Author Topic: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff  (Read 29957 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30371
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #375 on: November 05, 2020, 05:50:01 PM »
He's going to run again. Hopefully republicans narrowly reject him and he goes 3rd party

If the ‘rona couldn’t kill him he may live to 100
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44879
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #376 on: November 05, 2020, 05:54:22 PM »
the moderate-progressive split didn't mean much in the house over the last two years, because trump.  with a smaller caucus and a less salient common enemy, things could heat up.

https://twitter.com/ericawerner/status/1324439295847968768

LOL, why is Abigail acting like this is her first election? Defunding the police was never part of any platform anywhere, it was an activist talking point that the pubs used against the dems, that crap happens every single election. I'm guessing the reason she was in a close election has less to do about what activists say and think and more about she's the type to blame others for her nearly losing.

These idiots making policy decisions based on what mean ads the super pacs will run is exactly why they, unlike republicans, have spent the last 30 years not getting dick done.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44879
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #377 on: November 05, 2020, 05:56:12 PM »
He's going to run again. Hopefully republicans narrowly reject him and he goes 3rd party

No chance. There will be trump republicans that will run though, certainly a woman, someone like Sarah Sanders.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85296
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #378 on: November 05, 2020, 05:56:50 PM »
I'm 100% certain Ivanka will run

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30371
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #379 on: November 05, 2020, 06:25:36 PM »
I figured it would be Nikki Haley
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40504
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #380 on: November 05, 2020, 06:42:38 PM »
I'm guessing the reason she was in a close election has less to do about what activists say and think and more about she's the type to blame others for her nearly losing.

it was a close election because she represents a (slightly) red district.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40504
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #381 on: November 05, 2020, 06:45:14 PM »
it was a close election because she represents a (slightly) red district.

also, she's been in congress for two years.  she's no more responsible for not getting dick done than omar is.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9553
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #382 on: November 05, 2020, 06:49:11 PM »
I think Trump's base is fool's gold, anyway. Pursuing them probably helps the republicans keep the senate, but the presidency is always going to be a long shot if they plan on continuing to run somebody who doesn't have the slightest prayer of winning the popular vote. It feels like Trump came close in this one, but really by late Tuesday it was apparent that the odds were not in his favor at all. Planning on winning the number of close states that their current strategy requires is like betting a parlay.

Increased access to voting helped Democrats, imo. I mean, you had a month to vote. I don't think this many people will be able to vote in 2 or 4 years.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37086
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #383 on: November 05, 2020, 06:56:02 PM »
I think Trump's base is fool's gold, anyway. Pursuing them probably helps the republicans keep the senate, but the presidency is always going to be a long shot if they plan on continuing to run somebody who doesn't have the slightest prayer of winning the popular vote. It feels like Trump came close in this one, but really by late Tuesday it was apparent that the odds were not in his favor at all. Planning on winning the number of close states that their current strategy requires is like betting a parlay.

Increased access to voting helped Democrats, imo. I mean, you had a month to vote. I don't think this many people will be able to vote in 2 or 4 years.

It's really hard to say it helped the democrats more than the repulicans.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9553
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #384 on: November 05, 2020, 07:01:51 PM »
I think Trump's base is fool's gold, anyway. Pursuing them probably helps the republicans keep the senate, but the presidency is always going to be a long shot if they plan on continuing to run somebody who doesn't have the slightest prayer of winning the popular vote. It feels like Trump came close in this one, but really by late Tuesday it was apparent that the odds were not in his favor at all. Planning on winning the number of close states that their current strategy requires is like betting a parlay.

Increased access to voting helped Democrats, imo. I mean, you had a month to vote. I don't think this many people will be able to vote in 2 or 4 years.

It's really hard to say it helped the democrats more than the repulicans.

You think all of those democrats would have showed up on election day? This was the most free, most fair election in the countries history.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #385 on: November 05, 2020, 07:05:12 PM »
Joe manchin would be an automatic no on any progressive legislation

You are truly a dipshit, dumb troll clown.

