goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Other Sports (Tiger's Back) => Topic started by: Kat Kid on February 15, 2010, 07:01:19 AM

Title: olympics
Post by: Kat Kid on February 15, 2010, 07:01:19 AM
GMAFB olympics.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2010, 07:12:50 AM
What about the medal count?  How can we kick so much ass?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: _33 on February 15, 2010, 08:33:44 AM
Too many events that are "judged" in the winter olympics.  I hate subjective sporting events.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 15, 2010, 08:46:50 AM
I enjoy watching it. If this was an annual thing, definitely wouldn't watch it though.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Pete on February 15, 2010, 12:42:52 PM
Can't wait for Johnny Weir!   :pbj:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: fatty fat fat on February 15, 2010, 01:14:31 PM
If you've never skied before, I understand why you wouldn't appreciate the winter games.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 15, 2010, 01:23:07 PM
Team USA vs Switzerland!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: CatsNShocks on February 15, 2010, 03:32:09 PM
Too many events that are "judged" in the winter olympics.  I hate subjective sporting events.

This.

Plus, NBC has completely ruined the Olympics...both Winter and Summer.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Pete on February 15, 2010, 06:05:57 PM
Too many events that are "judged" in the winter olympics.  I hate subjective sporting events.

This.

Plus, NBC has completely ruined the Olympics...both Winter and Summer.

You don't like Costas?

Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2010, 09:44:44 PM
I watch Winter O's just for the sweeping panoramas when they go to commercial breaks.  Awesome.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: j rake on February 15, 2010, 09:48:31 PM
Can't wait for Johnny Weir!   :pbj:

WTF?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kso_FAN on February 16, 2010, 08:02:25 AM
Enjoy watching. 

Though Collinsworth should stick to football.

Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 16, 2010, 09:19:30 AM
I enjoy popping my collar to foreign people about the Olympics.  I purposefully make it known that I don't know WTF is going on in the Olympics but that I'm sure USA! is dominating whatever country they are unfortunate enough to be from.  Made this German girl very angry two years ago during the summer games doing this. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: OK_Cat on February 16, 2010, 11:26:53 AM
I enjoy popping my collar to foreign people about the Olympics.  I purposefully make it known that I don't know WTF is going on in the Olympics but that I'm sure USA! is dominating whatever country they are unfortunate enough to be from.  Made this German girl very angry two years ago during the summer games doing this. 

this.

I was in Europe during a summer olympics, and I made sure to LOL @ the british about how they could suck my USA gold-medal winning male genitals.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: ksuwizard on February 16, 2010, 11:46:07 AM
I enjoy popping my collar to foreign people about the Olympics.  I purposefully make it known that I don't know WTF is going on in the Olympics but that I'm sure USA! is dominating whatever country they are unfortunate enough to be from.  Made this German girl very angry two years ago during the summer games doing this. 

this.

I was in Europe during a summer olympics, and I made sure to LOL @ the british about how they could suck my USA gold-medal winning male genitals.

I forgot to record my DVR for curling this afternoon.  But, USA curler's go at it tonight!  Get your brooms ready!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: The42Yardstick on February 16, 2010, 09:43:53 PM
Too many events that are "judged" in the winter olympics.  I hate subjective sporting events.

This.

Plus, NBC has completely ruined the Olympics...both Winter and Summer.

Yeah it's not the talent that sucks. It's the way the NBC has this clusterfuck set up. It's worse than FOX doing college football :barf:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mcmwcat on February 17, 2010, 11:13:18 AM
has it started yet?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: CrushNasty on February 17, 2010, 12:01:07 PM
Funny how many events, the people aren't like even breathing hard.... Doesn't seem like real sporting events. Very diff than Summer Olympics.

How about that biathlon? Like a manhunt on a mountain!
Title: olympics
Post by: BigCat on February 17, 2010, 11:36:05 PM
Silver-Gold

Julia Mancuso  :love:

Idiot

Linsday Vonn still :thumbsup:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 17, 2010, 11:46:34 PM
Summer Olympics = people doing stuff I can do better than I could ever do it
Winter Olympics = people doing stuff I can't/will never do.

Winter Olympics are almost like the Guinness World Records version of Olympics. 25 saltines in a minute/world record luge time? Congrats, I guess you're the best at that.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: fatty fat fat on February 18, 2010, 04:16:28 AM
Quote
Winter Olympics are almost like the Guinness World Records version of Olympics. 25 saltines in a minute/world record luge time? Congrats, I guess you're the best at that.

you know that 6 saltines in one minute challenge that's suppose to be impossible? complete horse sh*t.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 18, 2010, 06:58:22 AM
Summer Olympics = people doing stuff I can do better than I could ever do it
Winter Olympics = people doing stuff I can't/will never do.

You could do any of it if you wanted to (or at least try to).  What you're really saying is that you don't want to do things like ski or ice skate.  But do you really want to do things like run around a track or throw crap really far? 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 18, 2010, 07:05:48 AM
Winter sports all seem like something you'd need to be rich to get good at.  Except maybe speed skating.(?)

Summer sports mostly require a shoe or ball and a flat surface.  Anyone can do a summer sport.  (except maybe equestrian(?))
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 18, 2010, 07:23:19 AM
I have the means to collect coins.  That doesn't mean I want to watch people do it on TV.  I want to ski, but I don't want to run.  I watch them both.  For me, competition is competition.  I find both olympics equally compelling.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 18, 2010, 08:18:27 AM
I like to watch the snowboard guys flip around all cazily and junk/stuff
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 18, 2010, 08:34:01 AM
I like to watch the snowboard guys flip around all cazily and junk/stuff

The snowboard race was the simultaneously the most ridiculous and most entertaining event I saw.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 18, 2010, 10:01:13 AM
I enjoy speed skating...not sure if its the nascar fan in me...
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kso_FAN on February 18, 2010, 10:01:47 AM
I like to watch the snowboard guys flip around all cazily and junk/stuff

The snowboard race was the simultaneously the most ridiculous and most entertaining event I saw.

Agreed.  Snowboard cross is fun to watch.  Short track speed skating has its moments too.  
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 18, 2010, 11:30:48 AM
Short track speed skating has its moments too. 

This is my favorite.  Also, mic'ing up Shaun White and his coach after he was secured the gold was brilliant.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: _33 on February 18, 2010, 11:44:53 AM
I would really like to see video from a helmet cam going down the ski jump thing.  It's hard to tell how steep it really is when you're watching.  This is the reason I would like to see video from a helmet cam.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: hemmy on February 18, 2010, 12:07:15 PM
I like gymnastics :fatty:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: DILLIGAF on February 18, 2010, 01:31:33 PM
Curling is an GD amazing sport, so fun to watch, full of tension much more than basketball could ever hope for.   Speed skating is a good time as well as downhill skiing.   shazbot! the fracking X game crap, GOOMF X games. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 18, 2010, 06:46:07 PM
Is she holding a roll of TP there?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kso_FAN on February 18, 2010, 10:18:24 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKCl4G4jK4c&feature=player_embedded (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKCl4G4jK4c&feature=player_embedded)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: BigCat on February 18, 2010, 11:18:29 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKCl4G4jK4c&feature=player_embedded (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKCl4G4jK4c&feature=player_embedded)

It's amazing how awful the snow conditions have been in about every event
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: slimz on February 19, 2010, 09:14:32 PM
Ice dancing.   :flush:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 19, 2010, 09:34:57 PM
Ice dancing.   :flush:

Yeah, WTF?  Just sat down with some Cheez-Its and a Diet Pepsi and this crap is on?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 19, 2010, 11:13:34 PM
You guys had the opp. to talk to any foreigners the last couple days?  :cool:  Keep asking Mrs. dave how Mexico or wherever the eff her ancestors are from are doing :dunno:  get a lot of blank stares ...PWNT!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 20, 2010, 01:46:11 AM
You guys had the opp. to talk to any foreigners the last couple days?  :cool:  Keep asking Mrs. dave how Mexico or wherever the shazbot! her ancestors are from are doing :dunno:  get a lot of blank stares ...PWNT!

My wife is Lebanese. They just root for Brazil in the World Cup, constantly apologize for France, and brush off any criticism by pointing out that they're richer and better looking than everyone else (plus, she's like a Macgyver with explosives and what not so if I push her too far she'll jerry-rig my coffee pot and blow my eyebrows off again).
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: slimz on February 22, 2010, 12:02:22 PM
My wife is Lebanese.

You, sir, are a lucky, lucky man.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 22, 2010, 12:45:52 PM
My wife is Lebanese.

You, sir, are a lucky, lucky man.

:fatty:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: slimz on February 22, 2010, 01:01:00 PM
My wife is Lebanese.

You, sir, are a lucky, lucky man.

:fatty:


Just in case other folks aren't familiar:


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.willisms.com%2Farchives%2Fcedarrevolution2.gif&hash=fde903e7a24997a4b423917086ccd70c6724e174)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm1.static.flickr.com%2F8%2F6600512_46a5f3d527.jpg&hash=cb435462c823f159d29d6e73351998e677d2de0f)



 :love:

Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 22, 2010, 01:49:56 PM
I thoroughly enjoyed the "make fun of another ethnicity" portion of the Ice Dancing competition, while simultaneously being embarrassed for all competitors.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 22, 2010, 01:51:59 PM
My wife is Lebanese.

You, sir, are a lucky, lucky man.

:fatty:


Just in case other folks aren't familiar:


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.willisms.com%2Farchives%2Fcedarrevolution2.gif&hash=fde903e7a24997a4b423917086ccd70c6724e174)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm1.static.flickr.com%2F8%2F6600512_46a5f3d527.jpg&hash=cb435462c823f159d29d6e73351998e677d2de0f)



 :love:



seems like good looking lebanese women hang out w/ very ugly looking men.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 22, 2010, 02:41:33 PM
My wife is Lebanese.

seems like good looking lebanese women hang out w/ very ugly looking men.

Good taste in everything but men.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: hemmy on February 22, 2010, 09:19:36 PM
usa vs canada lesbos for gold
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 22, 2010, 09:26:52 PM
These women probably don't know too much about technology or women's liberation.  Sounds like a good deal.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: theKSU on February 23, 2010, 01:06:17 AM
Ugh ice dancing.  Why not just burn 3 days of prime-time olympic coverage with the rough ridin' ice capades. 

And mercifully, the USA Mens curlers are finished.  Time for those guys to get drunk and retire.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 23, 2010, 04:55:47 AM
 :combofan:
These women probably don't know too much about technology or women's liberation.  Sounds like a good deal.

Lebanese women are super hi-tech (hello? car bombs?), but enchantingly third world.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: nicname on February 24, 2010, 11:09:54 AM
I would really like to see video from a helmet cam going down the ski jump thing.  It's hard to tell how steep it really is when you're watching.  This is the reason I would like to see video from a helmet cam.

I can't decide which I like better. 

Ski Jumping, for the straight up hangtime and flight distance....
or
X Games Style Big Air, which has less hang time but cool tricks.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 'taterblast on February 26, 2010, 02:27:56 PM
mighty ducks are playing well against finland right now.

quack, quack, quack, quack....

(that is the us team's name right?)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 26, 2010, 02:33:07 PM
We win this we play for gold right?  Or does this mean we at least play for bronze?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Jmo on February 26, 2010, 03:51:36 PM
We win this we play for gold right?  Or does this mean we at least play for bronze?

We'll be playing for gold. :kstatriot: <----but U.S. flag
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 26, 2010, 05:52:19 PM
Jesus.  That goalie, Miller, just said that the team thinks they match up really well with Canada, are more physical than Canada is, and that they expect to beat them again.  He was dead serious.  He finished by saying that he'd almost guarantee a victory.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: slobber on August 23, 2012, 02:52:26 PM
I like to watch the snowboard guys flip around all cazily and junk/stuff
That is the best part about the olympics.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 20, 2014, 03:34:22 PM
So like how much of a mess is Sochi going to be?  I've seen reports that we (the US) will have warships and choppers on standby to evacuate in case of a terrorist attack. 

Anyone you'll be following in particular?  Shaun White, Bode Miller, Lindsey Vonn will be missed obviously, what else?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: OK_Cat on January 20, 2014, 03:35:11 PM
i don't mean this to be edgy, but i would watch the winter olympics if something big happened.  otherwise,   :zzz:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 20, 2014, 03:38:18 PM
I like the downhill skiing.  Not the slalom stuff, the put your head down and go stuff.  Also the ski jumping is good.  Bobsled/luge/skeleton stuff is good, too.  Ice skating is good if we win and we get to mush the Russians.  Otherwise it's whatevs. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 20, 2014, 03:40:54 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on January 20, 2014, 03:41:04 PM
Winter Olympics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer Olympics
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 20, 2014, 03:42:01 PM
Do we have any figure skaters worth keeping an eye on?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 20, 2014, 04:02:55 PM
Do we have any figure skaters worth keeping an eye on?

Glad you asked.  We return the silver medalist ice dancers who also won the world title in 2011.  The figure skating squad is young but poised to do big things.  Lotta question marks on the men's side.

This Olympics will have a team medal, which is a new for the event.  Team USA is a favorite to win in.  U S A!  U S A!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 20, 2014, 04:05:06 PM
Do we have any figure skaters worth keeping an eye on?

Glad you asked.  We return the silver medalist ice dancers who also won the world title in 2011.  The figure skating squad is young but poised to do big things.  Lotta question marks on the men's side.

This Olympics will have a team medal, which is a new for the event.  Team USA is a favorite to win in.  U S A!  U S A!

Sweet. Is the triple axel still everyone's best move, or has the sport evolved beyond that?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sys on January 20, 2014, 08:21:44 PM
love the olys.  can't wait.  curling for national pride is one of the greatest things in the world (not sarcastic).
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on January 20, 2014, 08:25:28 PM
Winter Olympics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer Olympics

absolutely
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: ben ji on January 20, 2014, 08:29:31 PM
The olympics are great because they never interfere with any important sporting events(Football season, NCAA Tournament).
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on January 20, 2014, 08:49:34 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: ben ji on January 20, 2014, 08:52:15 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

Because we are America?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on January 20, 2014, 08:54:03 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

Because we are America?

