Author Topic: why not Jim?  (Read 24998 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53861
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #75 on: January 01, 2011, 02:52:19 PM »
If Rich Rod pulls a dante stallworth tonight after their bowl game would he still be out of our reach?


If the Mich AD shot RichRod out of a cannon before the final gun sounded, he still would never come to KSU.

Who the shazbot! do you guys think is chomping at the bit to take this job, even as a HCIW? 

Leavitt coud at least try to fix the defense until BS leaves (likely in 3 years when Tate has completed his free education) and at that point, who knows who is out there.


Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18047
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #76 on: January 01, 2011, 03:43:07 PM »
If Rich Rod pulls a dante stallworth tonight after their bowl game would he still be out of our reach?


If the Mich AD shot RichRod out of a cannon before the final gun sounded, he still would never come to KSU.

Who the shazbot! do you guys think is chomping at the bit to take this job, even as a HCIW? 

Leavitt coud at least try to fix the defense until BS leaves (likely in 3 years when Tate has completed his free education) and at that point, who knows who is out there.



:love: You just made me hope for some new coach coming in and pulling Tate's scholly :love:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53861
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #77 on: January 01, 2011, 03:56:32 PM »
If Rich Rod pulls a dante stallworth tonight after their bowl game would he still be out of our reach?


If the Mich AD shot RichRod out of a cannon before the final gun sounded, he still would never come to KSU.

Who the shazbot! do you guys think is chomping at the bit to take this job, even as a HCIW? 

Leavitt coud at least try to fix the defense until BS leaves (likely in 3 years when Tate has completed his free education) and at that point, who knows who is out there.



:love: You just made me hope for some new coach coming in and pulling Tate's scholly :love:

Which is exactly why BS isn't going anywhere until Tate gets what Bill considers his birthright.  So, let's try and fix the defense in the meantime.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #78 on: January 01, 2011, 04:00:42 PM »
leavitt would come. our defense would get better, because getting worse would be impossible. all the powertards would hail him as the next ksu savior. he'd be the next head coach cause he'd be the easy hire for currie who in all likelihood wants to rock the boat as little as possible and get the shazbot! out of manhattan. we'd then be stuck w/ leavitt and a 5-7 football team every year. do not want. go broke or go home. eff leavitt.

this. in all likelihood Greg Robinson will be available in about 4 hours.  Hire him, Bill.
you seriously just said this?  I mean rough ridin' seriously?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #79 on: January 01, 2011, 04:01:30 PM »
If Rich Rod pulls a dante stallworth tonight after their bowl game would he still be out of our reach?


If the Mich AD shot RichRod out of a cannon before the final gun sounded, he still would never come to KSU.

Who the shazbot! do you guys think is chomping at the bit to take this job, even as a HCIW? 

Leavitt coud at least try to fix the defense until BS leaves (likely in 3 years when Tate has completed his free education) and at that point, who knows who is out there.



:love: You just made me hope for some new coach coming in and pulling Tate's scholly :love:

Which is exactly why BS isn't going anywhere until Tate gets what Bill considers his birthright.  So, let's try and fix the defense in the meantime.


i just had a really scary thought. what if there are more "tates" and bill wants to be able to give free ride football scholarships to all of them. how old is the youngest snyder grandchild? male only.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53861
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #80 on: January 01, 2011, 04:02:23 PM »
If Rich Rod pulls a dante stallworth tonight after their bowl game would he still be out of our reach?


If the Mich AD shot RichRod out of a cannon before the final gun sounded, he still would never come to KSU.

Who the shazbot! do you guys think is chomping at the bit to take this job, even as a HCIW? 

Leavitt coud at least try to fix the defense until BS leaves (likely in 3 years when Tate has completed his free education) and at that point, who knows who is out there.



:love: You just made me hope for some new coach coming in and pulling Tate's scholly :love:

Which is exactly why BS isn't going anywhere until Tate gets what Bill considers his birthright.  So, let's try and fix the defense in the meantime.


i just had a really scary thought. what if there are more "tates" and bill wants to be able to give free ride football scholarships to all of them. how old is the youngest snyder grandchild? male only.

If anybody knows, you should....

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42607
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #81 on: January 01, 2011, 04:31:49 PM »
Quote
refuse to lose

On the depth chart
Post #3285
Wichita
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
I hope we send LHCBS out with a Bowl Win   Reply
Watching Urban Meyer go out with a bowl in front of tens of thousands of Florida fans is giving me chills. I hope when Bill steps down we get to send him out with a bowl victory in front of 30,000 plus K-Staters.

