goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:23:39 PM

Title: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:23:39 PM
rough ridin' Pussy.  Choke artist. 

Senior AA getting stripped like that for a break away dunk, not showing up all night.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Pett on February 12, 2011, 10:24:34 PM
I liked his free throws with three minutes to go to put us up by two. :facepalm:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: PowercatPat on February 12, 2011, 10:25:10 PM
I liked his free throws with three minutes to go to put us up by two. :facepalm:

I was just abou to say this.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: pike on February 12, 2011, 10:25:17 PM
Hate Jake.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 12, 2011, 10:25:26 PM
What he did to get us back in the game didn't atone for putting us there in the first place.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:25:59 PM
What he did to get us back in the game didn't atone for putting us there in the first place.
not sure if serious.jpg

he didn't get us back in it
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 12, 2011, 10:26:17 PM
He fell pretty far, pretty fast.   :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 12, 2011, 10:28:07 PM
What he did to get us back in the game didn't atone for putting us there in the first place.
not sure if serious.jpg

he didn't get us back in it

Not all the way... but he did make some decent plays (3 at the TO :shrug:, layup, FT + miss). But it was on his shoulders that we were in that position, so... yeah.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: KSU176 on February 12, 2011, 10:28:53 PM
I hate Jake more than any K-State athlete ever before!
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:29:29 PM
I understand he thinks he is better then he is.  but he is playing himself out of the NBA with this rough ridin' pussy attitude.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:30:14 PM
the 0 will not be in the bram's rafters
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Pendergast on February 12, 2011, 10:30:24 PM
Sherron looked the norm this evening.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2011, 10:30:36 PM
His attitude is fine. He wants to win. He's just not making enough plays. Simple really.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: EMAWzified on February 12, 2011, 10:31:23 PM
He was never an NBA player.
You won't know how much you miss him until he's gone
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 12, 2011, 10:31:52 PM
You guys are dipshits. 
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 12, 2011, 10:32:22 PM
you people are genuine retards.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:32:52 PM
you guys are idiots if you don't put the majority of this on jake.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:33:26 PM
Senior AA don't get rough ridin' stripped by underclassmen to lose game you idiots.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 12, 2011, 10:33:34 PM
I understand he thinks he is better then he is.  but he is playing himself out of the NBA with this rough ridin' pussy attitude.

I am in the mood, I want to beat someone's ass right now.  I hate that I am not somewhere where I can show you what a pussy is.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 12, 2011, 10:35:26 PM
Senior AA don't get rough ridin' stripped by underclassmen to lose game you idiots.

it's hard to believe a human can be as stupid as you seem.  i'd like to believe you're someone's sock.  but you aren't funny either.  you'd be a lot of work for no payoff.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Bookcat on February 12, 2011, 10:36:07 PM
Jake is the goat for this one.

I don't care what you say about his 8 against ISU ( who sux)


or his three ball to tie it....he blew the game. Had a great chance to give us  this one at the freethrow line.

eff you apologists...You're the ones that thought Wooly was a nice guy. shazbot! your faces. Expect more.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 12, 2011, 10:37:03 PM
His attitude is fine. He wants to win. He's just not making enough plays. Simple really.

The "attitude" of a one-man offense trying to take about 3 people off the dribble and turning it over or taking a bad 3? I can see he wants to win, but he's simply not good enough (at least this year) to continue trying to be Michael Jordan in end game scenarios. If it's reasonable to try and make a play, fine, but he's forcing too much (ex: watch the play when he got to the rim & missed the 2 FTs. He had an easy pass to a baseline-running Sprads for a wide open 3, but was too busy trying to force something to even see that it was available).

It's this same attitude I've been frustrated with most of this year.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 12, 2011, 10:37:42 PM
I don't want to make the HBBIQ posters mad, but Jake did kind of choke in clutch didn't he?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Pendergast on February 12, 2011, 10:37:50 PM
I understand he thinks he is better then he is.  but he is playing himself out of the NBA with this rough ridin' pussy attitude.

I am in the mood, I want to beat someone's ass right now.  I hate that I am not somewhere where I can show you what a pussy is.

Wait, so you're a pussy, and you want to show him what you look like?  Weird thing to say.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2011, 10:38:40 PM
His attitude is fine. He wants to win. He's just not making enough plays. Simple really.

The "attitude" of a one-man offense trying to take about 3 people off the dribble and turning it over or taking a bad 3? I can see he wants to win, but he's simply not good enough (at least this year) to continue trying to be Michael Jordan in end game scenarios. If it's reasonable to try and make a play, fine, but he's forcing too much (ex: watch the play when he got to the rim & missed the 2 FTs. He had an easy pass to a baseline-running Sprads for a wide open 3, but was too busy trying to force something to even see that it was available).

It's this same attitude I've been frustrated with most of this year.  :dunno:

Even with the mistakes he made, I want the ball in Jake's hands in those situations every time. Every time. The TO was bad, but I still want him making a play.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 12, 2011, 10:38:55 PM
I don't want to make the HBBIQ posters mad, but Jake did kind of choke in clutch didn't he?

Yeah, he did.  No reason to go off on him like a bunch of 7th graders.  
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: KSU176 on February 12, 2011, 10:39:26 PM
If any other player on the team played as shitty as Jake, they would never see the court.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:40:02 PM
His attitude is fine. He wants to win. He's just not making enough plays. Simple really.

The "attitude" of a one-man offense trying to take about 3 people off the dribble and turning it over or taking a bad 3? I can see he wants to win, but he's simply not good enough (at least this year) to continue trying to be Michael Jordan in end game scenarios. If it's reasonable to try and make a play, fine, but he's forcing too much (ex: watch the play when he got to the rim & missed the 2 FTs. He had an easy pass to a baseline-running Sprads for a wide open 3, but was too busy trying to force something to even see that it was available).

It's this same attitude I've been frustrated with most of this year.  :dunno:

Even with the mistakes he made, I want the ball in Jake's hands in those situations every time. Every time. The TO was bad, but I still want him making a play.
problem is that more often that not he isn't making the plays.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 12, 2011, 10:40:18 PM
His attitude is fine. He wants to win. He's just not making enough plays. Simple really.

The "attitude" of a one-man offense trying to take about 3 people off the dribble and turning it over or taking a bad 3? I can see he wants to win, but he's simply not good enough (at least this year) to continue trying to be Michael Jordan in end game scenarios. If it's reasonable to try and make a play, fine, but he's forcing too much (ex: watch the play when he got to the rim & missed the 2 FTs. He had an easy pass to a baseline-running Sprads for a wide open 3, but was too busy trying to force something to even see that it was available).

It's this same attitude I've been frustrated with most of this year.  :dunno:

Even with the mistakes he made, I want the ball in Jake's hands in those situations every time. Every time. The TO was bad, but I still want him making a play.

MAKING A PLAY!!!!!!
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 12, 2011, 10:40:37 PM
I don't want to make the HBBIQ posters mad, but Jake did kind of choke in clutch didn't he?

No

People get the ball stolen, he went to the same move he always goes to, Burks made the play, crap happens.  He is limited, can't go left, nothing we don't know.  He didn't make a play, it's far different from a choke.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:41:02 PM
Senior AA don't get rough ridin' stripped by underclassmen to lose game you idiots.

it's hard to believe a human can be as stupid as you seem.  i'd like to believe you're someone's sock.  but you aren't funny either.  you'd be a lot of work for no payoff.
I know you think you are being cute, but STFU.  He choked hard.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ksualum92 on February 12, 2011, 10:41:19 PM
If any other player on the team played as cacty as Jake, they would never see the court.

Have to agree!!
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2011, 10:41:34 PM
Jake didn't make enough plays tonight, but this game was far more than the plays he didn't make.

He's still our best playmaker.

And its not even close.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Johnny Wichita on February 12, 2011, 10:42:00 PM
I understand he thinks he is better then he is.  but he is playing himself out of the NBA with this rough ridin' pussy attitude.

I am in the mood, I want to beat someone's ass right now.  I hate that I am not somewhere where I can show you what a pussy is.

