Author Topic: Bracketology 1/8/13 (Read 101964 times)

GoodForAnother · « **Reply #700 on:** March 16, 2013, 10:27:16 PM »

Quote from: kougar24 on March 16, 2013, 10:23:46 PM

Quote from: scottwildcat on March 16, 2013, 10:22:58 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 16, 2013, 10:19:29 PM
Seriously guys, Gonzaga wouldn't even buy us dinner first. And they'd go in dry (again). You guys are crazy.

out of the projected 1s who do you want.

Louisville by a country mile. Then Indiana. Then .................................Zaga.

Louisville is a really complete team

kougar24 · « **Reply #701 on:** March 16, 2013, 10:29:33 PM »

Quote from: GoodForAnother on March 16, 2013, 10:27:16 PM

Quote from: kougar24 on March 16, 2013, 10:23:46 PM
Quote from: scottwildcat on March 16, 2013, 10:22:58 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 16, 2013, 10:19:29 PM
Seriously guys, Gonzaga wouldn't even buy us dinner first. And they'd go in dry (again). You guys are crazy.

out of the projected 1s who do you want.

Louisville by a country mile. Then Indiana. Then .................................Zaga.

Louisville is a really complete team

It's about matchups. And we match up horribly with Gonzaga. Confirmed.

We wouldn't beat any of the #1s, so this is all academic, but give me a shot against Louisville over a repeat ass-raping by Zaga.

The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep · « **Reply #702 on:** March 16, 2013, 10:31:55 PM »

I think Angel might be able to hang with Silva. Don't really wanna find out though...

Ideally I'd wanna move up to a 3 and see Miami as the 2. That probably won't happen, so I guess I'd wanna see Gonzaga as the 1 in our bracket.

We're a completely different team and they haven't been tested in conference play like they would be against us. Any idea where that hypothetical game would be?

kougar24 · « **Reply #703 on:** March 16, 2013, 10:32:26 PM »

Quote from: Kelly Clarkson Creep on March 16, 2013, 10:31:55 PM

Any idea where that hypothetical game would be?

Ass-rape City.

timhawk · « **Reply #704 on:** March 16, 2013, 10:33:32 PM »

Quote from: Kelly Clarkson Creep on March 16, 2013, 10:31:55 PM

I think Angel might be able to hang with Silva. Don't really wanna find out though...

Ideally I'd wanna move up to a 3 and see Miami as the 2. That probably won't happen, so I guess I'd wanna see Gonzaga as the 1 in our bracket.

We're a completely different team and they haven't been tested in conference play like they would be against us. Any idea where that hypothetical game would be?

not being a jerk on this post, but where do you see ksu seeded? do you think they'll be in KC first 2 rounds?

GoodForAnother · « **Reply #705 on:** March 16, 2013, 10:34:44 PM »

Quote from: kougar24 on March 16, 2013, 10:29:33 PM

Quote from: GoodForAnother on March 16, 2013, 10:27:16 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 16, 2013, 10:23:46 PM
Quote from: scottwildcat on March 16, 2013, 10:22:58 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 16, 2013, 10:19:29 PM
Seriously guys, Gonzaga wouldn't even buy us dinner first. And they'd go in dry (again). You guys are crazy.

out of the projected 1s who do you want.

Louisville by a country mile. Then Indiana. Then .................................Zaga.

Louisville is a really complete team

It's about matchups. And we match up horribly with Gonzaga. Confirmed.

We wouldn't beat any of the #1s, so this is all academic, but give me a shot against Louisville over a repeat ass-raping by Zaga.

You're prob right. I haven't watched much basketball outside of ksu this year so I don't really know. I watched lville tonight though and they looked amazing in the 2nd.

The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep · « **Reply #706 on:** March 16, 2013, 10:36:34 PM »

Quote from: ljmhawk on March 16, 2013, 10:33:32 PM

Quote from: Kelly Clarkson Creep on March 16, 2013, 10:31:55 PM
I think Angel might be able to hang with Silva. Don't really wanna find out though...

Ideally I'd wanna move up to a 3 and see Miami as the 2. That probably won't happen, so I guess I'd wanna see Gonzaga as the 1 in our bracket.

We're a completely different team and they haven't been tested in conference play like they would be against us. Any idea where that hypothetical game would be?

not being a jerk on this post, but where do you see ksu seeded? do you think they'll be in KC first 2 rounds?

4. Yes. Any other questions I can answer for you so you don't have to read the last 8 posts in this thread to find the answers?

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #707 on:** March 17, 2013, 03:29:59 AM »

OK guys, Its after 3 o clock. I am tired but i am gonna try to give us some hope. Thank you Lville for coming back against the Cuse

As of right now, I am still hopeful we have that last 3 seed spot.

I think Mich St and Kstate are the last two 3 seeds. I think Syracuse and Michigan are the top two 4 seeds

________________________________________________________________________________________

Its gonna be close whether we get the 3 or the 4.
New Mexico ---- won MWC, will be at least a 3 seed
Florida ----- I think they are a 3 seed win or lose tommorow. Have a shot at the last 2 seed
Ohio St ---- I think they are a 3 seed win or lose tommorrow. Have a shot at the last 2 seed

Lville, Gonz, Indiana and KU are my likely #1 seeds
Duke, Miami, and GTown are 3 of the 4 #2 seeds

Stevesie60 · « **Reply #708 on:** March 17, 2013, 03:33:59 AM »

Just to play Devil's advocate, K-State and Syracuse both lost to a 1 seed today. Why do you think we'll jump them for a 3 seed because of this?

