Amazing how quickly the story can change as facts come to light. So anyone still believe the friend's "the cop initiated the physical confrontation by grabbing Brown from a seated position in his patrol vehicle" bullshit story?
The only thing this changes is that Dorian Johnson isn't credible but he wasn't the only witness. The cop initiating physical confrontation from inside the vehicle is much more believable than the story that cops told, that Johnson tried to take the cop's gun who was inside of the vehicle. The truth is likely in the middle.
square that circle a little more for me. Why do you think its more credible than the cops? After all, isn't it alleged now that these two used physical intimidation to steal? Why can't we make the jump that they used the same physical intimidation to threaten a cop and once the confrontation escalated it went to gun grabbing.
Square what circle, did you stop reading before I said the truth is likely in the middle? How in the hell could anyone take a gun from a cop in a car? Either it is in a holster or it was being pointed at Brown. If it was holstered that cop would have to be dead for Brown to reach into the car and get to his hip while seated. If it were pointed at Brown the cop certainly would have squeezed off a round before any struggle for the gun happened.
I thought they were out of the car and there the confrontation continued. Supposedly Brown was moving away and shot, while the cop maintains the confrontation continued, gun grab, shots etc. Or am I wrong on the narratives?
I'm not completely sure we know. The eyewitness accounts have the first shot being fired from the car so that would mean the supposed struggle happened there as well.
The police side of the story is that they were out of the car, one of the suspects shoved the police back into the car, struggle ensued, gun went off, suspects fleed, gunshots, dead.
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk