The Trump Presidency

[steve dave]

I don't have a problem with them looking into vaccine safety all the time. probably wasteful to specifically pick out this MAGA conspiracy theory to look into instead of real stuff though. Counterpoint, maybe it'll help some people stop being anti-vax so even if they know they don't cause autism just going through the exercise will help MAGA kids live longer so that's good.

[sonofdaxjones]

Viewers of this blog will note that the Anti-Vax movement was born and nurtured in the realm of #blueanon

[Stupid Fitz]

I don't have a problem with them looking into vaccine safety all the time. probably wasteful to specifically pick out this MAGA conspiracy theory to look into instead of real stuff though. Counterpoint, maybe it'll help some people stop being anti-vax so even if they know they don't cause autism just going through the exercise will help MAGA kids live longer so that's good.

I don't disagree. Complete agree that the issue is looking at this specific thing that has been debunked over and over just to appease MAGA. Barring a complete disaster, their "study" should come to the same conclusion as the others. The issue will be that they will add some rough ridin' footnote or something that is just off enough to have all of the cult lose their minds and go "seeeeeee, we told you guys!!!!!!!!" while completely ignoring the rest of it saying they are safe and don't cause autism.

The other main issue and the most important piece is that MAGA and anti vaxxers will never admit to being wrong regardless as to what this study says. This has been proven over and over so this study is an even more waste of everyone's time and resources.

[wetwillie]

Id choose autism over polio and measles fwiw

[Stupid Fitz]

Id choose autism over polio and measles fwiw

well you are a not rough ridin' idiot so that also helps.

[Sandstone Outcropping]

I don't have a problem with them looking into vaccine safety all the time. probably wasteful to specifically pick out this MAGA conspiracy theory to look into instead of real stuff though. Counterpoint, maybe it'll help some people stop being anti-vax so even if they know they don't cause autism just going through the exercise will help MAGA kids live longer so that's good.

I don't disagree. Complete agree that the issue is looking at this specific thing that has been debunked over and over just to appease MAGA. Barring a complete disaster, their "study" should come to the same conclusion as the others. The issue will be that they will add some rough ridin' footnote or something that is just off enough to have all of the cult lose their minds and go "seeeeeee, we told you guys!!!!!!!!" while completely ignoring the rest of it saying they are safe and don't cause autism.

The other main issue and the most important piece is that MAGA and anti vaxxers will never admit to being wrong regardless as to what this study says. This has been proven over and over so this study is an even more waste of everyone's time and resources.

How are they planning to "study" this? Read the comments section on Facebook or something?

[sonofdaxjones]

#blueanongE always in DerpCon status  will take this as being anti-vax

But imagine being such a giant derp that you chose to be potentially severely mentally impaired, over having a virus that only in rare cases has any long term impact on health.  The virus is very treatable, or at least the 10-14 on average symptoms are very treatable.  Autism on the other hand, is forever.

Lades and Gentleman - I gave you - #blueanongE

[Sandstone Outcropping]

I demand that we have a strategic Beanie Baby reserve. We should not allow other countries to outpace us in Beanie Babies.
I'm offering to sell my collection to the American people for $25billion.

https://x.com/Acyn/status/1898117647537209675

[sonofdaxjones]

The best part of watching #blueanon/#blueanongE in action is knowing that they truly believed that the Federal Government propping up the economy was good and sustainable.

[catastrophe]

I don't have a problem with them looking into vaccine safety all the time. probably wasteful to specifically pick out this MAGA conspiracy theory to look into instead of real stuff though. Counterpoint, maybe it'll help some people stop being anti-vax so even if they know they don't cause autism just going through the exercise will help MAGA kids live longer so that's good.

Remember when Trump assembled a team to prove election fraud and they only caught like 5 MAGAs? And then they went even harder on the election fraud talking point next cycle?

MAGAs feelings don’t care about your facts.

[star seed 7]

Shouldn't understanding the safety of vaccinations be like, I don't know, an ongoing endeavor?

Note to viewers of this blog: Certain #blueanongE'rs/CoronaBrosgE equate talking about vaccine safety as being anti-vax.

It's very weird and frankly not a good look for our collective The Kansas State University . . . but it is what it is, and it's never going to change

Is there any proof it's not? When did it stop?

[Stevesie60]

I don't have a problem with them looking into vaccine safety all the time. probably wasteful to specifically pick out this MAGA conspiracy theory to look into instead of real stuff though. Counterpoint, maybe it'll help some people stop being anti-vax so even if they know they don't cause autism just going through the exercise will help MAGA kids live longer so that's good.

Remember when Trump assembled a team to prove election fraud and they only caught like 5 MAGAs? And then they went even harder on the election fraud talking point next cycle?

MAGAs feelings don’t care about your facts.

This. How many times, by how many sources, has it been pointed out that the study RFK Jr sites as reason to believe vaccines cause autism was an extremely small sample size AND had inaccurate information? I just saw a study that tracked the last 30 years and showed a correlation between vaccines and lack of autism.

But alas, the stupidest people on earth believe they cause autism, so kids will die of measles because those people don't trust a single scientific study, only their feelings.

[Dugout DickStone]

It’s been really disproven.  It’s flat earth crap

[Institutional Control]

I don’t believe that there is a higher percentage of people with autism now than there was 60 years ago, just more awareness and thus more diagnosis’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Dugout DickStone]

I don’t believe that there is a higher percentage of people with autism now than there was 60 years ago, just more awareness and thus more diagnosis’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That enrages me!

A fat idiot

[steve dave]

https://x.com/NewsWire_US/status/1898121537971999017

[wetwillie]

Well at least they didn't get autism. That crap is for life.

[steve dave]

https://x.com/buccocapital/status/1898172495296971035

[Cartierfor3]

Post the article, Kat Kid

[catastrophe]

I don’t believe that there is a higher percentage of people with autism now than there was 60 years ago, just more awareness and thus more diagnosis’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am convinced that for like 60% of today’s autism diagnoses, 20-50 years ago they just would have been diagnosed as being an bad person.

[steve dave]

https://x.com/wawog_now/status/1898744896372011199?s=46


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wetwillie]

What lawful reason do they have to deport him?

[nicname]

I don’t believe that there is a higher percentage of people with autism now than there was 60 years ago, just more awareness and thus more diagnosis’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am convinced that for like 60% of today’s autism diagnoses, 20-50 years ago they just would have been diagnosed as being an bad person.

Most spectrum autism is fake imo, or just basically being unable to “deal” with a variety of situations or things imo. A lot of it is people never learning to, or being forced to learn to deal with said situations or difficulties. There is obviously real, debilitating autism as well.

[catastrophe]

I don’t believe that there is a higher percentage of people with autism now than there was 60 years ago, just more awareness and thus more diagnosis’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am convinced that for like 60% of today’s autism diagnoses, 20-50 years ago they just would have been diagnosed as being an bad person.

Most spectrum autism is fake imo, or just basically being unable to “deal” with a variety of situations or things imo. A lot of it is people never learning to, or being forced to learn to deal with said situations or difficulties. There is obviously real, debilitating autism as well.

^ direct quote from 20-50 years ago

[CNS]

I don’t believe that there is a higher percentage of people with autism now than there was 60 years ago, just more awareness and thus more diagnosis’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am convinced that for like 60% of today’s autism diagnoses, 20-50 years ago they just would have been diagnosed as being an bad person.

Most spectrum autism is fake imo, or just basically being unable to “deal” with a variety of situations or things imo. A lot of it is people never learning to, or being forced to learn to deal with said situations or difficulties. There is obviously real, debilitating autism as well.

What makes you think this?