Yeah, exactly. We're talking about hockey not basketball.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on January 20, 2014, 08:55:27 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

all the canadians i know that religiously follow hockey seem to think they are the favorites  :dunno:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: ben ji on January 20, 2014, 08:56:50 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

Because we are America?

Yeah, exactly. We're talking about hockey not basketball.

Did we not win the gold in hockey last time?

I just assume that America kicks ass at every sport and I'm usually right.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: puniraptor on January 20, 2014, 09:05:19 PM
America is like the kstate of the world.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 20, 2014, 09:25:31 PM
This is going to be Munich bad, isn't it.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: yoga-like_abana on January 20, 2014, 09:35:49 PM
olympics  :flush:
its for all of the people who weren't good at actual sports
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on January 20, 2014, 09:39:46 PM
olympics  :flush:
its for all of the people who weren't good at actual sports

ok michigan-like_abana
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: yoga-like_abana on January 20, 2014, 09:45:40 PM
olympics  :flush:
its for all of the people who weren't good at actual sports

ok michigan-like_abana
its true and the olympics get americas B teamers
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on January 20, 2014, 11:04:07 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

all the canadians i know that religiously follow hockey seem to think they are the favorites  :dunno:

I haven't read a single article or heard a single podcast that lists us as even winning a medal. We have no scoring and a very unproven blue line. Our goaltending is a huge strength with Miller, our backups are trash, but Finland may be Bette there.

I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

Because we are America?

Yeah, exactly. We're talking about hockey not basketball.

Did we not win the gold in hockey last time?

I just assume that America kicks ass at every sport and I'm usually right.

No we didn't, or the time before that, or before that, or before that, so on so forth. They didn't make a Disney movie called Miracle because we're some kind of gold medal juggernaut. Its been 42 years since we have even won a medal in a non North American Olympics.

The women's team is bawse tho
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on January 20, 2014, 11:10:04 PM
lol, nice qualifier.

silver in 2010 means they sucked because it was in north america
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 8manpick on January 20, 2014, 11:37:45 PM
lol, nice qualifier.

silver in 2010 means they sucked because it was in north america


No kidding
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: EMAWmeister on January 20, 2014, 11:56:06 PM
This is going to be Munich bad, isn't it.

I'm a little anxious.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on January 21, 2014, 12:31:00 AM
lol, nice qualifier.

silver in 2010 means they sucked because it was in north america


No kidding

Yes because that's exactly what I said, its like you idiots want to be called stupid.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on January 21, 2014, 05:34:45 PM
@BuzzFeedSports: Whoa. Check out the suits for Norway’s Men’s Olympic curling team: (Cassie Kovacevich/AP) http://t.co/0pDMWOqh8O
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 21, 2014, 05:59:29 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

I saw Wayne Gretzky on the tv a few days ago saying that team USA was a darkhorse candidate for the gold. He said the Russians would be playing hard for Putin, though.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: hemmy on January 21, 2014, 06:52:35 PM
Winter Olympics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer Olympics

Only complete dumbasses would think that.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 21, 2014, 09:07:23 PM
Nobody cares about womens hockey, tho. :dunno: Does it really exist? :dunno:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 21, 2014, 09:50:01 PM
I care about women's hockey every 4 years when Team USA is kicking ass in the olympics.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on January 21, 2014, 11:17:01 PM
I care about women's hockey every 4 years when Team USA is kicking ass in the olympics.

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bones129 on January 22, 2014, 12:05:03 AM
I care about women's hockey every 4 years when Team USA is kicking ass in the olympics.

Studettes.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on January 22, 2014, 01:10:48 AM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

I saw Wayne Gretzky on the tv a few days ago saying that team USA was a darkhorse candidate for the gold. He said the Russians would be playing hard for Putin, though.

He nearly single handedly ruined the Phoenix Coyote franchise
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 22, 2014, 01:03:00 PM
I saw an American Express commercial featuring US figure skater Ashely Wagner, so she must be pretty good.

Title: Re: olympics
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on January 22, 2014, 03:08:27 PM
Winter Olympics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summer Olympics


Couldn't have said it any better myself, 7.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: illBisonYourdele on January 22, 2014, 03:49:33 PM
Medal Count Projections!!

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ybgP5Hs-5u0%2FUt4YT5awg2I%2FAAAAAAAAtaQ%2Fl_sUgtsFrGQ%2Fs1600%2Fsportsmyriadmedalprojection.png&hash=bc5df605c823d8ec423f717ac26bc27bdb714e26)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-40B2Rx1Ih00%2FUt4YJSSZPOI%2FAAAAAAAAtaI%2FD-kgZXuWj0Q%2Fs1600%2Fsochimedalprojections.png&hash=c9a5284f6cabf1e162312a34522a0e40d5b89559)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 22, 2014, 04:20:46 PM
Norway, Germany, and Canada usually pick up a crap ton of medals in the skiing events. I'm surprised USA is projected so high.

Poor Russians. Ever since the fall of the USSR, those cats can't compete.

I take a mild interest in Winter Olympics just because I enjoy America kicking ass, but Summer's where it's at.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bubbles4ksu on January 22, 2014, 07:54:37 PM
Norway, Germany, and Canada usually pick up a crap ton of medals in the skiing events. I'm surprised USA is projected so high.

Poor Russians. Ever since the fall of the USSR, those cats can't compete.

I take a mild interest in Winter Olympics just because I enjoy America kicking ass, but Summer's where it's at.
summer will be even better if they make the jamacians test.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on January 22, 2014, 09:33:15 PM
I can't wait to watch the Olympics and laugh my rough ridin' ass off at everyone who doesn't like them. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on January 22, 2014, 11:30:00 PM
I can't wait to watch the Olympics and laugh my rough ridin' ass off at everyone who doesn't like them.

 :D  :thumbs:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bones129 on January 22, 2014, 11:49:57 PM
Bobsled. What is there not to enjoy?  :dance:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 23, 2014, 12:04:40 AM
Oh, I love the Olympics! I'm always Team USA! Just love seeing MIR try so hard to stick up for women's sports. I obviously cheer for them, just love when he gets all high and mighty about women playing their sport. :D Obviously they're talented and awesome, but plz give me the WNBA numbers these days on the networks.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on January 23, 2014, 12:13:08 AM
I'm always Team USA!

OMG YES! 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on January 23, 2014, 12:20:50 AM
I'm always Team USA!

OMG YES!
:Woohoo:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on January 23, 2014, 12:22:14 AM
oh hey Olympic bros, let's have fun and stuff
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on January 23, 2014, 02:00:38 AM
Medal Count Projections!!

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ybgP5Hs-5u0%2FUt4YT5awg2I%2FAAAAAAAAtaQ%2Fl_sUgtsFrGQ%2Fs1600%2Fsportsmyriadmedalprojection.png&hash=bc5df605c823d8ec423f717ac26bc27bdb714e26)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-40B2Rx1Ih00%2FUt4YJSSZPOI%2FAAAAAAAAtaI%2FD-kgZXuWj0Q%2Fs1600%2Fsochimedalprojections.png&hash=c9a5284f6cabf1e162312a34522a0e40d5b89559)

Absolutely no way on that 30 for Canadian medals. That would be more than they won when they hosted in Vancouver
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Trogdor on January 23, 2014, 08:04:42 AM
Team USA uniforms looks cozy AF

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Beqvzt2CUAA16zB.jpg)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on January 23, 2014, 08:45:55 AM
That cardigan is amazing.  $600.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on January 23, 2014, 09:10:36 AM
The Olympics are so *insert nation*-O.... It's fantastic
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Fedor on January 23, 2014, 09:24:13 AM
I love the Oly's.  One of the few positive outlets for my raging jingoism.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 23, 2014, 11:50:07 AM
Mrs CF3 cares about 2 things in sports: Gymnastics at the summer olympics, and Figure skating at the winter olympics.

We're hoping for some Gold Medal performances!!!!!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on January 23, 2014, 04:09:10 PM
Mrs CF3 cares about 2 things in sports: Gymnastics at the summer olympics, and Figure skating at the winter olympics.

We're hoping for some Gold Medal performances!!!!!

Can we talk about US Figure Skating cheating the Asian girl out of the spot she earned on the national team?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: slucat on January 23, 2014, 04:13:00 PM
Stoked for the Olympics. Love the winter more than the summer, but they are all great.
Let's goooo super G, ring that bell!!!!  :excited:
Title: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: aggie_station on January 25, 2014, 07:49:38 PM
The winter olympics start in less than two weeks and I don't sense any excitement. We are going to kick the crap out of Italy and low life France in hockey and ski jumping
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: Tobias on January 25, 2014, 07:50:54 PM
winter olympics thread, bro
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: 8manpick on January 25, 2014, 07:54:23 PM
Kstate cat football: There is Nothing Better on the Earth
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 25, 2014, 07:59:27 PM
If France wins even 1 medal you gotta wonder if democracy has a chance in the new world order
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: bucket on January 25, 2014, 08:08:01 PM
If France wins even 1 medal you gotta wonder if democracy has a chance in the new world order

 :shakesfist:
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: sunny_cat on January 25, 2014, 08:14:30 PM
weird thread
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: hemmy on January 25, 2014, 08:33:02 PM
I just don't understand how anyone could prefer the winter olympics....

Summer has more sports, better sports (olympic basketball, swimming, track, volleyball all better then every winter sport by a mile except hockey.)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on January 25, 2014, 08:38:40 PM
when i was in grade school, i fist pumped my ass off when tara lipinski won the gold over her heavily favored american teammate michelle kwan.  great memory.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on January 25, 2014, 08:43:23 PM

I just don't understand how anyone could prefer the winter olympics....

Summer has more sports, better sports (olympic basketball, swimming, track, volleyball all better then every winter sport by a mile except hockey.)

you can easily see these sports performed at a high level throughout the year
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on January 25, 2014, 08:45:40 PM
OMG you guys, what a stud. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_lGt6auYDo
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 25, 2014, 08:49:08 PM
Summer Olympics usually fall in a time where there is baseball, preseason NFL, fantasy drafts, summer workouts for the KSU Cat football team, and its nice out so you do outdoor stuff a lot.

Winter 'lympics are when its cold out and only thing competing is hobby sport.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on January 25, 2014, 08:54:03 PM
I don't watch anything on that list and don't do much outside during the hot ass summer tho
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on January 25, 2014, 08:55:52 PM
They are both great dumbasses.  Watch that video I posted, it's an amazing moment in sports history.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 25, 2014, 08:57:34 PM
OMG you guys, what a stud. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_lGt6auYDo

3:33. WOW!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: hemmy on January 25, 2014, 09:43:26 PM

I just don't understand how anyone could prefer the winter olympics....

Summer has more sports, better sports (olympic basketball, swimming, track, volleyball all better then every winter sport by a mile except hockey.)

you can easily see these sports performed at a high level throughout the year

No you can't. Basketball yes (but also hockey).

Swimming and track maybe once in a blue moon. Olympic volleyball (men's specifically) is miles more interesting and fun to watch than college vball. Skiing and related events are on TV more than the majority of summer events. Sorry but you winter lovers are just dumb. (facts, not my opinion)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on January 25, 2014, 09:52:07 PM
Summer Olympics usually fall in a time where there is baseball, preseason NFL, fantasy drafts, summer workouts for the KSU Cat football team, and its nice out so you do outdoor stuff a lot.

Winter 'lympics are when its cold out and only thing competing is hobby sport.

lol that it's nice outside during the summer, especially in kansas  :lol:
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 26, 2014, 01:00:44 AM
I think football would be pretty sweet as an olympic sport, too, especially in the winter olympics. Just play the game on ice and make everyone wear skates. Oh, man, it would be awesome!
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: bucket on January 26, 2014, 03:14:59 AM
I think football would be pretty sweet as an olympic sport, too, especially in the winter olympics. Just play the game on ice and make everyone wear skates. Oh, man, it would be awesome!

 :confused:
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: AppleJack on January 26, 2014, 03:19:14 AM
you people?
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: MakeItRain on January 26, 2014, 09:18:35 AM
The winter olympics start in less than two weeks and I don't sense any excitement. We are going to kick the crap out of Italy and low life France in hockey and ski jumping

Yeah those hockey & ski jumping powerhouses France and Italy
Title: Re: WTF is wrong with you people?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 26, 2014, 02:04:55 PM
I think football would be pretty sweet as an olympic sport, too, especially in the winter olympics. Just play the game on ice and make everyone wear skates. Oh, man, it would be awesome!

 :confused:

Well, it was in the football thread when I posted, so I just made some assumptions . . .
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bubbles4ksu on January 26, 2014, 04:39:20 PM
nancy kerrigan is the first crush i can remember having. i wanted her to win very badly. she is my greatest olympic love.

after that i really liked dominique dawes. i was lucky enough to be in atl that year(saw MJs 200m WR live :gocho:) and dawes was my life's focus for a while.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on January 26, 2014, 05:43:51 PM
nancy kerrigan is the first crush i can remember having. i wanted her to win very badly. she is my greatest olympic love.

after that i really liked dominique dawes. i was lucky enough to be in atl that year(saw MJs 200m WR live :gocho:) and dawes was my life's focus for a while.

i understand completely :fatty:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 27, 2014, 09:58:19 AM
If you were going to Russia for the 'lympics, what events would you wanna hit? I'd definitely want to see some downhill skiing, some speed skating, and something with jumps (either snow boarding or skiing).
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 27, 2014, 05:49:33 PM
I would want to go to the hockey and chant "USA USA USA" when the russians were playing, even if they weren't playing against the USA.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on January 28, 2014, 12:12:11 AM
We have a figure skater named Gracie Gold?  GTFO!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on January 30, 2014, 07:11:57 PM
Jesus Christ, GB.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-lsSKOlV0I
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Trogdor on February 01, 2014, 03:20:13 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F17NWL4d.jpg&hash=9f4aa9782c8d7ded270d64b076cea015cebf3d09)

These are the Olympic busses apparently
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bones129 on February 01, 2014, 03:20:57 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F17NWL4d.jpg&hash=9f4aa9782c8d7ded270d64b076cea015cebf3d09)

These are the Olympic busses apparently

Fantastic.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 'taterblast on February 06, 2014, 09:26:57 AM
there's so much to love about these olympics

http://deadspin.com/all-the-sochi-food-is-in-the-ass-1517381077 (http://deadspin.com/all-the-sochi-food-is-in-the-ass-1517381077)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 06, 2014, 07:05:26 PM
Looks like NBC's coverage of the lolympics is being anchored in Superman's Fortress of Solitude.  Will provide visual evidence as soon as the internet catches up.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: puniraptor on February 06, 2014, 07:14:40 PM
Wow I think I'm watching people die on this slopestyle course right now
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 06, 2014, 07:33:37 PM
As promised.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bf1YOhUCIAEm9ob.png:large)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 06, 2014, 09:16:29 PM
Top ten movie from the 90's. Study up you guys.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 06, 2014, 09:30:45 PM
Pussy Riot

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimagecache%2Fthumbnail_570x321%2F2012%2F07%2Fbob_costas_carousel_tout.jpg&hash=daa596131d917632634e6e976de3b0998b834be5)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bones129 on February 06, 2014, 11:37:59 PM
Pussy Riot

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimagecache%2Fthumbnail_570x321%2F2012%2F07%2Fbob_costas_carousel_tout.jpg&hash=daa596131d917632634e6e976de3b0998b834be5)

Has Bob had a facelift? Or a cheek or eye lift? Or all of the above?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: j-dub on February 07, 2014, 12:00:16 AM
guys, this was the greatest moment in the history of the world. little j-dub was so happy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr4i6jRMNjo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr4i6jRMNjo)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 07, 2014, 08:19:18 AM
@sochiproblems
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: scottwildcat on February 07, 2014, 08:20:14 AM
@sochiproblems

last time i checked had more followers than the official Sochi Olympic twitter account.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 07, 2014, 08:33:50 AM
@sochiproblems

last time i checked had more followers than the official Sochi Olympic twitter account.

