Author Topic: capitol riot  (Read 127172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1225 on: February 23, 2021, 12:40:29 AM »
Rainman.7:  In full pearl clutching and closed mind mode.

1000% on brand


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1226 on: February 23, 2021, 12:41:52 AM »
Where do you find these places dax?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1227 on: February 23, 2021, 12:42:34 AM »
Where do you find these places dax?

Rainmain.7:  Moving to deflection mode

Predictable as the sunrise


Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3436
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1228 on: February 23, 2021, 12:43:26 AM »
That was all discussed in the article I posted.

Your movement is painting this out to be like it was bunch of people roaming the halls with AK's and M-16's.
You can move the goalposts however you want. I merely answered your question with evidence.

If moving the goalposts is simply referencing the breakdown of those arrests in the article I posted, then so be it I suppose.
Moving the goalposts is you asking if anyone had been charged with possessing weapons in the Capitol, being shown that people were, then being dissatisfied with the answer.

The article I posted addressed the specifics about those arrests, you didn't read the article.
Lol, ok Dax. I literally pointed out that your article addressed those arrests. You asked about weapons charges, I posted a link where one of the charges was verbatim:
Quote
entering a restricted building without lawful authority while carrying a dangerous weapon

I don't know what more you want.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1229 on: February 23, 2021, 12:44:49 AM »
We'll get your secret some day
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1230 on: February 23, 2021, 12:51:35 AM »
That was all discussed in the article I posted.

Your movement is painting this out to be like it was bunch of people roaming the halls with AK's and M-16's.
You can move the goalposts however you want. I merely answered your question with evidence.

If moving the goalposts is simply referencing the breakdown of those arrests in the article I posted, then so be it I suppose.
Moving the goalposts is you asking if anyone had been charged with possessing weapons in the Capitol, being shown that people were, then being dissatisfied with the answer.

The article I posted addressed the specifics about those arrests, you didn't read the article.
Lol, ok Dax. I literally pointed out that your article addressed those arrests. You asked about weapons charges, I posted a link where one of the charges was exactly entering a restricted building without lawful authority while carrying a dangerous weapon. I don't know what more you want.

So was it an armed insurrection, waks

1.  A so called weapon was not even indentified, but the charge was made

2.  Tazer gun in possession, unused

3.  A baseball bat and pepper spray, no indication if it was even used

4.  Evidence almost exclusively obtained from 3rd parties and social media

5.  Incident occurred outside the Capitol-baseball bat

6.  Spraying a fire extinguisher

7.  Baseball bat on a window

8.  Throwing a fire extinguisher

Does that define an armed insurrection?   Does that need a 9-11 style commission?












Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1231 on: February 23, 2021, 12:52:13 AM »
Where do you find these places dax?

I'm sure you will StalkerBoy Weirdo




Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1232 on: February 23, 2021, 12:54:31 AM »
2.  Tazer gun in possession, unused

@dickstone, can you confirm?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3436
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1233 on: February 23, 2021, 01:17:26 AM »
That was all discussed in the article I posted.

Your movement is painting this out to be like it was bunch of people roaming the halls with AK's and M-16's.
You can move the goalposts however you want. I merely answered your question with evidence.

If moving the goalposts is simply referencing the breakdown of those arrests in the article I posted, then so be it I suppose.
Moving the goalposts is you asking if anyone had been charged with possessing weapons in the Capitol, being shown that people were, then being dissatisfied with the answer.

The article I posted addressed the specifics about those arrests, you didn't read the article.
Lol, ok Dax. I literally pointed out that your article addressed those arrests. You asked about weapons charges, I posted a link where one of the charges was exactly entering a restricted building without lawful authority while carrying a dangerous weapon. I don't know what more you want.

So was it an armed insurrection, waks

1.  A so called weapon was not even indentified, but the charge was made

2.  Tazer gun in possession, unused

3.  A baseball bat and pepper spray, no indication if it was even used

4.  Evidence almost exclusively obtained from 3rd parties and social media

5.  Incident occurred outside the Capitol-baseball bat

6.  Spraying a fire extinguisher

7.  Baseball bat on a window

8.  Throwing a fire extinguisher

Does that define an armed insurrection?   Does that need a 9-11 style commission?
Like I said, you can move the goalposts however you want. You asked if anyone was charged with possessing a weapon on Capitol grounds. I provided links confirming that people were.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1234 on: February 23, 2021, 02:46:19 AM »
That was all discussed in the article I posted.

Your movement is painting this out to be like it was bunch of people roaming the halls with AK's and M-16's.
You can move the goalposts however you want. I merely answered your question with evidence.

If moving the goalposts is simply referencing the breakdown of those arrests in the article I posted, then so be it I suppose.
Moving the goalposts is you asking if anyone had been charged with possessing weapons in the Capitol, being shown that people were, then being dissatisfied with the answer.

