Author Topic: Waters  (Read 46720 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37193
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #125 on: September 24, 2013, 01:48:09 PM »
Take Balldling

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #126 on: September 24, 2013, 01:49:31 PM »
Jill Spradlers

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Waters
« Reply #127 on: September 24, 2013, 01:52:30 PM »
Jill Spradlers

 :thumbs:

i really was trying to figure out a last name to Jill.  That's wonderful. 

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #128 on: September 24, 2013, 02:00:41 PM »
You photo shop wizzards to need to get to work on this. Just two buds, hanging out in Manhattan....

Offline XocolateThundarr

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5238
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #129 on: September 24, 2013, 04:23:20 PM »
You photo shop wizzards to need to get to work on this. Just two buds, hanging out in Manhattan....

Sounds like a Poetwarrior narrative idea.
@mikec2w

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42049
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #131 on: October 04, 2014, 06:45:21 PM »
he stinks

Offline Rabid Cow

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 71
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #132 on: October 04, 2014, 06:48:12 PM »
Someone teach him how to dump the ball off.  Taking a sack because he refuses to hit a wide open Gronk in the flat  :curse:

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16215
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #133 on: October 04, 2014, 06:52:00 PM »
He is having a decent running game. Good for him.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #134 on: October 04, 2014, 06:54:46 PM »
He is having a decent running game. Good for him.

he is better at running than passing. 

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16215
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #135 on: October 04, 2014, 06:55:28 PM »
As long as he doesn't make stupid mistakes, then trim 3:16

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #136 on: October 04, 2014, 08:08:02 PM »
waters  :facepalm:

Offline Hurricane Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1358
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #137 on: October 04, 2014, 08:20:30 PM »
  :confused:  Waters is 18 of 24 passing for 213 and 2 tds AND has 104 yards rushing..... :dunno:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #138 on: October 04, 2014, 08:21:09 PM »
  :confused:  Waters is 18 of 24 passing for 213 and 2 tds AND has 104 yards rushing..... :dunno:

well he's not passing the eye test

Offline Hurricane Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1358
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #139 on: October 04, 2014, 08:25:56 PM »
  :confused:  Waters is 18 of 24 passing for 213 and 2 tds AND has 104 yards rushing..... :dunno:

well he's not passing the eye test

make that 20 of 26 for 232 and 3 tds....

Offline WildcatNation

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 800
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #140 on: October 04, 2014, 10:38:47 PM »
  :confused:  Waters is 18 of 24 passing for 213 and 2 tds AND has 104 yards rushing..... :dunno:

well he's not passing the eye test

make that 20 of 26 for 232 and 3 tds....

Bunch of dumbasses on this board

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85557
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Waters
« Reply #141 on: October 04, 2014, 10:39:54 PM »
Wildcatnation, you should try starting another board

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #142 on: October 04, 2014, 11:26:30 PM »
Is it still the consensus that Webb > Waters?

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64422
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #143 on: October 05, 2014, 12:44:38 AM »
Jeff volters makes me want to puke
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline WildcatNation

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 800
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #144 on: October 05, 2014, 03:05:25 AM »
Wildcatnation, you should try starting another board

Say that to my face

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13596
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #145 on: October 05, 2014, 03:25:26 AM »
Wildcatnation, you should try starting another board

Say that to my face

ok.  come to sd and i will say it to your face like the mature adult that i am.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Waters
« Reply #146 on: October 05, 2014, 07:25:55 AM »
It would be super neat if Jake could have those types of games against Auburn, OU, TCU and Baylor.

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #147 on: October 05, 2014, 08:08:33 AM »
It would be super neat if Jake could have those types of games against Auburn, OU, TCU and Baylor.

I'd be curious to see how waters numbers against auburn stack up against other QBs.  considering locketts dropped, perfectly placed TD pass. 

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Waters
« Reply #148 on: October 05, 2014, 09:08:17 AM »
It would be super neat if Jake could have those types of games against Auburn, OU, TCU and Baylor.

I'd be curious to see how waters numbers against auburn stack up against other QBs.  considering locketts dropped, perfectly placed TD pass.

i'd be curious to see how often that lockett drop is mentioned as some sort of reason that jake had a good game against auburn.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: Waters
« Reply #149 on: October 05, 2014, 09:41:22 AM »
GE'ing is getting out of hand, the board is becoming incredibly boring.