As of 242,000 to 141,000 and that gap is growing quickly.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: scottwildcat on February 07, 2014, 08:35:18 AM
@sochiproblems

last time i checked had more followers than the official Sochi Olympic twitter account.

As of 242,000 to 141,000 and that gap is growing quickly.

:lol: oh man, Putin isn't going to be happy next time he logs on twitter.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 07, 2014, 08:36:18 AM
Brown water or, well...

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bfy8UeCCAAER8UQ.jpg)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bones129 on February 07, 2014, 08:49:26 AM

 :runaway:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 07, 2014, 12:43:58 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.gawkerassets.com%2Fimg%2F19eyrlt2wsz52png%2Fku-xlarge.png&hash=5a6006e8ce6534a03f340c79f382fa53ce7f0ea9)

:cool:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 07, 2014, 01:22:51 PM
From all the tweets and pictures I've seen, the conditions in hotels are horrible.  Also, t.a.t.u. performed in the opening ceremonies which is ironic. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on February 07, 2014, 03:22:07 PM
Russian Police Choir performing "Get Lucky"!!!!

http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/russian-police-choir-performs-get-lucky-opening-ceremony (http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/russian-police-choir-performs-get-lucky-opening-ceremony)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 07, 2014, 04:00:04 PM
Russian Police Choir performing "Get Lucky"!!!!

http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/russian-police-choir-performs-get-lucky-opening-ceremony (http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/russian-police-choir-performs-get-lucky-opening-ceremony)

That was uncomfortable to watch.  I wish they would embrace their own culture more and not sing a song that was made popular in the U.S.  The great thing about the Olympics and opening ceremonies (in my opinion) is seeing the hosting country embrace their culture (current and past).   

Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 07, 2014, 04:07:56 PM
Russian Police Choir performing "Get Lucky"!!!!

http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/russian-police-choir-performs-get-lucky-opening-ceremony (http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/russian-police-choir-performs-get-lucky-opening-ceremony)

That was uncomfortable to watch.  I wish they would embrace their own culture more and not sing a song that was made popular in the U.S.  The great thing about the Olympics and opening ceremonies (in my opinion) is seeing the hosting country embrace their culture (current and past).   

I took a Russian History class in college. Trust me, it's probably best to just do it this way.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Brock Landers on February 07, 2014, 04:36:55 PM
Top ten movie from the 90's. Study up you guys.


This was on TV last night as a matter of fact.

A young Brock Landers used this movie several times to get some romancin' with the ladies.  Would go to the video store and be all "Hey, The Cutting Edge. I haven't seen this yet, have you??!?"
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 07, 2014, 04:41:50 PM
Russian Police Choir performing "Get Lucky"!!!!

http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/russian-police-choir-performs-get-lucky-opening-ceremony (http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/russian-police-choir-performs-get-lucky-opening-ceremony)

That was uncomfortable to watch.  I wish they would embrace their own culture more and not sing a song that was made popular in the U.S.  The great thing about the Olympics and opening ceremonies (in my opinion) is seeing the hosting country embrace their culture (current and past).   



they also played trololololol you dweeb
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 07, 2014, 04:42:29 PM
and it doesn't get more Russian than trolololololol, with perhaps the exception of hilarious dashcam videos.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 07, 2014, 04:54:13 PM
Journalists are big complainers. Good grief just stick to the sports, no one cares about your hotel.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 07, 2014, 04:59:17 PM
Journalists are big complainers. Good grief just stick to the sports, no one cares about your hotel.

Agreed, we get it, you aren't staying at the Ritz, dumb writer. The worst was the one where the curtain rod fell. I mean eff yourself you spoiled sack of crap.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: The Big Train on February 07, 2014, 09:43:25 PM
Is it just me or does the opening ceremonies stadium look a lot like Cowboys Stadium?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 07, 2014, 09:47:31 PM
Journalists are big complainers. Good grief just stick to the sports, no one cares about your hotel.

Agreed, we get it, you aren't staying at the Ritz, dumb writer. The worst was the one where the curtain rod fell. I mean eff yourself you spoiled sack of crap.
810 spoke about this two days ago. Their version of gE over there. Complaining about the littiest things and looking for an overreaction for the audience.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 07, 2014, 09:55:02 PM
Russians are really insecure and wanna-be racists.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2014, 12:34:44 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.gawkerassets.com%2Fimg%2F19eyrlt2wsz52png%2Fku-xlarge.png&hash=5a6006e8ce6534a03f340c79f382fa53ce7f0ea9)

:cool:

No, hell no. That Norway medal count is crazy low, they'll do that in womens xc alone.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bones129 on February 08, 2014, 01:12:11 AM
Journalists are big complainers. Good grief just stick to the sports, no one cares about your hotel.

Agreed, we get it, you aren't staying at the Ritz, dumb writer. The worst was the one where the curtain rod fell. I mean eff yourself you spoiled sack of crap.

If my curtain rod falls, I just put it back up. Simple as that.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 08, 2014, 03:33:54 AM
Journalists are big complainers. Good grief just stick to the sports, no one cares about your hotel.

Agreed, we get it, you aren't staying at the Ritz, dumb writer. The worst was the one where the curtain rod fell. I mean eff yourself you spoiled sack of crap.

If my curtain rod falls, I just put it back up. Simple as that.

i'd leave it down, but i don't really care who spies on me or sees my luscious wang.  #sochilife
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2014, 06:17:42 AM
I thought the opening deal was pretty good. copied london but london was best of all time so it was a good thing to copy.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2014, 06:19:28 AM
best part about it was the USA announcer people (matt lauer was one I think?) who made tons of dick and backhanded compliment type statements about Russia the whole time.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2014, 06:22:22 AM
Quote from:  stuff like this
this is showing the hipsters they had in the 1960s in russia. this is really overplaying the amount they had because obviously this was the height of the communist regime and it wasn't like this at all.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 08, 2014, 08:40:04 AM
Quote from:  stuff like this
this is showing the hipsters they had in the 1960s in russia. this is really overplaying the amount they had because obviously this was the height of the communist regime and it wasn't like this at all.

That's right, Matt. Some guy, I forgot his name because all Russian names look the same, bootlegged a copy of Rubber Soul and listened to it with 1 friend in crude lean-to. They might have danced, just like this!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 08, 2014, 08:44:05 AM
I kept wondering if they were going to mention Lenin and by extension mass genocide, but they just spent an s-ton of time focusing on the Industrial Revolution.  Stalin big time...
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: cfbandyman on February 08, 2014, 06:41:08 PM
I thought the opening ceremonies were pretty good. The idea of projecting each country like they did for the athletes to come out in (or really anything they did with those projectors) was pretty sweet. Sure the whole communist revolution glossed over a lot of the not so great parts, but really, the whole history of Russia and their long use of serfdom well after industrialization hit Europe meant a lot of brushing over the worst of oppressive regimes, but it was kinda of nice that they owned that era instead of running away from it (The Soviet era parade stuff  :love:). It was kinda fun to listen to the backhanded compliments from Lauer and that one lady who lived in Soviet Russia for like 4 years, until after an hour of it that it really got annoying, especially for the whole striking part of Russian Revolution, which was done artfully amazingly. What I kept thinking about our commentary was how this must be what it's like for all the countries who hate us when we put on shows like this. Also, it was kinda fun to see teams come in in Cyrillic alphabet order, just fascinating seeing it be very out of order to us, and led to a few interesting teams come out after one another (Israel-Iran, Jamaica being essentially last next to Russia).
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2014, 07:27:48 PM
Did we highlight our asswhipping in Vietnam in Atlanta? I don't remember that far back.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on February 08, 2014, 09:43:00 PM
carolina kostner finishing ahead of ashley wagner is a joke
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2014, 12:29:27 PM
Don't care, hobby olympics
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: hemmy on February 09, 2014, 12:31:06 PM
My god could winter olympics be any more pud and boring?  :zzz: Bring on 2016!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on February 09, 2014, 08:27:14 PM
bode  :frown:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2014, 07:38:40 AM
bode  :frown:

I really like him
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 10, 2014, 10:15:53 AM
There's a lot of "almost out of control" kinda events in the winter olympics, which I like. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 10, 2014, 04:13:35 PM
http://www.policymic.com/articles/81663/sochiproblems-is-more-of-an-embarrassment-for-america-than-it-is-for-russia (http://www.policymic.com/articles/81663/sochiproblems-is-more-of-an-embarrassment-for-america-than-it-is-for-russia)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 10, 2014, 04:41:32 PM
that guy is Canadian, tho
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 10, 2014, 05:13:10 PM
http://www.policymic.com/articles/81663/sochiproblems-is-more-of-an-embarrassment-for-america-than-it-is-for-russia (http://www.policymic.com/articles/81663/sochiproblems-is-more-of-an-embarrassment-for-america-than-it-is-for-russia)

:flush:

First of all what this author minimized as dirt in the pipes or rusty pipes is an outright lie. That writer was told not to put the water on her face because it contained something unsafe, she ran the water when she got to the room and then we have the famous water picture. The lady was told there was something unsafe in the water, not dirt. How in the hell can these people in their hotel rooms boil their damn water.

The bigger point that she conveniently ignores is that Russia bid for these Olympics with the intent of profiting off of the people complaining about the problems. They have a stray dog issue because they displaced thousands of people who couldn't afford to take their dogs with them. This is the most expensive Olympics ever, summer & winter. They built a highway that exceeded the entire cost of the Vancouver games. They moved out poor people & last I checked these hotels and restaurants aren't free. They aren't hosting a nun summit at no cost, they are hosting the Olympics if they didn't want the Olympics they shouldn't have bid on them. She should spend her time questioning why things are so sorry with all of the money they spent.

Reading her author profile the" I'm better than all of you" tone isn't surprising
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 11, 2014, 06:19:32 PM
Listening to these women curlers yell at each other in Russian and Chinese is pretty entertaining to me right now.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 12, 2014, 08:04:17 AM
Man, that Russian Railways sounds like a corrupt outfit.  I bet Putin shuts them down because Russians are trying really hard to make their country better.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 12, 2014, 08:14:32 AM
#stripforJackie #lebanon




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 13, 2014, 09:14:02 AM
What was the deal with the US v Canada hockey game?  Sounds like the refs were literally rough ridin' us in that one?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 13, 2014, 09:19:57 AM
Also guys here's the current medal count:

1 Norway 4 3 6 13
2 United States 4 2 6 12
3 Canada 4 4 2 10
4 Netherlands 4 2 4 10
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 13, 2014, 09:24:40 AM
What was the deal with the US v Canada hockey game?  Sounds like the refs were literally rough ridin' us in that one?

buncha hosers
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 13, 2014, 11:20:59 AM
Also guys here's the current medal count:

1 Norway 4 3 6 13
2 United States 4 2 6 12
3 Canada 4 4 2 10
4 Netherlands 4 2 4 10

best part of the winter olympics.  casually looking up to see if we're winning the thing.  If we're not winning, I don't really care.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 13, 2014, 11:23:05 AM
countrys that have winter all year round should be banned from the winter olympics. no polars allowed.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kso_FAN on February 13, 2014, 11:25:11 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BgXt0D0CAAEypeU.jpg)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 13, 2014, 11:29:31 AM
Man, Canada's gotta be so pissed if America beats them in the medal count like we did in Vancouver.  It's gotta be like the KU t-shirt fan coping with the shared basketball title last year.   
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 13, 2014, 11:48:00 AM
countrys that have winter all year round should be banned from the winter olympics. no polars allowed.

so no norway, sweden, finland, canada, usa, or russia?  :confused:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 13, 2014, 11:48:48 AM
What brainiac suggested a place that's like 60 degrees everyday for the winter 'lympics?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 13, 2014, 11:53:12 AM

countrys that have winter all year round should be banned from the winter olympics. no polars allowed.

so no norway, sweden, finland, canada, usa, or russia?  :confused:

USA is ok. The others are out.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 13, 2014, 11:54:17 AM

countrys that have winter all year round should be banned from the winter olympics. no polars allowed.

so no norway, sweden, finland, canada, usa, or russia?  :confused:

USA is ok. The others are out.

We're going to beat those losers anyway.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 13, 2014, 08:08:20 PM
What brainiac suggested a place that's like 60 degrees everyday for the winter 'lympics?

Could have happened in Vancouver and Salt Lake too. Dice roll
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 13, 2014, 09:46:59 PM
 :
What brainiac suggested a place that's like 60 degrees everyday for the winter 'lympics?

Could have happened in Vancouver and Salt Lake too. Dice roll

As long as the mountains have snow, why does it matter?  All other events are in temperature controlled arenas. 

