Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5830249 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Re: The Royals
« Reply #2925 on: April 11, 2013, 12:02:10 AM »
guys, the twins are a 105+ loss team

Almost never is any time predictably bad.  Very lbbiq on your part Cat Kid

Almost never may be true, but these Twins and these Astros are exceptions.
:adios:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Re: The Royals
« Reply #2926 on: April 11, 2013, 12:03:27 AM »
guys, the twins are a 105+ loss team

Almost never is any time predictably bad.  Very lbbiq on your part Cat Kid

Almost never may be true, but these Twins and these Astros are exceptions.

The stros had a $600 payroll last season and lost 107. The twinks are at least trying
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: Re: The Royals
« Reply #2927 on: April 11, 2013, 12:29:27 AM »
guys, the twins are a 105+ loss team

Almost never is any time predictably bad.  Very lbbiq on your part Cat Kid

Almost never may be true, but these Twins and these Astros are exceptions.

Have to agree with 8MP, at least as far as Minnesota goes. Minnie has always been an extraordinarily cyclical team, and they're in a downward spiral. Whether they lose 105 is another question, but they'll lose a bunch. I think this will be Gardenhire's last year. Houston? Big losers this year, also.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4604
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2928 on: April 11, 2013, 06:57:08 AM »
:)

[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40561
    • View Profile
Re: Re: The Royals
« Reply #2929 on: April 11, 2013, 07:04:00 AM »
Sweep!

Sweeping the Twins are the things we need to do to make a push for postseason play.

Sweeping the twins is only one thing

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2930 on: April 11, 2013, 07:29:42 AM »
Another bad attendance game. Makes me sad. Oh well hopefully a lot of people watch on TV.

If you don't like it, then go to the game.  Don't just talk about it scottwildcat; be about it.  I've got faith in you.

Last night was actually a great night at the K.  Once I got some of those handwarmers into my shoes and put a blanket on, I could hardly even notice the giant mist cloud that was hanging over the stadium.  Really Getz me all hot and bothered thinkin about how that was basically just a test run for what it's going to be like in early October when the [Insert mocat's 2nd favorite American League team here] come to town for the divisional series.   :drool:
« Last Edit: April 11, 2013, 08:08:46 AM by SabiNation »
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40561
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2931 on: April 11, 2013, 07:53:53 AM »
Angels? pffffft

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2932 on: April 11, 2013, 08:00:54 AM »
so kk has decided to be the kim carnes of the royals thread. interesting.

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2933 on: April 11, 2013, 08:07:23 AM »
Angels? pffffft

whatevr, mocat.  I think you're missing the point of the post   :dubious:
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Online ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12314
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2934 on: April 11, 2013, 08:09:55 AM »
Is this a cruel joke? First my beloved manhattan ks becomes Titletown usa overnight and now the the lovable loser KC Royals are looking good in first place.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2935 on: April 11, 2013, 08:18:54 AM »
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2936 on: April 11, 2013, 08:19:45 AM »
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2937 on: April 11, 2013, 08:20:47 AM »
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2938 on: April 11, 2013, 08:26:30 AM »
PAY NED!

NEDPRIL

#LOL

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55967
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2939 on: April 11, 2013, 08:44:06 AM »
columns extrapolating first week stats to season-long stats are the absolute worst.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16971
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2940 on: April 11, 2013, 08:47:04 AM »
columns extrapolating first week stats to season-long stats are the absolute worst.

no they're not

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2941 on: April 11, 2013, 08:56:09 AM »
Know what's not the worst? Pictures of the brooms while the Rawls are up 1.5 games in the division!
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2942 on: April 11, 2013, 09:23:01 AM »
and here we thought us cat fans were going to go through title withdrawal because football season is months away. nope. royals look like they are going to provide a nice title bridge. time to rename I-70 to title-70 and change all billboards along the way to giant trophies. go royalcats.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2943 on: April 11, 2013, 10:50:05 AM »
columns extrapolating first week stats to season-long stats are the absolute worst. good for a laugh and not meant to be taken seriously

Offline Boom Roasted

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1573
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2944 on: April 11, 2013, 12:24:16 PM »
and here we thought us cat fans were going to go through title withdrawal because football season is months away. nope. royals look like they are going to provide a nice title bridge. time to rename I-70 to title-70 and change all billboards along the way to giant trophies. go royalcats.
:thumbs: :thumbs:

Offline Boom Roasted

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1573
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2945 on: April 11, 2013, 12:26:25 PM »
Another bad attendance game. Makes me sad. Oh well hopefully a lot of people watch on TV.

If you don't like it, then go to the game.  Don't just talk about it scottwildcat; be about it.  I've got faith in you.

Last night was actually a great night at the K.  Once I got some of those handwarmers into my shoes and put a blanket on, I could hardly even notice the giant mist cloud that was hanging over the stadium.  Really Getz me all hot and bothered thinkin about how that was basically just a test run for what it's going to be like in early October when the [Insert mocat's 2nd favorite American League team here] come to town for the divisional series.   :drool:

Yes it was prety effing cold out there last night.  I was amazed by how many people were sitting out in the rain when they could just move up under the deck or to one of the bars that are inside.  We stayed out in the terrible till the 5th then I got the hook up for a suite which was nice n cozy.  Great to see the boys in blue getting those wins

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17067
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2946 on: April 11, 2013, 12:53:22 PM »
The really encouraging thing imo is that the Royals have earned their 6-3 record in such a variety of ways.  They've won slugfests, come from behind, held onto large and small leads that they built early, won and lost pitching duels, etc.  It is a small sample size, but if you look at the schedule and teams they have played their record is what you would expect from a playoff contender they have played .500 ball against the better teams on the schedule and have dominated weaker competition. 

I think the other key, and what makes this Royals team different, is that they are markedly less vulnerable to prolonged losing streaks as they have been in the past.  The 'pen is simply too strong (even with Holland's struggles) and there is simply to many starters in the rotation capable of winning a pitching-duel to warrant fear of a bad streak. 
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2947 on: April 11, 2013, 12:55:53 PM »
They beat an NL team and swept a bottom 3 team in the AL.  Let's just hold off a little.  Build your momentum morons.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2948 on: April 11, 2013, 12:58:43 PM »
Anyone know if World Series tickets are available yet? tia
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2949 on: April 11, 2013, 01:17:04 PM »
They beat an NL team and swept a bottom 3 team in the AL.  Let's just hold off a little.  Build your momentum morons.

Did you see the brooms I posted for the sweep, KK? Might be on the last page. You should look.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.