If Jake wasn't such a pussy, we win this game.  
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 12, 2011, 10:42:17 PM
I don't want to make the HBBIQ posters mad, but Jake did kind of choke in clutch didn't he?

not really.  higgins played great d on him all game.  the last play, cu's best player, an nba first rounder with long arms and good feet made a play.  that's why he was on pullen, because he has that ability.


if you're talking about the fts.  meh, crap happens.  sometimes it goes, sometimes it doesn't.

Title: Re: Jake
Post by: KSU176 on February 12, 2011, 10:42:26 PM
Would like to know how many points he gives up and have that counted against the points he scores.  He is a loser.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:42:53 PM
Jake didn't make enough plays tonight, but this game was far more than the plays he didn't make.

He's still our best playmaker.

And its not even close.
dude he as 50% from the line!!! (removing intentional miss)  COME ON.


Did you see the elevator raper doing that last year?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 12, 2011, 10:43:58 PM
His attitude is fine. He wants to win. He's just not making enough plays. Simple really.

The "attitude" of a one-man offense trying to take about 3 people off the dribble and turning it over or taking a bad 3? I can see he wants to win, but he's simply not good enough (at least this year) to continue trying to be Michael Jordan in end game scenarios. If it's reasonable to try and make a play, fine, but he's forcing too much (ex: watch the play when he got to the rim & missed the 2 FTs. He had an easy pass to a baseline-running Sprads for a wide open 3, but was too busy trying to force something to even see that it was available).

It's this same attitude I've been frustrated with most of this year.  :dunno:

Even with the mistakes he made, I want the ball in Jake's hands in those situations every time. Every time. The TO was bad, but I still want him making a play.

MAKING A PLAY!!!!!!

So no matter what happens in a close game, the guy or team you want to make a play has to make said play or it's a choke.  You do realize that there is another team out there right?  If making plays were that easy there would have been no need for a "clutch" play in the last minute, KSU would have won by 50.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kso_FAN on February 12, 2011, 10:44:08 PM
Would like to know how many points he gives up and have that counted against the points he scores.  He is a loser.

What are you talking about? He plays great defense.

Yes, he makes too many turnovers, but he's still our best playmaking guard.

By far.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:45:12 PM
I don't want to make the HBBIQ posters mad, but Jake did kind of choke in clutch didn't he?

not really.  higgins played great d on him all game.  the last play, cu's best player, an nba first rounder with long arms and good feet made a play.  that's why he was on pullen, because he has that ability.


if you're talking about the fts.  meh, crap happens.  sometimes it goes, sometimes it doesn't.


how was his shooting from 3?  what was his asst/to  ratio? 4 for rough ridin' 12! come the eff on.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:46:10 PM
His attitude is fine. He wants to win. He's just not making enough plays. Simple really.

The "attitude" of a one-man offense trying to take about 3 people off the dribble and turning it over or taking a bad 3? I can see he wants to win, but he's simply not good enough (at least this year) to continue trying to be Michael Jordan in end game scenarios. If it's reasonable to try and make a play, fine, but he's forcing too much (ex: watch the play when he got to the rim & missed the 2 FTs. He had an easy pass to a baseline-running Sprads for a wide open 3, but was too busy trying to force something to even see that it was available).

It's this same attitude I've been frustrated with most of this year.  :dunno:

Even with the mistakes he made, I want the ball in Jake's hands in those situations every time. Every time. The TO was bad, but I still want him making a play.

MAKING A PLAY!!!!!!

So no matter what happens in a close game, the guy or team you want to make a play has to make said play or it's a choke.  You do realize that there is another team out there right?  If making plays were that easy there would have been no need for a "clutch" play in the last minute, KSU would have won by 50.
he made the play at ISU.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: pike on February 12, 2011, 10:46:33 PM
Has Jake lost any chance of getting his jersey hung? I say yes
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: PowercatPat on February 12, 2011, 10:47:14 PM
We would have 2 conference wins without Jake.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 12, 2011, 10:47:24 PM
Guys, Will Spradling missed a free throw, too. The whole team choked, not just Jake. Jake did play like crap for the most part, though (so did everyone else).
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 12, 2011, 10:47:32 PM
Would like to know how many points he gives up and have that counted against the points he scores.  He is a loser.

What are you talking about? He plays great defense.

Yes, he makes too many turnovers, but he's still our best playmaking guard.

By far.

We got hooked by a group of idiots.  Seriously one of these dudes is repeatedly calling Jake a pussy, another two are talking about how much he sucks, and yet another thinks Jake is obligated to make a play late just because.  Using any type of logic or reason is pointless.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: KSU176 on February 12, 2011, 10:47:40 PM
Has Jake lost any chance of getting his jersey hung? I say yes

If he gets his Jersey hung.  Who is going to Boo with me?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 12, 2011, 10:48:31 PM
We would have 2 conference wins without Jake.

maybe 1.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 12, 2011, 10:48:39 PM
I realize that Jake is trying to be the playmaker and step up and be the man at the end and win games and all that... which I can appreciate. It's just very frustrating when more often than not he fails because he tries to do it all himself. I hold him to a higher standard than other players, because he's shown us he's better.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: BMWWcat on February 12, 2011, 10:48:50 PM
eff this loser team...
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:49:11 PM
Guys, Will Spradling missed a free throw, too. The whole team choked, not just Jake. Jake did play like crap for the most part, though (so did everyone else).
everyone chokes.  Jake did it like a porn star.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 12, 2011, 10:50:25 PM
Has Jake lost any chance of getting his jersey hung? I say yes

If he gets his Jersey hung.  Who is going to Boo with me?

JFC, you guys are worse than the dumbasses who booed Colon. The shirt tucks are better than you. Think about that.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: pike on February 12, 2011, 10:50:44 PM
I know Jake for some reason likes to dribble off his feet sometimes, but he picked the worst possible time to do so.


It's like a guy with tourettes dropping F bombs in Church, just shouldn't happen
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Johnny Wichita on February 12, 2011, 10:50:57 PM
Would like to know how many points he gives up and have that counted against the points he scores.  He is a loser.

What are you talking about? He plays great defense.

Yes, he makes too many turnovers, but he's still our best playmaking guard.

By far.

We got hooked by a group of idiots.  Seriously one of these dudes is repeatedly calling Jake a pussy, another two are talking about how much he sucks, and yet another thinks Jake is obligated to make a play late just because.  Using any type of logic or reason is pointless.

I agree 100% MIR, Jake = huge pussy.  Great point.  He just couldn't make any plays late.  
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: gatoveintisiete on February 12, 2011, 10:53:05 PM
Has Jake lost any chance of getting his jersey hung? I say yes

If he gets his Jersey hung.  Who is going to Boo with me?

JFC, you guys are worse than the dumbasses who booed Colon. The shirt tucks are better than you. Think about that.

BOOM!
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: PowercatPat on February 12, 2011, 10:55:07 PM
We would have 2 conference wins without Jake.

maybe 1.

I would count TT and NU. No more than that though.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: KSU176 on February 12, 2011, 10:55:51 PM
I know Jake for some reason likes to dribble off his feet sometimes, but he picked the worst possible time to do so.


It's like a guy with tourettes dropping F bombs in Church, just shouldn't happen

He usually forgets how to dribble time after time...game after game.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 10:56:07 PM
jake is average at best right now.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: mcmwcat on February 12, 2011, 11:05:54 PM
retards hate Jake just like they hated Freemaw.  haters gunna hate.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: swish1 on February 12, 2011, 11:12:34 PM
jake is average at best right now.

he averages 18 a game.  do you think average players average 18 a game?  he is currently the second leading scorer in kstate history.  all the jake hate is ridiculous.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 12, 2011, 11:14:30 PM
jake is average at best right now.

he averages 18 a game.  do you think average players average 18 a game?  he is currently the second leading scorer in kstate history.  all the jake hate is ridiculous.
404
Jake 18pts not found
404


found page
http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=310430038
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 13, 2011, 12:33:09 AM
The Jake hate is something else. It's apparent on BOTC to. 1 thread isn't enough to cover it. It needs a rough ridin' book written about it.

