Author Topic: Supreme Court Cases Thread  (Read 30228 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #575 on: June 26, 2022, 06:03:37 PM »
“Wacky married for $!” Lol. Dems are so stupid!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #576 on: June 26, 2022, 06:08:29 PM »


I know someone who was doing IVF and the pregnancy was ectopic and they needed to abort. It was really sad but good thing abortion was an option. (Because it would have killed her)

One of my best friends (in Kansas) boned his wife (raw dog; mutual sex tho) and got pregnant. They wanted the kid but suffered a miscarriage. Her doctor was reluctant to perform or refer a service because of the "age" of the fetus. She had to pass it at home. Imagine how traumatizing that is ...
Please point out the people who don’t think rare cases shouldn’t be treated differently. Let’s point and laugh at them together, bud! I love the idiocy of acting like people are doing it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think either of those examples are particularly rare

Mich according to peer reviewed research1 over 99% of abortions are recreational. There have been less than 30 people worldwide for whom an abortion was medically necessary.

1. He saw a Facebook meme that he shared and some ppl liked his post
You need Zoloft, bud!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #577 on: June 26, 2022, 06:12:45 PM »
Actually the lord, but let’s start simple for the small minded chodes


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6444
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #578 on: June 26, 2022, 06:31:15 PM »


I know someone who was doing IVF and the pregnancy was ectopic and they needed to abort. It was really sad but good thing abortion was an option. (Because it would have killed her)

One of my best friends (in Kansas) boned his wife (raw dog; mutual sex tho) and got pregnant. They wanted the kid but suffered a miscarriage. Her doctor was reluctant to perform or refer a service because of the "age" of the fetus. She had to pass it at home. Imagine how traumatizing that is ...
Please point out the people who don’t think rare cases shouldn’t be treated differently. Let’s point and laugh at them together, bud! I love the idiocy of acting like people are doing it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think either of those examples are particularly rare

Mich according to peer reviewed research1 over 99% of abortions are recreational. There have been less than 30 people worldwide for whom an abortion was medically necessary.

1. He saw a Facebook meme that he shared and some ppl liked his post
You’re seriously weird, bud. Sorry you killed a human in your past life fe


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There are enough layers of irony in this post it could cause haemochromatosis

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21242
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #579 on: June 26, 2022, 06:38:57 PM »

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6444
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #580 on: June 26, 2022, 06:58:02 PM »
Pure gold

Offline dal9

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1782
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #581 on: June 26, 2022, 07:18:12 PM »
guy spent $50K cuz he couldnt figure out which hole to put it in and he's out here giving life advice smh


Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6036
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #582 on: June 26, 2022, 07:20:03 PM »
I understand that he married her for money but really don't understand her motivations...

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #583 on: June 26, 2022, 07:22:37 PM »
guy spent $50K cuz he couldnt figure out which hole to put it in and he's out here giving life advice smh


You can’t be this rough ridin' incentive/stupid, right? JFC, the lefties are a joke!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #584 on: June 26, 2022, 07:24:42 PM »
I understand that he married her for money but really don't understand her motivations...
Spit in your hand more


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #585 on: June 26, 2022, 07:25:53 PM »
Good god wacky, take a breather. This whole “dem this” and “lefty that” isn’t a good look on you.

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6444
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #586 on: June 26, 2022, 07:28:05 PM »
guy spent $50K cuz he couldnt figure out which hole to put it in and he's out here giving life advice smh


You can’t be this rough ridin' incentive/stupid, right? JFC, the lefties are a joke!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Some external force provided motivation for him to say that

Offline dal9

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1782
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #587 on: June 26, 2022, 07:29:36 PM »
i've encountered plenty of sensitive people online and plenty of shitposters, but have never encountered a more sensitive shitposter...

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21242
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #588 on: June 26, 2022, 07:30:04 PM »

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6444
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #589 on: June 26, 2022, 07:38:49 PM »
Pure gold-digger

 :surprised:

Good thing they mutual'd, he got one of her kids, got her for 18 years

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14953
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #590 on: June 26, 2022, 08:01:49 PM »
I blew my entire early inheritance on a Mexican pizza at Taco Bell. #totallyworthit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19725
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #591 on: June 26, 2022, 08:07:44 PM »
When my wife’s parents kick it we will probably get stuck with a bill


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #592 on: June 26, 2022, 08:13:53 PM »
Pure gold-digger

 :surprised:

Good thing they mutual'd, he got one of her kids, got her for 18 years
Why are you such a d bag? Like what’s the advantage of being one?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #593 on: June 26, 2022, 10:21:34 PM »
Honestly, not gaf about ppl wanting to reproduce is a crap move by most of you


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21242
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #594 on: June 26, 2022, 10:32:32 PM »
Everybody: raw dog your spouses right now. Or don't. I don't care.

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6444
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #595 on: June 26, 2022, 10:45:29 PM »
Pure gold-digger

 :surprised:

Good thing they mutual'd, he got one of her kids, got her for 18 years
Why are you such a d bag? Like what’s the advantage of being one?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Please lift me up in prayer (if you haven't done so already)

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6928
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #596 on: June 26, 2022, 10:48:54 PM »
Pro-life or not, the abortion ban will:

* Threaten IVF
* Increase maternal death rates in ectopic pregnancies and other related complications
* Facilitate unsafe, back alley abortions which will increase maternal deaths

Anyone who thinks states banning abortion will put in concessions for things like rape or incest is wishful thinking.

In the end, dudes have no business being part of this decision.  Additionally religion should not play a part in this decision.  I wish there was a way for females to be the only ones to vote on this.




Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51411
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #597 on: June 26, 2022, 11:04:16 PM »
trying to catch up

SCOTUS totally dunked on Spracs

Nicname has gone full libertarian

Wacky married for money

anything else I miss?

IVF is baby killing and it has got the anti Roe people tantruming.

Otherwise yup

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #598 on: June 27, 2022, 08:22:04 AM »
Bad look for super lefties yesterday on this board. Woof! Openly hating on someone for no reason. Sad!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #599 on: June 27, 2022, 08:23:01 AM »
trying to catch up

SCOTUS totally dunked on Spracs

Nicname has gone full libertarian

Wacky married for money

anything else I miss?

IVF is baby killing and it has got the anti Roe people tantruming.

Otherwise yup
Let’s point and laugh at those people on here together! Who was it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk