Author Topic: Spring Football Insider Information Thread  (Read 43229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #175 on: April 13, 2014, 09:05:45 PM »
Stop over analyzing that win and under analyzing our win. We were with OU till the 4th. We loaded up on D and the offense is coming back. Not worried.
OPEN CASE!!!

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #176 on: April 14, 2014, 12:26:20 AM »
It doesn't really matter if they played at full effort or not(I think they did), that's still an extremely impressive win over a team with backups that would be our starting group and full of NFL talent.

And OU isn't stocked with similar talent?   No idea how old you are but a perfect example a team not giving a eff was the KSU Wildcats v Purdue in 98.  No way Purdue was better than the Cats but they sure whipped our asses.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #177 on: April 14, 2014, 08:38:10 AM »

It doesn't really matter if they played at full effort or not(I think they did), that's still an extremely impressive win over a team with backups that would be our starting group and full of NFL talent.

And OU isn't stocked with similar talent?   No idea how old you are but a perfect example a team not giving a eff was the KSU Wildcats v Purdue in 98.  No way Purdue was better than the Cats but they sure whipped our asses.

CASE CLOSED

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7100
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #178 on: April 14, 2014, 08:56:08 AM »
I think it's pretty dumb to say Bama wasn't motivated.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53679
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #179 on: April 14, 2014, 09:42:07 AM »
I think it's pretty dumb to say Bama wasn't motivated.


Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6089
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #180 on: April 14, 2014, 09:46:52 AM »
Sams is practicing with the WR's.

He is also running some "wildcat" snaps during scrimmages.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Offline KanSt43

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 378
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #181 on: April 14, 2014, 09:51:51 AM »
Sams is practicing with the WR's.

He is also running some "wildcat" snaps during scrimmages.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Instagram, huh? lol

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #182 on: April 14, 2014, 11:51:45 AM »
I think it's pretty dumb to say Bama wasn't motivated.

Great point.  Kids that are accustomed to playing in the BCS CG for the crystal football were probably extra excited to get to play in one of the meaningless exhibition games.

 :dubious:
bears are fast...

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #183 on: April 14, 2014, 12:00:00 PM »
why are bowl games "meaningless exhibition games" except for when our KSU catz are playing in them?  I mean, our recent Cotton and Fiesta Bowls weren't MEGs.  In fact, these games seemed very meaningful for most everybody on this Board.  Double in fact, if any team viewed the games as meaningless, it would have been Arkansas and Oregon, moreso than us.  And we still got dick punched by both teams.  so.  moral of the story.  good teams are good. 

Now, more about Sams and the Wildcat.   

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22292
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #184 on: April 14, 2014, 12:16:28 PM »
People are discounting how well Snyde-dog plays in Norman.  We almost won there in 2009 for crying out loud.

THESE THINGS MATTER!


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7100
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #185 on: April 14, 2014, 12:19:07 PM »
I think it's pretty dumb to say Bama wasn't motivated.

Great point.  Kids that are accustomed to playing in the BCS CG for the crystal football were probably extra excited to get to play in one of the meaningless exhibition games.

 :dubious:
Great point. Kids that have been coached to expect to win, and play for championships probably have a problem bringing it for every game. They particularly have a problem getting up for an elite caliber bowl game against a traditional blue blood from another power conference.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #186 on: April 14, 2014, 12:22:27 PM »
i gotta admit, "alabama wasn't motivated to play in that BCS game" in order to somehow downgrade OU for preseason confidence seems like something i would read on GPC

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #187 on: April 14, 2014, 12:22:52 PM »
not that there's anything wrong with that

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #188 on: April 14, 2014, 12:23:31 PM »
Yeah, I agree, 'blast. However, the '98 cats kinda make me feel like it could be a thing. That was a great win for OU tho.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #189 on: April 14, 2014, 12:26:40 PM »
Yeah, I agree, 'blast. However, the '98 cats kinda make me feel like it could be a thing. That was a great win for OU tho.

i mean i guess, being demoted to the Sugar Bowl is not the same as being demoted to the Alamo Bowl