Posted on 1/1 3:52 PM | IP: Logged

Didn't we kind of do this back in 2005 (absent the bowl game)?

Offline O-town Kat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1118
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #82 on: January 01, 2011, 04:42:17 PM »
Can't like our odds of bowling next year there, Refuse to Lose

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53861
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #83 on: January 01, 2011, 04:45:25 PM »
Against mu.  I got misty, cheered a bunch.

Wish I hadn't even gone now.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #84 on: January 01, 2011, 04:46:03 PM »
If Rich Rod pulls a dante stallworth tonight after their bowl game would he still be out of our reach?


If the Mich AD shot RichRod out of a cannon before the final gun sounded, he still would never come to KSU.

Who the shazbot! do you guys think is chomping at the bit to take this job, even as a HCIW? 

Leavitt coud at least try to fix the defense until BS leaves (likely in 3 years when Tate has completed his free education) and at that point, who knows who is out there.



:love: You just made me hope for some new coach coming in and pulling Tate's scholly :love:

Which is exactly why BS isn't going anywhere until Tate gets what Bill considers his birthright.  So, let's try and fix the defense in the meantime.


i just had a really scary thought. what if there are more "tates" and bill wants to be able to give free ride football scholarships to all of them. how old is the youngest snyder grandchild? male only.

If anybody knows, you should....

just what the eff is that supposed to mean bad person?  :curse:

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20114
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #85 on: January 01, 2011, 04:46:41 PM »
:surprised:

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #86 on: January 01, 2011, 05:16:42 PM »
leavitt would come. our defense would get better, because getting worse would be impossible. all the powertards would hail him as the next ksu savior. he'd be the next head coach cause he'd be the easy hire for currie who in all likelihood wants to rock the boat as little as possible and get the shazbot! out of manhattan. we'd then be stuck w/ leavitt and a 5-7 football team every year. do not want. go broke or go home. eff leavitt.

this. in all likelihood Greg Robinson will be available in about 4 hours.  Hire him, Bill.
you seriously just said this?  I mean effing seriously?

it's for the greater good.

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7173
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #87 on: January 01, 2011, 06:07:58 PM »
Quote
refuse to lose

On the depth chart
Post #3285
Wichita
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
I hope we send LHCBS out with a Bowl Win   Reply
Watching Urban Meyer go out with a bowl in front of tens of thousands of Florida fans is giving me chills. I hope when Bill steps down we get to send him out with a bowl victory in front of 30,000 plus K-Staters.

Posted on 1/1 3:52 PM | IP: Logged

Didn't we kind of do this back in 2005 (absent the bowl game)?
To be fair, I'm pretty sure there was at least 39k there in '05.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline Deez Nutz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1192
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #88 on: January 01, 2011, 07:22:23 PM »
Quote
refuse to lose

On the depth chart
Post #3285
Wichita
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
I hope we send LHCBS out with a Bowl Win   Reply
Watching Urban Meyer go out with a bowl in front of tens of thousands of Florida fans is giving me chills. I hope when Bill steps down we get to send him out with a bowl victory in front of 30,000 plus K-Staters.

Posted on 1/1 3:52 PM | IP: Logged

Didn't we kind of do this back in 2005 (absent the bowl game)?
To be fair, I'm pretty sure there was at least 39k there in '05.

There was actually 45,000 at that game.  Everybody else knew he would return and thus purchased the "Thanks, Coach!"  commemorative DVD rather than spend the money on tickets. 

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42607
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #89 on: January 01, 2011, 07:25:46 PM »
Quote
refuse to lose

On the depth chart
Post #3285
Wichita
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
I hope we send LHCBS out with a Bowl Win   Reply
Watching Urban Meyer go out with a bowl in front of tens of thousands of Florida fans is giving me chills. I hope when Bill steps down we get to send him out with a bowl victory in front of 30,000 plus K-Staters.

Posted on 1/1 3:52 PM | IP: Logged

Didn't we kind of do this back in 2005 (absent the bowl game)?
To be fair, I'm pretty sure there was at least 39k there in '05.

There was actually 45,000 at that game.  Everybody else knew he would return and thus purchased the "Thanks, Coach!"  commemorative DVD rather than spend the money on tickets. 