That said, Sochi is nothing like Vancouver or Salt Lake.  It's a subtropical climate with avg winter temps above 50 degrees. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 14, 2014, 10:52:41 AM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BgZBmg0CQAA-hfw.jpg:large)

 :D
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on February 14, 2014, 10:53:15 AM
:lol:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 14, 2014, 02:59:01 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 14, 2014, 03:16:31 PM
US now tied for first in medal count with Norway.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 14, 2014, 03:19:42 PM
US now tied for first in medal count with Norway.

Really? Nor Way!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: ednksu on February 14, 2014, 04:09:38 PM
have we discussed anti-America America hating Under Armor sabotaging our athletes on the speed skatin' rink?
https://espn.go.com/olympics/winter/2014/speedskating/story/_/id/10457154/2014-sochi-olympics-us-speedskating-changing-uniforms
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 14, 2014, 11:10:47 PM
Considering getting up to watch the USA v. Russia hockey game tomorrow at 6:30.  :surprised:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 14, 2014, 11:12:45 PM
Considering getting up to watch the USA v. Russia hockey game tomorrow at 6:30.  :surprised:

I am going to.  Actually having some guys I play hockey with over.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 14, 2014, 11:13:13 PM
Considering getting up to watch the USA v. Russia hockey game tomorrow at 6:30.  :surprised:

I am going to.  Actually having some guys I play hockey with over.

I don't know much about hockey. We're going to lose, aren't we?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 15, 2014, 01:13:38 AM
i think it's on at 6pm replay.  i'll probably watch that one instead.

and sunnycat, the usa is v good at hockey
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: SabiNation on February 15, 2014, 07:59:27 AM
Tied it up!  1-1
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 15, 2014, 08:34:02 AM
:hockeyhandsign:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 15, 2014, 09:06:59 AM
Penalties.   :drool:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 15, 2014, 09:18:16 AM
Russia v. Oshie in penalties.  Jfc.  Finally it's over!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 'taterblast on February 15, 2014, 09:19:18 AM
:gocho: :AA:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 15, 2014, 09:23:32 AM
Oshie is a boss
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 15, 2014, 09:27:43 AM
Putin is organizing his own shootout, of sorts, in the back alley.  That goal keeper had a good run.  RIP
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 15, 2014, 09:31:58 AM
i think it's on at 6pm replay.  i'll probably watch that one instead.

and sunnycat, the usa is v good at hockey

Yeah, I know we're good. Isn't Russia supposed to be better though?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: slobber on February 15, 2014, 09:32:50 AM
i think it's on at 6pm replay.  i'll probably watch that one instead.

and sunnycat, the usa is v good at hockey

Yeah, I know we're good. Isn't Russia supposed to be better though?
NOT TODAY!!!! :lynchmob:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 15, 2014, 09:34:10 AM
i think it's on at 6pm replay.  i'll probably watch that one instead.

and sunnycat, the usa is v good at hockey

Yeah, I know we're good. Isn't Russia supposed to be better though?
NOT TODAY!!!! :lynchmob:

:emawkid:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Belvis Noland on February 15, 2014, 09:43:27 AM
i think it's on at 6pm replay.  i'll probably watch that one instead.

and sunnycat, the usa is v good at hockey

Yeah, I know we're good. Isn't Russia supposed to be better though?

On the whole, they were slightly better.  We got both goals in power plays.  Russo had a third, go ahead goal, that was disallowed for some reason.  Something about the net being disconnected.  Not really sure.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2014, 10:26:17 AM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 15, 2014, 01:02:39 PM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 15, 2014, 01:03:59 PM
And yes, Oshie is a boss.  :lol: at anyone that questioned his selection to the team.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 16, 2014, 03:18:11 AM
Pavelski  :D

Go Sharks
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 16, 2014, 06:03:00 PM
wow, finally got to watch the usa/russia game this afternoon.  what a great match.  datsyuk is probably my favorite non-sharks player, he's just too damn good.  and that shootout!   :excited:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on February 16, 2014, 07:05:32 PM
if jamaica were to somehow win a medal in bobsled it would probably be the greatest sports moment of my life.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on February 16, 2014, 08:50:18 PM
the Netherlands is winning the medal count and every medal they have is in speed skating.  lame city.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 16, 2014, 09:36:09 PM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.

Go ahead and throw in the Czech Republic and Finland. All 6 have the ability to win a single elimination tournament.

Slovakia and Switzerland can beat anyone in a single elimination tournament but can't win 3 or 4 in a row.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on February 16, 2014, 09:55:47 PM
the Netherlands is winning the medal count and every medal they have is in speed skating.  lame city.

what makes this stat even more amazing is that only one of those medals is in short track  :Wha:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 16, 2014, 11:30:23 PM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.

Go ahead and throw in the Czech Republic and Finland. All 6 have the ability to win a single elimination tournament.

Slovakia and Switzerland can beat anyone in a single elimination tournament but can't win 3 or 4 in a row.

Yea, I think The Czechs or Finns winning gold would still be a mild surprise. They do definitely have the ability but I don't think to many people would bet on it.

Switzerland seems to be the up and comer. The way things are going I wouldn't be surprised if they're better than both Czech Rep and Finland in 8 years.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 17, 2014, 01:58:30 AM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.

Go ahead and throw in the Czech Republic and Finland. All 6 have the ability to win a single elimination tournament.

Slovakia and Switzerland can beat anyone in a single elimination tournament but can't win 3 or 4 in a row.

Yea, I think The Czechs or Finns winning gold would still be a mild surprise. They do definitely have the ability but I don't think to many people would bet on it.

Switzerland seems to be the up and comer. The way things are going I wouldn't be surprised if they're better than both Czech Rep and Finland in 8 years.

The Czechs and the Fins have relatively young talent, the Swiss are really only buoyed by excellent goal keeping right now, they need to develop talent depth or else they will just be Germany circa 2006.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: ChiComCat on February 17, 2014, 09:23:55 AM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.

Go ahead and throw in the Czech Republic and Finland. All 6 have the ability to win a single elimination tournament.

Slovakia and Switzerland can beat anyone in a single elimination tournament but can't win 3 or 4 in a row.

Yea, I think The Czechs or Finns winning gold would still be a mild surprise. They do definitely have the ability but I don't think to many people would bet on it.

Switzerland seems to be the up and comer. The way things are going I wouldn't be surprised if they're better than both Czech Rep and Finland in 8 years.

The Czechs and the Fins have relatively young talent, the Swiss are really only buoyed by excellent goal keeping right now, they need to develop talent depth or else they will just be Germany circa 2006.

MIR's knowledge about every sporting event really blows my mind.  MIR, who you got in Ice Dancing?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 17, 2014, 10:04:43 AM
the Netherlands is winning the medal count and every medal they have is in speed skating.  lame city.

As long as it isn't Norway or Sweden or Germany or Russia winning those medals it's fine.  Any medal one of these fringe countries wins is like a half win for us.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: felix rex on February 17, 2014, 11:37:23 AM

Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.

Go ahead and throw in the Czech Republic and Finland. All 6 have the ability to win a single elimination tournament.

Slovakia and Switzerland can beat anyone in a single elimination tournament but can't win 3 or 4 in a row.

Yea, I think The Czechs or Finns winning gold would still be a mild surprise. They do definitely have the ability but I don't think to many people would bet on it.

Switzerland seems to be the up and comer. The way things are going I wouldn't be surprised if they're better than both Czech Rep and Finland in 8 years.

The Czechs and the Fins have relatively young talent, the Swiss are really only buoyed by excellent goal keeping right now, they need to develop talent depth or else they will just be Germany circa 2006.

I was just saying this the other day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 17, 2014, 11:56:13 AM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.

Go ahead and throw in the Czech Republic and Finland. All 6 have the ability to win a single elimination tournament.

Slovakia and Switzerland can beat anyone in a single elimination tournament but can't win 3 or 4 in a row.

Yea, I think The Czechs or Finns winning gold would still be a mild surprise. They do definitely have the ability but I don't think to many people would bet on it.

Switzerland seems to be the up and comer. The way things are going I wouldn't be surprised if they're better than both Czech Rep and Finland in 8 years.

The Czechs and the Fins have relatively young talent, the Swiss are really only buoyed by excellent goal keeping right now, they need to develop talent depth or else they will just be Germany circa 2006.

Entirely possible, and without knowing the pulse of hockey in Switzerland I have no idea what they're youth programs are like. Was simply basing the thought they could be one of the better countries in the upcoming years based on there being some quality young Swiss talent for the first time as long as I've been paying attention to hockey.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on February 17, 2014, 11:57:29 AM
MIR's knowledge about every sporting event really blows my mind.  MIR, who you got in Ice Dancing?

yeah, it's almost absurd
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 17, 2014, 04:45:11 PM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.

Go ahead and throw in the Czech Republic and Finland. All 6 have the ability to win a single elimination tournament.

Slovakia and Switzerland can beat anyone in a single elimination tournament but can't win 3 or 4 in a row.

Yea, I think The Czechs or Finns winning gold would still be a mild surprise. They do definitely have the ability but I don't think to many people would bet on it.

Switzerland seems to be the up and comer. The way things are going I wouldn't be surprised if they're better than both Czech Rep and Finland in 8 years.

The Czechs and the Fins have relatively young talent, the Swiss are really only buoyed by excellent goal keeping right now, they need to develop talent depth or else they will just be Germany circa 2006.

MIR's knowledge about every sporting event really blows my mind.  MIR, who you got in Ice Dancing?

NBC did an amazing story on the us team, Davis & White. They have been dancing together since they were little kids, it was a very cute and amazing story at the same time. It was nice to see Meryl Davis not in her ice dancing garb, because she looks freakish in that makeup.

I'm also fascinated that the two best pairs in the world, the aforementioned Davis & White and a Canadian pair, share the same coach & practice rink

that's all I got ice dancing is boring
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 17, 2014, 05:01:14 PM
Russia isn't the powerhouse it once was.  I don't follow it, but don't think they'd be favored to win a game against either the US or Canada.

Russia, Canada, US, and Sweden are the true international hockey powers. Any of the four could win the gold and it wouldn't be entirely shocking. Canada is the odds on favorite though.

Go ahead and throw in the Czech Republic and Finland. All 6 have the ability to win a single elimination tournament.

Slovakia and Switzerland can beat anyone in a single elimination tournament but can't win 3 or 4 in a row.

Yea, I think The Czechs or Finns winning gold would still be a mild surprise. They do definitely have the ability but I don't think to many people would bet on it.

Switzerland seems to be the up and comer. The way things are going I wouldn't be surprised if they're better than both Czech Rep and Finland in 8 years.

The Czechs and the Fins have relatively young talent, the Swiss are really only buoyed by excellent goal keeping right now, they need to develop talent depth or else they will just be Germany circa 2006.

Entirely possible, and without knowing the pulse of hockey in Switzerland I have no idea what they're youth programs are like. Was simply basing the thought they could be one of the better countries in the upcoming years based on there being some quality young Swiss talent for the first time as long as I've been paying attention to hockey.

they poor money into Swiss Hockey, they've been okay during the world juniors the last few years but if they want to go to the next level they need more players to develop in North America or the KHL. They keep almost all of their players domestically in a league that's almost entirely Swiss. That's good for developing players within that system but it isn't good for developing individual talent, it's exactly why their impact players the last 16 years have only been goalies.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Pete on February 17, 2014, 06:47:00 PM
I can't quite put my finger on what makes this chick's face so off putting.  Is it that her eyes are too far apart?  I know once someone explains I'll be like "yep, that's it."

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdavis-white.ice-dance.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F02%2F2014.jpg&hash=7910e89a8ca18740d1e81f45bc8d6394215a3d1d)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Pete on February 17, 2014, 06:48:29 PM
I mean, look...everyone in this picture is pretty standard looking, but what the eff is going on with her?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fassets.nydailynews.com%2Fpolopoly_fs%2F1.1606875.1391879252%21%2Fimg%2FhttpImage%2Fimage.jpg_gen%2Fderivatives%2Flandscape_635%2Fbondycolweb9s-2-web.jpg&hash=257aa449ada947b760006406fd1495dea01c1298)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: puniraptor on February 17, 2014, 06:48:33 PM
If she were on star trek there would be no doubt that she was portraying an alien species.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Pete on February 17, 2014, 06:51:30 PM

She looks like one of those cloners on Star Wars from the planet Kamino.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.wikia.com%2Fstarwars%2Fimages%2Fd%2Fd9%2FKaminoan.jpg&hash=52c58233184bbc1bbd32a57618fdad77cdefffaa)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: The Big Train on February 17, 2014, 06:55:50 PM
 :lol: Pete do an Olympic look-alike thread. Please!?  :pray:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 17, 2014, 07:05:50 PM
She looks like a Disney character, but made of actual flesh and bone  :sdeek:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 17, 2014, 07:13:22 PM
she looks perfectly normal not in that make-up, pulled back hair, and white chowder all over her face
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tridelta.org%2Faspnet_client%2FFreeTextBox%2Fupload%2Fimages%2FCollegiate%2FNUP_135186_4298_Meryl_Davis.jpg&hash=aa3fbb72b68ae322c950ddc2fa8c7577ff742d38)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_DE66jWjE8X4%2FSyzN5DimUCI%2FAAAAAAAAALs%2F0VpqYTniQlc%2Fs320%2FMerylCharlie%252Bpic.jpg&hash=f20649a772adad0af6d4b37f691001e3e0b111df)

Have you seen the pictures of her dressing like Jasmine for one of her dances, its freaking uncanny

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.muchmusic.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F02%2FJasmine.jpg&hash=6b0ffe9bbd6eb479f8053ae1a1552020d5090f72)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BgonSXRIIAAgbU0.jpg:large)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 17, 2014, 07:26:57 PM
eyes far apart and separated by strong nose bridge is my guess Pete. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: j-dub on February 17, 2014, 07:36:53 PM
her left eye is always more narrow/squintier than her right eye. also, they are really far apart. and long windy nose.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 18, 2014, 07:31:55 AM
:lol: Pete do an Olympic look-alike thread. Please!?  :pray:

Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 19, 2014, 09:07:49 AM
WTF is up with Bob Costas' eyes?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 09:14:23 AM
WTF is up with Bob Costas' eyes?

