Author Topic: The Trump Presidency  (Read 1027370 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41955
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11950 on: January 13, 2020, 11:36:13 AM »
Not familiar with the youtube embassy thing, but gE is well versed in other youtube atrocities that led to them nearly being subpoenaed.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11951 on: January 13, 2020, 11:39:35 AM »
It's 2020 and dax is still clinging to benghazi
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11952 on: January 13, 2020, 11:42:58 AM »
Because it's absolutely  :lol:

What's sad is how hard LibDerp Nation circled the wagons to protect their own.  But that's what you guys do better than anyone.




Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11953 on: January 13, 2020, 01:10:07 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11954 on: January 13, 2020, 01:13:09 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Are you surprised it solely focuses on Barack?

He's legitimately too stupid to play any other note. On a board full of progressives and disillusioned Republicans, he only trashes Obama, as if any of us care. My guy is posting like he's talking to his stormfront or texags buddies.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11955 on: January 13, 2020, 01:36:40 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Tap out noted

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3436
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11956 on: January 13, 2020, 01:39:16 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Tap out noted
You didn't even address the original post which was regarding Trump appointing lobbyists at an alarming rate. The match never even started. You didn't enter the ring.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11957 on: January 13, 2020, 01:42:30 PM »
The president of the United States of America




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11958 on: January 13, 2020, 01:48:33 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Are you surprised it solely focuses on Barack?

He's legitimately too stupid to play any other note. On a board full of progressives and disillusioned Republicans, he only trashes Obama, as if any of us care. My guy is posting like he's talking to his stormfront or texags buddies.

You’re the same ol same ol, all you ever have is the race card. 

I’ll gladly discuss any of the complete whack job socialist frauds you support. 

Disillusioned Republicans?  What are they missing? The regime change, the Great Recession, what exactly?   Supply side economics? 

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11959 on: January 13, 2020, 01:54:43 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Tap out noted
You didn't even address the original post which was regarding Trump appointing lobbyists at an alarming rate. The match never even started. You didn't enter the ring.

Lol, I’m supposed to address the caveat of 3 vs 6 years in terms of lobbyists?   How is pro publica defining “lobbyist”? What are these appointments?   Given the unilateral declarative nature of enraged LibBot Nation these claims have to be questioned. 

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3436
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11960 on: January 13, 2020, 02:03:07 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Tap out noted
You didn't even address the original post which was regarding Trump appointing lobbyists at an alarming rate. The match never even started. You didn't enter the ring.

Lol, I’m supposed to address the caveat of 3 vs 6 years in terms of lobbyists?   How is pro publica defining “lobbyist”? What are these appointments?   Given the unilateral declarative nature of enraged LibBot Nation these claims have to be questioned.
Naturally you should address the argument being brought to you, yes. Apparently you struggle with reading comprehension as well. I assume that's why you didn't read the article (which answers the questions you have asked). It's just the same old exhausting BS and deflections from you. You lack substance of any kind.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11961 on: January 13, 2020, 02:07:26 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Tap out noted
You didn't even address the original post which was regarding Trump appointing lobbyists at an alarming rate. The match never even started. You didn't enter the ring.

Lol, I’m supposed to address the caveat of 3 vs 6 years in terms of lobbyists?   How is pro publica defining “lobbyist”? What are these appointments?   Given the unilateral declarative nature of enraged LibBot Nation these claims have to be questioned.

Yes, stupid, 3 versus 6 matters when you don't need to project the numbers to have 3 exceed 6, unless you think that trump can somehow make the number smaller, which your dumb ass probably thinks is possible. Also the article answered your other questions, but like your orange hero, you seem to be barely literate.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11962 on: January 13, 2020, 02:23:08 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Tap out noted
You didn't even address the original post which was regarding Trump appointing lobbyists at an alarming rate. The match never even started. You didn't enter the ring.

Lol, I’m supposed to address the caveat of 3 vs 6 years in terms of lobbyists?   How is pro publica defining “lobbyist”? What are these appointments?   Given the unilateral declarative nature of enraged LibBot Nation these claims have to be questioned.
Naturally you should address the argument being brought to you, yes. Apparently you struggle with reading comprehension as well. I assume that's why you didn't read the article (which answers the questions you have asked). It's just the same old exhausting BS and deflections from you. You lack substance of any kind.
Lol, by admission they acknowledge that they don’t have the full picture.  I know in LibDerp world that means that every appointee that Pro Publica declares to be a lobbyist was obviously a super hardcore lobbyist just like the 2 or 3 cherry picked examples that they used. 

