Author Topic: Bracketology 1/8/13  (Read 94022 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #750 on: March 17, 2013, 01:00:43 PM »
Just looked at all of Lunardi's bracket. Everything about it is the best possible situation. Everything. I want Ohio State as the 2 seed to our 3 so hard. And can you imagine if KU gets to play Duke? KU fans would talk about it for years if they won.
They won't, Duke is the only team in the country that get calls in the tournament. Ku players would be so confused.

Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #751 on: March 17, 2013, 01:03:42 PM »
BELMONT!

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13745
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #752 on: March 17, 2013, 01:05:48 PM »
if we're a 3 seed in KC, i will cry tears of joy

Online Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29961
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #753 on: March 17, 2013, 01:06:05 PM »
Just looked at all of Lunardi's bracket. Everything about it is the best possible situation. Everything. I want Ohio State as the 2 seed to our 3 so hard. And can you imagine if KU gets to play Duke? KU fans would talk about it for years if they won.

He has Wisconsin as the 5 in our region.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #754 on: March 17, 2013, 01:08:14 PM »
Welp.

Quote from: @slmandel
Selection Sunday reminder: EVERY YEAR committee emphasizes non-conf. SOS.

we played Michigan, Florida, and Gonzaga.  WGAF what our non con SOS rating is, they need to look past that or they're dumb.

You know they're dumb, right?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17806
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #755 on: March 17, 2013, 01:11:22 PM »
Just looked at all of Lunardi's bracket. Everything about it is the best possible situation. Everything. I want Ohio State as the 2 seed to our 3 so hard. And can you imagine if KU gets to play Duke? KU fans would talk about it for years if they won.

He has Wisconsin as the 5 in our region.

If we're a 3 and Wisky a 5, I would be quite happy to run into them

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #756 on: March 17, 2013, 01:13:47 PM »
Just looked at all of Lunardi's bracket. Everything about it is the best possible situation. Everything. I want Ohio State as the 2 seed to our 3 so hard. And can you imagine if KU gets to play Duke? KU fans would talk about it for years if they won.

He has Wisconsin as the 5 in our region.

If we're a 3 and Wisky a 5, I would be quite happy to run into them

Yeah, the only way we play them is in the Elite 8. I'd be happy to play pretty much anyone in the E8  :dunno:
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17806
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #757 on: March 17, 2013, 01:15:23 PM »
Palm has us playing the winner of a play-in game :sdeek: Would make it hard to troll fanbases

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #758 on: March 17, 2013, 01:23:21 PM »
Palm has us playing the winner of a play-in game :sdeek: Would make it hard to troll fanbases

South Dakota St would be like shooting fish in a barrel.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13745
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #759 on: March 17, 2013, 01:23:56 PM »
UNC is a 7?  no rough ridin' way

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #760 on: March 17, 2013, 01:24:27 PM »
UNC is a 7?  no rough ridin' way

Yeah if they win today they'll move up for sure. They're UNC.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1418
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #761 on: March 17, 2013, 01:25:29 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.

According to massey ratings, we would have a 60% chance of beating Wichita St and a 61% chance of beating UCLA.  Interesting.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #762 on: March 17, 2013, 01:26:36 PM »
would be a great couple days at the sprint center. I would love it if exactly that happened.
emaw

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #763 on: March 17, 2013, 01:29:28 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.

LEMONROCK!!

Man, I would take this so hard.  Dream bracket?  :bracketmouse:

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #764 on: March 17, 2013, 01:41:45 PM »
My top 4 seeds i would still stand by,  but when trying to put them in regions, i forget that Lville actually has the best chance to be the 1 in the MWest since they are overall #1 seed.    So have to re-shift my regions

--- West --- South --- MWest --- East ---
1.Gonz      1. KU        1. Lville     1. Ind
2. Gtown   2. Duke    2. Ohio St  2. Miami
3. N Mex   3. Mich St  3. Kstate   3. Flor
4. Mich      4. Marq     4. Wisc      4. Cuse
« Last Edit: March 17, 2013, 01:51:08 PM by Powercat Posse »

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9500
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #765 on: March 17, 2013, 01:45:05 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.

LEMONROCK!!

Man, I would take this so hard.  Dream bracket? YES  :bracketmouse:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #766 on: March 17, 2013, 01:54:32 PM »

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17326
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #767 on: March 17, 2013, 02:05:45 PM »
My top 4 seeds i would still stand by,  but when trying to put them in regions, i forget that Lville actually has the best chance to be the 1 in the MWest since they are overall #1 seed.    So have to re-shift my regions

--- West --- South --- MWest --- East ---
1.Gonz      1. KU        1. Lville     1. Ind
2. Gtown   2. Duke    2. Ohio St  2. Miami
3. N Mex   3. Mich St  3. Kstate   3. Flor
4. Mich      4. Marq     4. Wisc      4. Cuse

Oh my God the butthurt if KU doesn't end up in KC. CAN YOU GUYS EVEN IMAGINE THE BUTTHURT!?!?!

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #768 on: March 17, 2013, 02:07:44 PM »
My top 4 seeds i would still stand by,  but when trying to put them in regions, i forget that Lville actually has the best chance to be the 1 in the MWest since they are overall #1 seed.    So have to re-shift my regions

--- West --- South --- MWest --- East ---
1.Gonz      1. KU        1. Lville     1. Ind
2. Gtown   2. Duke    2. Ohio St  2. Miami
3. N Mex   3. Mich St  3. Kstate   3. Flor
4. Mich      4. Marq     4. Wisc      4. Cuse

Oh my God the butthurt if KU doesn't end up in KC. CAN YOU GUYS EVEN IMAGINE THE BUTTHURT!?!?!

They're a lock for KC.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #769 on: March 17, 2013, 02:08:08 PM »
I think I really underestimated the impact of having no bad losses. I don't think we've DONE anything to deserve a three seed, it must be what we DIDN'T do, which is have a bad loss. I would seriously forget all about the KU game yesterday if we end up as a 3 seed with favorable matchups.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #770 on: March 17, 2013, 02:09:02 PM »
Why would that happen Stevesie?

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #771 on: March 17, 2013, 02:12:43 PM »
So does UF losing help us?

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17326
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #772 on: March 17, 2013, 02:15:01 PM »
Why would that happen Stevesie?

It won't. It'd just be hilarious.

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #773 on: March 17, 2013, 02:15:21 PM »
I don't think so PP. They are a pretty strong 3. Michigan losing to Wiscy was the biggest thing. They've been very mediocre their last 12 games and taking an early exit in your conference tourney doesn't look good.

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #774 on: March 17, 2013, 02:15:36 PM »