ksu bowl thread

[Rage Against the McKee]

So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.

If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.

no, they are not an AQ conference team.  They are done.

Not that it matters because they won't be picked, but all you have to do to be an at-large is be top 14 with 9 wins.  Hence the theoretically possible to be an at-large.

NO Denied, they must be conference champions to be considered.

They have to be conference champions to become an automatic bid. They only have to be in the top 14 to be eligible.

[Dr Rick Daris]

Know what is ridiculous in this whole thing? That the conference that could be the best in the country probably won't have its 1 loss champ in the BCS championship game and its 2 loss runner-up is about 50/50 to even get into a BCS bowl

i think cats to sugar is quite a bit higher than 50/50.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.   at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

[joda]

Know what is ridiculous in this whole thing? That the conference that could be the best in the country probably won't have its 1 loss champ in the BCS championship game and its 2 loss runner-up is about 50/50 to even get into a BCS bowl

i think cats to sugar is quite a bit higher than 50/50.

Ok, so better than 50/50, but still, should it really even be a question at this point

[Panjandrum]

Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.   at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

[0.42]

Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.   at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

Yes, this.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.   at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

We would be the second best team they have played all year.

[Shacks]

Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.   at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

Our only hope would be if Alabama showed up flat and uninspired and didn't care about the game because they thought they would play for all the marbles while K-State treats it like the Super Bowl, like what happened to Bama against Utah in 2008

[Rage Against the McKee]

Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.

[jtksu]

Yeah, we wouldn't be able to do crap offensively against Bama but their offense isn't good.  Could see us getting beat like 27-7.

[Katpappy]

Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.

+1 

[Cartierfor3]

Quit being scared of teams.  We're awesome.

Teams that scare me:
Oklahoma State, LSU.  We will destroy any other possible foe.  

[Shacks]

Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.

He probably would, but the thing about Stanford is their receivers aren't that good.  They are pretty slow, pretty much all possession receivers.  Luck has to throw into tight windows (which he definitely can) but at least there's a chance to deflect the pass or get a pick if he has to throw the ball within inches of Garrett's or Malone's hands.  Stanford's receivers would not be torching 2Y and the rest of the secondary from start to finish like Broyles and his buddies did to us.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Yeah, we wouldn't be able to do crap offensively against Bama but their offense isn't good.  Could see us getting beat like 27-7.

They would have to successfully convert two field goals to get to 27.

[bradleigh]

Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.   at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

I had so much fun at that OU game.  And even though I enjoyed myself thoroughly on a day on which we lost,  We still almost won the big 12.

[j-dub]

Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.

we would rack up 48 minutes of possession. maybe keep the ripped assholes in the 1.5 range

[ksucrcoop]

Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.   at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

Well, winning is always fun.

Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.

I'll take anyone except Bama.  Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.

Our only hope would be if Alabama showed up flat and uninspired and didn't care about the game because they thought they would play for all the marbles while K-State treats it like the Super Bowl, like what happened to Bama against Utah in 2008

We won't play Bama. The only way we would play Bama is if they weren't in the NC because OSU replaced them. In that case, we are in the Fiesta Bowl and everyone says Stanford is a lock for the Fiesta Bowl...

[Rage Against the McKee]

Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.

we would rack up 48 minutes of possession. maybe keep the ripped assholes in the 1.5 range

I think we would win, but the defense would look horrible in the process.

[kstater]

Have I mentioned how terrible it is discussing which team would kick our ass the most in a BCS game?

[CatMission]

Yeah, we wouldn't be able to do crap offensively against Bama but their offense isn't good.  Could see us getting beat like 27-7.

They would have to successfully convert two field goals to get to 27.

Well played sir.

[Cartierfor3]

Have I mentioned how terrible it is discussing which team would kick our ass the most in a BCS game?

i know because it's a waste of time.  we'll win.  we already beat the best quarterback (RGIII) the best coach (Mack) and a bunch of other teams.  maybe you should buy in.

[Stevesie60]

Oh man, imagine how great it would be to play TCU in the Sugar Bowl.

[Dugout DickStone]

The Dr. will have to scheme like he has never schemed before. 

[Shacks]

Oh man, imagine how great it would be to play TCU in the Sugar Bowl.

I would rather not because TCU will be in the Big 12 starting next season.  I want to see us play a team/conference we rarely face, not a team that we will be playing every year starting in 2012.

[SdK]

Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too.   at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.

THANK YOU!!!!!

The upside is so great. There is no downside.