You disagree??  WV is red by a huge margin.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13555
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #386 on: November 05, 2020, 07:07:22 PM »
Also, you’re a crazy person and should seek help

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37086
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #387 on: November 05, 2020, 07:21:09 PM »
I think Trump's base is fool's gold, anyway. Pursuing them probably helps the republicans keep the senate, but the presidency is always going to be a long shot if they plan on continuing to run somebody who doesn't have the slightest prayer of winning the popular vote. It feels like Trump came close in this one, but really by late Tuesday it was apparent that the odds were not in his favor at all. Planning on winning the number of close states that their current strategy requires is like betting a parlay.

Increased access to voting helped Democrats, imo. I mean, you had a month to vote. I don't think this many people will be able to vote in 2 or 4 years.

It's really hard to say it helped the democrats more than the repulicans.

You think all of those democrats would have showed up on election day? This was the most free, most fair election in the countries history.

No, but the repulicans wouldn't have, either.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85296
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #388 on: November 05, 2020, 08:49:48 PM »
no idea if these people are up for election or anything but what a world

https://twitter.com/davejourno/status/1324509281996124160

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9553
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #389 on: November 05, 2020, 09:00:08 PM »
I think Trump's base is fool's gold, anyway. Pursuing them probably helps the republicans keep the senate, but the presidency is always going to be a long shot if they plan on continuing to run somebody who doesn't have the slightest prayer of winning the popular vote. It feels like Trump came close in this one, but really by late Tuesday it was apparent that the odds were not in his favor at all. Planning on winning the number of close states that their current strategy requires is like betting a parlay.

Increased access to voting helped Democrats, imo. I mean, you had a month to vote. I don't think this many people will be able to vote in 2 or 4 years.

It's really hard to say it helped the democrats more than the repulicans.

You think all of those democrats would have showed up on election day? This was the most free, most fair election in the countries history.

No, but the repulicans wouldn't have, either.

I think it favors democrats.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63968
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #390 on: November 05, 2020, 09:03:36 PM »
no idea if these people are up for election or anything but what a world

https://twitter.com/davejourno/status/1324509281996124160

That dude has a long history of getting caught and re-elected
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40504
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #391 on: November 05, 2020, 09:09:03 PM »
rumors that gp bush is going to kill and bury him next election.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41981
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21912
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #393 on: November 05, 2020, 10:50:42 PM »
Gross keeps saying that he's going to win. Sure would be nice.

https://twitter.com/NormOrnstein/status/1324563691719790592

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44879
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #394 on: November 06, 2020, 03:55:37 AM »
I'm guessing the reason she was in a close election has less to do about what activists say and think and more about she's the type to blame others for her nearly losing.

it was a close election because she represents a (slightly) red district.

I think you need to tell Abby Spanbarger this, she's the one blaming activists, not me.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44879
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #395 on: November 06, 2020, 04:12:11 AM »
Joe manchin would be an automatic no on any progressive legislation

You are truly a dipshit, dumb troll clown.

You disagree??  WV is red by a huge margin.

Of course I agree, you idiot. I called you a dipshit because your point was basic and overly simplistic. Yet, you somehow made it worse by saying that he will vote that way because "WV is red by a huge margin." They've had two Republican senators and two Republican governors the last 40 years, that's the same as Massachusetts.

Everyone reading this board knows that Manchin is a centrist. I'm interested in what you consider "progressive legislation" though. Do you really think a man who represents one of the poorest states in the country, with notoriously limited and expensive access to healthcare would vote no on a public option?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53147
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #396 on: November 06, 2020, 06:53:08 AM »
Also, you’re a crazy person and should seek help
1000% correct

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14953
    • View Profile

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
:adios:

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63968
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 (non-presidential) elections stuff
« Reply #399 on: November 06, 2020, 07:57:09 AM »
BRB moving to Georgia
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite