0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
My wife and I spent over $50,000 to be able to have a child. We value life. Stop 1%’ing cases to try and prove your point. Most cases are due to carelessness/laziness and dumb people having sex. Mostly libs!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Spracne on June 26, 2022, 03:06:38 PMQuote from: dal9 on June 26, 2022, 02:45:46 PMQuote from: Spracne on June 26, 2022, 02:16:38 PMQuote from: DQ12 on June 26, 2022, 09:49:58 AMAgreed. I always thought Miranda was just an evidentiary issue. I haven’t read the opinion though.§ 1983i think they were asking what u could actually sue for if the evidence is thrown out. the point is, sometimes the evidence is mistakenly admitted and a person spends time in prison, for which they could (previously) seek compensation (as in the case the Supreme Court heard)They = Dlew?In that particular case, the evidence was admitted, though the defendant was acquitted, nonetheless.I worked on § 1983 cases while clerking at the Solicitor General's office, and the injury can simply be the deprivation of an established right.I'm not sure if I'm fully understanding your response, so please let me know if that's the case.yeah that's what i meant.i thought the guy spent time in prison in the case--must have misread or misrememberedbut do people ever recover anything, under 1983, for deprivation of an established right if they can't point to concrete financial damages?
Quote from: dal9 on June 26, 2022, 02:45:46 PMQuote from: Spracne on June 26, 2022, 02:16:38 PMQuote from: DQ12 on June 26, 2022, 09:49:58 AMAgreed. I always thought Miranda was just an evidentiary issue. I haven’t read the opinion though.§ 1983i think they were asking what u could actually sue for if the evidence is thrown out. the point is, sometimes the evidence is mistakenly admitted and a person spends time in prison, for which they could (previously) seek compensation (as in the case the Supreme Court heard)They = Dlew?In that particular case, the evidence was admitted, though the defendant was acquitted, nonetheless.I worked on § 1983 cases while clerking at the Solicitor General's office, and the injury can simply be the deprivation of an established right.I'm not sure if I'm fully understanding your response, so please let me know if that's the case.
Quote from: Spracne on June 26, 2022, 02:16:38 PMQuote from: DQ12 on June 26, 2022, 09:49:58 AMAgreed. I always thought Miranda was just an evidentiary issue. I haven’t read the opinion though.§ 1983i think they were asking what u could actually sue for if the evidence is thrown out. the point is, sometimes the evidence is mistakenly admitted and a person spends time in prison, for which they could (previously) seek compensation (as in the case the Supreme Court heard)
Quote from: DQ12 on June 26, 2022, 09:49:58 AMAgreed. I always thought Miranda was just an evidentiary issue. I haven’t read the opinion though.§ 1983
Agreed. I always thought Miranda was just an evidentiary issue. I haven’t read the opinion though.
Look, if you spent $50k to try and have a kid, you’re 1%ing, just own it. It’s fine
Quote from: 8manpick on June 26, 2022, 04:14:17 PMLook, if you spent $50k to try and have a kid, you’re 1%ing, just own it. It’s fineOr, if you like, get an "early inheritance"
Quote from: michigancat on June 26, 2022, 04:33:47 PMQuote from: 8manpick on June 26, 2022, 04:14:17 PMLook, if you spent $50k to try and have a kid, you’re 1%ing, just own it. It’s fineOr, if you like, get an "early inheritance"Bootstraps, you mean?
Quote from: michigancat on June 26, 2022, 04:33:47 PMQuote from: 8manpick on June 26, 2022, 04:14:17 PMLook, if you spent $50k to try and have a kid, you’re 1%ing, just own it. It’s fineOr, if you like, get an "early inheritance"People who had college paid for, for their entire life checking in! Especially living in the two most expensive cities in the US. So shunned!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know someone who was doing IVF and the pregnancy was ectopic and they needed to abort. It was really sad but good thing abortion was an option. (Because it would have killed her)
We used my wife’s early inheritance to make it happen. Kinda not funny, guys! I’m disappointed in you two!Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: michigancat on June 26, 2022, 04:47:46 PMI know someone who was doing IVF and the pregnancy was ectopic and they needed to abort. It was really sad but good thing abortion was an option. (Because it would have killed her)One of my best friends (in Kansas) boned his wife (raw dog; mutual sex tho) and got pregnant. They wanted the kid but suffered a miscarriage. Her doctor was reluctant to perform or refer a service because of the "age" of the fetus. She had to pass it at home. Imagine how traumatizing that is ...
Quote from: 420seriouscat69 on June 26, 2022, 04:11:37 PMWe used my wife’s early inheritance to make it happen. Kinda not funny, guys! I’m disappointed in you two!Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkImagine what kind of genetic stud/freak you must be for a woman to fork over that much cash to be impregnated by you. #King
Quote from: Spracne on June 26, 2022, 04:51:24 PMQuote from: michigancat on June 26, 2022, 04:47:46 PMI know someone who was doing IVF and the pregnancy was ectopic and they needed to abort. It was really sad but good thing abortion was an option. (Because it would have killed her)One of my best friends (in Kansas) boned his wife (raw dog; mutual sex tho) and got pregnant. They wanted the kid but suffered a miscarriage. Her doctor was reluctant to perform or refer a service because of the "age" of the fetus. She had to pass it at home. Imagine how traumatizing that is ...Please point out the people who don’t think rare cases shouldn’t be treated differently. Let’s point and laugh at them together, bud! I love the idiocy of acting like people are doing it.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: 420seriouscat69 on June 26, 2022, 04:56:08 PMQuote from: Spracne on June 26, 2022, 04:51:24 PMQuote from: michigancat on June 26, 2022, 04:47:46 PMI know someone who was doing IVF and the pregnancy was ectopic and they needed to abort. It was really sad but good thing abortion was an option. (Because it would have killed her)One of my best friends (in Kansas) boned his wife (raw dog; mutual sex tho) and got pregnant. They wanted the kid but suffered a miscarriage. Her doctor was reluctant to perform or refer a service because of the "age" of the fetus. She had to pass it at home. Imagine how traumatizing that is ...Please point out the people who don’t think rare cases shouldn’t be treated differently. Let’s point and laugh at them together, bud! I love the idiocy of acting like people are doing it.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkI don't think either of those examples are particularly rare
Quote from: michigancat on June 26, 2022, 05:01:20 PMQuote from: 420seriouscat69 on June 26, 2022, 04:56:08 PMQuote from: Spracne on June 26, 2022, 04:51:24 PMQuote from: michigancat on June 26, 2022, 04:47:46 PMI know someone who was doing IVF and the pregnancy was ectopic and they needed to abort. It was really sad but good thing abortion was an option. (Because it would have killed her)One of my best friends (in Kansas) boned his wife (raw dog; mutual sex tho) and got pregnant. They wanted the kid but suffered a miscarriage. Her doctor was reluctant to perform or refer a service because of the "age" of the fetus. She had to pass it at home. Imagine how traumatizing that is ...Please point out the people who don’t think rare cases shouldn’t be treated differently. Let’s point and laugh at them together, bud! I love the idiocy of acting like people are doing it.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkI don't think either of those examples are particularly rareMich according to peer reviewed research1 over 99% of abortions are recreational. There have been less than 30 people worldwide for whom an abortion was medically necessary.1. He saw a Facebook meme that he shared and some ppl liked his post
trying to catch upSCOTUS totally dunked on Spracs Nicname has gone full libertarianWacky married for moneyanything else I miss?
Quote from: LickNeckey on June 26, 2022, 05:41:48 PMtrying to catch upSCOTUS totally dunked on Spracs Nicname has gone full libertarianWacky married for moneyanything else I miss?To be fair I was admittedly drunken edgelording last night. Still, I’ve always leaned pretty hard into libertarianism when it comes to the fed gov. I did go full send for Bernie and later Tulsi in 2016/2020.