He had pink eye which is why people filled in for him for like a week.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 19, 2014, 09:20:54 AM
lol, in your stupid idiot faces Russia  :lol:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 19, 2014, 09:22:31 AM
lol, in your stupid idiot faces Russia  :lol:

i hope you're talking about finland  :D
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 19, 2014, 09:23:24 AM
lol, in your stupid idiot faces Russia  :lol:

i hope you're talking about finland  :D

 :Woot:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 19, 2014, 09:40:12 AM
lol, in your stupid idiot faces Russia  :lol:

i hope you're talking about finland  :D

 :Woot:

Look how sad the president of Russia is watching that game!  :lol: :lol: :lol: :Woot: :Woot: :Woot:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bg2FPzvCEAAKTqv.jpg:large)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 19, 2014, 10:02:52 AM
I kinda feel bad for them.  It's like the one thing that really matters to them.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 19, 2014, 10:08:40 AM
lol, in your stupid idiot faces Russia  :lol:

i hope you're talking about finland  :D

 :Woot:

Look how sad the president of Russia is watching that game!  :lol: :lol: :lol: :Woot: :Woot: :Woot:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bg2FPzvCEAAKTqv.jpg:large)

LMAO
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 19, 2014, 10:10:32 AM
Guys what happen?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on February 19, 2014, 11:52:49 AM
Damn. USA jumping all over the Czechs early. I'd love to see USA make the medal round with Russia and Canada both eliminated.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 12:13:14 PM
eff this game

also Canada is not eliminated, not yet anyway
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 12:14:13 PM
eff this game

also Canada is not eliminated, not yet anyway

MIR, is Canada slightly better than the USA or are they even?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: TownieCat on February 19, 2014, 12:21:58 PM
lol, in your stupid idiot faces Russia  :lol:

i hope you're talking about finland  :D

 :Woot:

Look how sad the president of Russia is watching that game!  :lol: :lol: :lol: :Woot: :Woot: :Woot:
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bg2FPzvCEAAKTqv.jpg:large)

LMAO

He's not sad, he's thinking about where to bury the bodies.  :frown:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 12:23:30 PM
eff this game

also Canada is not eliminated, not yet anyway

MIR, is Canada slightly better than the USA or are they even?

Canada is more talented but they are having chemistry issues. USA and Sweden are playing the best hockey right now.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 12:27:55 PM
eff this game

also Canada is not eliminated, not yet anyway

MIR, is Canada slightly better than the USA or are they even?

Canada is more talented but they are having chemistry issues. USA and Sweden are playing the best hockey right now.

So I guess I'm feeling pretty good about that gold medal. :Woot:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 12:35:13 PM
eff this game

also Canada is not eliminated, not yet anyway

MIR, is Canada slightly better than the USA or are they even?

Canada is more talented but they are having chemistry issues. USA and Sweden are playing the best hockey right now.

So I guess I'm feeling pretty good about that gold medal. :Woot:

well if you want USA to win gold :flush: you better stop watching that game and turn to the Canada v. Latvia game on msnbc, Latvia is 20 minutes away from pulling the biggest upset in the history of Olympic hockey.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 12:36:28 PM
 :surprised:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 12:57:31 PM
for those of you unfamiliar with Latvia, this is the equivalent of Maine being in the Olympics and being tied with Canada after 50 minutes of hockey
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 19, 2014, 12:58:48 PM
so you took a Giant Country vs a Small Country, and changed them up in your analogy to:
the exact same Giant Country vs a Small State?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 19, 2014, 01:04:57 PM
so you took a Giant Country vs a Small Country, and changed them up in your analogy to:
the exact same Giant Country vs a Small State?

"latvia = maine" would be more efficient.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 19, 2014, 01:06:52 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

 :dunno:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 01:07:55 PM
so you took a Giant Country vs a Small Country, and changed them up in your analogy to:
the exact same Giant Country vs a Small State?

yes, population and current NHL experience of Maine and Latvia are similar. Actually the better example of number of NHLers the better example would be Alabama.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 19, 2014, 01:12:41 PM
so you took a Giant Country vs a Small Country, and changed them up in your analogy to:
the exact same Giant Country vs a Small State?

"latvia = maine" would be more efficient.

what are you doing over here? people have unanswered questions in the travel thread. sheesh
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 01:13:19 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

 :dunno:

1. They were not the gold medal favorites
2. They haven't won crap yet; Canada, Finland, and Sweden are better than anyone they have played.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 19, 2014, 01:17:18 PM
I think US hockey just might get the gold this year, guys.

What in gods name would lead you to believe that?

 :dunno:

1. They were not the gold medal favorites
2. They haven't won crap yet; Canada, Finland, and Sweden are better than anyone they have played.

You just have to believe, MIR.  :gocho:



 :D
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 01:27:52 PM
Go Scandinavia!

my cheering hierarchy is as follows

Sweden
Finland
murica
murica's lice riddled hat :Yuck: :Yuck:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 19, 2014, 01:32:14 PM
That Latvian goalie was pretty nails. Would have been an epic upset
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 19, 2014, 03:14:32 PM
Go Scandinavia!

my cheering hierarchy is as follows

Sweden
Finland
murica
murica's lice riddled hat :Yuck: :Yuck:

with all due respect, what in the holy eff is wrong with you? :curse:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 03:16:53 PM
Yeah, I don't understand how you could cheer for another country over USA.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 19, 2014, 03:21:15 PM
I don't even understand how people from other countries can cheer for another country over the USA.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 19, 2014, 04:21:31 PM
Go Scandinavia!

my cheering hierarchy is as follows

Sweden
Finland
murica
murica's lice riddled hat :Yuck: :Yuck:

with all due respect, what in the holy eff is wrong with you? :curse:

He's bitter over Yandle being left off the team.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Fedor on February 19, 2014, 04:23:12 PM
Hockey fan MIR is a total buttmunch, you guys.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 19, 2014, 04:25:10 PM
I mean, maybe he should just move to Finland or something if he hates the USA so much. Seems awfully cold, though.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 19, 2014, 04:36:20 PM
sweden is really awesome at being a country you guys
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 19, 2014, 04:40:52 PM
sweden is really awesome at being a country you guys

they suck at wars/drones tho
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 19, 2014, 04:42:32 PM
so metal tho
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 19, 2014, 04:48:04 PM
Guys a Swedish guy named Bjorn was just at my desk munching on my summer sausage.  :D
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 19, 2014, 04:50:00 PM
how pissed do you think other countries are that they don't have a sweet ass chant like U-S-A U-S-A
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 19, 2014, 04:54:20 PM
Guys a Swedish guy named Bjorn was just at my desk munching on my summer sausage.  :D
:facepalm:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: The Big Train on February 19, 2014, 04:56:13 PM
 :buh-bye:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 07:57:33 PM
Go Scandinavia!

my cheering hierarchy is as follows

Sweden
Finland
murica
murica's lice riddled hat :Yuck: :Yuck:

with all due respect, what in the holy eff is wrong with you? :curse:

simple concept really, there isn't anyone on the USA team that I like as a matter off fact there are a couple I can't stand. I'm cheering for Sweden and Finland because I like players on those teams.

if the Olympic basketball team was comprised of players like T-Rob and the Morii but Puerto Rico had Angel and Denis who would you cheer for?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 19, 2014, 07:59:45 PM
Go Scandinavia!

my cheering hierarchy is as follows

Sweden
Finland
murica
murica's lice riddled hat :Yuck: :Yuck:

with all due respect, what in the holy eff is wrong with you? :curse:

simple concept really, there isn't anyone on the USA team that I like as a matter off fact there are a couple I can't stand. I'm cheering for Sweden and Finland because I like players on those teams.

if the Olympic basketball team was comprised of players like T-Rob and the Morii but Puerto Rico had Angel and Denis who would you cheer for?

  :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 08:30:26 PM
Go Scandinavia!

my cheering hierarchy is as follows

Sweden
Finland
murica
murica's lice riddled hat :Yuck: :Yuck:

with all due respect, what in the holy eff is wrong with you? :curse:

He's bitter over Yandle being left off the team.

Wouldn't change my hierarchy, Canada has Mike Smith and I would have cheered for the Russians before I cheered for Canada
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on February 19, 2014, 08:50:11 PM
we are kicking the crap out of everyone and are pretty much guaranteed to win gold
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 09:04:21 PM
happy to have so many hockey fans, the NHL is so much better than the cycle-fest that is olympic hockey
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 09:07:53 PM
happy to have so many hockey fans, the NHL is so much better than the cycle-fest that is olympic hockey

Is it on national TV much? Any channel other than NBCSN? Maybe I'll pick a team. :D
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 19, 2014, 09:27:44 PM
happy to have so many hockey fans, the NHL is so much better than the cycle-fest that is olympic hockey

Is it on national TV much? Any channel other than NBCSN? Maybe I'll pick a team. :D

Don't let MIR bully you into liking Phoenix or some of these other losers push you towards San Jose. St Louis is the team to cheer for. Goaltending can be a bit maddening but they're basically the junkyard cats of the NHL :love:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 09:29:26 PM
happy to have so many hockey fans, the NHL is so much better than the cycle-fest that is olympic hockey

Is it on national TV much? Any channel other than NBCSN? Maybe I'll pick a team. :D

Don't let MIR bully you into liking Phoenix or some of these other losers push you towards San Jose. St Louis is the team to cheer for. Goaltending can be a bit maddening but they're basically the junkyard cats of the NHL :love:

I like the idea of STL because they're kind of local..
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 19, 2014, 10:05:12 PM
happy to have so many hockey fans, the NHL is so much better than the cycle-fest that is olympic hockey

Is it on national TV much? Any channel other than NBCSN? Maybe I'll pick a team. :D

Their contract is with NBC, if you only watch on there don't worry about being a fan of Phoenix, San Jose, or St. Louis. You can pick from Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, NY Rangers, Washington, Detroit, or Boston. Have fun with that.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 19, 2014, 10:17:25 PM
1. Jamaica bobsled team
2. USA
3. Everyone else.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 10:20:54 PM
happy to have so many hockey fans, the NHL is so much better than the cycle-fest that is olympic hockey

Is it on national TV much? Any channel other than NBCSN? Maybe I'll pick a team. :D

Their contract is with NBC, if you only watch on there don't worry about being a fan of Phoenix, San Jose, or St. Louis. You can pick from Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, NY Rangers, Washington, Detroit, or Boston. Have fun with that.

 :Yuck:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 19, 2014, 10:29:33 PM
So Canada is our enemy now.  I just poured a bottle of maple syrup down the toilet.   :gocho:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 19, 2014, 10:31:37 PM
happy to have so many hockey fans, the NHL is so much better than the cycle-fest that is olympic hockey

Is it on national TV much? Any channel other than NBCSN? Maybe I'll pick a team. :D

Don't let MIR bully you into liking Phoenix or some of these other losers push you towards San Jose. St Louis is the team to cheer for. Goaltending can be a bit maddening but they're basically the junkyard cats of the NHL :love:

I like the idea of STL because they're kind of local..

Local and you can get a pretty good look at them during the Olympics. Oshie, Shattenkirk, and Backes from the US, Bouwmeester and Pietrangelo for Canada, and Steen and Berglund from Sweden
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 19, 2014, 10:32:13 PM
happy to have so many hockey fans, the NHL is so much better than the cycle-fest that is olympic hockey

Is it on national TV much? Any channel other than NBCSN? Maybe I'll pick a team. :D

Don't let MIR bully you into liking Phoenix or some of these other losers push you towards San Jose. St Louis is the team to cheer for. Goaltending can be a bit maddening but they're basically the junkyard cats of the NHL :love:

I like the idea of STL because they're kind of local..

Local and you can get a pretty good look at them during the Olympics. Oshie, Shattenkirk, and Backes from the US, Bouwmeester and Pietrangelo for Canada, and Steen and Berglund from Sweden

:thumbs:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 20, 2014, 12:53:33 AM
the ducks would be a fun team to like too.

personally i'm all for sharks and blackhawks
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:41:30 AM
the ducks would be a fun team to like too.

personally i'm all for sharks and blackhawks

uh um oh woah  :Yuck:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: OK_Cat on February 20, 2014, 08:23:37 AM
i don't know about you guys, but THESE COLORS DON'T RUN.

gtfo, MIR.  or should i say MIUSSR!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 09:00:15 AM
Murica motherfuckers.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Institutional Control on February 20, 2014, 09:16:33 AM
i don't know about you guys, but THESE COLORS DON'T RUN.

gtfo, MIR.  or should i say MIUSSR!

I think the fact that he's chose the Russian space station as his SN speaks volumes. Volumes.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 11:20:10 AM
Guys the women's hockey gold medal final between USA and Canada is just underway and you gotta watch it. This is really the biggest rivalry in hockey men's or women's. These are the only two good countries in women's hockey and unlike the men the Americans and Canadians don't play together in a domestic league, this is the pinnacle of women's hockey.

These two sides got into a line brawl, a fight comprised of all players on the ice, just a month ago. The line brawl wasn't basketball fighting either, these girls were throwing haymakers. These teams HATE each other.


