Author Topic: Bracketology 1/8/13  (Read 86429 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #725 on: March 17, 2013, 12:33:27 PM »
Posse, you're not really thinking we're a 3 seed, right?

We're a pretty clear 4.

Seems like some pretty stiff competition between K-State, Michigan, Marquette, Syracuse and Wisconsin for that last 3.   
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #726 on: March 17, 2013, 12:33:58 PM »
We're a 4 that could slide to a 5.  This isn't that hard*.


*that's what she said

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #727 on: March 17, 2013, 12:34:03 PM »
Also, wasn't it a big surprise that we were a 5 seed in 2011? IIRC, everyone thought we would be a 6 seed.

1993 was the craziest, we were on the bubble and ended up as a 6.

Can someone elaborate on this craziness? I was too young to remember it. Sounds awesome.

Offline Lemonrock

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #728 on: March 17, 2013, 12:39:32 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.
S.outhern ignorance +
E.astern arrogance =
C.onfernce hatred

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #729 on: March 17, 2013, 12:40:10 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.

Would love to play that shitty third tier Kansas team.

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1409
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #730 on: March 17, 2013, 12:41:07 PM »
Also, wasn't it a big surprise that we were a 5 seed in 2011? IIRC, everyone thought we would be a 6 seed.

1993 was the craziest, we were on the bubble and ended up as a 6.

Can someone elaborate on this craziness? I was too young to remember it. Sounds awesome.

I don't recall being a bubble team at all in 93.  I remember being pretty confident we were in.  Bubble teams don't get 6 seeds.  Then we got Tulaned.  :cry:  :cry:

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16045
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #731 on: March 17, 2013, 12:42:28 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.
I'll order my Sweet16 shirts now.
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #732 on: March 17, 2013, 12:43:13 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.

Would love to play that shitty third tier Kansas team.

Good bracket.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #733 on: March 17, 2013, 12:44:21 PM »
Top 3 seeds are probably set. Joey Brackets top 3 seeds really shifted last night ... the source is talking.   

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1409
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #734 on: March 17, 2013, 12:45:07 PM »
Nice Bracketology work, Posse! 

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #735 on: March 17, 2013, 12:46:16 PM »
YES!  :bracketmouse:
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #736 on: March 17, 2013, 12:46:24 PM »
Top 3 seeds are probably set. Joey Brackets top 3 seeds really shifted last night ... the source is talking.   

This. I ignore Lunardi all year, but on Selection Sunday, I'm all ears.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #737 on: March 17, 2013, 12:46:52 PM »
Posse, you're not really thinking we're a 3 seed, right?

We're a pretty clear 4.

I immediately regret saying this.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #738 on: March 17, 2013, 12:48:58 PM »
Putting WSU in KC would be a bit of a dick move but would be fun to eliminate them

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85346
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #739 on: March 17, 2013, 12:50:06 PM »
Feels good

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #740 on: March 17, 2013, 12:50:11 PM »
Putting WSU in KC would be a bit of a dick move but would be fun to eliminate them

I mean, they wouldn't get past UCLA so it shouldn't matter.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #741 on: March 17, 2013, 12:50:53 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.
:bracketmouse:

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #742 on: March 17, 2013, 12:52:11 PM »
Putting WSU in KC would be a bit of a dick move but would be fun to eliminate them

I mean, they wouldn't get past UCLA so it shouldn't matter.

Yea, and I just remembered that we got Omaha as an 11 against USC.

Offline yoman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #743 on: March 17, 2013, 12:52:58 PM »
Lunardi just updated:
Bumped to a #3 against SDSU
Wichita St vs #6 UCLA would play the winner.
:bracketmouse:
This. Would take and love. Life would be sweet.
I think this yoman guy is on to something....

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #744 on: March 17, 2013, 12:53:52 PM »
Putting WSU in KC would be a bit of a dick move but would be fun to eliminate them

I mean, they wouldn't get past UCLA so it shouldn't matter.

Yea, and I just remembered that we got Omaha as an 11 against USC.

That was hilarious. So transparent that the committee put us as an 11 just to get the Beaz/Mayo matchup.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #745 on: March 17, 2013, 12:55:27 PM »
Having a hard time reminding myself this is just our hobby sport...  :drool:
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29284
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #746 on: March 17, 2013, 12:56:32 PM »
Being a 3 would be wonderful.  Now I am all nervous inside.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #747 on: March 17, 2013, 12:56:54 PM »
If Wisconsin can be a 4/5 and match up with KU in the second game, I could forgive them. Terrible matchup for KU.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #748 on: March 17, 2013, 12:57:29 PM »
Just looked at all of Lunardi's bracket. Everything about it is the best possible situation. Everything. I want Ohio State as the 2 seed to our 3 so hard. And can you imagine if KU gets to play Duke? KU fans would talk about it for years if they won.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #749 on: March 17, 2013, 12:59:44 PM »
Welp.

Quote from: @slmandel
Selection Sunday reminder: EVERY YEAR committee emphasizes non-conf. SOS.

we played Michigan, Florida, and Gonzaga.  WGAF what our non con SOS rating is, they need to look past that or they're dumb.