So if we give that GZ had the right to use his gun to defend himself, do we really think it was okay to shoot him in the chest for a killshot? I'm sure it all happened fast and all, but I would imagine that if he had told TM that he was going to shoot him, then TM would have stopped, or GZ could have at least shot him in the leg or arm or anywhere that he would have a chance of surviving. I dunno. I think its all pretty mumped up. If GZ didn't have a gun, then neither of them are dead today. I don't think that is really debatable.