GO USA!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 8manpick on February 20, 2014, 11:21:33 AM
Oilers! Ales Hemsky yesterday :love:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 11:24:27 AM
Oilers! Ales Hemsky yesterday :love:

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 8manpick on February 20, 2014, 11:26:34 AM
Oilers! Ales Hemsky yesterday :love:

 :thumbsup:

Someday all these high draft picks are going to payoff into a Western Conference 8 seed
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 11:29:24 AM
I forgot to add that despite us being the best at women's hockey we haven't won gold since 1998 :curse:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2014, 11:39:55 AM
canada seems like the kind of country that would line up an NES Ice Hockey all medium sized guys team v. a USA team of 2 fat guys and 2 skinny guys. I don't have to tell you guys which one is the superior team.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcQNtNchj1MHkTfzUWCgHdcifm4wrpbFZuc5uFd6UPjgD_d8bF7sMiPkFrdx&hash=bd346f9a717aef3ebd8bd2628d1498cbbd1e29a5)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 12:07:52 PM
Power play for Canada :ohno:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 12:10:11 PM
Power play for Canada :ohno:

These power plays for both teams have been wooftown
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 12:14:50 PM
GOAL!!!!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 12:15:09 PM
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 20, 2014, 12:20:25 PM
:emawkid:

What's this mean?  Did Canada score?  The US?  I can't tell with you anymore  :dubious:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 12:23:07 PM
usa - 1
Canada - 0

but usa has 3 players in the penalty box. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 12:30:05 PM
:emawkid:

What's this mean?  Did Canada score?  The US?  I can't tell with you anymore  :dubious:

I didn't know illiteracy was an acute condition
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 20, 2014, 12:30:44 PM
is this watchable online?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 20, 2014, 12:31:16 PM
:emawkid:

What's this mean?  Did Canada score?  The US?  I can't tell with you anymore  :dubious:

I didn't know illiteracy was an acute condition

some people like lice, MIR
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 20, 2014, 12:39:08 PM
:emawkid:

What's this mean?  Did Canada score?  The US?  I can't tell with you anymore  :dubious:

I didn't know illiteracy was an acute condition

Dude, it burns so bad.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 12:44:01 PM
Just getting to start watching the game, but ice hockey is one of the few team sports I enjoy watching the women's version almost as much as the men, especially when USA/Canada games are on. I just wish there was a few more quality teams. It seemed the rest of the field was slightly improved from 4 years ago so maybe there's hope.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Institutional Control on February 20, 2014, 12:44:26 PM
is this watchable online?

http://stream.nbcsports.com/liveextra/
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 12:50:36 PM
USA! USA! USA!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 12:52:01 PM
WE GON WIN!!!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 12:56:10 PM
is this watchable online?

I was watching it on first row when I was at work.  Now I'm watching it on NBC at home.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:14:17 PM
 :flush:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 01:18:46 PM
Oh crap almost a half court shot!   :surprised:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 01:20:07 PM
 :Wha:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 20, 2014, 01:20:38 PM
jfc
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 20, 2014, 01:22:19 PM
Guys is oscar coaching the American side?  :dunno:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 01:30:33 PM
Moe is not in our favor right now.  Come on ladies get angry!  They were on their heels the entire period.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 01:36:26 PM
 :pray:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:39:16 PM
I can't take much more of this about to have a heart attack
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 01:44:08 PM
This OT  :excited:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:45:08 PM
power play :excited:

USA has done a very poor job getting pucks on net in the overtime this far
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:46:22 PM
holy crap that's rough ridin' horrid
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 01:46:54 PM
Bullshit call ref.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 20, 2014, 01:48:47 PM
booo... Bullhockey!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:50:23 PM
 :flush: this officiating
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 01:51:54 PM
rough ridin' Canadians
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 01:52:13 PM
H-E double hockey sticks.  :'bye cruel world:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:52:35 PM
rough ridin' eff off motherfucking bullshit eff
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 01:54:34 PM
Go eh-f yourselves Canada
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:55:57 PM
eff canada and that stupid rough ridin' rotted out toothed british referee, how in the eff can england have a gold medal game referee they don't even play hockey







[redacted]
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 20, 2014, 01:56:51 PM
They still have Beiber though.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 01:58:16 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft3.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcTGTPhUq1M58JC9TWDCVqrgKu-bcnPS1XgmRzVkM8A4awGN2RP8pw&hash=05882486f97d5ab402f6910caa1ee8b7255b1adf)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 01:58:58 PM
we have to beat these poutine eating fucks tomorrow
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 02:01:10 PM
eff them and their rough ridin' bags of milk
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 02:03:12 PM
God damn this is painful to watch.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 02:04:32 PM
Congrats to the Swiss on their bronze. Pretty cool for them.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Fedor on February 20, 2014, 02:04:49 PM
First the women's bobsled and now this.  I am calling it now we are beating their asses tomorrow.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 02:05:46 PM
God damn this is painful to watch.

Just wait til they start playing rough ridin' O Canada, will make your ears bleed too
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 02:07:07 PM
This Swiss team looks like a high school team
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Trim on February 20, 2014, 02:11:53 PM
I can't get past the medals being valued equally.  eff a medal count.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 02:18:41 PM
God damn this is painful to watch.

Just wait til they start playing rough ridin' O Canada, will make your ears bleed too

Puke faces all of them.  Take a flyin leap Canada.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 02:19:13 PM
Just looked it up, Switzerland had a 15 year old playing for them  :surprised:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 02:25:03 PM
if Canada wins the mens gold I am going to commit a crime, I'm already on the verge now.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: EllRobersonisInnocent on February 20, 2014, 03:56:53 PM
I'd rather leave this here over the Rob Ford thread.....celebrating Canada's win today

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.gawkerassets.com%2Fimg%2F19gb1d4lmlst3gif%2Fku-xlarge.gif&hash=c2c72b83a9b697df05c5acd91bb76a2d3142b24d)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: hemmy on February 20, 2014, 05:28:38 PM
I can't get past the medals being valued equally.  eff a medal count.

Better than the system of ranking only by golds. If the other medals don't mean anything why do they give them out? Ideally it would be Gold: 3 Silver: 2 Bronze: 1.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: puniraptor on February 20, 2014, 05:48:07 PM
Gold 5 silver 2 bronze 1
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 05:58:09 PM
I'd rather leave this here over the Rob Ford thread.....celebrating Canada's win today

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.gawkerassets.com%2Fimg%2F19gb1d4lmlst3gif%2Fku-xlarge.gif&hash=c2c72b83a9b697df05c5acd91bb76a2d3142b24d)

I hope he ODs tomorrow when they lose
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Trim on February 20, 2014, 06:18:41 PM
MIR's gonna get mad but I 1) legitimately have no idea and 2) wll enjoy him lighting me up MIR-style with the answer somewhere within the rant vs. googling it.

What to the girl hockey players do the other 3 years and 10-ish months?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 20, 2014, 06:23:09 PM
Roller Derby
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 20, 2014, 07:04:09 PM
MIR's gonna get mad but I 1) legitimately have no idea and 2) wll enjoy him lighting me up MIR-style with the answer somewhere within the rant vs. googling it.

What to the girl hockey players do the other 3 years and 10-ish months?

it's actually a good question, some of them play in a "professional" league with 5 Canadian teams and a team in Boston, but not all play because they don't pay a salary, they only cover some expenses, the ladies have to buy their own sticks. They get a stipend for playing on the national team and they play into the spring with the annual world championships. Most of them work real jobs and play in mens leagues.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 20, 2014, 07:15:55 PM
MIR's gonna get mad but I 1) legitimately have no idea and 2) wll enjoy him lighting me up MIR-style with the answer somewhere within the rant vs. googling it.

What to the girl hockey players do the other 3 years and 10-ish months?

it's actually a good question, some of them play in a "professional" league with 5 Canadian teams and a team in Boston, but not all play because they don't pay a salary, they only cover some expenses, the ladies have to buy their own sticks. They get a stipend for playing on the national team and they play into the spring with the annual world championships. Most of them work real jobs and play in mens leagues.

Yea, was actually a legit good question. Also should point out many of them are still playing collegiate hockey.

I stick by my statement earlier than I enjoy watching women's hockey almost as much as men's. I think it's the women's sport that deserves a true professional league the most but unless hockey in general can gain a larger following in the US it won't happen for awhile.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 20, 2014, 08:00:00 PM
I'm not sure why I enjoyed watching that women's championship game more than any NHL game I've ever watched.  Maybe it was because the camera could actually keep up with the puck movement and I wasn't staring at the opposite end of the rink where I thought the puck was but it's really at the other end of the rink.   I don't watch a lot of hockey tho so maybe it's just me being a rube.  :dunno:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Trim on February 20, 2014, 11:16:54 PM
MIR's gonna get mad but I 1) legitimately have no idea and 2) wll enjoy him lighting me up MIR-style with the answer somewhere within the rant vs. googling it.

What to the girl hockey players do the other 3 years and 10-ish months?

it's actually a good question, some of them play in a "professional" league with 5 Canadian teams and a team in Boston, but not all play because they don't pay a salary, they only cover some expenses, the ladies have to buy their own sticks. They get a stipend for playing on the national team and they play into the spring with the annual world championships. Most of them work real jobs and play in mens leagues.

Mens leagues, like at the wichita ice centers of their respective towns?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: bones129 on February 21, 2014, 12:33:58 AM
I've watched far less of the Winter O's than I have in many years. Just couldn't get motivated. Any others trending in that direction?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Boom Roasted on February 21, 2014, 08:18:47 AM
As good a thread as any for this:  Went and curled last night at Line Creek in KC.  Was pretty darn sweet.  Much further than i expected and it was much more difficult to get one to go the right speed where it stops in the "house" than i thought.  The brooming/sweeping certainly makes a difference.  now that i am an expert, you can ask many any curling questions like we ask MIR womens hockey questions.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 21, 2014, 08:59:03 AM
I've watched far less of the Winter O's than I have in many years. Just couldn't get motivated. Any others trending in that direction?

Same.  I think I've watched about 30 total minutes of the Winter Olympics...all of which have been while sitting in a restaurant/bar setting.  I chalk the rest of the non-watching time due to house remodel. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 21, 2014, 09:09:38 AM
You guys, I'm getting pretty amped up about the hockey game. :excited:

:kstatriot:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Institutional Control on February 21, 2014, 10:35:38 AM
You guys, I'm getting pretty amped up about the hockey game. :excited:

:kstatriot:

What time is the game?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 21, 2014, 10:37:24 AM
You guys, I'm getting pretty amped up about the hockey game. :excited:

:kstatriot:

What time is the game?

Lunch'o'clock, according to NBC.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 21, 2014, 10:38:32 AM
You guys, I'm getting pretty amped up about the hockey game. :excited:

:kstatriot:

What time is the game?

11 CT
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 21, 2014, 10:55:02 AM
 :excited:  :lynchmob:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 21, 2014, 10:56:56 AM
they set up a conference room in our office to watch the game  :sdeek:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: HELLHAMMER on February 21, 2014, 11:08:32 AM
eff CANADA

 :kstatriot: :kstatriot:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 21, 2014, 11:39:32 AM
eff CANADA

 :kstatriot: :kstatriot:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 21, 2014, 11:44:33 AM
Quote
Matthew Doyle ?@MLS_Analyst  1m
US locker room first intermission team talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccmhHlPPQJ8 …

ROCK, FLAG, AND EAGLE!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 21, 2014, 11:45:27 AM
eff this piece of moose crap on my screen right now eh.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 21, 2014, 12:17:51 PM
canada = thugs
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 21, 2014, 12:32:29 PM
Backes :love: eff Sid
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Demo158 on February 21, 2014, 12:59:30 PM
I'm getting nervous, I don't know if I could make it through another shootout finish!!! :ohno:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 21, 2014, 01:08:59 PM
eff you Canada, nobody likes you :curse:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 21, 2014, 01:09:49 PM
Let's go Sweden
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 21, 2014, 01:11:33 PM
Let's go Sweden

 :eye:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 21, 2014, 01:13:35 PM
Carey Price just had the game of his life.

Seven, how did it feel to see Vlasic defending Pavelski as that game ended?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Demo158 on February 21, 2014, 01:15:23 PM
Well crap  :frown:, we'll get those canucks next time  :shakesfist:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 21, 2014, 01:23:00 PM
As good a thread as any for this:  Went and curled last night at Line Creek in KC.  Was pretty darn sweet.  Much further than i expected and it was much more difficult to get one to go the right speed where it stops in the "house" than i thought.  The brooming/sweeping certainly makes a difference.  now that i am an expert, you can ask many any curling questions like we ask MIR womens hockey questions.

How much drinking is involved?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 21, 2014, 01:28:56 PM
MIR's gonna get mad but I 1) legitimately have no idea and 2) wll enjoy him lighting me up MIR-style with the answer somewhere within the rant vs. googling it.

What to the girl hockey players do the other 3 years and 10-ish months?

it's actually a good question, some of them play in a "professional" league with 5 Canadian teams and a team in Boston, but not all play because they don't pay a salary, they only cover some expenses, the ladies have to buy their own sticks. They get a stipend for playing on the national team and they play into the spring with the annual world championships. Most of them work real jobs and play in mens leagues.

Mens leagues, like at the wichita ice centers of their respective towns?

sorta, yeah. They are playing in USA Hockey leagues and tournaments though. Wichita Ice Center didn't have any USAH adult programs when I was there. When my wife played she was on a very good women's team that beat mens teams, they went to a USAH womens tournament in St. Paul and it was predictably ugly.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 21, 2014, 01:32:45 PM
As good a thread as any for this:  Went and curled last night at Line Creek in KC.  Was pretty darn sweet.  Much further than i expected and it was much more difficult to get one to go the right speed where it stops in the "house" than i thought.  The brooming/sweeping certainly makes a difference.  now that i am an expert, you can ask many any curling questions like we ask MIR womens hockey questions.

that sport is completely confounding to me, controlling that 40 lb a stone, man. And the sweeping thing, do they shave the ice and leave the shavings on? The ice seems like what hockey ice would be like if it were never zambonied
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Spracne on February 21, 2014, 01:36:53 PM
As good a thread as any for this:  Went and curled last night at Line Creek in KC.  Was pretty darn sweet.  Much further than i expected and it was much more difficult to get one to go the right speed where it stops in the "house" than i thought.  The brooming/sweeping certainly makes a difference.  now that i am an expert, you can ask many any curling questions like we ask MIR womens hockey questions.

that sport is completely confounding to me, controlling that 40 lb a stone, man. And the sweeping thing, do they shave the ice and leave the shavings on? The ice seems like what hockey ice would be like if it were never zambonied

I always thought the brooms smoothened the ice to allow the stone to travel further :dunno:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 21, 2014, 01:41:13 PM
As good a thread as any for this:  Went and curled last night at Line Creek in KC.  Was pretty darn sweet.  Much further than i expected and it was much more difficult to get one to go the right speed where it stops in the "house" than i thought.  The brooming/sweeping certainly makes a difference.  now that i am an expert, you can ask many any curling questions like we ask MIR womens hockey questions.

that sport is completely confounding to me, controlling that 40 lb a stone, man. And the sweeping thing, do they shave the ice and leave the shavings on? The ice seems like what hockey ice would be like if it were never zambonied

I always thought the brooms smoothened the ice to allow the stone to travel further :dunno:

smooth it by sweeping the shaved ice away :dunno: I've never even seen a curling ice sheet
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: puniraptor on February 21, 2014, 01:44:31 PM
As good a thread as any for this:  Went and curled last night at Line Creek in KC.  Was pretty darn sweet.  Much further than i expected and it was much more difficult to get one to go the right speed where it stops in the "house" than i thought.  The brooming/sweeping certainly makes a difference.  now that i am an expert, you can ask many any curling questions like we ask MIR womens hockey questions.

that sport is completely confounding to me, controlling that 40 lb a stone, man. And the sweeping thing, do they shave the ice and leave the shavings on? The ice seems like what hockey ice would be like if it were never zambonied

I always thought the brooms smoothened the ice to allow the stone to travel further :dunno:

smooth it by sweeping the shaved ice away :dunno: I've never even seen a curling ice sheet

Quote from: wikwikwiwkwikwiwi
When sweeping, pressure and speed of the brush head are key in slightly increasing the layer of moisture that builds up under the stone.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kso_FAN on February 21, 2014, 02:42:51 PM
You may have won the battle Canadians, but the USA is winning the war:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BhBnQ3vCMAA2RM8.jpg)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 21, 2014, 02:51:35 PM
curling ice is dimpled, like an inverted golf ball.  the brooms don't shave the ice, it just effects it in some way where you can make the stone go faster and follow a curved path.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 21, 2014, 02:52:42 PM
Carey Price just had the game of his life.