I just don't know what people to expect. Do they expect rough ridin' superman to pop out every game? The Xavier game is rough ridin' with people's heads. He's our best offensive playmaker, it's not even close. A future NBAer made a play. It is what it is. Oh, he missed some FTs? So did everyone else. Don't give me that clutch bullshit. Purely BS to talk about. So much went wrong today to put blame on one rough ridin' thing. In conclusion...  Love him. go cats.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Powercat Posse on February 13, 2011, 12:45:00 AM
Jake is our best player.  Has been all year.   Just wished our best player had an attitude that makes that good player a "special player"

btw.... man i miss Clemente.   His defense was suspect on a team that prided itself on D....... but the guy had that attitude.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: swish1 on February 13, 2011, 01:05:40 AM
Jake is our best player.  Has been all year.   Just wished our best player had an attitude that makes that good player a "special player"

btw.... man i miss Clemente.   His defense was suspect on a team that prided itself on D....... but the guy had that attitude.

he got picked, went right back down the court and hit the game tying 3...  if only frank had as much confidence as jake does...
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 13, 2011, 01:06:30 AM
Just wished our best player had an attitude that makes that good player a "special player"


What the eff does that mean?  Jake pulled up a chair next to you and said "help me, tell me what I need to do to be a special player."  What tangible advise do you give him?  
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 13, 2011, 01:08:44 AM
 :lol:

This thread is like a group of adults talking with a bunch of children.

If you hate Jake, then leave forever. The fan base, the state of Kansas, the country, and ESPECIALLY this board. You are seriously delusional. Players make mistakes, or fail to make big plays. You can not expect perfection. Jake may not have lived up to expectations, but that is not completely his fault. He is still, easily, our best player. Do you idiots realize he is our highest scorer? And he leads our team in assists?

Great. Thanks for playing.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: 0.42 on February 13, 2011, 01:11:10 AM
:lol:

This thread is like a group of adults talking with a bunch of children.

If you hate Jake, then leave forever. The fan base, the state of Kansas, the country, and ESPECIALLY this board. You are seriously delusional. Players make mistakes, or fail to make big plays. You can not expect perfection. Jake may not have lived up to expectations, but that is not completely his fault. He is still, easily, our best player. Do you idiots realize he is our highest scorer? And he leads our team in assists?

Great. Thanks for playing.

Yeah, the fans would see Jake's mistakes as excusable if his supporting cast consistently played worth a crap. Since they aren't, he's somehow getting the blame.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 13, 2011, 01:14:09 AM
:lol:

This thread is like a group of adults talking with a bunch of children.

If you hate Jake, then leave forever. The fan base, the state of Kansas, the country, and ESPECIALLY this board. You are seriously delusional. Players make mistakes, or fail to make big plays. You can not expect perfection. Jake may not have lived up to expectations, but that is not completely his fault. He is still, easily, our best player. Do you idiots realize he is our highest scorer? And he leads our team in assists?

Great. Thanks for playing.

Agreed. Weird how much better Pullen looks when he has a point guard next to him who can hit floaters, nail 3's, and dribble from endline to endline in 3 seconds flat.

Yeah, the fans would see Jake's mistakes as excusable if his supporting cast consistently played worth a crap. Since they aren't, he's somehow getting the blame.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 13, 2011, 01:23:56 AM
:lol:

This thread is like a group of adults talking with a bunch of children.

If you hate Jake, then leave forever. The fan base, the state of Kansas, the country, and ESPECIALLY this board. You are seriously delusional. Players make mistakes, or fail to make big plays. You can not expect perfection. Jake may not have lived up to expectations, but that is not completely his fault. He is still, easily, our best player. Do you idiots realize he is our highest scorer? And he leads our team in assists?

Great. Thanks for playing.

Agreed. Weird how much better Pullen looks when he has a point guard next to him who can hit floaters, nail 3's, and dribble from endline to endline in 3 seconds flat.

Yeah, the fans would see Jake's mistakes as excusable if his supporting cast consistently played worth a crap. Since they aren't, he's somehow getting the blame.
Jamar, Rodney, Shane, Victor, Ta, Sprad all have something in common.  If our senior leader had stepped up and beaten the aforementioned players we would have won.  What did those players do as good or better then Jake?
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=310430038
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 13, 2011, 01:26:01 AM
question(s). Does being a Senior give you special powers? Make you play better? Give you a statistical advantage?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 13, 2011, 01:28:08 AM
question(s). Does being a Senior give you special powers? Make you play better? Give you a statistical advantage?

Obviously.

Energy and LuCo were the the best players last year.  CU's seniors are awesome too, clearly their best players.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 13, 2011, 01:31:11 AM
:lol:

This thread is like a group of adults talking with a bunch of children.

If you hate Jake, then leave forever. The fan base, the state of Kansas, the country, and ESPECIALLY this board. You are seriously delusional. Players make mistakes, or fail to make big plays. You can not expect perfection. Jake may not have lived up to expectations, but that is not completely his fault. He is still, easily, our best player. Do you idiots realize he is our highest scorer? And he leads our team in assists?

Great. Thanks for playing.

Agreed. Weird how much better Pullen looks when he has a point guard next to him who can hit floaters, nail 3's, and dribble from endline to endline in 3 seconds flat.

Yeah, the fans would see Jake's mistakes as excusable if his supporting cast consistently played worth a crap. Since they aren't, he's somehow getting the blame.
Jamar, Rodney, Shane, Victor, Ta, Sprad all have something in common.  If our senior leader had stepped up and beaten the aforementioned players we would have won.  What did those players do as good or better then Jake?
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=310430038


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages2.memegenerator.net%2FImageMacro%2F4778881%2FENGLISH-DO-YOU-SPEAK-IT.jpg%3FimageSize%3DMedium%26amp%3BgeneratorName%3DJules-Pulp-Fiction&hash=d5ae0c13cd1db3b966281dd9ce25bc4ba73d95e0)
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 13, 2011, 01:34:42 AM
question(s). Does being a Senior give you special powers? Make you play better? Give you a statistical advantage?
experience is rough ridin' huge.  It tends to make better players preform at a higher level in clutch situations.  Experience makes you realize what is going on, makes you slow down the pace of the surroundings to a manageable setting and should allow a top performer for a team to help create a desirable result.   

Or you rough ridin' choke.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 13, 2011, 01:47:28 AM
:lol:

This thread is like a group of adults talking with a bunch of children.

If you hate Jake, then leave forever. The fan base, the state of Kansas, the country, and ESPECIALLY this board. You are seriously delusional. Players make mistakes, or fail to make big plays. You can not expect perfection. Jake may not have lived up to expectations, but that is not completely his fault. He is still, easily, our best player. Do you idiots realize he is our highest scorer? And he leads our team in assists?

Great. Thanks for playing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Powercat Posse on February 13, 2011, 01:49:34 AM
In the 8 losses he played in=
34.2 % FG
28.5% 3pt
73.6% FT
3 more turnovers than assists

Still like Jake, but not gonna say i love him........     When our team is struggling, its clear his numbers don't rise up and help us get over a hump
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Rams on February 13, 2011, 01:50:08 AM
Same brand of idiots that were saying "BISHOP SUCKS!!!" after the '98 championship.

Jake's the QB.  You live and die by him.  Sometimes he fucks up.  Sometimes it's a really bad time to eff up.

Is he Jimmer rough ridin' Fredette?  No.  Does he suck?  Absolutely not.  

Not sure why this is so hard for some of you.  We're K-State.  This is what we do.  We piss down our leg like it's our rough ridin' job!  :emawkid:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 13, 2011, 01:53:22 AM
Same brand of idiots that were saying "BISHOP SUCKS!!!" after the '98 championship.

Jake's the QB.  You live and die by him.  Sometimes he fucks up.  Sometimes it's a really bad time to eff up.

Is he Jimmer rough ridin' Fredette?  No.  Does he suck?  Absolutely not.  

