Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5842653 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6338
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2976 on: April 12, 2013, 09:04:23 AM »
I am staunchly #TeamGreinke
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.


Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16972
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2978 on: April 12, 2013, 09:12:37 AM »
reminds me of 2003, constantly checking the ESPN power rankings

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2979 on: April 12, 2013, 09:24:20 AM »
In your rough ridin' face, Greinke!
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2980 on: April 12, 2013, 09:46:22 AM »
reminds me of 2003, constantly checking the ESPN power rankings

Yeah lol
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline slucat

  • GIRL ALERT, GIRL ALERT
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 706
  • This SLU, not the city
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2981 on: April 12, 2013, 09:54:44 AM »
I like pitchers hitting better, fwiw

me too, its like super underdog.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2982 on: April 12, 2013, 09:56:18 AM »
reminds me of 2003, constantly checking the ESPN power rankings

Yeah lol

maaaan its going to suck if we hit a stretch of going 3-15. I am letting myself get excited

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16972
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2983 on: April 12, 2013, 09:58:46 AM »
i legitimately think this team is good enough that a 3-15 is out of the question.

(yes i could be wrong, eff off everyone)

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2984 on: April 12, 2013, 10:00:33 AM »
i legitimately think this team is good enough that a 3-15 is out of the question.

(yes i could be wrong, eff off everyone)

pitching staff is too good to let that happen
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40563
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2985 on: April 12, 2013, 10:01:37 AM »
i legitimately think this team is good enough that a 3-15 is out of the question.

(yes i could be wrong, eff off everyone)

pitching staff is too good to let that happen

that's what the titanic-folks thought

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2986 on: April 12, 2013, 10:03:43 AM »
i legitimately think this team is good enough that a 3-15 is out of the question.

(yes i could be wrong, eff off everyone)

pitching staff is too good to let that happen

that's what the titanic-folks thought

 :dubious: ... really?
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2987 on: April 12, 2013, 10:06:34 AM »
i legitimately think this team is good enough that a 3-15 is out of the question.

(yes i could be wrong, eff off everyone)

pitching staff is too good to let that happen

that's what the titanic-folks thought

The titanic had a pitching staff?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2988 on: April 12, 2013, 10:07:47 AM »
i legitimately think this team is good enough that a 3-15 is out of the question.

(yes i could be wrong, eff off everyone)

pitching staff is too good to let that happen

that's what the titanic-folks thought

The titanic had a pitching staff?

Yes, and a world class one at that. It all went to crap when they had to bat, though.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40563
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2989 on: April 12, 2013, 10:09:35 AM »
believe me, for years and years, survivors would shudder when baseball announcers would haphazardly throw out the cliche "this pitcher has ice in his veins"

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2990 on: April 12, 2013, 10:20:21 AM »
believe me, for years and years, survivors would shudder when baseball announcers would haphazardly throw out the cliche "this pitcher has ice in his veins"

 :ohno:

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2991 on: April 12, 2013, 12:03:52 PM »
so, Greinke vs. Carlos Quentin is my favorite thing ever  :love:

http://scores.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=330411125

Quentin is a dumbass.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17068
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2992 on: April 12, 2013, 12:39:52 PM »
reminds me of 2003, constantly checking the ESPN power rankings

I do it every season.  Huge  :emawkid: when KC moves into the top 25, which is rare.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2993 on: April 12, 2013, 12:59:01 PM »
Pro tip; don't be afraid to Royally excited.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2994 on: April 12, 2013, 02:40:17 PM »
Pro tip; don't be afraid to Royally excited.

I'M NOT AFRAID ANYMORE

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40563
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2995 on: April 12, 2013, 02:45:44 PM »
Pro tip; don't be afraid to Royally excited.

La Salle was the team I preferred playing, just looking at their numbers.

Cats 78 - La Salle 63

 :frown:

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2996 on: April 12, 2013, 02:47:59 PM »
Pro tip; don't be afraid to Royally excited.

La Salle was the team I preferred playing, just looking at their numbers.

Cats 78 - La Salle 63

 :frown:

I AM AFRAID AGAIN!!!!!!1

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2997 on: April 12, 2013, 03:30:36 PM »
Pro tip; don't be afraid to Royally excited.

Never am (afraid to be Royally excited)


Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2998 on: April 12, 2013, 11:40:17 PM »
In your rough ridin' face, Greinke!

You're the rough ridin' worst.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #2999 on: April 13, 2013, 12:56:15 AM »
I'm starting to like this team.