Seven, how did it feel to see Vlasic defending Pavelski as that game ended?

i don't wake up early enough to watch hockey in russia, but that sounds like watching your brothers fight  :frown:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Institutional Control on February 21, 2014, 02:58:46 PM
curling ice is dimpled, like an inverted golf ball.  the brooms don't shave the ice, it just effects it in some way where you can make the stone go faster and follow a curved path.

A lot of lciq here, seven. Glad you're here to set these clowns straight.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 21, 2014, 03:00:59 PM
curling ice is dimpled, like an inverted golf ball.  the brooms don't shave the ice, it just effects it in some way where you can make the stone go faster and follow a curved path.

A lot of lciq here, seven. Glad you're here to set these clowns straight.

i read wikipedia like a week ago  :gocho:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 21, 2014, 03:51:37 PM
The guy comes on here and says he's available for lciq questions and then he's nowhere to be seen.  :flush:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 21, 2014, 05:01:27 PM
Carey Price just had the game of his life.

Seven, how did it feel to see Vlasic defending Pavelski as that game ended?

i don't wake up early enough to watch hockey in russia, but that sounds like watching your brothers fight  :frown:

seven, that game ended at 1:30 CST
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Bloodfart on February 21, 2014, 05:35:28 PM
That U.S. coach had his head WAY up his ass the whole game!  We didn't even attempt the best and most potent offensive scheme ever conceived "the flying V!"  :flush:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 21, 2014, 05:37:24 PM
http://espn.go.com/olympics/winter/2014/speedskating/story/_/id/10498174/2014-sochi-olympics-dutch-coach-jillert-anema-says-us-focus-more-speedskating-not-football (http://espn.go.com/olympics/winter/2014/speedskating/story/_/id/10498174/2014-sochi-olympics-dutch-coach-jillert-anema-says-us-focus-more-speedskating-not-football)

Oh those silly Dutch
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: 'taterblast on February 21, 2014, 05:46:33 PM
eff that guy
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on February 21, 2014, 05:50:03 PM

seven, that game ended at 1:30 CST

l7iq
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: star seed 7 on February 21, 2014, 05:54:48 PM

seven, that game ended at 1:30 CST

l7iq

lol, just before i went to sleep at 6am, i looked up when the game was, saw it was at 11am, and thought hmmm, i guess i could try and stay up and watch it.

anyway, i just watched the replay, disappointing, but the right result.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Trim on February 21, 2014, 07:59:00 PM
You may have won the battle Canadians, but the USA is winning the war:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BhBnQ3vCMAA2RM8.jpg)

Absurd.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 21, 2014, 08:49:12 PM
these colors (bronze) don't run Trim
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 21, 2014, 09:16:34 PM
We didn't make the rules.  If everyone cared most about gold medal count, we'd win more gold.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kim carnes on February 21, 2014, 10:00:05 PM
we are BITB at winning non-gold medals, always have been
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 22, 2014, 10:09:44 AM
hockey is such a stupid sport
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: HELLHAMMER on February 22, 2014, 10:14:48 AM
Our guys just can't bring themselves to give a eff about bronze.  3rd place games are dumb.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: steve dave on February 22, 2014, 11:10:48 AM
lol, lifted from twitter

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BhGBc1LCYAAqoa-.png)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 22, 2014, 11:17:58 AM
Is this where we talk about the Olympic roster? Other than Stepan and Howard I'm pretty happy with the roster. Would've liked Bobby Ryan too but I can see why he was left off.

Keith Yandle was royally mumped. The highest scoring American defenseman the last 5 years. Brooks Orpik, wtf? The Penguins GM and head coach a part of the process and two penguins defenders were seleted who habe spent the better part of the winter hurt. Also eff Brian Burke

http://espn.go.com/olympics/hockey/story/_/id/10195703/how-us-hockey-team-bound-sochi-olympics-was-named

I sincerely hope the Americans lose and give up a ton of goals doing so, what a horrific way to compose a team. I will be cheering for Oliver Ekman-Larsson and team Sweeden.

Jack Johnson was the biggest snub in my opinion. and yeah, the penguins thing is very wtf. ill still root for team USA.

Jack Johnson only has 11 points and a +/- of -12. If they were looking for stay home defensemen they could do and did better than Jack Johnson. Keith Yandle is without a doubt the best American scoring defender. We don't have the most skilled forwards one would guess they would pick the most skilled defenseman available.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview2%2F3866725%2Fi-told-you-so-dance-o.gif&hash=f3c8c79258c47fd5791117c11f0ab83f2f24c47a)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOMk5GWvlks
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 22, 2014, 11:39:10 AM
Is this where we talk about the Olympic roster? Other than Stepan and Howard I'm pretty happy with the roster. Would've liked Bobby Ryan too but I can see why he was left off.

Keith Yandle was royally mumped. The highest scoring American defenseman the last 5 years. Brooks Orpik, wtf? The Penguins GM and head coach a part of the process and two penguins defenders were seleted who habe spent the better part of the winter hurt. Also eff Brian Burke

http://espn.go.com/olympics/hockey/story/_/id/10195703/how-us-hockey-team-bound-sochi-olympics-was-named

I sincerely hope the Americans lose and give up a ton of goals doing so, what a horrific way to compose a team. I will be cheering for Oliver Ekman-Larsson and team Sweeden.

Jack Johnson was the biggest snub in my opinion. and yeah, the penguins thing is very wtf. ill still root for team USA.

Jack Johnson only has 11 points and a +/- of -12. If they were looking for stay home defensemen they could do and did better than Jack Johnson. Keith Yandle is without a doubt the best American scoring defender. We don't have the most skilled forwards one would guess they would pick the most skilled defenseman available.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstream1.gifsoup.com%2Fview2%2F3866725%2Fi-told-you-so-dance-o.gif&hash=f3c8c79258c47fd5791117c11f0ab83f2f24c47a)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOMk5GWvlks

Eh, Yandle wouldn't have changed the outcome of either game IMO. He may have given them an extra scoring chance or 2 yesterday but the way Price was playing I don't think it would have mattered. Today they just didn't look like they gave a damn.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 22, 2014, 12:00:02 PM
less about Yandle and more about the issues on how the roster was constructed and the issues they would have

They cared today, they just folded up and quit when they had adversity. Did you hear the post game interview with Parise, because thats what he said? Kane's hack and wack act in the 3rd period was deplorable and a sure sign they cared.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 22, 2014, 01:03:57 PM
less about Yandle and more about the issues on how the roster was constructed and the issues they would have

They cared today, they just folded up and quit when they had adversity. Did you hear the post game interview with Parise, because thats what he said? Kane's hack and wack act in the 3rd period was deplorable and a sure sign they cared.

Yandle was the only one you really brought up as being an issue with the roster construction and like I said, he really wouldn't have made a difference. With the current crop of American players I think they built the roster basically how they needed to to have a chance.

They may have cared, but that there was definitely not the same intensity as there was in the semis. I also don't blame them too much for just folding up in the third. Most of those guys are getting ready to head back to teams that will be right in the thick of battles for playoff spots and seedlings and a Stanley Cup means a lot more than a bronze medal.

Kane was pretty bad in the 3rd, but as a Blues fan I'm not a big fan of his anyways.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 22, 2014, 02:49:20 PM
less about Yandle and more about the issues on how the roster was constructed and the issues they would have

They cared today, they just folded up and quit when they had adversity. Did you hear the post game interview with Parise, because thats what he said? Kane's hack and wack act in the 3rd period was deplorable and a sure sign they cared.

Yandle was the only one you really brought up as being an issue with the roster construction and like I said, he really wouldn't have made a difference. With the current crop of American players I think they built the roster basically how they needed to to have a chance.

They may have cared, but that there was definitely not the same intensity as there was in the semis. I also don't blame them too much for just folding up in the third. Most of those guys are getting ready to head back to teams that will be right in the thick of battles for playoff spots and seedlings and a Stanley Cup means a lot more than a bronze medal.

Kane was pretty bad in the 3rd, but as a Blues fan I'm not a big fan of his anyways.

I said this team would have trouble scoring goals

the Fins play in the NHL too, that's a wack excuse, fact is that team had quitters with no heart and don't care as much as playing for their country as other nations, Russia was afflicted with the same thing
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 22, 2014, 03:06:28 PM
less about Yandle and more about the issues on how the roster was constructed and the issues they would have

They cared today, they just folded up and quit when they had adversity. Did you hear the post game interview with Parise, because thats what he said? Kane's hack and wack act in the 3rd period was deplorable and a sure sign they cared.

Yandle was the only one you really brought up as being an issue with the roster construction and like I said, he really wouldn't have made a difference. With the current crop of American players I think they built the roster basically how they needed to to have a chance.

They may have cared, but that there was definitely not the same intensity as there was in the semis. I also don't blame them too much for just folding up in the third. Most of those guys are getting ready to head back to teams that will be right in the thick of battles for playoff spots and seedlings and a Stanley Cup means a lot more than a bronze medal.

Kane was pretty bad in the 3rd, but as a Blues fan I'm not a big fan of his anyways.

I said this team would have trouble scoring goals

the Fins play in the NHL too, that's a wack excuse, fact is that team had quitters with no heart and don't care as much as playing for their country as other nations, Russia was afflicted with the same thing

I won't argue with that, but I still believe this was about as good a team as the US could put on the ice right now. And honestly, a bronze means a lot more for a country like Finland than it does for the USA.

I also think it's a little harsh to dump the whole team in that categories. There where a few players who where giving everything they had up until it became painfully obvious that others had quit.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 22, 2014, 06:45:42 PM
I said they have quitters not that they are quitters, that isn't collective
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 22, 2014, 11:32:31 PM
Why does the almost naked TP lady show up in tapatalk? She's not even ITT.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on February 22, 2014, 11:37:04 PM
Why does the almost naked TP lady show up in tapatalk? She's not even ITT.

tapatalk image preview thing is the most terrible thing ever
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: chum1 on February 22, 2014, 11:43:23 PM
The last day of the olympics is a bummer because they're so infrequent.  I guess that's also part of what makes them great, though, too.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: michigancat on February 23, 2014, 12:38:59 AM
Why does the almost naked TP lady show up in tapatalk? She's not even ITT.

tapatalk image preview thing is the most terrible thing ever

yeah, sd tried to delete it but it won't go away.

FWIW, it was this piece of crap:

Silver-Gold

Julia Mancuso  :love:

Idiot

Linsday Vonn still :thumbsup:

Is this the racist one?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: scottwildcat on February 23, 2014, 08:42:36 AM
“@AP: BREAKING: Swedish Olympic official says hockey player Nicklas Backstrom fails doping test at #Sochi2014 Games.”
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: scottwildcat on February 23, 2014, 08:52:52 AM
“@AP_Sports: FINAL medal count from #sochi2014:
Russia 33
US 28
Norway 26
Canada 25
Netherlands 24
Germany 19
For more: http://apne.ws/1cE8S5D"
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 23, 2014, 11:23:18 AM
“@AP: BREAKING: Swedish Olympic official says hockey player Nicklas Backstrom fails doping test at #Sochi2014 Games.”

 :Wha:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: wetwillie on February 23, 2014, 01:20:44 PM
“@AP: BREAKING: Swedish Olympic official says hockey player Nicklas Backstrom fails doping test at #Sochi2014 Games.”

 :Wha:

Warm up the banner!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 23, 2014, 01:34:04 PM
Luke'd?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQJPhzgk8GU
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: joda on February 23, 2014, 04:49:21 PM
Luke'd?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQJPhzgk8GU

http://espn.go.com/olympics/winter/2014/speedskating/story/_/id/10498174/2014-sochi-olympics-dutch-coach-jillert-anema-says-us-focus-more-speedskating-not-football (http://espn.go.com/olympics/winter/2014/speedskating/story/_/id/10498174/2014-sochi-olympics-dutch-coach-jillert-anema-says-us-focus-more-speedskating-not-football)

Oh those silly Dutch
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 23, 2014, 09:54:30 PM
Luke'd?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQJPhzgk8GU

http://espn.go.com/olympics/winter/2014/speedskating/story/_/id/10498174/2014-sochi-olympics-dutch-coach-jillert-anema-says-us-focus-more-speedskating-not-football (http://espn.go.com/olympics/winter/2014/speedskating/story/_/id/10498174/2014-sochi-olympics-dutch-coach-jillert-anema-says-us-focus-more-speedskating-not-football)

Oh those silly Dutch

Figured it was when I saw the date on the video. My bad.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 23, 2014, 11:06:05 PM
“@AP: BREAKING: Swedish Olympic official says hockey player Nicklas Backstrom fails doping test at #Sochi2014 Games.”