Not sure why this is so hard for some of you.  We're K-State.  This is what we do.  We piss down our leg like it's our rough ridin' job!  :emawkid:
at the end of the day I can get behind this.  G'nite all.  Don't drink and drive and start recruiting shitty players.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Powercat Posse on February 13, 2011, 01:56:01 AM
Bishop had like 446 yds of offense i think in that big 12 title game.   His fumble sucked but he brought his A game

Pullen did not have his A game tonight or in any of our losses.    If he had 24 pts on 10-17 shooting..... might be easier to forget his 2 miss FTs and pocket getting picked in crunch time
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: swish1 on February 13, 2011, 01:58:59 AM
Bishop had like 446 yds of offense i think in that big 12 title game.   His fumble sucked but he brought his A game

Pullen did not have his A game tonight or in any of our losses.    If he had 24 pts on 10-17 shooting..... might be easier to forget his 2 miss FTs and pocket getting picked in crunch time

this wasnt the big 12 championship game it was a road game against colorado.  how about those ncaa tournament games last year when jake was killing it?  didnt see your bitch ass complaining then.

also dont you think the fact that pullen has to have his A game in order for the team to win is a problem?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: theswo on February 13, 2011, 02:03:09 AM
if i ever meet you and you tell me you don't like jake i'm going to fight you
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Trim on February 13, 2011, 08:53:21 AM
Retire Denis' jersey now.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: steve dave on February 13, 2011, 08:55:28 AM
Retire Denis' jersey now.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 13, 2011, 09:40:10 AM
Retire Denis' jersey now.

Yup.  He made Jake really much more good.  Little Puerto Rican rascal, I love him.  We will always have San Juan.   :cry:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Trim on February 13, 2011, 09:57:26 AM
Denis = Ell
Pullen = Sproles
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: hemmy on February 13, 2011, 10:13:25 AM
question(s). Does being a Senior give you special powers? Make you play better? Give you a statistical advantage?
experience is rough ridin' huge.  It tends to make better players preform at a higher level in clutch situations.  Experience makes you realize what is going on, makes you slow down the pace of the surroundings to a manageable setting and should allow a top performer for a team to help create a desirable result.   

Or you rough ridin' choke.

When is the last time you saw a mid major comprised of freshmen/soph go deep in the tourny?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: KSU176 on February 13, 2011, 10:50:22 AM
The Jake hate is something else. It's apparent on BOTC to. 1 thread isn't enough to cover it. It needs a effing book written about it.

I just don't know what people to expect. Do they expect effing superman to pop out every game?

You're right.  Expecting him to be able to dribble the basketball may be asking too much.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 13, 2011, 10:57:08 AM
I've decided to back off the Jake hate and focus on the general team dynamic of FPness.  I mean none of our guards could make a 3 for 75% of the game.  Curt for all the crap he has caused FPed the entire 2nd half.  JHR went back to being really lost....again.  Jamar is the only person from the game who shouldn't be called a FP for their entire game performance.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: catzacker on February 13, 2011, 11:09:40 AM
you should just hate Frank.  instead of marcus denmon, we got buchi awaji.  instead of michael dixon, we got  irving/russell.  that's the difference in why this team sucks.  frank's recruiting.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 13, 2011, 11:14:34 AM
you should just hate Frank.  instead of marcus denmon, we got buchi awaji.  instead of michael dixon, we got  irving/russell.  that's the difference in why this team sucks.  frank's recruiting.
Kinda the take on my position in this thread
Quote
You go to war with the army you have---not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 13, 2011, 12:23:42 PM
The Jake hate is something else. It's apparent on BOTC to. 1 thread isn't enough to cover it. It needs a effing book written about it.

I just don't know what people to expect. Do they expect effing superman to pop out every game?

You're right.  Expecting him to be able to dribble the basketball may be asking too much.

 :dubious:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sunny_cat on February 13, 2011, 02:10:42 PM
if i ever meet you and you tell me you don't like jake i'm going to fight you
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: chum1 on February 13, 2011, 02:32:59 PM
what about those of us who never liked his game?  are jake lovers okay with that?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 13, 2011, 02:45:07 PM
what about those of us who never liked his game?  are jake lovers okay with that?

i remember going pretty far in some anti-pullen arguments his freshman year.  you were one of his biggest proponents.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: chum1 on February 13, 2011, 03:14:26 PM
what about those of us who never liked his game?  are jake lovers okay with that?

i remember going pretty far in some anti-pullen arguments his freshman year.  you were one of his biggest proponents.

what was the specific issue?  i only remember thinking that people's expectations were way to high considering that he chose us over dayton.  oh, and i remember that prior to this season you compared my suggestion that he didn't have pg skills to clams' rants about denis the year before.  it turns out that he's even worse than i thought.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 13, 2011, 04:35:08 PM
what about those of us who never liked his game?  are jake lovers okay with that?

i remember going pretty far in some anti-pullen arguments his freshman year.  you were one of his biggest proponents.

what was the specific issue?  i only remember thinking that people's expectations were way to high considering that he chose us over dayton.  oh, and i remember that prior to this season you compared my suggestion that he didn't have pg skills to clams' rants about denis the year before.  it turns out that he's even worse than i thought.

i attacked a lot of people that went around saying "man, will he be good in a couple years".  you defended them/him.

i was wrong then, you're wrong now.  pullen has been playing really well.  lol @ him not being a "pg".
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 13, 2011, 04:55:25 PM
pullen should make his 3's go in more.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: chum1 on February 13, 2011, 06:05:48 PM
]iattacked a lot of people that went around saying "man, will he be good in a couple years".  you defended them/him.

i was wrong then, you're wrong now.  pullen has been playing really well.  lol @ him not being a "pg".

he was pretty good as a freshman.  i don't know why he would be the exception to the rule and regress later.  he got way better than i thought he would, but not as a pg.  you can say that we play two combo guards all you want, but it's pretty obvious who the pg is when they're on the floor playing.  much more often than not, it's not jake.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: BigCat on February 13, 2011, 07:18:03 PM
He's obviously lost something. Tough to tell if it's a focus issue or what. But here's a kid who as a true freshman stepped into the biggest game of his life on a national stage and went 10-10 from the line and chipped in 20. Just not sure where that guy went. :(
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: OregonSmock on February 13, 2011, 07:37:23 PM
Pullen is point shaving, 100%.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: BigCat on February 13, 2011, 07:48:12 PM
Pullen is point shaving, 100%.

Would love it if this was true.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: michigancat on February 13, 2011, 09:07:56 PM
He's obviously lost something. Tough to tell if it's a focus issue or what.

It's pretty easy to tell he lost Denis.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 13, 2011, 10:23:56 PM
He's obviously lost something. Tough to tell if it's a focus issue or what.

It's pretty easy to tell he lost Denis.

he's the same or better in just about every stat you can find, except 3 pt%.  probably a little reversion to the mean & a little throwing up 3s late in the clock after his teammates fail to do anything.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 14, 2011, 01:49:19 AM

he's the same or better in just about every stat you can find, except 3 pt%.  probably a little reversion to the mean & a little throwing up 3s late in the clock after his teammates fail to do anything.

At some point people will get this.  I don't mean morons either.  There are a lot of smart people who can't read a stat sheet.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: michigancat on February 14, 2011, 07:00:18 AM
He's obviously lost something. Tough to tell if it's a focus issue or what.

It's pretty easy to tell he lost Denis.

he's the same or better in just about every stat you can find, except 3 pt%.  probably a little reversion to the mean & a little throwing up 3s late in the clock after his teammates fail to do anything.

Yeah. Denis took a lot of shots late in the shot clock, too. Also set up a lot of transition 3's for Pullen. (Purely anecdotal).
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: slucat on February 14, 2011, 12:31:28 PM
:lol:

This thread is like a group of adults talking with a bunch of children.

If you hate Jake, then leave forever. The fan base, the state of Kansas, the country, and ESPECIALLY this board. You are seriously delusional. Players make mistakes, or fail to make big plays. You can not expect perfection. Jake may not have lived up to expectations, but that is not completely his fault. He is still, easily, our best player. Do you idiots realize he is our highest scorer? And he leads our team in assists?

