We're not going to be forced into taking Clemson or someone else just to satisfy FSU.
This is just ridiculous. We would be lucky to have Clemson.
I don't disagree, but maybe some would prefer Louisville?
And maybe FSU doesn't want Clemson? Maybe they feel like it should be Georgia Tech (for all we know)?
GT is actually the closest ACC school to FSU. They are academically "superior". They bring Atlanta. They are a historical partner with ND (even if that relationship is currently dormant).
Think about it like this. Let's just say that the best we can hope for is ND as a non-football member. If we want them to schedule six Big 12 games per year, as is rumored, and they are a thirteenth partial member, this could be your lineup:
Texas (has a current scheduling agreement with ND)
Oklahoma (has a current scheduling agreement with ND)
FSU (would most like be a partner here because it would be a huge moneymaker for both programs)
Georgia Tech (this could allow them to easily rekindle the rivalry)
The last two games per year could be ND/TCU in Dallas, ND/KSU in KC, ND/WVU in Pittsburgh, etc.
If that's your mix of teams, ND barely has to change a single thing about what they do today, and they can fill out half of their schedule with Big 12 teams. Sure, it would put them at a competitive disadvantage, but man, it would make NBC very happy, it would make ABC very happy, and everyone would get rich.
I know that everyone, including myself, has reservations about partial members, but other non-Clemson teams have their selling points.