is play by play for cotton.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 09:19:53 PM
OU would have been a much better selection than Virginia Tech.

VT makes no sense.  I'd love to know more about how this all went down.

I wonder if our attendance figure from yesterday had anything to do with it
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 09:20:42 PM
OU would have been a much better selection than Virginia Tech.

VT makes no sense.  I'd love to know more about how this all went down.

I wonder if our attendance figure from yesterday had anything to do with it

Don't do this to yourself.  You know this is just a classic KITN because that's what we always get.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2011, 09:20:59 PM
fyi, gus is play by play for cotton.

This is actually pretty big for me.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: wetwillie on December 04, 2011, 09:21:24 PM
Apparently not having a conference chanpionship game was our downfall.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: unleashthemob on December 04, 2011, 09:22:30 PM
I get Michigan receiving the invite.  I'm still a little flummoxed on the VT invite.
Really starting to get excited about this Cotton Bowl match-up.   :excited:

    Well when ESPN owns the rights to the ACC then all of this should make sense...we got cactus mumped, or better yet...sugar dicked
    • 3rd best bowl match-up behind the National Championship and Fiesta
    • Last major Bowl Game before the National Championship
    • Only Bowl Game of the night with a 7pm kickoff on FOX on Friday
    • Jerry World

     :emawkid:
I think people are really overstating their ability to travel and the TV ratings, but I could be wrong there.  I think we probably draw just as well as they would (if not better) in person, and I'm pretty sure the TV draw would be marginal at best.

This baffles me.  I'm not sure what just happened here.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: WildcatNkilt on December 04, 2011, 09:31:17 PM
Anyone else having trouble loading the Cotton Bowl Ticket Exchange site?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on December 04, 2011, 09:33:17 PM
Is VT the worst BCS at large ever?

Non-Notre Dame category
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: bigwillie20 on December 04, 2011, 09:33:34 PM
Will we have to add Arkansas to our Texas State Champs shirt?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: doom on December 04, 2011, 09:34:34 PM
Will we have to add Arkansas to our Texas State Champs shirt?

I want a Sugar Bowl Reserve Champion T-shirt when we win.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: felix rex on December 04, 2011, 09:35:10 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 04, 2011, 09:41:30 PM
Anyone else having trouble loading the Cotton Bowl Ticket Exchange site?

Yes, I believe we have crashed the site.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 04, 2011, 09:42:06 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

You absolutely root for an Alabama 1 point win and OSU rout of Stanford.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Kat Kid on December 04, 2011, 09:42:23 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

I threw a remote and cursed for about 5 minutes.  Then I went on turntable.fm and started typing out my Peggy Po's and Nancy Neg's for the hoops game.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Houstoncat93 on December 04, 2011, 09:43:01 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

You absolutely root for an Alabama 1 point win and OSU rout of Stanford.

Combine with as ass stomping of the SEC #3 team.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2011, 09:43:11 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

you wouldn't be over it if you knew what the website was going to look and sound like when you pulled it up. this one is going to sting for quite a while in darisville.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 09:44:38 PM
Is VT the worst BCS at large ever?

would KSU have been worse?  maybe
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: nicname on December 04, 2011, 09:44:50 PM
Is jerry going to give the conf 12million?  And ksu about 1.5million?

Texas is losing $1.5M as well.  So is OU.  So is OSU....the entire conference gets equally mumped.  Embrace that.

Meanwhile, be rough ridin' thankful we didn't drop to the Insight, which would clearly have happened if OU had won.  Think about that rough ridin' crap for a moment.

we'd have a big 12 title, pete. think about that.


Jesus rough ridin' christ, you retards, I rough ridin' know.


I'm merely having the audacity to suggest that despite being upset about the Sugar, we should be pleased to be in the Cotton.


Get bent out of shape about the Sugar and see what rough ridin' good it does you...

Pretty much how I feel. KSU and the B12 lost a crap load of money with us getting left out of the BCS, but the BCS has never been about who "deserved to be there."  The Cotton is cool and we are playing in a game that truely features two heavyweights.  I'm kind of surprised that they picked VT over us though.  Michigan is expected but VT?   :dunno:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 09:45:21 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

I threw a remote and cursed for about 5 minutes.  Then I went on turntable.fm and started typing out my Peggy Po's and Nancy Neg's for the hoops game.

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: OregonSmock on December 04, 2011, 09:45:48 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi161.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft236%2Fhubba64%2Flollerskates-small.gif&hash=10ef0dbb75df3261adab23bbd90f510e0cce6b04)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kso_FAN on December 04, 2011, 09:48:00 PM
Is VT the worst BCS at large ever?

would KSU have been worse?  maybe

 :confused:

I guess Michigan is rated worse in the BCS, but they aren't coming off of a 4 TD loss.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Cartierfor3 on December 04, 2011, 09:48:26 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi161.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft236%2Fhubba64%2Flollerskates-small.gif&hash=10ef0dbb75df3261adab23bbd90f510e0cce6b04)

Beems you pretty pumped for Todd  Dodge?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: 0.42 on December 04, 2011, 09:51:51 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi161.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft236%2Fhubba64%2Flollerskates-small.gif&hash=10ef0dbb75df3261adab23bbd90f510e0cce6b04)

 :lol:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 09:53:07 PM
Is VT the worst BCS at large ever?

would KSU have been worse?  maybe

 :confused:

I guess Michigan is rated worse in the BCS, but they aren't coming off of a 4 TD loss.

MOV doesn't matter.  a Cat fan should be the first to realize this - especially after this season.

remember when OU went to the BCS title game in 03 after losing by 4 TDs.



Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: ChiComCat on December 04, 2011, 09:53:39 PM
I enjoy beems mocking our BCS disappointment while his program searches for a 3rd rung coach
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on December 04, 2011, 09:54:24 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

you wouldn't be over it if you knew what the website was going to look and sound like when you pulled it up. this one is going to sting for quite a while in darisville.

i'm serious about this btw. i could give a crap about the cats playing in the sugar bowl but my god this place would've been like five johnny kaw raves combined, all at once and cubed.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Panjandrum on December 04, 2011, 09:55:00 PM
Is VT the worst BCS at large ever?

would KSU have been worse?  maybe

 :confused:

I guess Michigan is rated worse in the BCS, but they aren't coming off of a 4 TD loss.

Delany had to have had a hand in this.  Had to.  There is no other explanation.  This is to set up Michigan for success.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Spaces on December 04, 2011, 09:55:26 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi161.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ft236%2Fhubba64%2Flollerskates-small.gif&hash=10ef0dbb75df3261adab23bbd90f510e0cce6b04)
   :sdeek:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 09:56:42 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

you wouldn't be over it if you knew what the website was going to look and sound like when you pulled it up. this one is going to sting for quite a while in darisville.

i'm serious about this btw. i could give a crap about the cats playing in the sugar bowl but my god this place would've been like five johnny kaw raves combined, all at once and cubed.

w/o a doubt this is true.  this is good news for real life combo fans.  football season ended today.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: chunkles on December 04, 2011, 09:58:17 PM
Collin Klein probably isn't upset about this.

Collin Klein probably looks forward to karate-chopping razorback players' in the lung and elbowing their team's hope and dreams to Jupiter where there's no breathable atmosphere and it's cold and really windy.





Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: chum1 on December 04, 2011, 09:59:24 PM
Delany had to have had a hand in this.  Had to.  There is no other explanation.  This is to set up Michigan for success.

 :jeffy: :jeffy: :jeffy: :jeffy:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: nicname on December 04, 2011, 10:02:30 PM
All this means is that outside of the BCS title game the BCS is a beauty contest and about TV ratings etc.  They have already said they are gong to change things to more resemble this next season.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Panjandrum on December 04, 2011, 10:07:13 PM
Delany had to have had a hand in this.  Had to.  There is no other explanation.  This is to set up Michigan for success.

 :jeffy: :jeffy: :jeffy: :jeffy:

Yep.  Fully aware that I upped the signal on that too.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 10:09:05 PM
All this means is that outside of the BCS title game the BCS is a beauty contest and about TV ratings etc.  They have already said they are gong to change things to more resemble this next season.

I think it shows that the title game is the same way, honestly.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 10:11:39 PM
All this means is that outside of the BCS title game the BCS is a beauty contest and about TV ratings etc.  They have already said they are gong to change things to more resemble this next season.

 :dunno:  the bowl system has always been this.

that's why the end of conference play is, for all intensive purposes, the end of the competitive football - until next season starts.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 10:13:20 PM
Prolly outta just put out the final rankings now, outside of 1 and 2.  Just turn the bowls into a Pro Bowl type of situ.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 10:17:00 PM
Just turn the bowls into a Pro Bowl type of situ.

goddammit they are.  they always have been.  it's great for the players;  shitty for fans of competitive sporting events.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: jtksu on December 04, 2011, 10:21:11 PM
Yeah but the game still counts in the final rankings and against your record.  We need to win so we can say we finished top 10 and beat our bowl opponent.  Why not just make them like exhibition games?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on December 04, 2011, 10:23:18 PM
Yeah but the game still counts in the final rankings and against your record.  We need to win so we can say we finished top 10 and beat our bowl opponent.  Why not just make them like exhibition games?

They are just exhibition games.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Deez Nutz on December 04, 2011, 10:23:56 PM
:dunno:  the bowl system has always been this.

that's why the end of conference play is, for all intensive purposes, the end of the competitive football - until next season starts.

 :lol:  (You've gone your whole life not knowing the phrase is intents and purposes.)
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: nicname on December 04, 2011, 10:26:14 PM
:dunno:  the bowl system has always been this.

that's why the end of conference play is, for all intensive purposes, the end of the competitive football - until next season starts.

 :lol:  (You've gone your whole life not knowing the phrase is intents and purposes.)

what a dick
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: theKSU on December 04, 2011, 10:28:46 PM
Hello Bowl thread.  Very excited for Dallas.  Go Cats.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 10:29:39 PM
:dunno:  the bowl system has always been this.

that's why the end of conference play is, for all intensive purposes, the end of the competitive football - until next season starts.

 :lol:  (You've gone your whole life not knowing the phrase is intents and purposes.)

ha.  really?  i never knew.  thanks for the heads up. :cheers:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: mcmwcat on December 04, 2011, 10:30:54 PM
until last week i had the Billy Jean lyrics all wrong  :blank:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 04, 2011, 10:32:04 PM
:dunno:  the bowl system has always been this.

that's why the end of conference play is, for all intensive purposes, the end of the competitive football - until next season starts.

 :lol:  (You've gone your whole life not knowing the phrase is intents and purposes.)

what a dick

Somebody had to teach him.  We're :kstategrad: , so we bear the burden of representing ourselves as the educated brainiacs that we truly are.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: Deez Nutz on December 04, 2011, 10:33:02 PM
until last week i had the Billy Jean lyrics all wrong  :blank:

I never have figured those out yet.  Maybe someday.   :cheers:
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: DOOM_Catz on December 04, 2011, 10:40:12 PM
Can't wait to watch Chris Harper slide down the ICE! slide and artificial snow hill at the team hotel  :ksu:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6iTzFpcf00&feature=related
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: theKSU on December 04, 2011, 10:46:12 PM
mcmw cheated on all his tests
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: felix rex on December 04, 2011, 11:04:38 PM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

you wouldn't be over it if you knew what the website was going to look and sound like when you pulled it up. this one is going to sting for quite a while in darisville.

I'm here, Rick. Not on some madeup sabbatical. But right rough ridin' here shoulder to shoulder. in the crap. Escorting the BCS angina and blood clot folk delicately down the stairs to the cotton closet. When you get a breather, think about the business favor youll pridefully ask for in ten years, using our shared experience on this killbox as leverage to pry up my own deeply buried emotions about this Charlie foxtrot. It better be a killer idea named after a great guy we both lost tonight. And dammit, don't you do that to me. Don't you do it if just doesn't matter anymore.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SkinnyBenny on December 05, 2011, 01:42:45 AM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

you wouldn't be over it if you knew what the website was going to look and sound like when you pulled it up. this one is going to sting for quite a while in darisville.

I'm here, Rick. Not on some madeup sabbatical. But right rough ridin' here shoulder to shoulder. in the crap. Escorting the BCS angina and blood clot folk delicately down the stairs to the cotton closet. When you get a breather, think about the business favor youll pridefully ask for in ten years, using our shared experience on this killbox as leverage to pry up my own deeply buried emotions about this Charlie foxtrot. It better be a killer idea named after a great guy we both lost tonight. And dammit, don't you do that to me. Don't you do it if just doesn't matter anymore.


Well I don't know what the f that means but if what daris is saying is true, that might be the worst part of all of this.  eff.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: SdK on December 05, 2011, 01:46:31 AM
I got over this pretty fast. Only thing left to decide is who to vindictively root against.

you wouldn't be over it if you knew what the website was going to look and sound like when you pulled it up. this one is going to sting for quite a while in darisville.

I'm here, Rick. Not on some madeup sabbatical. But right rough ridin' here shoulder to shoulder. in the crap. Escorting the BCS angina and blood clot folk delicately down the stairs to the cotton closet. When you get a breather, think about the business favor youll pridefully ask for in ten years, using our shared experience on this killbox as leverage to pry up my own deeply buried emotions about this Charlie foxtrot. It better be a killer idea named after a great guy we both lost tonight. And dammit, don't you do that to me. Don't you do it if just doesn't matter anymore.


Well I don't know what the f that means but if what daris is saying is true, that might be the worst part of all of this.  eff.

What is going on?
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kso_FAN on December 05, 2011, 09:17:43 AM
http://isportsweb.com/2011/12/05/bcs-sugar-bowl-offer-worst-at-large-matchup-in-series-history/
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: kstater on December 05, 2011, 10:43:44 AM
:lol:

Quote
The Cotton Bowl is something for Houston Nutt and Ole Miss to brag about not Bobby Petrino and the Razorbacks.
Title: Re: ksu bowl thread
Post by: spnshinqsn on December 05, 2011, 10:58:45 AM
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/55076/3-point-stance-va-tech-over-kansas-state (http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/55076/3-point-stance-va-tech-over-kansas-state)

Quote
3-point stance: Va. Tech over Kansas State?

1. The Sugar Bowl’s choice of No. 11 Virginia Tech over No. 8 Kansas State is a stunner. Both have 10-2 records; both had flaccid non-league schedules, both had narrow wins over Miami. The Sugar must not have heard about the Hokies’ 38-10 loss to Clemson on Saturday. Sugar Bowl boss Paul Hoolahan said Virginia Tech’s ability to sell tickets and how it has proven itself “over the years” helped the Sugar make the choice. I thought the bowl had to do with results this season. The Big 12 got shafted twice on Sunday.