Author Topic: Trump owns Russia (Read 772417 times)

Phil Titola · « **Reply #4050 on:** January 24, 2018, 11:05:15 AM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 24, 2018, 10:57:05 AM

Here’s a great write up of what happened with firing Flynn and Comey.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/flynn-kept-fbi-interview-concealed-white-house-trump-n840491

Much of the info in this article was likely leaked by Mueller’s team, and the article seems to suggest that these firings may be at the root of an obstruction of justice probe. Except that even if the President asked (or ordered) Comey to drop the Russia matter, and even if he fired Comey because of the Russia matter, and even if he fired Flynn for privately meeting with the FBI without an attorney present - none of that would be obstruction of justice.

Inappropriate? If you believe there’s substance to the KGB Kollusion Kaper, sure. But if you don’t, if you think this is all just a politically motivated bullshit narrative to undermine Trump’s presidency, then it was absolutely appropriate. And therein lies the rub. Even this article seems to concede that Trump did these things not to hide something, but because he thinks it’s all bullshit.

Yes.. This is exactly the end all be all summary...shut it down Mueller! It's over

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #4051 on:** January 24, 2018, 11:35:29 AM »

Quote from: catastrophe on January 24, 2018, 11:00:45 AM

So are you saying if the FBI asked me for a file because they thought it was useful in their case, I could burn it without giving it to them if I am sure it did not contain anything useful?

Can co this is how legal system works

Yard Dog · « **Reply #4052 on:** January 24, 2018, 12:26:25 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on January 24, 2018, 11:35:29 AM

Quote from: catastrophe on January 24, 2018, 11:00:45 AM
So are you saying if the FBI asked me for a file because they thought it was useful in their case, I could burn it without giving it to them if I am sure it did not contain anything useful?

Can co this is how legal system works

Is this about Hillary's emails?

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #4053 on:** January 24, 2018, 12:57:33 PM »

Quote from: Yard Dog on January 24, 2018, 12:26:25 PM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on January 24, 2018, 11:35:29 AM
Quote from: catastrophe on January 24, 2018, 11:00:45 AM
So are you saying if the FBI asked me for a file because they thought it was useful in their case, I could burn it without giving it to them if I am sure it did not contain anything useful?

Can co this is how legal system works

Is this about Hillary's emails?

Doesn’t apply to her she guilty lock her up

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #4054 on:** January 24, 2018, 02:38:08 PM »

Quote from: catastrophe on January 24, 2018, 11:00:45 AM

So are you saying if the FBI asked me for a file because they thought it was useful in their case, I could burn it without giving it to them if I am sure it did not contain anything useful?

No, you can't do that. That would be destruction of evidence, which I'm not aware is being alleged.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #4055 on:** January 24, 2018, 02:40:25 PM »

Quote from: Phil Titola on January 24, 2018, 11:05:15 AM

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 24, 2018, 10:57:05 AM
Here’s a great write up of what happened with firing Flynn and Comey.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/flynn-kept-fbi-interview-concealed-white-house-trump-n840491

Much of the info in this article was likely leaked by Mueller’s team, and the article seems to suggest that these firings may be at the root of an obstruction of justice probe. Except that even if the President asked (or ordered) Comey to drop the Russia matter, and even if he fired Comey because of the Russia matter, and even if he fired Flynn for privately meeting with the FBI without an attorney present - none of that would be obstruction of justice.

Inappropriate? If you believe there’s substance to the KGB Kollusion Kaper, sure. But if you don’t, if you think this is all just a politically motivated bullshit narrative to undermine Trump’s presidency, then it was absolutely appropriate. And therein lies the rub. Even this article seems to concede that Trump did these things not to hide something, but because he thinks it’s all bullshit.
Yes.. This is exactly the end all be all summary...shut it down Mueller! It's over

I didn't say that. But considering the news outlet, I just you might find the (relatively benign) story more credible.

steve dave · « **Reply #4056 on:** January 24, 2018, 02:40:48 PM »

catastrophe · « **Reply #4057 on:** January 24, 2018, 03:18:25 PM »

Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on January 24, 2018, 02:38:08 PM

Quote from: catastrophe on January 24, 2018, 11:00:45 AM
So are you saying if the FBI asked me for a file because they thought it was useful in their case, I could burn it without giving it to them if I am sure it did not contain anything useful?

No, you can't do that. That would be destruction of evidence, which I'm not aware is being alleged.

But if I believe it’s not evidence of anything, I can burn it right?

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #4058 on:** January 24, 2018, 03:34:49 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on January 24, 2018, 02:40:48 PM

lol

LickNeckey · « **Reply #4059 on:** January 24, 2018, 07:09:41 PM »

Peter Strzok is a deep state secret soceity cancer who is hell bent on undermining Trump presidency and cannot be trusted under any circumstance.

Wait he says that he didn't think there was evidence of COLUSION? Well we need to take him at his word.

obvs

bucket · « **Reply #4060 on:** January 24, 2018, 09:35:03 PM »

https://twitter.com/MikeDelMoro/status/956336767384408069

chum1 · « **Reply #4061 on:** January 25, 2018, 09:18:35 PM »

What an amazing shitshow!

The Big Train · « **Reply #4062 on:** January 29, 2018, 07:26:24 PM »

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/958122766657638401

The Big Train · « **Reply #4063 on:** January 29, 2018, 07:27:15 PM »

Supreme leader does not need to listen to elected officials! Supreme leader makes all the decisions!

mocat · « **Reply #4064 on:** January 29, 2018, 10:14:12 PM »

Need someone to explain this to me bc I thought Don would be tough on russia

SkinnyBenny · « **Reply #4065 on:** January 29, 2018, 11:13:04 PM »

https://twitter.com/Pappiness/status/958164365051662336

Psyched to see the mental gymnastics Dubz & Co. pull out to make this one okay

wetwillie · « **Reply #4066 on:** January 29, 2018, 11:21:06 PM »

Lol what a melodramatic rat that guy is.

8manpick · « **Reply #4067 on:** January 30, 2018, 12:02:32 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on July 27, 2017, 06:04:16 PM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 27, 2017, 05:41:10 PM
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on July 27, 2017, 05:36:40 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on July 27, 2017, 04:45:22 PM
How many presidents have signed off on bills taking away their power relative to foreign affairs?

Would that be Trump's excuse for letting Putin punk him publically? It's an awfully beta excuse but ...

When is the last time a president has allowed the legislative branch to dictate what the executive branch can or can't on foreign policy issues. I'll help you out, it's been a long, long time, much to the detriment of our country.

So yeah that will be his excuse for presenting to Putin.

The bill, which gives Congress new powers to block Trump from easing sanctions against Moscow, passed the Senate 98-2. It passed the House on Tuesday 419-3.

I hope he doesn't ignore the will of the people.

Well, there you have it. No sanctions needed.

catastrophe · « **Reply #4068 on:** January 30, 2018, 12:22:35 PM »

Damnit Putin, just release the tape.

renocat · « **Reply #4069 on:** January 30, 2018, 01:40:26 PM »

:drool?

Translated. Yeah Congress is releasing the mystery 4 page memo about the Obama FBI Fiasco. Things being released and will hit the fan soon. Good bye leftists.