Great. Thanks for playing.

Hmm where were the player defenders when we had clent? there are some serious haters on this board, you all find someone to pile on, for the CU game it was Jake.  he has lost something this year for sure...however, I don't hate any of our players.  we just suck this year and its disappointing. reminds me too much of magina's last season with KU.   :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: EllToPay on February 14, 2011, 12:47:27 PM
He's obviously lost something. Tough to tell if it's a focus issue or what.

It's pretty easy to tell he lost Denis.

he's the same or better in just about every stat you can find, except 3 pt%.  probably a little reversion to the mean & a little throwing up 3s late in the clock after his teammates fail to do anything.

this.

anyone hating on jake is rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). without him, we'd be lucky to make the NIT.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kso_FAN on February 14, 2011, 12:53:18 PM
We really need Jake to have a big game tonight to have a chance. Like a BYU/Xavier game.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 14, 2011, 12:54:26 PM
:lol:

This thread is like a group of adults talking with a bunch of children.

If you hate Jake, then leave forever. The fan base, the state of Kansas, the country, and ESPECIALLY this board. You are seriously delusional. Players make mistakes, or fail to make big plays. You can not expect perfection. Jake may not have lived up to expectations, but that is not completely his fault. He is still, easily, our best player. Do you idiots realize he is our highest scorer? And he leads our team in assists?

Great. Thanks for playing.

Hmm where were the player defenders when we had clent?

This board didn't exist when we had Clent.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 14, 2011, 12:55:10 PM
We really need Jake to have a big game tonight to have a chance. Like a BYU/Xavier game.

I'm thinking like an Askia Jones NIT game
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 14, 2011, 01:13:23 PM
FTR, I don't hate Jake, its just that at many times this year his play has been frustrating. Sure, I'm glad he's on our team, but that doesn't mean that he's lived up to his potential. Others, like Sprads and Gruds, while they may not be overall as good a player as Pullen, have met or exceeded my expectations (which were lower), and they are underclassmen, so they aren't as quickly criticized.

Pullen is a senior, has 4 yrs of experience w/ Martin and the program, and has a high talent level, so when he hogs the ball only to turn it over or chuck up a well-guarded 3 (few of which he has hit all year), it can be frustrating. Pullen, Gruds, Sprads and Samuels all have very similar points/attempt, and I wish he'd focus some more on moving the ball around to find a good shot for someone rather than dribbling it around for 20 seconds in half-court sets.  :dunno: He's just held to a higher standard, and I believe rightfully so. 
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: michigancat on February 14, 2011, 01:25:51 PM
Your (undefined) expectations of Pullen are stupid (whatever they are).

He's been incredible for a 3 star who picked us over Dayton.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: mcmwcat on February 14, 2011, 01:37:29 PM
Pullen, Gruds, Sprads and Samuels all have very similar points/attempt

why don't Spradling, McGruder and Samuels shoot more then.  is it not their own fault?

have you not considered the fact they don't have the talent to create their own shots like Pullen does. 
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kso_FAN on February 14, 2011, 01:38:41 PM
Your (undefined) expectations of Pullen are stupid (whatever they are).

He's been incredible for a 3 star who picked us over Dayton.

Its pretty clear many of our fans expected BYU/Xavier type performances every game this year.

And the Big 12 stats he's putting up this year are almost identical to last year. With Kelly missing action and no Clemente, he's performing very well.

Pullen is scoring 18.9 PPG with an eFG% of 46.3% in Big 12 games. Last year he was at 17.8 PPG and 45.9%. Pullen's assist to turnovers averge per game this year is 3.5 to 2.9. Last year was 3.6 to 2.9. Pullen is averaging 1.3 steals per game after averaging 1.8 steals per game last year.  Rebounds are 1.8 this year to 2.2 last year.  

Title: Re: Jake
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 14, 2011, 01:48:54 PM
and I wish he'd focus some more on moving the ball around to find a good shot for someone rather than dribbling it around for 20 seconds in half-court sets.

jfc, have you even watched them lately?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kso_FAN on February 14, 2011, 01:52:19 PM
and I wish he'd focus some more on moving the ball around to find a good shot for someone rather than dribbling it around for 20 seconds in half-court sets.

jfc, have you even watched them lately?

More proof that fans see whatever the heck they want to see, and often that doesn't fit with what is really happening.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 14, 2011, 10:25:30 PM
Bump.  rough ridin' idiots. 
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 14, 2011, 10:31:33 PM
This kind of performance (not just shots falling, but taking better shots + playing w/ intensity throughout) is what you idiots seem to think I shouldn't expect. It's SO good to see the ol' Pullz come back again (w/o Clemente, people!). Congrats Pullz -- you played like a champion tonight. I KNEW you had it in you!

 :cheers: :cheers: :cheers:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: chum1 on February 14, 2011, 10:31:59 PM
Bump.  rough ridin' idiots. 

nothing calms the waters like a win over ku.  who cares what else happens all season, right?  
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: SwiftCat on February 14, 2011, 10:32:09 PM
This kind of performance (not just shots falling, but taking better shots + playing w/ intensity throughout) is what you idiots seem to think I shouldn't expect. It's SO good to see the ol' Pullz come back again (w/o Clemente, people!). Congrats Pullz -- you played like a champion tonight. I KNEW you had it in you!

 :cheers: :cheers: :cheers:

Love you jake.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: KSUTOMMY on February 14, 2011, 10:33:11 PM
Bump.  effing idiots. 

nothing calms the waters like a win over ku.  who cares what else happens all season, right?  

BINGO!!!
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 14, 2011, 10:33:28 PM
Latest Tardville Conspiracy Theory:  Jake has been point shaving until tonight.

Title: Re: Jake
Post by: EMAWzified on February 14, 2011, 10:42:05 PM
Quote
Latest Tardville Conspiracy Theory:  Jake has been point shaving until tonight.

Might buy that myself.
Naaaaah, he's too emaw. Due for a very big game (defense, too, check out Taylor's six TOs, 1 assist.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: OregonSmock on February 14, 2011, 10:43:01 PM
Latest Tardville Conspiracy Theory:  Jake has been point shaving until tonight.





I'm responsible for that... and after tonight, it's pretty much confirmed. 
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 14, 2011, 10:45:45 PM
Bump.  rough ridin' idiots. 

:lol:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: felix rex on February 14, 2011, 10:47:56 PM
So hilarious how this game cemented Pullen's legacy with the bulk of our fanbase. Nothing else ever happened while he was here. We beat KU twice and went to the elite 8. That's all. Nothing else ever happened.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: felix rex on February 14, 2011, 10:48:32 PM
So hilarious how this game cemented Pullen's legacy with the bulk of our fanbase. Nothing else ever happened while he was here. We beat KU twice and went to the elite 8. That's all. Nothing else ever happened.

Also, that's not sarcastic. Love you, Jake. Nothing else ever happened.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 14, 2011, 11:07:22 PM
I will rough ridin' own that.  Straight up mans game tonight by Jake.  Man's game/rome.

Congrats to Jake for lifting this team and putting it all on him.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: j-dub on February 14, 2011, 11:28:54 PM
little jake. emaw hero.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: SwiftCat on February 14, 2011, 11:40:40 PM
Behind Xaiver, this is the best game of Jake's career.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 14, 2011, 11:41:46 PM
Quote
BlairKerkhoff Blair Kerkhoff
ESPN says Pullen's 38 were the most ever scored against a top-ranked team.
13 minutes ago
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: canadian_breeze on February 14, 2011, 11:42:26 PM
leg end
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 14, 2011, 11:44:41 PM
Might he be the all-time winningest Wildcat?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sunny_cat on February 14, 2011, 11:47:47 PM
Quote
BlairKerkhoff Blair Kerkhoff
ESPN says Pullen's 38 were the most ever scored against a top-ranked team.
13 minutes ago

 :pbj:
 :emawkid:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Ira Hayes on February 14, 2011, 11:48:54 PM
So hilarious how this game cemented Pullen's legacy with the bulk of our fanbase. Nothing else ever happened while he was here. We beat KU twice and went to the elite 8. That's all. Nothing else ever happened.

Also, that's not sarcastic. Love you, Jake. Nothing else ever happened.

I'm 48 years old. Beating KU twice when they were #1 and going to the elite 8 one time is as good as I've ever seen.

Plus, he's not done yet.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: swish1 on February 15, 2011, 12:20:05 AM
what happened to all the jake hate?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sunny_cat on February 15, 2011, 12:20:49 AM
what happened to all the jake hate?

NEVER hated jake.  :dubious:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 15, 2011, 12:28:43 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.kansas.com%2Fsmedia%2F2011%2F02%2F14%2F22%2F021411ksu_th9.slideshow_main.prod_affiliate.80.jpg&hash=5769f3a517da65290d5df0a7e6a2bb4aca614ff1)


good lord but southwell is a beautiful man.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: swish1 on February 15, 2011, 12:29:42 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.kansas.com%2Fsmedia%2F2011%2F02%2F14%2F22%2F021411ksu_th9.slideshow_main.prod_affiliate.80.jpg&hash=5769f3a517da65290d5df0a7e6a2bb4aca614ff1)


good lord but southwell is a beautiful man.

not as beautiful as jake
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 15, 2011, 12:31:47 AM
not as beautiful as jake

although everyone can be the best at something, nobody is the best at everything.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kougar24 on February 15, 2011, 12:42:24 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.kansas.com%2Fsmedia%2F2011%2F02%2F14%2F22%2F021411ksu_th9.slideshow_main.prod_affiliate.80.jpg&hash=5769f3a517da65290d5df0a7e6a2bb4aca614ff1)


good lord but southwell is a beautiful man.

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=10862.0   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 15, 2011, 12:42:56 AM
Self called Jake classy for not going for 40. Didn't notice this.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2011, 01:37:10 AM
this maybe the booze or logic talking



I fell in love with jake again tonight.... make a tbs movie out of that crap.


(no homo)
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: swish1 on February 15, 2011, 01:48:16 AM
this maybe the booze or logic talking



I fell in love with jake again tonight.... make a tbs movie out of that cac.


(no homo)

rough ridin' idiot...
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2011, 01:52:43 AM
this maybe the booze or logic talking



I fell in love with jake again tonight.... make a tbs movie out of that cac.


(no homo)

rough ridin' idiot...
eff you. I'm owning it.  Jake came back to me. 
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 15, 2011, 02:52:51 AM
what happened to all the jake hate?
nobody will own up to it now...  except ednksu
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2011, 06:39:48 AM
this maybe the booze or logic talking



I fell in love with jake again tonight.... make a tbs movie out of that cac.


(no homo)

rough ridin' idiot...
eff you. I'm owning it.  Jake came back to me. 

Oh eff off. You do not deserve admiration for being a dumbshit. You suck.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: mcmwcat on February 15, 2011, 08:47:08 AM
 :lol:

pullen confusing the beat KU and we are happy tucks.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2011, 12:23:51 PM
this maybe the booze or logic talking



I fell in love with jake again tonight.... make a tbs movie out of that cac.


(no homo)

rough ridin' idiot...
eff you. I'm owning it.  Jake came back to me. 

Oh eff off. You do not deserve admiration for being a dumbshit. You suck.
dude if you can't see the polar opposites between his last 2 games you are an idiot.  He did EVERYthing right last night.  He had a crap game against CU on all levels.  He proved that he can be a top tier player in CBB last night.  He had a great game and made everyone around him better.  Amazing performance.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 15, 2011, 12:26:27 PM
the 0 will not be in the bram's rafters

 :blank: You've made your bed. :blank:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2011, 12:27:34 PM
this maybe the booze or logic talking



I fell in love with jake again tonight.... make a tbs movie out of that cac.


(no homo)

rough ridin' idiot...
eff you. I'm owning it.  Jake came back to me. 

Oh eff off. You do not deserve admiration for being a dumbshit. You suck.
dude if you can't see the polar opposites between his last 2 games you are an idiot.  He did EVERYthing right last night.  He had a crap game against CU on all levels.  He proved that he can be a top tier player in CBB last night.  He had a great game and made everyone around him better.  Amazing performance.

He had 22 points and 6 assists at CU. You just choose to remember him getting stripped, and it clouds your memory, because you suck.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: yat on February 15, 2011, 12:30:24 PM
um, he had 12 @ CU.  He's still the crap, but . . .
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2011, 12:35:36 PM
um, he had 12 @ CU.  He's still the crap, but . . .

Ha!

Ed still rough ridin' sucks.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 15, 2011, 12:36:00 PM
Lollers at Rusty using the stats from the 1st CU game!  :lol:

If you're going to tell some1 they suck, maybe you shouldn't suck yourself?
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: FP TC etc. on February 15, 2011, 12:37:51 PM
Then why is your sig what it is?  :ck:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2011, 12:39:32 PM
Lollers at Rusty using the stats from the 1st CU game!  :lol:

If you're going to tell some1 they suck, maybe you shouldn't suck yourself?

I don't suck at all.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: kso_FAN on February 15, 2011, 12:40:34 PM
Jake had a very inefficient game at CU... but so did most of the roster. He had an eFG% of 41.6 and Orating of 89.4. I would classify it as a bad game, but not terrible. The problem is besides Samuels and McGruds, that type of offense was rampant on the roster that night. Plus, I don't expect Jake to play lights out every game, and no doubt he had some mistakes, namely the strip and missed FTs.

The problem is saying he sucks because of one game, especially when overall he has played well in Big 12 games.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 15, 2011, 12:40:45 PM
FWIW... Pullz has had some pretty good games this yr, and his defense has been pretty solid all along. KU just goes to prove what he's capable of, and we hadn't seen that all year. Granted he won't do that every game, even if he plays his best, but his decision-making and energy was much better, not just shots falling. Again, glad to see him have this kind of breakout game -- hope it continues.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 15, 2011, 12:42:43 PM
Lollers at Rusty using the stats from the 1st CU game!  :lol:

If you're going to tell some1 they suck, maybe you shouldn't suck yourself?

I don't suck at all.

Your post sucked.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 15, 2011, 12:44:23 PM
sorry to interrupt the circle jerk, but i didn't know where to put this (http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/14689783/after-this-beatdown-who-would-want-to-be-no-1)...

Quote
Meanwhile, K-State's Jacob Pullen played the game of his life -- a career-high 38 points with his team's tournament chances sinking like a Flint Hills sunset.

 :love:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 15, 2011, 12:47:29 PM
sorry to interrupt the circle jerk, but i didn't know where to put this (http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/14689783/after-this-beatdown-who-would-want-to-be-no-1)...

Quote
Meanwhile, K-State's Jacob Pullen played the game of his life -- a career-high 38 points with his team's tournament chances sinking like a Flint Hills sunset.

 :love:

How bout
Quote
Morris, whose elbows can be as sharp as his words...

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: OregonSmock on February 15, 2011, 01:07:16 PM
Jake was doing a documentary on Point Shaving 101 in his last game against CU. 
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: yat on February 15, 2011, 01:09:16 PM
Oh, Jake, so EMAW :blush:

Quote
But what happens to Pullen if Kansas State doesn’t make the NCAA and is invited to play in the NIT?

“I will play anywhere,’’ Pullen said. “I said that comment in a heated moment to get my teammates to understand the reality. I didn’t say that comment to mean it. In my heart I will play for Kansas State regardless if it’s in the NIT or the NCAA.


http://espn.go.com/blog/CollegeBasketballNation/post/_/id/23287/jacob-pullen-comes-through-when-needed
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sys on February 15, 2011, 01:13:58 PM
sorry to interrupt the circle jerk, but i didn't know where to put this (http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/14689783/after-this-beatdown-who-would-want-to-be-no-1)...

