Author Topic: Gender Issues  (Read 43245 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #100 on: May 06, 2016, 07:20:35 PM »
I think there is much more stigma in society to men admitting they are gay or bi than women. For this reason men may be conditioned to never act on or explore any slight gay tendencies.

i think it is more biology, not culture.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #101 on: May 06, 2016, 07:21:57 PM »
Is an overwhelming majority being defined as over 68%?

i was thinking more like 90% above 99%ish.  post your data, please.
What data?  You're the one making a statement, I am trying to parse it.  For all I know I could agree with you.

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1587
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #102 on: May 06, 2016, 07:23:30 PM »
I think a lot of people wouldn't admit to being below 100% but they actually are.

i think an overwhelming majority of males are 100% or very close to it.
Is an overwhelming majority being defined as over 68%?
Link?, Queercity.com says it is only 51%, but maybe your research is more rigorous?
No Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), I am asking sys how he defines "overwhelming majority". Is it 95% 99% 51%? 50.1%?
And you picked 68% out of thin air?  Interesting.  Why the ad hominim, Chings?
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #103 on: May 06, 2016, 07:25:45 PM »
i thought you were setting up a post to introduce a study that would include a 68% data point.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53675
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #104 on: May 06, 2016, 07:27:12 PM »
If you ever had a dream that you were getting a BJ and you look down to see that it is a guy giving it......then you are less than 100%. IMO.
I think it would take a lot less than that to be less than 100%. Just being aroused by seeing or thinking about a BJ makes you less than 100% IMO.

But really, even a spectrum based on percentages is a far too simplistic way to define sexual attraction.

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1587
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #105 on: May 06, 2016, 07:28:13 PM »
i thought you were setting up a post to introduce a study that would include a 68% data point.
He was and now we ruined it.  Poor Chings.
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #106 on: May 06, 2016, 07:31:50 PM »
i thought you were setting up a post to introduce a study that would include a 68% data point.
No, just curious about what an "overwhelming majority" would be in the gedanken study you are discussing. I just threw out being within one standard deviation (assuming normal distribution, which admittedly is probably unfounded to do).

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #107 on: May 06, 2016, 07:34:51 PM »
If you ever had a dream that you were getting a BJ and you look down to see that it is a guy giving it......then you are less than 100%. IMO.
I think it would take a lot less than that to be less than 100%. Just being aroused by seeing or thinking about a BJ makes you less than 100% IMO.

But really, even a spectrum based on percentages is a far too simplistic way to define sexual attraction.

Yeah I was just giving one example.

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1587
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #108 on: May 06, 2016, 07:35:47 PM »
If you ever had a dream that you were getting a BJ and you look down to see that it is a guy giving it......then you are less than 100%. IMO.
I think it would take a lot less than that to be less than 100%. Just being aroused by seeing or thinking about a BJ makes you less than 100% IMO.

But really, even a spectrum based on percentages is a far too simplistic way to define sexual attraction.
It is the sex act and your imagination placing yourself in that situation that is arousing not the other guy's wiener, good grief.

What is your percentage Mich?  Feeling attracted to another man, not your weird redefining to suit your own purposes.
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #109 on: May 06, 2016, 07:37:20 PM »
But really, even a spectrum based on percentages is a far too simplistic way to define sexual attraction.

it's really not that complex, michigancat.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53675
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #110 on: May 06, 2016, 07:37:57 PM »


If you ever had a dream that you were getting a BJ and you look down to see that it is a guy giving it......then you are less than 100%. IMO.
I think it would take a lot less than that to be less than 100%. Just being aroused by seeing or thinking about a BJ makes you less than 100% IMO.

But really, even a spectrum based on percentages is a far too simplistic way to define sexual attraction.
It is the sex act and your imagination placing yourself in that situation that is arousing not the other guy's wiener, good grief.

Yes, but a male could easily be performing the sex act that arouses you. And you might not even realize it!

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #111 on: May 06, 2016, 07:38:33 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40472
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #112 on: May 06, 2016, 07:42:46 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #113 on: May 06, 2016, 07:44:49 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.
That makes sense.  I was worried it would be something stupid like divided by total time.

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1587
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #114 on: May 06, 2016, 07:47:08 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?
sys covered it, and I mumped it up anyway.
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #115 on: May 06, 2016, 07:48:23 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.

No I do not think it is limited to your actual IRL interactions.  You do not have to eff 1 person of the same sex and 19 of the opposite sex to get a 95%.

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1587
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #116 on: May 06, 2016, 07:49:51 PM »
[vine][/vine]
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.

No I do not think it is limited to your actual IRL interactions.  You do not have to eff 1 person of the same sex and 19 of the opposite sex to get a 95%.
It is attractions, not acts.
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53675
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #117 on: May 06, 2016, 07:50:33 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.
Could you be 100% if there are any members of the opposite sex that you don't find sexually attractive?

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #118 on: May 06, 2016, 07:51:12 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?
sys covered it, and I mumped it up anyway.

No in my dream example that wasn't even an IRL attraction to a real actual person.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #119 on: May 06, 2016, 07:51:27 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.
At what point in time? Do you suspect this is a static quantity?

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1587
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #120 on: May 06, 2016, 07:52:25 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.
Could you be 100% if there are any members of the opposite sex that you don't find sexually attractive?
would that be asexual?
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1587
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #121 on: May 06, 2016, 07:54:05 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.
At what point in time? Do you suspect this is a static quantity?
Total  in lifetime.  Would increase with time, rate would depend on libido.
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #122 on: May 06, 2016, 07:55:24 PM »
What if a male is attracted to a female with traditionally defined masculine characteristics? Half a point?

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #123 on: May 06, 2016, 07:56:34 PM »
How is this percentage even defined?

# of sexual attractions to the subject of interest/total # of sexual attractions x 100.
Could you be 100% if there are any members of the opposite sex that you don't find sexually attractive?
would that be asexual?

Asexual means you are not attracted to anyone. That is not what mich is saying.

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1587
    • View Profile
Re: Gender Issues
« Reply #124 on: May 06, 2016, 07:58:29 PM »
What if a male is attracted to a female with traditionally defined masculine characteristics? Half a point?
He knows she is a woman? Full point.
I am partial to athletically built women, still the female form tho.  100%er.
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14