« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Down

Author Topic: why not Jim?  (Read 25241 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #100 on: January 06, 2011, 06:52:25 PM »
There are definitely some legs to this rumor now. Bill, please don't break our hearts again :pray:
Logged

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #101 on: January 06, 2011, 06:59:44 PM »
Quote from: Pett on January 06, 2011, 06:52:25 PM
There are definitely some legs to this rumor now. Bill, please don't break our hearts again :pray:

don't know if Bill can mess this up. The tree branchs trend to curve in when it comes to Bill.
Logged
RIP Fatty

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #102 on: January 06, 2011, 11:46:30 PM »
As far as 2/3 of this thread goes: DNR.  But I, once again, had a solid realization that the majority of the posters on this board are balls to the wall retards.  I would love to think that some of you are simply joking or illiterate, but that's just not the case.  Mods- can we just rename this BBS:  "Tards and the people that love them?"  TIA.
Logged

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #103 on: January 07, 2011, 12:29:16 AM »
DNR, most of your post; but who are you considering the tards in this thread?
Logged
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline O-town Kat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1118
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #104 on: January 07, 2011, 09:08:36 AM »
Bennett to Baylor.  Carry on.
Logged

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #105 on: January 07, 2011, 10:13:37 AM »
Look forward to kicking Phil's garbage defense with whatever TecmoBowl Offense Bill/Sean decide to run.  :emawkid:
Logged

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #106 on: January 07, 2011, 01:23:53 PM »
Interesting.

Quote
Leavitt's Next Job...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...will be as an assistant at Kansas State University and his job immediately following that will be as head coach at either K-State or KU.


Logged
Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #107 on: January 07, 2011, 01:27:38 PM »
who wouldn't want the DC job here, you have the chance to look like a coaching genius.
I mean statistically we almost can't get any worse.  :emawkid:
Logged

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #108 on: January 07, 2011, 01:28:18 PM »
Quote from: wabash909 on January 07, 2011, 01:23:53 PM
Interesting.

Quote
Leavitt's Next Job...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...will be as an assistant at Kansas State University and his job immediately following that will be as head coach at either K-State or KU.




weird. Who's that from? reputable?
Logged
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #109 on: January 07, 2011, 01:41:27 PM »
Quote from: WillieWannabe on January 07, 2011, 01:28:18 PM
Quote from: wabash909 on January 07, 2011, 01:23:53 PM
Interesting.

Quote
Leavitt's Next Job...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...will be as an assistant at Kansas State University and his job immediately following that will be as head coach at either K-State or KU.




weird. Who's that from? reputable?


A guy over on GP that is actually pretty solid with his info.



Logged
Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #110 on: January 07, 2011, 01:42:45 PM »
Is K-State allergic to coaching searches?
Logged

Offline O-town Kat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1118
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #111 on: January 07, 2011, 01:51:31 PM »
KU can have him.
Logged

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #112 on: January 07, 2011, 01:55:32 PM »
Quote from: O-town Kat on January 07, 2011, 09:08:36 AM
Bennett to Baylor.  Carry on.

Shocking turn of events here.
this struck me as odd.
he will electrify that D.
he will bolt for the the TCU job when Patterson leaves.
Bet he will buy a Chevy Volt with his first paycheck.

I think that gets them all in there.
Logged
RIP Fatty

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #113 on: January 07, 2011, 01:59:17 PM »
Quote from: wabash909 on January 07, 2011, 01:41:27 PM
Quote from: WillieWannabe on January 07, 2011, 01:28:18 PM
Quote from: wabash909 on January 07, 2011, 01:23:53 PM
Interesting.

Quote
Leavitt's Next Job...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...will be as an assistant at Kansas State University and his job immediately following that will be as head coach at either K-State or KU.




weird. Who's that from? reputable?


A guy over on GP that is actually pretty solid with his info.

If true, then this means Currie caved on the HCIW idea no?
Logged

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #114 on: January 07, 2011, 02:02:47 PM »
Quote from: Chingon on January 07, 2011, 01:42:45 PM
Is K-State allergic to coaching searches that involve good candidates?

FYP

Currie may have the cure.  We need to see him in action. Soon maybe :pray:
Logged
RIP Fatty

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #115 on: January 07, 2011, 02:06:20 PM »
Quote from: stormnut on January 07, 2011, 02:02:47 PM
Quote from: Chingon on January 07, 2011, 01:42:45 PM
Is K-State allergic to coaching searches that involve good candidates?

