0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
why on god's green earth would that bother me? they do a great job at wsu and play angry is the best thing in college basketball.
i do.
we can't do better than a 3rd year head coach from the southern conference
People that are enamored with Forbes and think Jank is terrible are weird to me.Glad we all agree Steve Henson is bad.
The top would be Hoiberg.The best Huggins type hire is Sampson.The best K-State connection hire is obviously Brad. Some may say Jank or the real big reach of Steve Henson.The best up and comer coach is tougher. Archie Miller is clearly the best, but a long shot. Will Wade (Shaka's replacement at VCU) has had success, but at only 2 years each at 2 schools). Kevin Keatts at UNC Willmington looks like he might be a solid young coach. Some might say Dan Muller at Illinois State, but this is really his first really good year. I'm sure there are others and someone will only become an up and comer when they win a NCAA game or two as underdogs.
in the battle of the steves, i just don't see a big difference between the two career assistants. what is it that makes forbes so much different than henson?
forbes did do really well at Tennessee until that show cause arrived. but really, no one really knows the roll henson had in kruger's recruiting. i'd have to think that kruger's top assistant played some roll in recruiting though, don't you?
This thread is gonna be really long by March 2018..........