0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on April 13, 2018, 11:30:01 AMQuote from: The Big Train on April 13, 2018, 09:19:09 AMTotalitarian governments calling for imprisoning their political enemies is fine if dear leader says it’s fine.- DaxUsing state intelligence and internal security apparatus to spy on political opponents is perfectly fine: As long as Dems are doing it . . . The Big TuckSadI'll assume that your came absolutely unglued with the ObamaCuck administration called for "indefinite detention" without formal charge measures to be meted out and controlled by the executive branch.They used state intelligence to spy on a Russian agent... who just so happened to be on Trump's foreign policy team.
Quote from: The Big Train on April 13, 2018, 09:19:09 AMTotalitarian governments calling for imprisoning their political enemies is fine if dear leader says it’s fine.- DaxUsing state intelligence and internal security apparatus to spy on political opponents is perfectly fine: As long as Dems are doing it . . . The Big TuckSadI'll assume that your came absolutely unglued with the ObamaCuck administration called for "indefinite detention" without formal charge measures to be meted out and controlled by the executive branch.
Totalitarian governments calling for imprisoning their political enemies is fine if dear leader says it’s fine.- Dax
Quote from: bucket on April 13, 2018, 11:45:05 AMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on April 13, 2018, 11:30:01 AMQuote from: The Big Train on April 13, 2018, 09:19:09 AMTotalitarian governments calling for imprisoning their political enemies is fine if dear leader says it’s fine.- DaxUsing state intelligence and internal security apparatus to spy on political opponents is perfectly fine: As long as Dems are doing it . . . The Big TuckSadI'll assume that your came absolutely unglued with the ObamaCuck administration called for "indefinite detention" without formal charge measures to be meted out and controlled by the executive branch.They used state intelligence to spy on a Russian agent... who just so happened to be on Trump's foreign policy team.Then why does the DOJ/FBI refuse to produce the information and answer the questions as what they presented (and who presented) to the FISA court, if it's so cut and dry?Oh, who was the "Russian agent"?
Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on April 13, 2018, 11:37:36 AMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on April 13, 2018, 11:33:45 AMQuote from: libliblibliblibliblib on April 13, 2018, 09:18:19 AMAll y'all on notice, ain't nobody gonna criticize trump on dax's watch and get away with it. You have been warned.As opposed to unhinged lib (and The Big Tuck) whenever the most politically/criminally corrupt couple in U.S. history (and the core basis of this years long 24/7 Lib meltdown) is brought into the conversation.Sad that you now support (but once hated) a guy who leaked classified information and privileged conversations.Link?Don't need one. Your response to me says it all.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on April 13, 2018, 11:33:45 AMQuote from: libliblibliblibliblib on April 13, 2018, 09:18:19 AMAll y'all on notice, ain't nobody gonna criticize trump on dax's watch and get away with it. You have been warned.As opposed to unhinged lib (and The Big Tuck) whenever the most politically/criminally corrupt couple in U.S. history (and the core basis of this years long 24/7 Lib meltdown) is brought into the conversation.Sad that you now support (but once hated) a guy who leaked classified information and privileged conversations.Link?
Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on April 13, 2018, 09:18:19 AMAll y'all on notice, ain't nobody gonna criticize trump on dax's watch and get away with it. You have been warned.As opposed to unhinged lib (and The Big Tuck) whenever the most politically/criminally corrupt couple in U.S. history (and the core basis of this years long 24/7 Lib meltdown) is brought into the conversation.Sad that you now support (but once hated) a guy who leaked classified information and privileged conversations.
All y'all on notice, ain't nobody gonna criticize trump on dax's watch and get away with it. You have been warned.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on April 13, 2018, 11:48:12 AMQuote from: bucket on April 13, 2018, 11:45:05 AMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on April 13, 2018, 11:30:01 AMQuote from: The Big Train on April 13, 2018, 09:19:09 AMTotalitarian governments calling for imprisoning their political enemies is fine if dear leader says it’s fine.- DaxUsing state intelligence and internal security apparatus to spy on political opponents is perfectly fine: As long as Dems are doing it . . . The Big TuckSadI'll assume that your came absolutely unglued with the ObamaCuck administration called for "indefinite detention" without formal charge measures to be meted out and controlled by the executive branch.They used state intelligence to spy on a Russian agent... who just so happened to be on Trump's foreign policy team.Then why does the DOJ/FBI refuse to produce the information and answer the questions as what they presented (and who presented) to the FISA court, if it's so cut and dry?Oh, who was the "Russian agent"?Carter Page. They let the HPSCI look at it... Remember, we got memos.
Hitler comparisons. They're dumb. Also, i'm a bit hungover.
Yet the reality of 21st-century U.S. politics is one of asymmetric polarization in many dimensions. One of these dimensions is intellectual: While there are some serious, honest conservative thinkers, they have no influence on the modern Republican Party. What’s a centrist to do?The answer, all too often, has involved what we might call motivated gullibility. Centrists who couldn’t find real examples of serious, honest conservatives lavished praise on politicians who played that role on TV. Paul Ryan wasn’t actually very good at faking it; true fiscal experts ridiculed his “mystery meat” budgets. But never mind: The narrative required that the character Ryan played exist, so everyone pretended that he was the genuine article.And let me say that the same bothsidesism that turned Ryan into a fiscal hero played a crucial role in the election of Donald Trump. How did the most corrupt presidential candidate in American history eke out an Electoral College victory? There were many factors, any one of which could have turned the tide in a close election. But it wouldn’t have been close if much of the news media hadn’t engaged in an orgy of false equivalence.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/12/opinion/paul-ryan-fascism.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fopinion&action=click&contentCollection=opinion®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=4&pgtype=sectionfront
He did nothing wrong tho. - Daxhttps://twitter.com/abcpolitics/status/984866054802427905
@stone I'm not obsessed with this crap like some of you are. TBT has made several references comparing Trump to Hitler. I'm just here to let him know how rough ridin' dumb that is. He follows around dax like a lil barking puppy repeating the same crap down here. Trumps a dumbass, we know. He's not Hitler tho. He doesn't even have the IQ to be smart enough to be that much of a monster.
Quote from: wetwillie on March 18, 2018, 08:48:26 AMHe leaked something to the press during the 2016 campaign and then when it was discovered lied about his involvement. Should be fired
He leaked something to the press during the 2016 campaign and then when it was discovered lied about his involvement.
CNN Poll: 42% approve of Trump, highest in 11 months
You and dax get along super well in the pit.