That was all discussed in the article I posted.
Your movement is painting this out to be like it was bunch of people roaming the halls with AK's and M-16's.
You can move the goalposts however you want. I merely answered your question with evidence.
If moving the goalposts is simply referencing the breakdown of those arrests in the article I posted, then so be it I suppose.
Moving the goalposts is you asking if anyone had been charged with possessing weapons in the Capitol, being shown that people were, then being dissatisfied with the answer.
The article I posted addressed the specifics about those arrests, you didn't read the article.
Lol, ok Dax. I literally pointed out that your article addressed those arrests. You asked about weapons charges, I posted a link where one of the charges was exactly entering a restricted building without lawful authority while carrying a dangerous weapon. I don't know what more you want.
So was it an armed insurrection, waks
1. A so called weapon was not even indentified, but the charge was made
2. Tazer gun in possession, unused
3. A baseball bat and pepper spray, no indication if it was even used
4. Evidence almost exclusively obtained from 3rd parties and social media
5. Incident occurred outside the Capitol-baseball bat
6. Spraying a fire extinguisher
7. Baseball bat on a window
8. Throwing a fire extinguisher
Does that define an armed insurrection? Does that need a 9-11 style commission?