The Trump Presidency

[star seed 7]

https://twitter.com/ndrew_lawrence/status/1189002513594441730

Lol, I think this is what dax is trying to push lol

[Institutional Control]

I don't have a subscription to the NYT so I can't read the story you're referring to but it seems like you're very anxious to discredit this guy for no reason other than his testimony makes your boy look bad. 

[Brock Landers]

Again, they know they can't dispute or defend any facts but can only attack the process.

[sonofdaxjones]

Again, they know they can't dispute or defend any facts but can only attack the process.

Or just unilaterally declare the personal feelings and opinions of individuals are absolute fact and wholly objective in order to fit an agenda.

[catastrophe]

Dax pining for the days when the whistleblower complaint was just double hearsay. Now it’s just that all the sources were biased.

[sonofdaxjones]

Dax pining for the days when the whistleblower complaint was just double hearsay. Now it’s just that all the sources were biased.

So you're dumpster diving back weeks ago in order to make a really stupid argument.

We don't live in a linear world cat

[Brock Landers]

Again, they know they can't dispute or defend any facts but can only attack the process.

Or just unilaterally declare the personal feelings and opinions of individuals are absolute fact and wholly objective in order to fit an agenda.

Can you decipher who or what you're referring to here?  I was referring to Vindman, surely you're not gullible enough to believe that crap about a decorated veteran and foreign policy expert is making crap up and whose testimony isn't reliable.  Right?

[sonofdaxjones]

Again, they know they can't dispute or defend any facts but can only attack the process.

Or just unilaterally declare the personal feelings and opinions of individuals are absolute fact and wholly objective in order to fit an agenda.

Can you decipher who or what you're referring to here?  I was referring to Vindman, surely you're not gullible enough to believe that crap about a decorated veteran and foreign policy expert is making crap up and whose testimony isn't reliable.  Right?

He's testifying based on his opinion of what occurred.   We have the transcript of the call.    You just like just about everyone else didn't know this guy existed until about 15 minutes ago, but now in typical LibDerp fashion you've decided to wrap yourself in the flag of service, when the vast majority of time your movement makes fun of such things (Full Assimilation).

[bucket]

Again, they know they can't dispute or defend any facts but can only attack the process.

Or just unilaterally declare the personal feelings and opinions of individuals are absolute fact and wholly objective in order to fit an agenda.

Can you decipher who or what you're referring to here?  I was referring to Vindman, surely you're not gullible enough to believe that crap about a decorated veteran and foreign policy expert is making crap up and whose testimony isn't reliable.  Right?

He's testifying based on his opinion of what occurred.   We have the transcript of the call.    You just like just about everyone else didn't know this guy existed until about 15 minutes ago, but now in typical LibDerp fashion you've decided to wrap yourself in the flag of service, when the vast majority of time your movement makes fun of such things (Full Assimilation).

What's willful ignorance, Alex.

[catastrophe]

Dax pining for the days when the whistleblower complaint was just double hearsay. Now it’s just that all the sources were biased.

So you're dumpster diving back weeks ago in order to make a really stupid argument.

We don't live in a linear world cat

Definitely fair to say the dumpster is where I found that talking point.

[Phil Titola]

Dax pining for the days when the whistleblower complaint was just double hearsay. Now it’s just that all the sources were biased.

So you're dumpster diving back weeks ago in order to make a really stupid argument.

We don't live in a linear world cat

says the guy who dumpster dives back to bill Clinton

[sonofdaxjones]

Again, they know they can't dispute or defend any facts but can only attack the process.

Or just unilaterally declare the personal feelings and opinions of individuals are absolute fact and wholly objective in order to fit an agenda.

Can you decipher who or what you're referring to here?  I was referring to Vindman, surely you're not gullible enough to believe that crap about a decorated veteran and foreign policy expert is making crap up and whose testimony isn't reliable.  Right?

He's testifying based on his opinion of what occurred.   We have the transcript of the call.    You just like just about everyone else didn't know this guy existed until about 15 minutes ago, but now in typical LibDerp fashion you've decided to wrap yourself in the flag of service, when the vast majority of time your movement makes fun of such things (Full Assimilation).

What's willful ignorance, Alex.

I'll take interpretation as fact for 800, Alex

[sonofdaxjones]

Dax pining for the days when the whistleblower complaint was just double hearsay. Now it’s just that all the sources were biased.

So you're dumpster diving back weeks ago in order to make a really stupid argument.

We don't live in a linear world cat

Definitely fair to say the dumpster is where I found that talking point.

Oh hey, look at cat playing both sides of the fence, stunning . . . not

I know following along is not a strong suit of yours along with most people on here, but the "hearsay" narrative was derived from the original "whistle blower" (while Schiff was lying about meeting with them).

[sonofdaxjones]

Dax pining for the days when the whistleblower complaint was just double hearsay. Now it’s just that all the sources were biased.

So you're dumpster diving back weeks ago in order to make a really stupid argument.

We don't live in a linear world cat

says the guy who dumpster dives back to bill Clinton

We already know that you're part of the history doesn't matter contingency.

[waks]

The only explanation that I can think of for Dax's absolute insanity on this board is that he's building a resume to work in the Trump White House. I've got to say, if that's the case, he's a shoo-in. 

[Trim]

stunning . . . not

[star seed 7]

Dax heard of this dude 15 minutes ago and has already declared him a double agent with strong personal bias who is obviously not worth talking to

[Brock Landers]

Once dax gets his marching orders he gets started right away.

[chum1]

Once dax gets his marching orders he gets started right away.

And never before. The preferred sources do not always have their talking points formulated immediately, but he dutifully awaits them. Good soldiers don't go rogue.

[sonofdaxjones]

I can't even pretend to touch the level of groupthink, self-affirmation and taking everything uttered that's OrangeMan Bad as being absolute fact/truth . . . that is exhibited by resident LibBot Nation (and LibNation as a whole).

This guy is testifying about how he personally interpreted what went down with the Ukraine.    I'm sure he'll factually convey how he felt.   

It's still  to read LibBot Nation wrapping themselves in the flag of service and now taking every single word (that's OrangeMan Bad) of the cogs in the complex  as the absolute truth.   

[Phil Titola]

Isn't he stating a fact that the actual conversation (not made up transcript) withheld aid for help?

His opinion only enforces what others have stated did happen.

[sonofdaxjones]

Slurs Pelosi re-affirms that Dems have no real interest in impeaching and will continue to conduct their one sided hearings for as long as possible to weaken the current administration and buying the Dem establishment enough time to find someone else besides the current list of whack-a-doo's running for the Dem nomination.

[Brock Landers]

There's only one way to interpret what happened on the call so it's really not even an opinion.

[sonofdaxjones]

Isn't he stating a fact that the actual conversation (not made up transcript) withheld aid for help?

His opinion only enforces what others have stated did happen.

It is the executive branch's responsibility to investigate corruption in countries receiving foreign aid.

I know "our current favorite Ukrainian" changes every single day with LibBot Nation, but there are some people involved in politics or where involved in politics in the Ukraine who are saying that key Dem apparatchiks were corrupt as hell in their dealings with the Ukraine.

Just like the former ambassador got crap canned because she was "investigating" so as to make sure certain people got protected.

[waks]

Slurs Pelosi re-affirms that Dems have no real interest in impeaching and will continue to conduct their one sided hearings for as long as possible to weaken the current administration and buying the Dem establishment enough time to find someone else besides the current list of whack-a-doo's running for the Dem nomination.

LOL didn't you already get dominated over this false talking point?