Also by admission they acknowledge their tracking wasn’t as extensive during the previous administration. 

Lol, you do try hard Waks.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15097
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11963 on: January 13, 2020, 02:27:59 PM »
This might all be a moot point.

Dax: if Trump appointed more lobbyists to positions in 3 years than Obama appointed in 6, would that be bad?

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11964 on: January 13, 2020, 06:29:49 PM »

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15255
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11965 on: January 13, 2020, 07:09:43 PM »
have you guys every google'd this "youtube bengazi" thing Dax is on repeat about?  Holy crap, lol.  there has to be a better single talking point to fall back on.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5990
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11966 on: January 13, 2020, 10:04:59 PM »
https://www.thedailybeast.com/hillary-blamed-me-for-benghazi

long but interesting read about the “film”

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15255
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11967 on: January 13, 2020, 10:30:54 PM »

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3436
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11968 on: January 13, 2020, 11:58:26 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Tap out noted
You didn't even address the original post which was regarding Trump appointing lobbyists at an alarming rate. The match never even started. You didn't enter the ring.

Lol, I’m supposed to address the caveat of 3 vs 6 years in terms of lobbyists?   How is pro publica defining “lobbyist”? What are these appointments?   Given the unilateral declarative nature of enraged LibBot Nation these claims have to be questioned.
Naturally you should address the argument being brought to you, yes. Apparently you struggle with reading comprehension as well. I assume that's why you didn't read the article (which answers the questions you have asked). It's just the same old exhausting BS and deflections from you. You lack substance of any kind.
Lol, by admission they acknowledge that they don’t have the full picture.  I know in LibDerp world that means that every appointee that Pro Publica declares to be a lobbyist was obviously a super hardcore lobbyist just like the 2 or 3 cherry picked examples that they used. 

Also by admission they acknowledge their tracking wasn’t as extensive during the previous administration. 

Lol, you do try hard Waks.
You literally spend your entire workday on here. Nobody tries harder on this blog than you, bud

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21893
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11969 on: January 14, 2020, 11:51:14 AM »
Trump wants to feel like a big shot, Trump's shady acquaintances want to make a buck. This would totally happen.

https://twitter.com/NoahShachtman/status/1217131500426141696

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52946
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11970 on: January 14, 2020, 12:00:06 PM »
Can't wait to see dax's word salad explaining how he wasn't lied to when he believed a crooked "billionaire" would drain the swamp.

Politician/election BS vs literally telling (and LibBit Nation believing) the world that a YouTube video attacked an embassy. 

Like your policy/keep your policy.  Hope and change! (And bombing, spying etc etc etc).

Jesus, you really do bark on command.

Tap out noted
You didn't even address the original post which was regarding Trump appointing lobbyists at an alarming rate. The match never even started. You didn't enter the ring.

Lol, I’m supposed to address the caveat of 3 vs 6 years in terms of lobbyists?   How is pro publica defining “lobbyist”? What are these appointments?   Given the unilateral declarative nature of enraged LibBot Nation these claims have to be questioned.
Naturally you should address the argument being brought to you, yes. Apparently you struggle with reading comprehension as well. I assume that's why you didn't read the article (which answers the questions you have asked). It's just the same old exhausting BS and deflections from you. You lack substance of any kind.
Lol, by admission they acknowledge that they don’t have the full picture.  I know in LibDerp world that means that every appointee that Pro Publica declares to be a lobbyist was obviously a super hardcore lobbyist just like the 2 or 3 cherry picked examples that they used. 

Also by admission they acknowledge their tracking wasn’t as extensive during the previous administration. 

Lol, you do try hard Waks.
You literally spend your entire workday on here. Nobody tries harder on this blog than you, bud

Oh waks . . .

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21893
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11971 on: January 15, 2020, 11:59:35 AM »

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21893
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11972 on: January 15, 2020, 12:02:10 PM »

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51303
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11973 on: January 15, 2020, 12:38:27 PM »

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21893
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #11974 on: January 16, 2020, 09:55:41 AM »
Someone on TV last night described the bar at Trump's DC hotel as the cantina in Star Wars, full of scoundrels looking for their next grift. I think that's hilarious and totally want to go check out the scene!

https://twitter.com/bethreinhard/status/1217818032011120640