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #190 on: April 14, 2014, 12:29:16 PM »
Yeah, I agree, 'blast. However, the '98 cats kinda make me feel like it could be a thing. That was a great win for OU tho.

i mean i guess, being demoted to the Sugar Bowl is not the same as being demoted to the Alamo Bowl
Still pisses me off.  :curse:

Offline kostakio

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 475
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #191 on: April 14, 2014, 12:49:44 PM »
Yeah, I agree, 'blast. However, the '98 cats kinda make me feel like it could be a thing. That was a great win for OU tho.

i mean i guess, being demoted to the Sugar Bowl is not the same as being demoted to the Alamo Bowl

yes and also like half our coaching staff announced they were leaving before the game.  Mangino announced he was leaving after but apparently he had already planned on leaving before.  I don't remember anything like that happening with Alabama.   In addition we were facing Drew Brees who is probably one of the 5 best QB's of the last 20 years or so. 

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6719
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #192 on: April 14, 2014, 02:25:13 PM »
Yeah, I agree, 'blast. However, the '98 cats kinda make me feel like it could be a thing. That was a great win for OU tho.

i mean i guess, being demoted to the Sugar Bowl is not the same as being demoted to the Alamo Bowl

yes and also like half our coaching staff announced they were leaving before the game.  Mangino announced he was leaving after but apparently he had already planned on leaving before.  I don't remember anything like that happening with Alabama.   In addition we were facing Drew Brees who is probably one of the 5 best QB's of the last 20 years or so.

found that game on-demand a couple months ago and watched it (not sure why i did that to myself).  Even though I was in attendance at the game, when I re-watched I realized how completely wrong I remembered it.  As I remembered it, despite making a ton of stupid mistakes (adversity) we overcame adversity and put ourselves in position to win, except then made more stupid mistakes.  Totally wrong - we pretty much just got our dicks kicked in.  Made the game somewhat interesting towards the end but it was never really in question.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #193 on: April 14, 2014, 02:25:48 PM »
Yeah, I agree, 'blast. However, the '98 cats kinda make me feel like it could be a thing. That was a great win for OU tho.

i mean i guess, being demoted to the Sugar Bowl is not the same as being demoted to the Alamo Bowl

While I wholeheartedly agree with you here, the point is that when the dream/goal all season was the BCS championship, a certain level of disappointment in NOT playing for the crystal football is to be expected.  Thus, the level of focus/motivation across the entirety of the team decreases.

I remain firmly of the belief that had the OU vs Bama game been the BCS title game that Bama likely covers the 14 pt spread.  As it was, playing OU +14 was a no-brainer... Just like it was a no brainer to play Utah plus 14 vs Bama in the '09 Sugar that the Utes won 31-17.  I think we all saw what Bama did to a Notre Dame team that won in Norman when it was for a crystal football.

 :buh-bye:
bears are fast...

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4527
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #194 on: April 14, 2014, 02:28:36 PM »
This thread  :'bye cruel world:
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #195 on: April 14, 2014, 02:33:53 PM »
So, wait, if someone is super favored to win, then they aren't motivated, and therefore more likely to get their dicks kicked in?  Why doesn't Vegas just factor that in? 

Offline Muldoon

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 547
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #196 on: April 14, 2014, 02:34:51 PM »
People are discounting how well Snyde-dog plays in Norman.  We almost won there in 2009 for crying out loud.

THESE THINGS MATTER!
If we win, will it be because OU wasn't motivated and didn't put much effort into the game?

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #197 on: April 14, 2014, 02:53:19 PM »
Belvis just completely alpha'd Bookie G-Pimp-C.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #198 on: April 14, 2014, 03:52:13 PM »
Belvis just completely alpha'd Bookie G-Pimp-C.

I can't imagine how bad life is when you're left with nothing but trolling your non rivals board.   I'm just glad there's no college baseball blog or I'd probably be over there, just BMW'ing it all the time.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Spring Football Insider Information Thread
« Reply #199 on: April 14, 2014, 04:02:39 PM »
Belvis just completely alpha'd Bookie G-Pimp-C.

Interesting, if true.
bears are fast...