Dax, are you welcoming #blueanon to your continual dislike and fight against online censorship and free speech?
If so, you have to be furious about this act, I assume. Confirm?
The article is pointing out the potential for overreach, but otherwise has the reader believing the act is very well intended.
So, your takeaway is based on what you perceive as the intention of those in power, not the open doorway posibility? What happens if another Bidenesque Dictator gets in office next and has this tool? Feel the same?
Using the #blueanon melts down and cries about everything all the time as the backdrop for what I am about to say. Do you really think that if this administration overreached under the auspices of this act that the parties involved are just going to sit back and not say a word? Given what we know about the political proclivities of the majority who work in that industry . . .
For the next #blueanon POTUS and the subsequent political (fascist whackjob) mind meld of the majority working and running said industry . . . yes, very concerning.
The SCOTUS and House/Senate will 100% sit back and not say a word about anything Dipshit has done or has said he wants to do. They have pretty much done nothing but that other than hint, suggest, and outright state that they will do nothing in the future either.
Again, if you actually think that entities who think that this administration is overreaching are going to stay quiet, then you're a complete whack-a-doo.
It's also total BS to think that SCOTUS "won't say a word".
You're projecting here based on what we already know as fact about #bluanon POTUS administration.
I can 1000% say using history as our guide . . . that the moment a #blueanon administration asks for censorship, if the entity they're asking is inline with the ideology and politics (which 9.97 times out of 10 they will be) - they will follow through with the #blueanon administrations demands 99.6% of the time. Then at some point we'll get something like, "internal memos/emails/messages show that (insert something like legal counsel, executives etc. etc. here) had concerns about the administrations requests . . . but still met their demands anyway".