 :Wha:

it was OTC allergy medicine that he has been taking for 7 years that is only banned in the Olympics, rough ridin' dumb
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: scottwildcat on February 23, 2014, 11:08:54 PM
“@AP: BREAKING: Swedish Olympic official says hockey player Nicklas Backstrom fails doping test at #Sochi2014 Games.”

 :Wha:

it was OTC allergy medicine that he has been taking for 7 years that is only banned in the Olympics, rough ridin' dumb

The Olympics are really shitty when it comes to a lot of stuff.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 23, 2014, 11:10:11 PM
“@AP: BREAKING: Swedish Olympic official says hockey player Nicklas Backstrom fails doping test at #Sochi2014 Games.”

 :Wha:

it was OTC allergy medicine that he has been taking for 7 years that is only banned in the Olympics, rough ridin' dumb

Why is it called a "doping test" if he just tested positive for allergy medication? I really don't know.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 23, 2014, 11:23:28 PM
“@AP: BREAKING: Swedish Olympic official says hockey player Nicklas Backstrom fails doping test at #Sochi2014 Games.”

 :Wha:

it was OTC allergy medicine that he has been taking for 7 years that is only banned in the Olympics, rough ridin' dumb

Why is it called a "doping test" if he just tested positive for allergy medication? I really don't know.

is that a serious question, I just told you? The active ingredient in Zyrtec is a banned substance by the IOC. also worth noting that Backstrom used this in the Vancouver Olympics as well.

Quote
More relevantly, an IIHF doctor called Backstrom "an innocent victim of circumstances." He, of course, is upset.

"I was ready to play probably the biggest game of my career, and 2 1/2 hours before game I got pulled aside," he said. "It’s sad."
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: sunny_cat on February 23, 2014, 11:25:57 PM
I thought it meant "blood doping."  :buh-bye:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: waks on February 23, 2014, 11:38:51 PM
I'm pretty sad the olys are over guys.  :frown:
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 23, 2014, 11:42:39 PM
me too, even though 'murica was largely a disappointment. The thing they did at the closing ceremony after the flame was extinguished was incredible and the Russian Olympian that NBC caught crying was a perfect ending
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: waks on February 24, 2014, 12:18:58 AM
I liked the way they made fun of the fifth olympic ring not working in the opening ceremony.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 24, 2014, 08:06:19 AM
 :cheese: to the world cup!
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Tobias on February 25, 2014, 02:59:32 PM
cool collection of "then and now" pics from former olympic venues: http://distractify.com/culture/sports/haunting-images-of-abandoned-olympic-venues/ (http://distractify.com/culture/sports/haunting-images-of-abandoned-olympic-venues/)

Title: Re: olympics
Post by: Trogdor on March 15, 2014, 10:22:43 PM
USA beat Russia in Hockey for the paralympic gold fwiw
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: meow meow on February 25, 2020, 03:42:22 PM
bucket, more like luke it
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on March 09, 2020, 04:44:38 AM
Weird ass bump, m2, also I don't remember any of this crap.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: meow meow on March 09, 2020, 08:43:14 AM
either i really fitzed up that post in the wrong thread, or bucket deleted something.  either way, lmao
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 17, 2022, 09:48:19 PM
This Russian figure skating saga is absolutely insane.

After they forced the 15 year old to be a drug cheat, then forced her to compete after she tested positive and have the weight of the world on her shoulders, she very predictively choked. Her Russian teammate who got the gold is crying and they aren't tears of joy, and no one is comforting her, she's just standing in a room, hugging a stuffed animal.

Her other Russian teammate who got silver spent half an hour yelling at Russian coaches and officials and said she refused to go to the medal stand because she didn't deserve silver, I guess she set an Olympic record for most quads landed in one competition.

https://twitter.com/buygrilledcorn/status/1494422821291925509
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on February 17, 2022, 09:53:28 PM
That crap was so wild I thought she was upset from watching her team mate absolutely implode I had no idea it was bc she was essentially protesting not getting gold. That’s insane
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 17, 2022, 10:09:33 PM
That crap was so wild I thought she was upset from watching her team mate absolutely implode I had no idea it was bc she was essentially protesting not getting gold. That’s insane

I didn't either until I read twitter and NBC played a clip of her press conference.

Quote
With all the attention on 15-year-old prodigy Kamila Valieva, who in the wake of a doping scandal slipped to the ice and tumbled to fourth after topping the standings in the short programme, Trusova's moment of despair almost went unnoticed.

"Everyone has a gold medal, everyone, but not me. I hate skating. I hate it. I hate this sport. I will never skate again. Never," Trusova said as she briefly left the sight of Eteri Tutberidze, who coaches her, Shcherbakova and Valieva.

"It's impossible. That's now how it should be."

Trusova, the world championships' bronze medallist, elaborated in the post-event news conference, where she was also close to tears.

"I haven't been winning major events for three years. I always try to reach a goal, I always add more quads," the 17-year-old said.

"And when I get to that, I will win. This didn't happen, that's why I was upset."

I also found this tweet funny. In the previous tweet I posted someone noticed that the Chinese called this woman ramen head.
https://twitter.com/KOSTONlON/status/1494335017945759755
I can't stand figure skating but this was more entertaining than Tanya and Nancy.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: mocat on February 18, 2022, 08:55:44 AM
I can't stand figure skating

(https://media3.giphy.com/media/5b5OU7aUekfdSAER5I/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47uefl7csx9k02bdvg4470gsd3l2g3992ztrwjwyjv&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: ChiComCat on February 18, 2022, 09:01:17 AM
Curling with a disappointing finish this morning.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: cfbandyman on February 18, 2022, 09:42:59 AM
I can't stand figure skating

(https://media3.giphy.com/media/5b5OU7aUekfdSAER5I/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47uefl7csx9k02bdvg4470gsd3l2g3992ztrwjwyjv&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)

I'm with MiR, I hate figure skating. Just drama and a sport with judged winners/losers. It and gymnastics are the same effing thing. Amazing athletes? For sure and absolutely. Dumbass controversy and bs run amok, yup. 
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 18, 2022, 12:03:26 PM
I can't stand figure skating

(https://media3.giphy.com/media/5b5OU7aUekfdSAER5I/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47uefl7csx9k02bdvg4470gsd3l2g3992ztrwjwyjv&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)

Real sure. I've watched 30 minutes of figure skating the last decade. 10 minutes of Johnny Weir and Tara Lipinski talking, in response to the Russian girl not being suspended, about the things they had to go through for drug testing from 13 years old and on. Then the 20 minutes last night. I already knew from notifications that the girl fell, but she took the ice just as I turned the TV on so I wanted to see it. Didn't know about the other crap, NBC got quite lucky to have all that footage and I'm guessing it being tape delayed helped them package it all up like they did.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: kstate4life on February 18, 2022, 01:40:22 PM
These were one of the worst Olympics that I can remember.  Not sure if it was because the US generally sucked, or there not being any fans, etc. but I was pretty amped at the beginning and then just got bored. 

Also, anyone think it's weird that Eileen Gu chose to represent China?  I get her point of trying to inspire young Chinese athletes, but like picking China over the US is just odd.  I think we gave her more coverage than a lot of our own athletes.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: OB_Won on February 18, 2022, 01:47:00 PM
I can't stand figure skating

(https://media3.giphy.com/media/5b5OU7aUekfdSAER5I/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47uefl7csx9k02bdvg4470gsd3l2g3992ztrwjwyjv&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)

Real sure. I've watched 30 minutes of figure skating the last decade. 10 minutes of Johnny Weir and Tara Lipinski talking, in response to the Russian girl not being suspended, about the things they had to go through for drug testing from 13 years old and on. Then the 20 minutes last night. I already knew from notifications that the girl fell, but she took the ice just as I turned the TV on so I wanted to see it. Didn't know about the other crap, NBC got quite lucky to have all that footage and I'm guessing it being tape delayed helped them package it all up like they did.
Same. My wife just happened to flip over as the petulant, sore loser (silver medalist) skated. Wife knew about the drama via social media so we watched it unfold. I understand ROC's motivation to allow the doper to skate, but for the life of me I can't understand why the IOC allowed it to proceed. The best possible outcome happened, and it was still a crap show. The alternative was not having a ceremony at all if she medaled. WTaF?
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: MakeItRain on February 18, 2022, 02:50:42 PM
I can't stand figure skating

(https://media3.giphy.com/media/5b5OU7aUekfdSAER5I/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47uefl7csx9k02bdvg4470gsd3l2g3992ztrwjwyjv&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)

Real sure. I've watched 30 minutes of figure skating the last decade. 10 minutes of Johnny Weir and Tara Lipinski talking, in response to the Russian girl not being suspended, about the things they had to go through for drug testing from 13 years old and on. Then the 20 minutes last night. I already knew from notifications that the girl fell, but she took the ice just as I turned the TV on so I wanted to see it. Didn't know about the other crap, NBC got quite lucky to have all that footage and I'm guessing it being tape delayed helped them package it all up like they did.
Same. My wife just happened to flip over as the petulant, sore loser (silver medalist) skated. Wife knew about the drama via social media so we watched it unfold. I understand ROC's motivation to allow the doper to skate, but for the life of me I can't understand why the IOC allowed it to proceed. The best possible outcome happened, and it was still a crap show. The alternative was not having a ceremony at all if she medaled. WTaF?

The IOC didn't have a choice, they're the ones who wanted to suspend her but the Russians appealed to the court of arbitration of sport and they said because she's 15 and the Russians delayed the results she had to compete. So to recap, the Russians forced this 15 year old to dope, then when she tested positive they tried to hide the results. The CAS rewarded them for this behavior.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: cfbandyman on February 18, 2022, 03:52:00 PM
These were one of the worst Olympics that I can remember.  Not sure if it was because the US generally sucked, or there not being any fans, etc. but I was pretty amped at the beginning and then just got bored. 

Also, anyone think it's weird that Eileen Gu chose to represent China?  I get her point of trying to inspire young Chinese athletes, but like picking China over the US is just odd.  I think we gave her more coverage than a lot of our own athletes.

It's up there, no fans definitely sucks, but I think a giant reason why is the last 3 being in South Korea then Japan and then China paired with increased technology making it easy to see who did what before you got to see it I think is the main reason. I think it's fatigue of having such a huge time zone difference.

Like I remember Sydney 2000 and that was exciting cause there was no really way to actually know who did what, now it doesn't matter. I think the next two summer being in Paris and LA, and the winter one in Italy in 2026 will change that back to better. You'll have more chances to either watch crap in real time or have less of a delay for it to make it better. The last good weird time zone Olympics was 2008 and smart phones were barely a thing so it didn't matter then either.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: stunted on February 18, 2022, 04:25:21 PM
These were one of the worst Olympics that I can remember.  Not sure if it was because the US generally sucked, or there not being any fans, etc. but I was pretty amped at the beginning and then just got bored. 

Also, anyone think it's weird that Eileen Gu chose to represent China?  I get her point of trying to inspire young Chinese athletes, but like picking China over the US is just odd.  I think we gave her more coverage than a lot of our own athletes.

It’s not odd at all. Many athletes do this but when it’s China people get all :curse:. Asians have a history of kissing the west’s ass but times are changing.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: nicname on February 18, 2022, 07:25:23 PM
These were one of the worst Olympics that I can remember.  Not sure if it was because the US generally sucked, or there not being any fans, etc. but I was pretty amped at the beginning and then just got bored. 

Also, anyone think it's weird that Eileen Gu chose to represent China?  I get her point of trying to inspire young Chinese athletes, but like picking China over the US is just odd.  I think we gave her more coverage than a lot of our own athletes.

It's up there, no fans definitely sucks, but I think a giant reason why is the last 3 being in South Korea then Japan and then China paired with increased technology making it easy to see who did what before you got to see it I think is the main reason. I think it's fatigue of having such a huge time zone difference.

Like I remember Sydney 2000 and that was exciting cause there was no really way to actually know who did what, now it doesn't matter. I think the next two summer being in Paris and LA, and the winter one in Italy in 2026 will change that back to better. You'll have more chances to either watch crap in real time or have less of a delay for it to make it better. The last good weird time zone Olympics was 2008 and smart phones were barely a thing so it didn't matter then either.

Yes, I miss the days of not GAF about Olympic events being tape-delayed, because it was all "new to me" anyway. Not having as many alternative sports/entertainment options also made what truly the biggest of all sporting events seem so much bigger. Even better when the games are in our own or an adjacent time zone. Would I trade it all back for that hype, suspense and nostalgia? Prob not.

It might just be age, but it sure felt like the lack of alternatives made all sorts of things seem larger than life. This really changed when smartphones got so powerful, social media, etc. I'm rambling like a neo-luddite.

No fans is terrible of course.
Title: Re: olympics
Post by: OB_Won on February 21, 2022, 12:36:05 PM
I can't stand figure skating

(https://media3.giphy.com/media/5b5OU7aUekfdSAER5I/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47uefl7csx9k02bdvg4470gsd3l2g3992ztrwjwyjv&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)

Real sure. I've watched 30 minutes of figure skating the last decade. 10 minutes of Johnny Weir and Tara Lipinski talking, in response to the Russian girl not being suspended, about the things they had to go through for drug testing from 13 years old and on. Then the 20 minutes last night. I already knew from notifications that the girl fell, but she took the ice just as I turned the TV on so I wanted to see it. Didn't know about the other crap, NBC got quite lucky to have all that footage and I'm guessing it being tape delayed helped them package it all up like they did.
Same. My wife just happened to flip over as the petulant, sore loser (silver medalist) skated. Wife knew about the drama via social media so we watched it unfold. I understand ROC's motivation to allow the doper to skate, but for the life of me I can't understand why the IOC allowed it to proceed. The best possible outcome happened, and it was still a crap show. The alternative was not having a ceremony at all if she medaled. WTaF?

The IOC didn't have a choice, they're the ones who wanted to suspend her but the Russians appealed to the court of arbitration of sport and they said because she's 15 and the Russians delayed the results she had to compete. So to recap, the Russians forced this 15 year old to dope, then when she tested positive they tried to hide the results. The CAS rewarded them for this behavior.
I didn't know there was a CAS, and didn't bother to research the issue. I just thought it was ROC bribing and/or bullying IOC. Didn't realize IOC had a superior. Thanks for the info!