That rough ridin' DVD was about the same price as a ticket.  OBz should give me a refund.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #90 on: January 01, 2011, 10:08:39 PM »
if ron's a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), like everyone says, then it takes a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) to get two good coaches on your staff.  so what in the hell does that make bill since '04?

it seems pretty obvious that it's relatively easy to hire asst coaches that are at least as not-Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) as everyone else's asst coaches.  probably because there's a huge pool of self-selecting potential applicants and an extremely limited number of jobs.


the key is probably to create a work environment where you don't lock the asst coaches in their offices 18 hrs/day and/or have them run steps while you eff their wives.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18047
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #91 on: January 01, 2011, 10:46:15 PM »
the key is probably to create a work environment where you don't lock the asst coaches in their offices 18 hrs/day and/or have them run steps while you eff their wives.

You'd have better luck finding a unicorn than this "dream job" of which you speak

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13888
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #92 on: January 01, 2011, 10:52:05 PM »
the key is probably to create a work environment where you don't lock the asst coaches in their offices 18 hrs/day and/or have them run steps while you eff their wives.

You'd have better luck finding a unicorn than this "dream job" of which you speak


Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #93 on: January 02, 2011, 12:28:40 PM »
Against mu.  I got misty, cheered a bunch.

Wish I hadn't even gone now.
This

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53861
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #94 on: January 02, 2011, 12:42:42 PM »
leavitt would come. our defense would get better, because getting worse would be impossible. all the powertards would hail him as the next ksu savior. he'd be the next head coach cause he'd be the easy hire for currie who in all likelihood wants to rock the boat as little as possible and get the shazbot! out of manhattan. we'd then be stuck w/ leavitt and a 5-7 football team every year. do not want. go broke or go home. eff leavitt.

this. in all likelihood Greg Robinson will be available in about 4 hours.  Hire him, Bill.

So we are worried Leavitt would come and make our defense so good that some folks would want him as a head coach? 

Seems like there are a lot worse things that could happen.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #95 on: January 02, 2011, 01:00:03 PM »
Does our football administration understand that we don't give a shazbot! what Venables did in the past? I don't care if he killed a guy, I just wanna be good at football again. :frown:

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #96 on: January 02, 2011, 01:17:06 PM »
Does our football administration understand that we don't give a shazbot! what Venables did in the past? I don't care if he killed a guy, I just wanna be good at football again. :frown:

A part of me wonders if Venables would come here now if the HCIW tag was made very public, and a timetable was very defined.

For example, Brent Venables would make $500K a year, and he'd be HC starting in 2013.

However, I highly doubt that Snyder would give up that kind of control.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #97 on: January 02, 2011, 01:24:43 PM »
Does our football administration understand that we don't give a shazbot! what Venables did in the past? I don't care if he killed a guy, I just wanna be good at football again. :frown:

A part of me wonders if Venables would come here now if the HCIW tag was made very public, and a timetable was very defined.

For example, Brent Venables would make $500K a year, and he'd be HC starting in 2013.

However, I highly doubt that Snyder would give up that kind of control.

why wouldn't he do this? who else is going to hire him?

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #98 on: January 02, 2011, 01:27:50 PM »
Does our football administration understand that we don't give a shazbot! what Venables did in the past? I don't care if he killed a guy, I just wanna be good at football again. :frown:

A part of me wonders if Venables would come here now if the HCIW tag was made very public, and a timetable was very defined.

For example, Brent Venables would make $500K a year, and he'd be HC starting in 2013.

However, I highly doubt that Snyder would give up that kind of control.

why wouldn't he do this? who else is going to hire him?

I have no idea.  His name is mentioned a lot, but as you say, hiring him is a different issue.

I'd be on board with this, if it were the case.

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: why not Jim?
« Reply #99 on: January 02, 2011, 03:31:16 PM »
hey dipsh*ts, it doesn't matter if you get tyson hartman aligned correctly
Point taken, but he did better last year with presumably equal athletic ability. But anyway, I think it's fair to say that we all want a new DC that isn't just an X's and O's guy, but also a recruiter. As much as I'm pissed at Snyder, he made our offense fairly effective with the worst BCS starting QB in the country, a decent/good RB, and an average line. Get a DC that can at least get middle of the road BCS talent on that side of the ball and know how to coach them on top of that, and we'll be at least an 8 win team for as long as Snyder and said imaginary DC is here. Not great, but I'll take it over what we have now. I'm ok with starting from scratch, but what coach that is worth a cac is going to come here now? We might  be able to get an up and comer or a coordinator with a good background if we can get to a 8-9 win team.

i think it's fair to say that I want a new head coach, who will fill the staff with non-Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) coaches who can recruit.  that's pretty much the solution.  everything else is fingering dykes or something.
"fingering dykes" isn't as easy as it looks