Author Topic: phog.net realignment gems  (Read 163479 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #375 on: September 15, 2011, 08:08:37 PM »
Butthurt Nation is in all out invalidation mode.  I love it.  


 :love:

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #376 on: September 15, 2011, 08:09:04 PM »
Butthurt Nation is in all out invalidation mode.  I love it.  


 :love:

 :love:

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #377 on: September 15, 2011, 08:10:01 PM »
Butthurt Nation is in all out invalidation mode.  I love it.  


 :love:

 :love:
wut?














:confused:

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #378 on: September 15, 2011, 08:10:11 PM »
35-3 Big 12 regular season/post-season titles and Elite Eight would have been the best season in the modern day era of K-State basketball.  For Jayhawk fans, it was just another season.  God, I love it.  


 :love:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32489
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #379 on: September 15, 2011, 08:11:59 PM »
its cute when ben uses dax's terminology, like a married couple finishing each others sentences.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #380 on: September 15, 2011, 08:12:22 PM »

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #381 on: September 15, 2011, 08:12:42 PM »
ku draws alot of poor/white trash viewers, so they aren't as attractive, in terms of television dollars.
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #382 on: September 15, 2011, 08:14:45 PM »
35-3 Big 12 regular season/post-season titles and Elite Eight would have been the best season in the modern day era of K-State basketball.  For Jayhawk fans, it was just another season.  God, I love it.  


 :love:
really..... i mean really.....Do we really have to go with you losing to mid major smack?


I know, lets go realignment based on tournament, outs. put like competition with like competition
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #383 on: September 15, 2011, 08:16:05 PM »
Quote
They would love to have Kansas, academically and basketball. It would not be a monetary thing with football, but it would give you a flagship basketball program on one side of the league and one on the other side of the league with UCLA.


 :woot:

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #384 on: September 15, 2011, 08:16:26 PM »
What's the over/under on number of posts before Beems implodes and leaves (forever!) again?

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17812
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #385 on: September 15, 2011, 08:16:40 PM »
KU absolutely SHOULD be terrified of going mid-major. Have they ever won a game against them?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18050
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #386 on: September 15, 2011, 08:17:32 PM »
Congrats on keeping your fingers crossed that the Big Ten drops to option 14 of 15

Also, congrats on being mentioned in someones Pac 12 speculation.  Note though, we're listed too.

:dunno:

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #387 on: September 15, 2011, 08:17:43 PM »
What's the over/under on number of posts before Beems implodes and leaves (forever!) again?

He can only own us with FRANK THE TANK and TURFBURNER.COM for so long.  
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #388 on: September 15, 2011, 08:18:26 PM »
KU absolutely SHOULD be terrified of going mid-major. Have they ever won a game against them?



K-State is a mid major.  Next.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #389 on: September 15, 2011, 08:20:06 PM »
ku draws alot of poor/white trash viewers, so they aren't as attractive, in terms of television dollars.

Good point, Saul.  Advertisers want viewers who can actually buy their products.

Offline babytears

  • Point Plank'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #390 on: September 15, 2011, 08:20:38 PM »
Manhattan should set up an Ellis Island-ish thing where they open the city to each and every Mexican that wants to move there.  Lots of Mexicans (like your bball team  :lol: ).  And when they come, instead of a giving them a cup of soup, you give them a color TV set.  That place would get huge.  Huge TV-owning population = huge TV market.  This is the only was to avoid the Missouri Valley.  Believe!!

The PAC 10 won't take ku because it's the most racist school in country.

So...what's with you, buddy?  You have a picture of a KU guy under your name thing.  And then you have a reference to KU under that picture thing.  And then you have a quote from a KU fan under the space where your posts go.  Is 'Limestone' a reference to KU too?  But you are a KSU fan, right?  I find all of this weird.  Does anyone else find this weird?  I find it weird.  I mean, I kinda understand why you wouldn't like KU very much, but to form your identity around KU is pretty odd.  It makes you seem like a real dildo.  Just being honest.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #391 on: September 15, 2011, 08:20:55 PM »
KU absolutely SHOULD be terrified of going mid-major. Have they ever won a game against them?



K-State is a mid major.  Next.

Source?

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #392 on: September 15, 2011, 08:22:37 PM »
KU absolutely SHOULD be terrified of going mid-major. Have they ever won a game against them?



K-State is a mid major.  Next.

Source?

FRANK THE TANK FOOOOOOOL

SO GOOD ESPN CAN'T GET A CONTRACT FOR HIM TO WRITE THEIR CONTENT
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #393 on: September 15, 2011, 08:24:12 PM »
what beems looks like in between postings on goEMAW

Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22435
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #394 on: September 15, 2011, 08:25:24 PM »
you all just fell for oh's plan to ruin the phog gems thread.  seriously, wasn't there an oh master thread for this crap?

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #395 on: September 15, 2011, 08:26:34 PM »
you all just fell for oh's plan to ruin the phog gems thread.  seriously, wasn't there an oh master thread for this crap?

i would argue that this thread at least was partially motivated in bringing him back here in the first place :kstategrad:

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #396 on: September 15, 2011, 08:28:17 PM »
you all just fell for oh's plan to ruin the phog gems thread.  seriously, wasn't there an oh master thread for this crap?

this is the thread for him.  he is ruining the Cigars thread

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #397 on: September 15, 2011, 08:29:05 PM »
Congrats on keeping your fingers crossed that the Big Ten drops to option 14 of 15

Also, congrats on being mentioned in someones Pac 12 speculation.  Note though, we're listed too.

:dunno:



It wasn't in any certain order.  It was just a list.  Butthurt status noted, though.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17812
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #398 on: September 15, 2011, 08:30:29 PM »
Congrats on keeping your fingers crossed that the Big Ten drops to option 14 of 15

Also, congrats on being mentioned in someones Pac 12 speculation.  Note though, we're listed too.

:dunno:



It wasn't in any certain order.  It was just a list.  Butthurt status noted, though.

Ben, you calling someone butthurt is like a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) calling someone dumb.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: phog.net realignment gems
« Reply #399 on: September 15, 2011, 08:31:34 PM »
No particular order but they are still numbered?  That makes sense.