The Trump Presidency

[sonofdaxjones]

Imagine caping up for Nazis in 2025.

Agreed and #blueanon wants to give them billions more in Ukraine. Where they celebrate an ultranationalist who collaborated with the Nazi’s and/or had genocides committed in his name.

Nothing horns #blueanongE up more than a POTUS standing in dark theatre lights screaming about half the country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sonofdaxjones]

Disgusting




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[chum1]

Imagine caping up for Nazis in 2025.

No different than it was when people did it in the 1930s

[catastrophe]

Disgusting




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

COMMOM GROUND!

I shouldn’t be, but pleasantly surprised that Dax is anti Nazi salute. Hope we don’t see any more of those.

[Rage Against the McKee]

He's not anti-Nazi salute. That's why he's scrambling to find still images of democrats waving to the crowd.

[sonofdaxjones]

Only the derpiest of the derps think people are giving Nazi salutes.

But #blueanongE is pinnacle derp - so there you have it

[LickNeckey]

what do you think Bannon is doing here?

[sonofdaxjones]

I haven't seen it . . . but then again I am not all Bannon all the time like you and the rest of #blueanongE

 . . . As the #blueanongE Big Mad Express - Friday Edition leaves the station on another run.  Lick already stoking the fire with faux rage.

Watch that pressure gauge, friend 

[wetwillie]

He's showing people how tall his grand kid is now, nothing to see here. Move along.

[LickNeckey]

I haven't seen it . . . but then again I am not all Bannon all the time like you and the rest of #blueanongE

 . . . As the #blueanongE Big Mad Express - Friday Edition leaves the station on another run.  Lick already stoking the fire with faux rage.

Watch that pressure gauge, friend 

please watch and offer your perspective

[sonofdaxjones]

Which raged out #blueanon go to media source has it, Lick.

I'm sure when I go there operation mockingbird will be in play

[sonofdaxjones]

For those keeping score at home. #blueanon Operation Mockingbird has reopened - Plan TTD: Threat to Democracy

[hjfklmor]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

[sonofdaxjones]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

You have not addressed as to whether the various provisions of the impoundment act have been repealed. If they have, when and do you have a link?

[hjfklmor]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

You have not addressed as to whether the various provisions of the impoundment act have been repealed. If they have, when and do you have a link?

So you're not going to answer the question?

I responded to your 45 day bullshit. Impoundments were illegal before the impoundment act, and illegal after. Now there is a temporarily resolution to spending disagreements, that the Trump administration is not following. I strongly suspect you're being deliberately obtuse (surprise, surprise).

[sonofdaxjones]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

You have not addressed as to whether the various provisions of the impoundment act have been repealed. If they have, when and do you have a link?

So you're not going to answer the question?

I responded to your 45 day bullshit. Impoundments were illegal before the impoundment act, and illegal after. Now there is a temporarily resolution to spending disagreements, that the Trump administration is not following. I strongly suspect you're being deliberately obtuse (surprise, surprise).

So you know for a fact that the Trump administration does not intend to submit a request for rescission to Congress?

Can you please provide a link.

[hjfklmor]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

You have not addressed as to whether the various provisions of the impoundment act have been repealed. If they have, when and do you have a link?

So you're not going to answer the question?

I responded to your 45 day bullshit. Impoundments were illegal before the impoundment act, and illegal after. Now there is a temporarily resolution to spending disagreements, that the Trump administration is not following. I strongly suspect you're being deliberately obtuse (surprise, surprise).

So you know for a fact that the Trump administration does not intend to submit a request for rescission to Congress?

Can you please provide a link.

This really should be an easy question. I'm not asking you about Nazis, or abortion, or global conflict. Can Hillary Clinton ignore appropriated spending? Third term Barack Obama?

[Rage Against the McKee]

Which raged out #blueanon go to media source has it, Lick.

I'm sure when I go there operation mockingbird will be in play

https://x.com/julianfeeld/status/1892729677782860052

You just have to push play, dax.

[sonofdaxjones]

Looks like the exact same wave of that the 4 #blueanon heroes I posted in this thread did.

[Justwin]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

Congress absolutely should have the power of the purse and the powers of the executive branch should be curtailed and diminished significantly. Yet many on here were cheering Biden's executive orders on student loan forgiveness.

[sonofdaxjones]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

You have not addressed as to whether the various provisions of the impoundment act have been repealed. If they have, when and do you have a link?

So you're not going to answer the question?

I responded to your 45 day bullshit. Impoundments were illegal before the impoundment act, and illegal after. Now there is a temporarily resolution to spending disagreements, that the Trump administration is not following. I strongly suspect you're being deliberately obtuse (surprise, surprise).

So you know for a fact that the Trump administration does not intend to submit a request for rescission to Congress?

Can you please provide a link.

This really should be an easy question. I'm not asking you about Nazis, or abortion, or global conflict. Can Hillary Clinton ignore appropriated spending? Third term Barack Obama?

I'm being purposely obtuse?

What is being "ignored"?

Again, has the Trump administration formally announced that they do not intend to send a request for rescission to Congress?

[sonofdaxjones]

This is like having a discussion with people who are screaming about USAID being "shut down" when it is simply being realigned.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Looks like the exact same wave of that the 4 #blueanon heroes I posted in this thread did.

Well, that's not surprising.

[hjfklmor]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

You have not addressed as to whether the various provisions of the impoundment act have been repealed. If they have, when and do you have a link?

So you're not going to answer the question?

I responded to your 45 day bullshit. Impoundments were illegal before the impoundment act, and illegal after. Now there is a temporarily resolution to spending disagreements, that the Trump administration is not following. I strongly suspect you're being deliberately obtuse (surprise, surprise).

So you know for a fact that the Trump administration does not intend to submit a request for rescission to Congress?

Can you please provide a link.

This really should be an easy question. I'm not asking you about Nazis, or abortion, or global conflict. Can Hillary Clinton ignore appropriated spending? Third term Barack Obama?

I'm being purposely obtuse?

What is being "ignored"?

Again, has the Trump administration formally announced that they do not intend to send a request for rescission to Congress?

I mean, Justwin was able to answer.

[Dugout DickStone]

After you watch the video of Bannon and give a conclusive answer regarding your stance towards Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent, salutes, I wonder if you could circle back to answering how you feel about the separation of powers and Congress' power of the purse?

Despite @-ing me to debate the finer points of administrative law, I don't recall you ever answering the question. Are we cool with the executive having unlimited power? Does it depend who is in charge? Wanting to get the non-#blueanonGE talking points.

You have not addressed as to whether the various provisions of the impoundment act have been repealed. If they have, when and do you have a link?

So you're not going to answer the question?

I responded to your 45 day bullshit. Impoundments were illegal before the impoundment act, and illegal after. Now there is a temporarily resolution to spending disagreements, that the Trump administration is not following. I strongly suspect you're being deliberately obtuse (surprise, surprise).

So you know for a fact that the Trump administration does not intend to submit a request for rescission to Congress?

Can you please provide a link.

This really should be an easy question. I'm not asking you about Nazis, or abortion, or global conflict. Can Hillary Clinton ignore appropriated spending? Third term Barack Obama?

I'm being purposely obtuse?

What is being "ignored"?

Again, has the Trump administration formally announced that they do not intend to send a request for rescission to Congress?

I mean, Justwin was able to answer.

justwin does not rely on other people for his thinking