Author Topic: frank for three more years  (Read 32871 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #75 on: March 07, 2010, 03:07:25 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

 :users:

manbeck says it went well the whole time. a basketball staff member says it didn't. don't know man.  :dunno:

Offline C_Manbeck

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #76 on: March 07, 2010, 03:10:03 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

 :users:

manbeck says it went well the whole time. a basketball staff member says it didn't. don't know man.  :dunno:

They did. You got the PM a week ago I sent out, I think anyways. I can't remember. I think I forgot Trim on it somehow. My bad Trim.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #77 on: March 07, 2010, 03:10:43 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

 :users:

manbeck says it went well the whole time. a basketball staff member says it didn't. don't know man.  :dunno:

I don't trust either. I trust the fact that it got signed today, before the tourney. That tells me the negotiations probably have been in good standing for quite awhile.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30946
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #78 on: March 07, 2010, 03:14:49 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

 :users:

manbeck says it went well the whole time. a basketball staff member says it didn't. don't know man.  :dunno:

I am sticking with the opinion that I have, based on information from the staff side of the equation....go ahead and jiggle Currie's balls if you want...he's never recruited a player, never won a game...I'll go with the talent, you can go with management if you want.

   :users:
« Last Edit: March 07, 2010, 03:17:20 PM by Pete »

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30946
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #79 on: March 07, 2010, 03:15:57 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

 :users:

manbeck says it went well the whole time. a basketball staff member says it didn't. don't know man.  :dunno:

I don't trust either. I trust the fact that it got signed today, before the tourney. That tells me the negotiations probably have been in good standing for quite awhile.

"AWHILE" after he got a bagillion requests to "pay frank."  Coincidence?

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #80 on: March 07, 2010, 03:17:43 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

 :users:

manbeck says it went well the whole time. a basketball staff member says it didn't. don't know man.  :dunno:

I am sticking with the opinion that I have, based on information from the staff side of the equation....go ahead and jiggle Currie's ball if you want...he's never recruited a player, never won a game...I'll go with the talent, you can go with management if you want.

   :users:

Sounds like you're jaded by corporate America, but it is possible for mngmt and the talent to be on the same side, you know. I prefer to jiggle Currie's and Martin's balls at the same time.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #81 on: March 07, 2010, 03:20:44 PM »
there is no incongruity in a bball staffer reporting that martin didn't feel like contract talks were progressing and not understanding why in january, and martin and currie concluding talks to mutual satisfaction in march.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30946
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #82 on: March 07, 2010, 03:21:28 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

 :users:

manbeck says it went well the whole time. a basketball staff member says it didn't. don't know man.  :dunno:

I am sticking with the opinion that I have, based on information from the staff side of the equation....go ahead and jiggle Currie's ball if you want...he's never recruited a player, never won a game...I'll go with the talent, you can go with management if you want.

   :users:

Sounds like you're jaded by corporate America, but it is possible for mngmt and the talent to be on the same side, you know. I prefer to jiggle Currie's and Martin's balls at the same time.

Agreed on the mutual ball jiggling, and corporate America.

I'm very pleased with Frank's deal, and I don't have any reason to think that Currie won't be very capable when it's time to hire a football coach...so life is good for me right now.   :thumbsup:

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42622
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #83 on: March 07, 2010, 03:24:53 PM »
They did. You got the PM a week ago I sent out, I think anyways. I can't remember. I think I forgot Trim on it somehow. My bad Trim.

We need to get you a master e-mail/PM/cell/text list for stuff like this. 


Between this, the octagon explosion, prince mysteriously getting canned just days before Pete's banner of dissent took flight I'm starting to think there isn't a more formidable cadre of fans who are as capable of shaping public opinion as the members here.

Give yourselves a fist pump gents.

Yep.

These gentlemen who lectured KK informed us that they serve on committees and so forth with Currie, and they "know what's going on."  When we informed them that we get our info from people who put money in the system, instead of those who take it out, they were unimpressed...assuring us that we didn't know how bad things were.

I liked their logic when they told you and KK to shut up and donate money, despite the fact you sit in the VERY SAME DONOR SECTION as they do.



there is no incongruity in a bball staffer reporting that martin didn't feel like contract talks were progressing and not understanding why in january, and martin and currie concluding talks to mutual satisfaction in march.

Don't forget the February PAY FRANK movement.



Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30946
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #84 on: March 07, 2010, 03:28:37 PM »

These gentlemen who lectured KK informed us that they serve on committees and so forth with Currie, and they "know what's going on."  When we informed them that we get our info from people who put money in the system, instead of those who take it out, they were unimpressed...assuring us that we didn't know how bad things were.

Quote
I liked their logic when they told you and KK to shut up and donate money, despite the fact you sit in the VERY SAME DONOR SECTION as they do.




Ya, their financial logic just got blown out the window by this very announcement.   Guess we aren't bankrupt after all.    :pbj:

Offline C_Manbeck

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #85 on: March 07, 2010, 03:30:38 PM »
They did. You got the PM a week ago I sent out, I think anyways. I can't remember. I think I forgot Trim on it somehow. My bad Trim.

