No, like this entire thread, if I evaluated each statement's veracity, my answer in each case would be, "No, not really.". For exaple, the idea that there is now more access to healthcare is false because deductibles are rising so fast that more and more people cannot afford them - especially those who couldn't afford heath insurance before Obamacare. As a result, people don't go to the doctor even when they have insurance.
I could be wrong, but the intent isn't necessarily to get people to go to the doctor. It's so that if you get cancer or have an emergency situation, you won't go bankrupt with a bill you can't pay. Part of this thing working is assuming a bunch of healthy people required to purchase the mandate wouldn't actually go to the doctor. It's how we pay for someone with chronic disease to get insured.
Some commercial insurance (I know mine does) creates an incentive for folks to engage in preventative activities like having physicals, health screenings, vaccinations, etc. My insurance pays 100% of all wellness visits for my family. Vaccinations are completely covered. Premium deductions are leveraged for unhealthy activities like obesity and smoking. Stuff like this is starting to gain more steam.
Honestly, a lot of people should go to the doctor less and take less prescription drugs. So, if you're only going to the doctor for truly preventative activities and when you're really sick, we're all probably better off anyway.