0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: kstater on December 03, 2011, 10:49:01 PMQuote from: Mikeyis4dcats on December 03, 2011, 10:46:50 PMQuote from: kstater on December 03, 2011, 10:26:33 PMQuote from: pike on December 03, 2011, 10:25:44 PMSo wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused. If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large. no, they are not an AQ conference team. They are done.Not that it matters because they won't be picked, but all you have to do to be an at-large is be top 14 with 9 wins. Hence the theoretically possible to be an at-large.NO Denied, they must be conference champions to be considered.
Quote from: Mikeyis4dcats on December 03, 2011, 10:46:50 PMQuote from: kstater on December 03, 2011, 10:26:33 PMQuote from: pike on December 03, 2011, 10:25:44 PMSo wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused. If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large. no, they are not an AQ conference team. They are done.Not that it matters because they won't be picked, but all you have to do to be an at-large is be top 14 with 9 wins. Hence the theoretically possible to be an at-large.
Quote from: kstater on December 03, 2011, 10:26:33 PMQuote from: pike on December 03, 2011, 10:25:44 PMSo wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused. If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large. no, they are not an AQ conference team. They are done.
Quote from: pike on December 03, 2011, 10:25:44 PMSo wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused. If they stay top 14, they could theoretically get an at large.
So wait is Houston still eligible for the BCS? I was just reading the selection rules and I'm now extremely confused.
Know what is ridiculous in this whole thing? That the conference that could be the best in the country probably won't have its 1 loss champ in the BCS championship game and its 2 loss runner-up is about 50/50 to even get into a BCS bowl
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on December 03, 2011, 11:11:21 PMHey guys, we have a pretty good team, too. at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.Well, winning is always fun.
Hey guys, we have a pretty good team, too. at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.
Quote from: joda on December 03, 2011, 11:11:46 PMKnow what is ridiculous in this whole thing? That the conference that could be the best in the country probably won't have its 1 loss champ in the BCS championship game and its 2 loss runner-up is about 50/50 to even get into a BCS bowli think cats to sugar is quite a bit higher than 50/50.
Quote from: Tortuga on December 03, 2011, 11:12:03 PMQuote from: Nuts Kicked on December 03, 2011, 11:11:21 PMHey guys, we have a pretty good team, too. at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.Well, winning is always fun.Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on December 03, 2011, 11:12:55 PMQuote from: Tortuga on December 03, 2011, 11:12:03 PMQuote from: Nuts Kicked on December 03, 2011, 11:11:21 PMHey guys, we have a pretty good team, too. at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.Well, winning is always fun.Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.I'll take anyone except Bama. Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.
Stanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.
Yeah, we wouldn't be able to do crap offensively against Bama but their offense isn't good. Could see us getting beat like 27-7.
Quote from: Panjandrum on December 03, 2011, 11:14:46 PMQuote from: Nuts Kicked on December 03, 2011, 11:12:55 PMQuote from: Tortuga on December 03, 2011, 11:12:03 PMQuote from: Nuts Kicked on December 03, 2011, 11:11:21 PMHey guys, we have a pretty good team, too. at everyone who is afraid of playing somebody good in a meaningless exhibition game.Well, winning is always fun.Winning against a top 5 team is just the icing on the cake.I'll take anyone except Bama. Good God, they'd destroy us to the point where the game wouldn't even be fun to watch.Our only hope would be if Alabama showed up flat and uninspired and didn't care about the game because they thought they would play for all the marbles while K-State treats it like the Super Bowl, like what happened to Bama against Utah in 2008
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on December 03, 2011, 11:17:09 PMStanford scares me more than Alabama. Luck would tear Cosh's zone defense two new assholes.we would rack up 48 minutes of possession. maybe keep the ripped assholes in the 1.5 range
Quote from: jtksu on December 03, 2011, 11:18:42 PMYeah, we wouldn't be able to do crap offensively against Bama but their offense isn't good. Could see us getting beat like 27-7.They would have to successfully convert two field goals to get to 27.
Have I mentioned how terrible it is discussing which team would kick our ass the most in a BCS game?
Oh man, imagine how great it would be to play TCU in the Sugar Bowl.