We need to get you a master e-mail/PM/cell/text list for stuff like this. 


Between this, the octagon explosion, prince mysteriously getting canned just days before Pete's banner of dissent took flight I'm starting to think there isn't a more formidable cadre of fans who are as capable of shaping public opinion as the members here.

Give yourselves a fist pump gents.

Yep.

These gentlemen who lectured KK informed us that they serve on committees and so forth with Currie, and they "know what's going on."  When we informed them that we get our info from people who put money in the system, instead of those who take it out, they were unimpressed...assuring us that we didn't know how bad things were.

I liked their logic when they told you and KK to shut up and donate money, despite the fact you sit in the VERY SAME DONOR SECTION as they do.



there is no incongruity in a bball staffer reporting that martin didn't feel like contract talks were progressing and not understanding why in january, and martin and currie concluding talks to mutual satisfaction in march.

Don't forget the February PAY FRANK movement.




Yeah, I always seem to forget and leave someone out.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30946
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #86 on: March 07, 2010, 03:32:09 PM »
Almost forgot the best part...

...IF it is proven that Wefald did indeed know about the "secret" Krause deals, after publicly denying it, then I proposed that we should sue Wefald personally for breach of fiduciary responsibility and a host of other malfeasances .  You would have thought that I said we should go re-kill Jesus or something.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #87 on: March 07, 2010, 03:35:39 PM »
Almost forgot the best part...

...IF it is proven that Wefald did indeed know about the "secret" Krause deals, after publicly denying it, then I proposed that we should sue Wefald personally for breach of fiduciary responsibility and a host of other malfeasances .  You would have thought that I said we should go re-kill Jesus or something.

LOL, who did you say that to again?

Offline JMart

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #88 on: March 07, 2010, 03:36:03 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

Well, that settles it. It's official.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55957
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #89 on: March 07, 2010, 03:36:35 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

Well, that settles it. It's official.

:bwpopcorn:

Offline JMart

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #90 on: March 07, 2010, 03:37:19 PM »
Did it really require giving the fans the impression of a rift?

 :facepalm:


:dunno:

Only two people gave the impression of a rift — Kietzman and JMart. I would question the validity of their sources, or at least what their sources' motives are. Don't fall for that stuff.

I know where Jmart got his stuff.  I have met the person from whom Jmart got his stuff.  It's completely valid, or people in the program were lying.


Wouldn't say he was lying, but again you need to question that source's motives

Motive was clearly to get the deal done asap.  Was this ever in question?

This.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42622
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #91 on: March 07, 2010, 03:37:39 PM »
:PUMP: :PUMP: :PUMP:

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #92 on: March 07, 2010, 03:37:46 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

Well, that settles it. It's official.

You know what is official? Currie got the freaking job done.

 :thumbsup:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #93 on: March 07, 2010, 03:37:58 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

Well, that settles it. It's official.

:bwpopcorn:

 :eek:
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline JMart

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #94 on: March 07, 2010, 03:38:37 PM »
Currie 1
JMart 0

:dunno:

WTF are you talking about?  Look at Frank's new deal.  JMart 1 Currie 0

Not a zero-sum game.

It is JMart 1 Currie 1 Frank 1 Sec 17 5 bazillion.

You're right.  I forgot to carry the remainder.

Currie did exactly what we asked. We cannot say he's as incompetent (yet) as JMart proposed. Still not awarding JMart crap. Nor those Sec 17 losers.

Where did I propose he was incompetent? Never asked you to reward me anything, either.

Offline JMart

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #95 on: March 07, 2010, 03:39:27 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

This.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55957
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #96 on: March 07, 2010, 03:39:58 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

Well, that settles it. It's official.

You know what is official? Currie got the freaking job done.

 :thumbsup:

Yeah, a lot of goEMAW elite's feelings towards Currie remind me of Powertards' feelings toward Clemente's transition 3's.  

Completely ignoring results, because they're racist.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17047
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #97 on: March 07, 2010, 03:40:51 PM »
nicely done KAZZU
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #98 on: March 07, 2010, 03:41:55 PM »
micat,

it is fun.  try to have fun sometime.

sincerely,
righteous anger

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: frank for three more years
« Reply #99 on: March 07, 2010, 03:42:28 PM »
Jmarts source was wrong.  It happens.  Doesn't mean it or others won't be right more often than not.

i don't think his source was wrong. his source said that currie is kind of a doof and that contract negotiations were not progressing and that frank was unsure as to why it wasn't. seems like this was probably the case.

Contract negotiations went well the whole time. There was never a problem.

Well, that settles it. It's official.

You know what is official? Currie got the freaking job done.

 :thumbsup:

Yeah, a lot of goEMAW elite's feelings towards Currie remind me of Powertards' feelings toward Clemente's transition 3's.  

Completely ignoring results, because they're racist.

Good comparison. It's just hard for people to switch gears once they go adamently (and prematurely) down a path.