I get why this guy, as a public defender, is more than a little butthurt about Wilson getting a more impartial grand jury proceeding than what 99.9% of his clients get. That much is true, and a fair point.
His analysis of "it only takes 1 witness for probable cause" - if that witness is contradicted by overwhelming evidence - is laughably tarded. Probable Cause means "more likely than not." It's a low standard, but not that low.
There are some very good, very bright public defenders, but there are also a lot of dumbasses working there. I'll count this guy in the latter camp.