Author Topic: Supreme Court Cases Thread  (Read 73216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32513
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1225 on: June 28, 2025, 11:54:33 AM »
Does this mean that if any certain state doesn’t file a lawsuit within 30days of any EO, the. That EO is effectively law in those states?  Wouldn’t this essentially make Don the law in most of the states?

No? What I'm saying is what's to stop a putative (would-be) plaintiff with standing from seeking certification of a class of persons similarly situated, i.e., persons affected by the particular policy or law at issue? The effect of that would be a nationwide injunction that bars government action against a person only if that person is a (named or unnamed) member of the class (and the class is comprised of only persons affected by the policy/law, to begin with). Does that make sense?

I read this and realized how clams feels reading the farming thread
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22867
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1226 on: June 28, 2025, 12:07:51 PM »
Appreciate your comments here Spracs. What about the ruling for parents afraid of gay people? If they can pull their kids from classes that mention gay people, can people pull their kids from class rooms that teach or mention religion?

If this is another decision that came down yesterday, I haven't read it. What's the case name?


https://www.npr.org/2025/06/27/nx-s1-5430355/scotus-opt-out-schools

This fuckery is mumped up but expected. Alito (writing for the Court) and Thomas are both zealots in the Christian Nationalist mold. ACB and Kavdawg are like Alito-lite, and Gorsuch and Roberts are just your run-of-the-mill conservatives. This is just the latest in a series of cases in which the Court has allowed Christian teachings and symbols to permeate secular areas of public life, purportedly in service of the First Amendment but actually in derogation thereof.

The low 'THWOMP' of the Christo-fascist drum beats slowly but steadily ...
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline Stupid Fitz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6834
  • Go Cats
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1227 on: June 28, 2025, 02:09:41 PM »
Appreciate your comments here Spracs. What about the ruling for parents afraid of gay people? If they can pull their kids from classes that mention gay people, can people pull their kids from class rooms that teach or mention religion?

If this is another decision that came down yesterday, I haven't read it. What's the case name?
Docket6969 weirdo snowflakes vs people they hate to make themselves feel superior


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59533
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1229 on: July 08, 2025, 06:03:53 PM »
StupidFitz is so deranged that apparently he can’t recall that multiple #blueanon icons spearheaded a substantial effort to downsize the Federal government once upon a time.

Intelligent viewers of this blog are invited to join me in recalling that out of control government hiring was the only thing that prevented the Biden years from being an unmitigated job “growth” disaster.

I’m also sensing a growing theme.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk