Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5834289 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46950 on: September 13, 2015, 08:18:28 PM »

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46951 on: September 13, 2015, 08:19:02 PM »
But how willing do you think Detroit was to trade Price within the Central?

dunno.  logically, they should have preferred to do so, since they could not only acquire useful players/prospects for themselves, but also deprive a division rival of those same players.  but i don't know if their mgmt was logical.

Norris was their #1 prospect, boyd appears to be SP material, and the other guy I couldnt find much on.  I'd say price was more expensive but it's hard to say how much.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46952 on: September 13, 2015, 08:19:33 PM »
Ned?
What about him?! Let Cueto's arm fall off.

that's Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
I mean, if he's going to pitch like dog crap the rest of the season, it's not our problem to save this rent a players arm. Obviously, we know he's capable of more, but we haven't really seen it yet.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46953 on: September 13, 2015, 08:20:12 PM »
He has given up 6 HRs in 9.0 Innings vs Balt this year.  :Ugh:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46954 on: September 13, 2015, 08:25:04 PM »
literally everyone thought he was the ace this staff was lacking.

cueto is not that good.  and he may be injured.

career he's a 3.81 fip pitcher, all in the national league.  he's good, but not "ace" good.  he doesn't have the career length, but medlen, for example, posted better numbers during the short time that he was healthy.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46955 on: September 13, 2015, 08:26:56 PM »
Ned?
What about him?! Let Cueto's arm fall off.

that's Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
I mean, if he's going to pitch like dog crap the rest of the season, it's not our problem to save this rent a players arm. Obviously, we know he's capable of more, but we haven't really seen it yet.

a)  it'd be nice to win this game, and b)  it'd be nice to get him pitching well before the playoffs.  so, leaving him out for his arm to fall off would be Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46956 on: September 13, 2015, 08:27:20 PM »
are you rough ridin' kidding me

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46957 on: September 13, 2015, 08:27:35 PM »
Another one. Enough is enough. Get him out of there.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46958 on: September 13, 2015, 08:28:02 PM »
He's a poor mans Guthrie.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46959 on: September 13, 2015, 08:28:16 PM »
Norris was their #1 prospect, boyd appears to be SP material, and the other guy I couldnt find much on.  I'd say price was more expensive but it's hard to say how much.

i think you're right.  norris seems better than anyone the royals gave up.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11098
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46960 on: September 13, 2015, 08:29:08 PM »
At least his last 3 HRs have been solo shots
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46961 on: September 13, 2015, 08:30:39 PM »
At least his last 3 HRs have been solo shots
#progress

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46962 on: September 13, 2015, 08:35:22 PM »
Cain's left leg takes such a beating, he is a foul ball machine.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46963 on: September 13, 2015, 08:36:11 PM »
I can't believe they are sending him back out there.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3820
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46964 on: September 13, 2015, 08:36:29 PM »
I'm not going back and looking for it, but I wasn't team #getcueto. I was just fine with the trade because I didn't think we gave up much for him.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46965 on: September 13, 2015, 08:36:41 PM »
Ms. Wacky: "Are they putting him back in?! Wtf?!" :lol:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46966 on: September 13, 2015, 08:38:31 PM »
I wanted Hamels because he had an extra year on his contract to trade next year for prospects.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46967 on: September 13, 2015, 08:39:03 PM »
Maybe ned is employing the rub the puppies nose in his own crap method of training tonight
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46968 on: September 13, 2015, 08:39:34 PM »
he's so dreamy  :love:



"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46969 on: September 13, 2015, 08:40:52 PM »
I wanted Hamels because he had an extra year on his contract to trade next year for prospects.
Well yeah, but we weren't going to pay his contract.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46970 on: September 13, 2015, 08:42:14 PM »
I wanted Hamels because he had an extra year on his contract to trade next year for prospects.
Well yeah, but we weren't going to pay his contract.

We only would have had to pay for less than half a season of it.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46971 on: September 13, 2015, 08:42:33 PM »
i'd much rather be listening to schilling talking about cueto's problems than these idiots, none of whom have ever pitched (maybe the woman has, don't know, don't care, different game).
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40561
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46972 on: September 13, 2015, 08:44:49 PM »
i'd much rather be listening to schilling talking about cueto's problems than these idiots, none of whom have ever pitched (maybe the woman has, don't know, don't care, different game).

Pedro would be the best possible guy imo

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46973 on: September 13, 2015, 08:46:19 PM »
Pedro would be the best possible guy imo

he'd be good, if he'd be honest.  i'm not sure he's willing to publicly criticize players.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #46974 on: September 13, 2015, 08:49:40 PM »
Roger Clemens
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best