Ben is always going to tweet pro K-State takes. I get the context of Brucecuses, but it is a decent point about the flaws in the RPI SOS formula.
what i meant is, it's a misleading tweet.
he is suggesting if KSU and TCU swapped the 5 worst teams on their schedule, KSU would have the same RPI as TCU. this is not the case.
TCU has 11 top 100 wins, ksu only has 7.
a fairer point would be to say if ksu traded its 4 worst opponents for 4 additional top 100 opponents, they'd have the same RPI as TCU.
Going by the committee's "quadrant" sheet, KSU and TCU each have 4 Q1 wins. They also each have 2 Q2 wins. TCU has 6 Q3 wins to KSU's 5. And KSU has 6 Q4 wins to TCU's 5 (having played 1 extra game). So the comparison is pretty valid. If KSU would have just lost to better teams we'd probably be much higher, which seems a little silly.
Edit: realized that's kind of confusing, so here is a different way to put it:
Q1 Wins: KSU - 4, TCU - 4
Q2 Wins: KSU - 2, TCU - 2
Q3 Wins: KSU - 5, TCU - 6
Q4 Wins: KSU - 6, TCU - 5