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #709 on:** March 17, 2013, 03:57:24 AM »

Quote from: Jakesie60 on March 17, 2013, 03:33:59 AM

Just to play Devil's advocate, K-State and Syracuse both lost to a 1 seed today. Why do you think we'll jump them for a 3 seed because of this?

Forget Lundardi.

I had Cuse as a 4 seed before today....... and my hope for KState >>> Cuse

1) a 14-4 co Big 12 champ Ksu team and a 11-7 5th place BEast Cuse team both lost in conf finals
2) That our 9-3 last 12 compared to their 6-6 last 12..... will help when realizing they have a much better SOS
3) Both teams 6 top 50 wins FWIW

gokatgo · « **Reply #710 on:** March 17, 2013, 06:36:49 AM »

It's all about Ohio State. If they win, they're a 3. If they lose, we're a 3.

Mark it down

kso_FAN · « **Reply #711 on:** March 17, 2013, 08:40:24 AM »

We're safe as a 4; maybe sneak into a 3. I remember we were all pretty surprised by the 2 seed in '10, but that team had a much tougher SOS and more quality wins (11-6 vs Top 50 in 10, 6-7 this year).

kougar24 · « **Reply #712 on:** March 17, 2013, 09:57:33 AM »

Who do we blame for our dumpster fire noncon schedule? Currie, right?

catzacker · « **Reply #713 on:** March 17, 2013, 10:10:11 AM »

there is little chance we're a 3. Mich and tOSU won't fall to a 4, however if one (or both) did, Marquette or Syracuse are more deserving (tougher league, better rpi, sos). If Whisky wins, they'll have to do something with them and that might mean moving them up to the 4 line. Hopefully its zona that falls.

K-S-U-Wildcats! · « **Reply #714 on:** March 17, 2013, 10:18:07 AM »

So when does Lunardi finish his conference call with the committee and post his latest projections?

PowercatPat · « **Reply #715 on:** March 17, 2013, 10:24:29 AM »

Looking at New Mexico's resume, how the eff are they ranked 2nd in the RPI? Their best RPI win is against Colorado State. Their top 8 RPI wins are all against MWC teams. Their losses include a home loss to South Dakota State and a road loss to Air Force. I just don't see it.

PowercatPat · « **Reply #716 on:** March 17, 2013, 10:26:44 AM »

Also, wasn't it a big surprise that we were a 5 seed in 2011? IIRC, everyone thought we would be a 6 seed.

wetwillie · « **Reply #717 on:** March 17, 2013, 11:04:31 AM »

Quote from: kougar24 on March 17, 2013, 09:57:33 AM

Who do we blame for our dumpster fire noncon schedule? Currie, right?

Andy and his ties are to blame

CHONGS · « **Reply #718 on:** March 17, 2013, 11:48:39 AM »

I just want the cats to play on Friday so I can watch.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

gokatgo · « **Reply #719 on:** March 17, 2013, 11:50:16 AM »

Quote from: PowercatPat on March 17, 2013, 10:26:44 AM

Also, wasn't it a big surprise that we were a 5 seed in 2011? IIRC, everyone thought we would be a 6 seed.

1993 was the craziest, we were on the bubble and ended up as a 6.

Then lost

scottwildcat · « **Reply #720 on:** March 17, 2013, 11:52:17 AM »

Quote from: PowercatPat on March 17, 2013, 10:26:44 AM

Also, wasn't it a big surprise that we were a 5 seed in 2011? IIRC, everyone thought we would be a 6 seed.

Don't care.

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #721 on:** March 17, 2013, 11:53:17 AM »

So here is what i think =

--- 1 seeds ---- 2 seeds ---- 3 seeds ---- 4 seeds ---
1. Lville 5. Duke 9. N Mex 13. Cuse
2. Gonz 6. Gtown 10. Fla 14. Mich
3. Ind 7. Miami 11. Mich St 15. Wisc
4. KU 8. Ohio St 12. KState 16. Marq

Conf record and place = Kstate 14-4 (T-1) Cuse 11-7 (5th) Mich 12-6 (5th). Ksu/Cuse made conf finals. Mich lost in qtrs.
SOS = KState 56, Cuse 5, Mich 68
Top 50 record = KState 6-7, Cuse 6-8, Mich 8-6
Last 12 games = KState 9-3, Cuse 6-6, Mich 6-6
Road/Nuetral gms = KState 11-6, Cuse 9-7, Mich 9-6

Last 2 seed was tough. I gave it to Ohio St. They went 13-5, tied for 2nd and at least made the finals in the toughest conf.
Duke got 2nd in ACC and lost in ACC quarters. So had to go with KU as the final 1 seed

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

I tried to just seed the top 4 seeds in regions and here is what i came up with.

--- WEST ---- SOUTH ---- MWest ---- EAST ----
1. Gonz 1. KU 1. Ind 1. Lvile
2. Ohio St 2. Duke 2. Gtown 2. Miami
3. KState 3. N Mex 3. Flor 3. Mich St
4. Marq 4. Mich 4. Cuse 4. Wisc

I will put out my top 12 seeds out later today. After these games at noon, might have a better idea who is on the 6 seed line (or 5 perhaps) and see who potential opponents for us could be

kim carnes · « **Reply #722 on:** March 17, 2013, 12:11:27 PM »

i am so nervous

The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep · « **Reply #723 on:** March 17, 2013, 12:12:30 PM »

Posse, you're not really thinking we're a 3 seed, right?

We're a pretty clear 4.

Stevesie60 · « **Reply #724 on:** March 17, 2013, 12:23:10 PM »

Welp.

Quote from: @slmandel

Selection Sunday reminder: EVERY YEAR committee emphasizes non-conf. SOS.

Author Topic: Bracketology 1/8/13 (Read 101964 times)

catzacker