FYP

Currie may have the cure.  We need to see him in action. Soon maybe :pray:
I am starting to doubt that Currie will ever make a coaching hire at KSU.  This all sounds like Bill is hiring the next coach.
Logged

Offline wiley

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2191
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #116 on: January 07, 2011, 02:10:08 PM »
Quote from: Chingon on January 07, 2011, 02:06:20 PM
Quote from: stormnut on January 07, 2011, 02:02:47 PM
Quote from: Chingon on January 07, 2011, 01:42:45 PM
Is K-State allergic to coaching searches that involve good candidates?

FYP

Currie may have the cure.  We need to see him in action. Soon maybe :pray:
I am starting to doubt that Currie will ever make a coaching hire at KSU.  This all sounds like Bill is hiring the next coach.

I'm of the absolute blind faith that Currie goes with an up and comer from the SEC.
Logged
it's easy to be emaw when EMAW is at your doorstep - FFF

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #117 on: January 07, 2011, 02:13:09 PM »
Quote from: Chingon on January 07, 2011, 02:06:20 PM
Quote from: stormnut on January 07, 2011, 02:02:47 PM
Quote from: Chingon on January 07, 2011, 01:42:45 PM
Is K-State allergic to coaching searches that involve good candidates?

FYP

Currie may have the cure.  We need to see him in action. Soon maybe :pray:
I am starting to doubt that Currie will ever make a coaching hire at KSU.  This all sounds like Bill is hiring the next coach.

Bill just keeping the seat warm for Levitt (of course after he was fired but was not before) Currie is "Okay" with this. Meaning Levitt is on a very short leash. Currie know there is still a lot of money, from donors, in keeping the Snyder tree well watered.
Logged
RIP Fatty

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #118 on: January 07, 2011, 02:14:39 PM »
Logged

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #119 on: January 07, 2011, 02:16:41 PM »
*Crazy and Extremely Pessimistic Chingon Prediction to Follow*

LHC Bill Snyder will be around (still HC) longer than John Currie.  I would not be shocked to see Currie walk if Leavitt is hired, who could blame him?
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #120 on: January 07, 2011, 02:18:53 PM »
Quote from: Chingon on January 07, 2011, 01:59:17 PM
Quote from: wabash909 on January 07, 2011, 01:41:27 PM
Quote from: WillieWannabe on January 07, 2011, 01:28:18 PM
Quote from: wabash909 on January 07, 2011, 01:23:53 PM
Interesting.

Quote
Leavitt's Next Job...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...will be as an assistant at Kansas State University and his job immediately following that will be as head coach at either K-State or KU.




weird. Who's that from? reputable?


A guy over on GP that is actually pretty solid with his info.

If true, then this means Currie caved on the HCIW idea no?

It probably means that Currie is a moron if he actually believes that after ku fires gill that cheyenne (even with his connections to Leavitt) would hire a coach who was fired from his job for acts that mirrored the ones of the coach that got fired before gill.  It would appear that currie is going to allow himself to get boxed into a corner and hire someone because he's scared that leavitt would go to ku and win, instead of focusing on getting a coach who will win at ksu.
Logged

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38077
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #121 on: January 07, 2011, 02:19:26 PM »
Quote from: Chingon on January 07, 2011, 02:16:41 PM
*Crazy and Extremely Pessimistic Chingon Prediction to Follow*

LHC Bill Snyder will be around (still HC) longer than John Currie.  I would not be shocked to see Currie walk if Leavitt is hired, who could blame him?

Levitt prob not the final straw.  It will prob be the second or third season where Currie tries to fire Bill and gets blocked.  He will leave once he realizes that no one will let him touch bill.
Logged

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #122 on: January 07, 2011, 02:20:35 PM »
Please bring this back Jim. http://twitter.com/#!/jimleavitt

A coach with a twitter account?! :excited:
Logged

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #123 on: January 07, 2011, 02:28:07 PM »
leavitt will come back here because he is not a total idiot and knows that if he does he will improve the defense and the tards and shirt tucks and old money will want him as coach and currie will hire him because the tards and shirt tucks and old money will want him as coach. if you are currie, you rock the boat as little as possible and then get the eff out while the getting is good. this is going to happen. how depresssing.
Logged

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #124 on: January 07, 2011, 02:34:51 PM »
Quote
Keep telling yourself that. There are things Currie is great at and there are a ton of things he has no experience at, like hiring head coaches. First of all, Currie knows better to piss of Snyder and his meaningful supporters. Also, by allowing Snyder to pick his successor, he does not take the blame if it dowen't work out. Currie is too smart to go in against the legend that is Coach Snyder. Let's think about this from Currie's perspective: (1) allow a legendary future hall of fame coach with ties to the industry and knows K-State better than any other person select our next coach, or (2) allow a young 2nd year AD who has never hired a head coach hire K-State's next football coach. Currie is not that arrogant despite what people want to think. The next coach will have Snyder ties.
:blindfold:
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Up
« previous next »