Quote
Meanwhile, K-State's Jacob Pullen played the game of his life -- a career-high 38 points with his team's tournament chances sinking like a Flint Hills sunset.

 :love:

How bout
Quote
Morris, whose elbows can be as sharp as his words...

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

my new sig was pretty good.  corcoran's article was loaded with as many as he could fit in.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2011, 03:20:43 PM
this maybe the booze or logic talking



I fell in love with jake again tonight.... make a tbs movie out of that cac.


(no homo)

rough ridin' idiot...
eff you. I'm owning it.  Jake came back to me. 

Oh eff off. You do not deserve admiration for being a dumbshit. You suck.
dude if you can't see the polar opposites between his last 2 games you are an idiot.  He did EVERYthing right last night.  He had a crap game against CU on all levels.  He proved that he can be a top tier player in CBB last night.  He had a great game and made everyone around him better.  Amazing performance.

Your flip flopping makes me want to beat your ass even more, you can't call a man a pussy and then suck his dick 48 hours later.  You're a piece of crap.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 23, 2011, 10:54:22 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 23, 2011, 10:59:45 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu

get off my nuts, I'm beginning to think you have some tyler hughes in you.   you and rusty can go back to the just friends circle jerk now
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 23, 2011, 11:03:31 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu

get off my nuts, I'm beginning to think you have some tyler hughes in you.   you and rusty can go back to the just friends circle jerk now
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthehumanscorch.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2F1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif%3Fw%3D228%26amp%3Bh%3D180&hash=a9825029dd7d01f8a64125cbd881f17629011a54)   

U MAD?
[/color][/size]
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 23, 2011, 11:09:09 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu

get off my nuts, I'm beginning to think you have some tyler hughes in you.   you and rusty can go back to the just friends circle jerk now
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthehumanscorch.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2F1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif%3Fw%3D228%26amp%3Bh%3D180&hash=a9825029dd7d01f8a64125cbd881f17629011a54)   

U MAD?
[/color][/size]

No I just think its funny you two dumbasses think youre funny.  If you don't think that @CU game was one of Jake's worst ever games youre damn fool.  I owned it after the KU game and thought he had a great game last night.  Anyone with a brain knows that game was crap and we needed a C+ effort to win. 

You can go back to fapping over how cool you are now because you brought this up.  way to go kid.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: j-dub on February 23, 2011, 11:14:26 PM
the 0 will not be in the bram's rafters

 :blank: You've made your bed. :blank:

this cannot be overemphasized.

loser.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 23, 2011, 11:18:29 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu

get off my nuts, I'm beginning to think you have some tyler hughes in you.   you and rusty can go back to the just friends circle jerk now
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthehumanscorch.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2F1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif%3Fw%3D228%26amp%3Bh%3D180&hash=a9825029dd7d01f8a64125cbd881f17629011a54)   

U MAD?
[/color][/size]

No I just think its funny you two dumbasses think youre funny.  If you don't think that @CU game was one of Jake's worst ever games youre damn fool.  I owned it after the KU game and thought he had a great game last night.  Anyone with a brain knows that game was crap and we needed a C+ effort to win. 

You can go back to fapping over how cool you are now because you brought this up.  way to go kid.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcSs6ErrhMuuzofwUudTdydhr6uskptI0hNWXRGmbF7HnEtn-wmxug%26amp%3Bt%3D1&hash=a4b3c0b651ed606e9a85fae6c945042912fedffe)
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: chum1 on February 23, 2011, 11:20:37 PM
I don't think anyone else really cares, so you two can probably stop now.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 23, 2011, 11:23:45 PM
I don't think anyone else really cares, so you two can probably stop now.
I would say that is how it should have been after the KU game.  Someone should tell the trolls to run along now.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 23, 2011, 11:23:58 PM
There is too much dumbassery in this thread for it to ever die.  It is like a virtual roll call of dumbasses who post on this board.  It should be engraved in stone.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 23, 2011, 11:40:37 PM
There is too much dumbassery in this thread for it to ever die.  It is like a virtual roll call of dumbasses who post on this board.  It should be engraved in stone.
oh you mean when your buddy posted stats from the wrong thread?  yeah that was pretty rough ridin' stupid.  Almost as dumb as thinking Jake had a game no one should bitch about.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: nicname on February 23, 2011, 11:48:26 PM
There is too much dumbassery in this thread for it to ever die.  It is like a virtual roll call of dumbasses who post on this board.  It should be engraved in stone.
oh you mean when your buddy posted stats from the wrong thread?  yeah that was pretty rough ridin' stupid.  Almost as dumb as thinking Jake had a game no one should bitch about.

No offense bro, but this thread is like a line in the sand between absolute retards and rational thinkers.  I mean, that's cool, make your little jokes dudes, throw a tantrum every now and then, but leave the real talk to those who wear big boy pants.   :cheers:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 23, 2011, 11:51:09 PM
There is too much dumbassery in this thread for it to ever die.  It is like a virtual roll call of dumbasses who post on this board.  It should be engraved in stone.
oh you mean when your buddy posted stats from the wrong thread?  yeah that was pretty rough ridin' stupid.  Almost as dumb as thinking Jake had a game no one should bitch about.

No offense bro, but this thread is like a line in the sand between absolute retards and rational thinkers.  I mean, that's cool, make your little jokes dudes, throw a tantrum every now and then, but leave the real talk to those who wear big boy pants.   :cheers:
not sure wtf this really means.  In case you forgot you were the one bumping this thread where you and your buddy look like small children running around.  Go back to letting people talk, I'm sure you want to get some rest before high school english tomorrow morning. Gotta try and 'PI' those teachers so people will think youre cool.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 23, 2011, 11:52:16 PM
JFC I just realized you're the doc of bbs-ing.  You have clawed this thread down to your level.  You have taken me down so far that I'm bickering with a high schooler.  Congrats to you sir. Way to doc up this message board.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 24, 2011, 12:31:25 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu

get off my nuts, I'm beginning to think you have some tyler hughes in you.   you and rusty can go back to the just friends circle jerk now
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthehumanscorch.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2F1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif%3Fw%3D228%26amp%3Bh%3D180&hash=a9825029dd7d01f8a64125cbd881f17629011a54)   

U MAD?
[/color][/size]

No I just think its funny you two dumbasses think youre funny.  If you don't think that @CU game was one of Jake's worst ever games youre damn fool.


Everyone thought he had a bad game, only one idiot repeatedly called him a pussy for it.  Bad games happen, your meltdown because of it was one of the most embarrassing things this site has seen and that says a lot.  You painted yourself in the corner by calling the man a pussy, like he did something personal to you.  There is no defense, the only way you could ever possibly save any face is to never post in here again.  You look like a rough ridin' moron attempting to defend your behavior.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: 0.42 on February 24, 2011, 12:33:25 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu

get off my nuts, I'm beginning to think you have some tyler hughes in you.   you and rusty can go back to the just friends circle jerk now
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthehumanscorch.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2F1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif%3Fw%3D228%26amp%3Bh%3D180&hash=a9825029dd7d01f8a64125cbd881f17629011a54)   

U MAD?
[/color][/size]

No I just think its funny you two dumbasses think youre funny.  If you don't think that @CU game was one of Jake's worst ever games youre damn fool.


Everyone thought he had a bad game, only one idiot repeatedly called him a pussy for it.  Bad games happen, your meltdown because of it was one of the most embarrassing things this site has seen and that says a lot.  You painted yourself in the corner by calling the man a pussy, like he did something personal to you.  There is no defense, the only way you could ever possibly save any face is to never post in here again.  You look like a rough ridin' moron attempting to defend your behavior.

 :users:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 24, 2011, 12:35:11 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu

get off my nuts, I'm beginning to think you have some tyler hughes in you.   you and rusty can go back to the just friends circle jerk now
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthehumanscorch.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2F1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif%3Fw%3D228%26amp%3Bh%3D180&hash=a9825029dd7d01f8a64125cbd881f17629011a54)   

U MAD?
[/color][/size]

No I just think its funny you two dumbasses think youre funny.  If you don't think that @CU game was one of Jake's worst ever games youre damn fool.


