Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5837585 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16971
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2875 on: April 10, 2013, 03:19:17 PM »
Hud cons: fake enthusiasm. starts talking without knowing what he's going to talk about and ends up rambling for a minute before slowly fading out with no conclusion to what he forgot he was trying to say. voice sounds stupid. really everything comes down to fake produced enthusiasm.

i am weird and see these as entertaining pro's

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2876 on: April 10, 2013, 03:19:54 PM »
Quote
Bob Dutton @Royals_Report
FSKC says Tuesday's game pulled its second-highest ratings ever (7.2) for the #Royals. Highest was 7.5 for May 6, 2009 vs. Seattle.


Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2877 on: April 10, 2013, 03:43:35 PM »
Anybody else goin to the game tonight?
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline jmlynch1

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2781
  • stay together for the kids
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2878 on: April 10, 2013, 03:49:33 PM »
Hud cons: fake enthusiasm. starts talking without knowing what he's going to talk about and ends up rambling for a minute before slowly fading out with no conclusion to what he forgot he was trying to say. voice sounds stupid. really everything comes down to fake produced enthusiasm.

i am weird and see these as entertaining pro's
me too. Hated it at first, and by June last year I loved it.

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2879 on: April 10, 2013, 04:09:46 PM »
Hud cons: fake enthusiasm. starts talking without knowing what he's going to talk about and ends up rambling for a minute before slowly fading out with no conclusion to what he forgot he was trying to say. voice sounds stupid. really everything comes down to fake produced enthusiasm.

i am weird and see these as entertaining pro's
me too. Hated it at first, and by June last year I loved it.

Agree completely.  Couldn't stand at first and now I pay more money to hear the hometown broadcast.  I love his love of being cheesy, holding baseballs, and drug use.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2880 on: April 10, 2013, 04:43:24 PM »
Quote
Bob Dutton @Royals_Report
FSKC says Tuesday's game pulled its second-highest ratings ever (7.2) for the #Royals. Highest was 7.5 for May 6, 2009 vs. Seattle.

That's crazy

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2881 on: April 10, 2013, 04:52:26 PM »
Do you guys think we might crack the 7.5 at some point this season? If so, Hud should get an automatic 1 year extension imo.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2882 on: April 10, 2013, 05:39:56 PM »
Do you guys think we might crack the 7.5 at some point this season? If so, Hud should get an automatic 1 year extension imo.

Yes then no

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2883 on: April 10, 2013, 07:13:19 PM »
Another bad attendance game. Makes me sad. Oh well hopefully a lot of people watch on TV.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2884 on: April 10, 2013, 07:24:25 PM »
Weather obviously a factor. I wouldn't go either. F that crap.


Wade Davis off to a great 30 pitch first inning. :dubious:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2885 on: April 10, 2013, 07:31:51 PM »
Okay you guys. I don't hate Rex anymore. Wtf is happening?  :dubious:

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2886 on: April 10, 2013, 07:33:28 PM »
Still do.

"Billy can hit a home run even in a snow storm! That was awesome"  :flush:

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2887 on: April 10, 2013, 07:34:52 PM »
Still do.

"Billy can hit a home run even in a snow storm! That was awesome"   :love:

fyp

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2888 on: April 10, 2013, 07:35:41 PM »
Still do.

"Billy can hit a home run even in a snow storm! That was awesome"   :love:

fyp

Nope sorry s_c

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2889 on: April 10, 2013, 07:36:14 PM »

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4604
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2890 on: April 10, 2013, 07:37:26 PM »
Rex deserves an Emmy.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2891 on: April 10, 2013, 07:37:45 PM »
Jfc Davis

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16971
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2892 on: April 10, 2013, 07:38:39 PM »
Jfc Davis

yeah i don't think i like him very much. bad weather though?? we'll see.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2893 on: April 10, 2013, 07:39:25 PM »

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2894 on: April 10, 2013, 07:43:14 PM »
Two straight strikeouts with the bases loaded! Oh man!

 :dance:

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2895 on: April 10, 2013, 07:46:51 PM »
Well I guess it's good we didn't give up runs yet but 51 pitches through two? Yikes.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2896 on: April 10, 2013, 07:52:40 PM »
Minnesota doesn't seem very good this year. i  like that.


Also, get some wipers on that Center Field camera.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2897 on: April 10, 2013, 07:54:18 PM »
Minnesota doesn't seem very good this year. i  like that.


Also, get some wipers on that Center Field camera.

They weren't good last year either. Last place. Lost 96 games.

Offline raquetcat

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
  • ^ I let us down
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2898 on: April 10, 2013, 08:01:18 PM »
PITCHERS DUEL!!! but seriously if Davis keeps this up we better start looking for a pitcher (not a belly itcher)
I'm purple down

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2899 on: April 10, 2013, 08:06:19 PM »
Woof at this game.