dax you are being extra weird in this thread
Let's see:
You said the largest terrorist organization directly tied to state sponsorship (outside of the militaries of nation states that some or many would call terrorists) in the world was nothing to worry about.
The second article I posted said this:
Exposing the full extent of the Maduro government’s relationship with Hezbollah and the entanglement of senior officials with the group will make a strong argument in favor of Guaido, because Hezbollah is involved in serious criminal activity in Venezuela (and elsewhere), including drug trafficking, money laundering and arms smuggling. The US in particular will feel obligated to address more forcefully Hezbollah’s presence in Venezuela. If the US is going around the Middle East and elsewhere to counter the malign activities of Iran and its proxies, and their attempts to circumvent US sanctions, it should do the same in Venezuela, virtually America’s own backyard.
Regardless of how the Venezuelan crisis evolves, the US and its allies should redouble their efforts to counter Hezbollah’s attempts to increase its influence and malign activities in Venezuela.
If there's no concern, then why is this author taking that position?
cRusty said:I mean that basically said the same non-scary stuff the other article did. Venezuelan Hezbollah is no threat to the US at all.
How could anyone read that Arab News article and have what you said be the take away?