Everyone thought he had a bad game, only one idiot repeatedly called him a pussy for it.  Bad games happen, your meltdown because of it was one of the most embarrassing things this site has seen and that says a lot.  You painted yourself in the corner by calling the man a pussy, like he did something personal to you.  There is no defense, the only way you could ever possibly save any face is to never post in here again.  You look like a rough ridin' moron attempting to defend your behavior.

 :users:

By in here I meant this thread
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 24, 2011, 12:40:44 AM
I will keep posting because just like the rest of the doc crew you are another example of slth BBSing at its finest.  Sure you may post something good every now and then, but over all you are mediocre posters who just fap over each other's comments.  There is a reason why only a few people bring this up and jerk each other off about it.  Everyone else knows Jake rough ridin' disappeared in that CU game.  He deserved to be called out, and look what happened.  You think the coaches told him he had a good game on the trip home?  eff no.  After the KU game they probably told him to keep those kinds of performances coming and enough with the CU crap. 


Anyways.....go back to the circle jerk, I'll wait here for your next mediocre post, then someone can come in and say how great it was and the circle of doc posters can continue. 
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: 0.42 on February 24, 2011, 12:43:43 AM
I will keep posting because just like the rest of the doc crew you are another example of slth BBSing at its finest.  Sure you may post something good every now and then, but over all you are mediocre posters who just fap over each other's comments.  There is a reason why only a few people bring this up and jerk each other off about it.  Everyone else knows Jake rough ridin' disappeared in that CU game.  He deserved to be called out, and look what happened.  You think the coaches told him he had a good game on the trip home?  eff no.  After the KU game they probably told him to keep those kinds of performances coming and enough with the CU crap. 


Anyways.....go back to the circle jerk, I'll wait here for your next mediocre post, then someone can come in and say how great it was and the circle of doc posters can continue. 

 :users:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Trim on February 24, 2011, 12:45:32 AM
FEAR THE BEARD
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: MakeItRain on February 24, 2011, 12:58:11 AM
I will keep posting because just like the rest of the doc crew you are another example of slth BBSing at its finest.  Sure you may post something good every now and then, but over all you are mediocre posters who just fap over each other's comments.  There is a reason why only a few people bring this up and jerk each other off about it.  Everyone else knows Jake rough ridin' disappeared in that CU game.  He deserved to be called out, and look what happened.  You think the coaches told him he had a good game on the trip home?  eff no.  After the KU game they probably told him to keep those kinds of performances coming and enough with the CU crap. 


Anyways.....go back to the circle jerk, I'll wait here for your next mediocre post, then someone can come in and say how great it was and the circle of doc posters can continue. 

How in the world is it "obvious that he needed to be called out," who the hell are you?  Did you calling him a pussy make him a better basketball player?

Of course the coaches didn't tell him he had a good game, I'm also pretty sure that they didn't call him a pussy either.  There is a wide wide gulf between critiquing a game and calling a dude a pussy.  Of course it is apparent that you went with the pussy blast because you are completely incapable of breaking down what the actual problem you had with him.

You can go with the circle jerk talking point all you want, but the fact is you made a gigantic ass of yourself and you look worse by continuing to act like you were somehow justified.  No one could possible come to your defense, attempting to justify that awful meltdown is completely indefensible.

Oh and if you truly believe this insane crap
Quote
After the KU game they probably told him to keep those kinds of performances coming and enough with the CU crap. 
you are honestly, like no joke honestly, too stupid to have a legitimate conversation with.  That's something I'd expect a 13 year old to say.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: 0.42 on February 24, 2011, 01:01:03 AM
look, guys, i'm gonna run out of these :users: at some point.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 24, 2011, 01:38:36 AM
look, guys, i'm gonna run out of these :users: at some point.

We have these --->  :popcorn:

It's what I'm going with.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: skycat on February 24, 2011, 03:27:06 AM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



  :flush: <---- ednksu

get off my nuts, I'm beginning to think you have some tyler hughes in you.   you and rusty can go back to the just friends circle jerk now
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fthehumanscorch.files.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F02%2F1243271414_black_guy_laughing.gif%3Fw%3D228%26amp%3Bh%3D180&hash=a9825029dd7d01f8a64125cbd881f17629011a54)   

U MAD?
[/color][/size]

No I just think its funny you two dumbasses think youre funny.  If you don't think that @CU game was one of Jake's worst ever games youre damn fool.


Everyone thought he had a bad game, only one idiot repeatedly called him a pussy for it.  Bad games happen, your meltdown because of it was one of the most embarrassing things this site has seen and that says a lot.  You painted yourself in the corner by calling the man a pussy, like he did something personal to you.  There is no defense, the only way you could ever possibly save any face is to never post in here again.  You look like a rough ridin' moron attempting to defend your behavior.

 :users:

By in here I meant this thread

No, everyone will remember ednksu's dumbassery in this thread every time he posts in another thread. Best for him to just delete his account and start over.

I still remember when he said Tim and Eric was a bad show. That's when I knew he was a 'tuck.
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Cire on February 24, 2011, 06:00:36 AM
I vote ed can't post about jake for the rest of the season. He can post about anyone else, just not jake
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 24, 2011, 06:17:47 AM
Wow, we're going to suck so much ass next year without Jake.

Shane Southwell, Will Spradling, Nick Russell (if he's even still around), the Canadian, No Confidence 95, maybe Angel Rodriquez . . .  :flush:
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: ednksu on February 24, 2011, 06:34:57 AM
I will keep posting because just like the rest of the doc crew you are another example of slth BBSing at its finest.  Sure you may post something good every now and then, but over all you are mediocre posters who just fap over each other's comments.  There is a reason why only a few people bring this up and jerk each other off about it.  Everyone else knows Jake rough ridin' disappeared in that CU game.  He deserved to be called out, and look what happened.  You think the coaches told him he had a good game on the trip home?  eff no.  After the KU game they probably told him to keep those kinds of performances coming and enough with the CU crap.  


Anyways.....go back to the circle jerk, I'll wait here for your next mediocre post, then someone can come in and say how great it was and the circle of doc posters can continue.  

How in the world is it "obvious that he needed to be called out," who the hell are you?  Did you calling him a pussy make him a better basketball player?

Of course the coaches didn't tell him he had a good game, I'm also pretty sure that they didn't call him a pussy either.  There is a wide wide gulf between critiquing a game and calling a dude a pussy.  Of course it is apparent that you went with the pussy blast because you are completely incapable of breaking down what the actual problem you had with him.

You can go with the circle jerk talking point all you want, but the fact is you made a gigantic ass of yourself and you look worse by continuing to act like you were somehow justified.  No one could possible come to your defense, attempting to justify that awful meltdown is completely indefensible.

Oh and if you truly believe this insane crap
Quote
After the KU game they probably told him to keep those kinds of performances coming and enough with the CU crap.  
you are honestly, like no joke honestly, too stupid to have a legitimate conversation with.  That's something I'd expect a 13 year old to say.

no one came to my defense?  I think you need to reread this thread before you post.  Lot of people were pissed about Jake's performance after the game.  Lots of people that day called him out.  What was really funny is when people started backing it up with facts like his FT%, PTs, TOs and general lack of leadership you tools stfu.  Here is an idea why don't you and your circle jerk post some more stats to prove me wrong.  Maybe this time you can get the right game.  I'll wait for lunch hour, see if you can fit it in between classes if you are allowed to have a phone at your high school.
edit: JFC just read the first rough ridin' page, its all people agreeing that Jake choked hard in that game.  Then the circle jerk crew come in to doc up the thread.  Nice work guys.  Way to bring posting down yet again.




Oh and tim and eric suck rough ridin' balls because it isn't funny.  ATHF>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that abortion of a show.  There is a reason why their crap always gets canned.  There aren't enough anti trend, dbags in highschool like you to keep the ratings up.  
Title: Re: Jake
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 24, 2011, 08:43:11 AM
the 0 will not be in the bram's rafters

Just stfu, please.