Ubben keeps saying Houston would be the best option to replace tamu. Not sure what I think about that.
I think BYU is the obvious choice.
I believe the line of thinking is the Big 12 wouldn't want to abandon the Houston market.
Texas already has the Houston market. UH would have to upgrade in a goddamn hurry if they wanted to be relevant in the Big 12-2. TCU would be a better option.
saw on twitter that Houston's # of Alums in 4 times as many as TCU's....or whatever...making Houston more appealing.
eff this crap.
plus we already own the Dallas market. adding a dallas team would be meaningless. we lose aTm and don't replace we lose Houston
I agree. bring in a team from the north like BYU to add depth. To me they are much more respected and would be make our conference better. Adding UH doesn't really do anything other than add a huge university. They really aren't good at any sports. Football they are meh. If everyone else (i.e. Notre Dame, BYU, Arkansas, Arizona, Arizona State, Louisville, Cincy and TCU ) says no then yes we should invite them. but if someone else says yes then we shouldn't even think about it. Maybe if we want to go back to 12 and we could get a couple big name programs then yes.