Author Topic: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats (Read 543833 times)

turnbull · « **Reply #7175 on:** April 17, 2020, 02:59:43 PM »

Then explain Ron Johnson's support

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on April 17, 2020, 02:56:22 PM

Quote from: turnbull on April 17, 2020, 12:20:38 PM
QuidProJOe.....love that since you know nothing of it is true.

1. He acted in official US Government capacity in US Policy interests.
2. It was supported Bipartisanly (even Ron Johnson the Republican from Wisconsin signed the damn letter)
3. It was supported and encouraged by the European Union and International Monetary Fund to remove the prosecutor who was not you know....prosecuting corruption...
4. Burisma's investigation was already over (Fact)....so i mean i guess that could have mean Joe was trying to get the prosecutor removed for not prosecuting Burisma? (Opinion)

But facts are a stubborn thing.

The obfuscation of what was clearly a shake down are quite

The EU and IMF "support" of the removal was based on perception of the prosecutor and those perceptions (for lack of a better word) were dubious at best. There's two sides to every story and supporters of Quid Pro Joe only hear one side.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7176 on:** April 17, 2020, 03:37:02 PM »

Quote from: turnbull on April 17, 2020, 02:59:43 PM

Then explain Ron Johnson's support

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on April 17, 2020, 02:56:22 PM
Quote from: turnbull on April 17, 2020, 12:20:38 PM
QuidProJOe.....love that since you know nothing of it is true.

1. He acted in official US Government capacity in US Policy interests.
2. It was supported Bipartisanly (even Ron Johnson the Republican from Wisconsin signed the damn letter)
3. It was supported and encouraged by the European Union and International Monetary Fund to remove the prosecutor who was not you know....prosecuting corruption...
4. Burisma's investigation was already over (Fact)....so i mean i guess that could have mean Joe was trying to get the prosecutor removed for not prosecuting Burisma? (Opinion)

But facts are a stubborn thing.

The obfuscation of what was clearly a shake down are quite

The EU and IMF "support" of the removal was based on perception of the prosecutor and those perceptions (for lack of a better word) were dubious at best. There's two sides to every story and supporters of Quid Pro Joe only hear one side.

Senator Ron Johnson?

Throwing around accusations of corruption in the Ukraine is easier than predicting Bud Light will be consumed at a NASCAR race.

You're gonna have to do a lot better than better than just unilaterally declare a Ukrainian politician corrupt.