The article I posted addressed the specifics about those arrests, you didn't read the article.
Lol, ok Dax. I literally pointed out that your article addressed those arrests. You asked about weapons charges, I posted a link where one of the charges was exactly entering a restricted building without lawful authority while carrying a dangerous weapon. I don't know what more you want.

So was it an armed insurrection, waks

1.  A so called weapon was not even indentified, but the charge was made

2.  Tazer gun in possession, unused

3.  A baseball bat and pepper spray, no indication if it was even used

4.  Evidence almost exclusively obtained from 3rd parties and social media

5.  Incident occurred outside the Capitol-baseball bat

6.  Spraying a fire extinguisher

7.  Baseball bat on a window

8.  Throwing a fire extinguisher

Does that define an armed insurrection?   Does that need a 9-11 style commission?
Like I said, you can move the goalposts however you want. You asked if anyone was charged with possessing a weapon on Capitol grounds. I provided links confirming that people were.

eff your facts.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1235 on: February 23, 2021, 06:19:35 AM »
I feel bad for Xi and Putin.  Spending all those billions on weapons.   When they could show up with a couple of extra fire extinguishers and a couple of Louisville Sluggers and take down the United States with ease.

Why did AQ need jetliners when a couple of burning trash cans would’ve done the job.

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8559
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1236 on: February 23, 2021, 08:25:05 AM »
Quote
Julie Kelly and Dinesh D’Souza on America’s Political Prisoners

Lol
Does Dinesh D'Souza believe anything that he says? I'm convinced everything he says/does is part of a grift.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1237 on: February 23, 2021, 08:26:35 AM »
Quote
Julie Kelly and Dinesh D’Souza on America’s Political Prisoners

Lol
Does Dinesh D'Souza believe anything that he says? I'm convinced everything he says/does is part of a grift.

So, like the Lincoln Project (among many) then?


Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1238 on: February 23, 2021, 08:30:28 AM »
Quote
Julie Kelly and Dinesh D’Souza on America’s Political Prisoners

Lol
Does Dinesh D'Souza believe anything that he says? I'm convinced everything he says/does is part of a grift.

No, he believes it, he's a legit coconut. He was on this bullshit far before 2016.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1239 on: February 23, 2021, 08:30:34 AM »
Imagine supporting a political party that wants to spend (approx) $568 million dollars on a National Guard deployment that will protect its leaders from non-existent bogey people.

While also conducting a 9-11 style commission to investigate people who can't walk without taz'ing themselves in the nutsack and who 'attack' with a couple of baseball bats and a fire extinguisher or two.

Imagine supporting a party that believes that a nation with a trillion plus dollar defense-intelligence-domestic policing force can't defend itself from some guys with a couple of baseball bats.

SMDH


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1240 on: February 23, 2021, 08:32:41 AM »
So now they do exist?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1241 on: February 23, 2021, 08:36:56 AM »
So now they do exist?

The fact that you continue to stay on this course is  :lol: :lol:

(you won't answer this) please tell me where I said they didn't exist.  Link?


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1242 on: February 23, 2021, 09:15:27 AM »
Do you really need a link to this thread?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9524
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1243 on: February 23, 2021, 09:21:17 AM »
The former Capitol Police Chief Sund's description


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1244 on: February 23, 2021, 09:22:53 AM »
Do you really need a link to this thread?

Turns up both the deflecto shields and the tapouts in one post.

Typical, but still impressive

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1245 on: February 23, 2021, 09:26:47 AM »
The former Capitol Police Chief Sund's description



Wasn't this guy fired?

The known weapons were:  A couple of baseball bats, a fire extinguisher and apparently a tazer gun

Yet this is going to start a 9-11 style inquiry?? 






Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1246 on: February 23, 2021, 09:35:00 AM »
These people didn't even succeed in overthrowing the government. Everyone needs to just let it go and move on.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1247 on: February 23, 2021, 09:36:00 AM »
I think what Dax is trying to say is eff blue lives, they don't matter at all. TRUMP 2024 BAY-BEE!!!

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52957
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1248 on: February 23, 2021, 09:50:00 AM »
January 6th 2021:  The day SFB MIR and the rest of ProgFacist Nation actually wanted the police called, and actually cared about them.

A few baseball bats and fire extinguishers stands on the same level as terrorists flying jet liners into massive buildings that killed thousands upon thousands of people and kicked started a 20 year and counting $20 to $30 trillion dollar world wide odyssey that has killed millions and displaced millions more.   Only from the mind of the hyper-partisan ProgFascist






Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #1249 on: February 23, 2021, 10:23:37 AM »
Dax, what weapons did the barely existent 9-11 hijackers use?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite