Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 4691287 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46514
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63450 on: June 24, 2016, 05:01:55 PM »
hosmer is guilty of one thing and one thing only, being ahead of the stats
when the game and it's measures catch up with the hoz, these detractors will look even more foolish than they currently do


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63451 on: June 24, 2016, 05:11:58 PM »
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/lets-talk-about-eric-hosmers-defense/

that is a great piece


The gold glove voters, much like the posters on this blog site, put a tremendous amount of value on scoops.

When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63452 on: June 24, 2016, 07:25:48 PM »
Volqy off to a nice start

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63453 on: June 24, 2016, 07:33:38 PM »
Well this is not ideal

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19133
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63454 on: June 24, 2016, 07:35:43 PM »
Yikes
:adios:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63455 on: June 24, 2016, 07:42:16 PM »
LOL forgot we had a game, saw the yikes comment and checked the score.  giving up 9 in the first has to be some kind of record.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63456 on: June 24, 2016, 07:42:20 PM »
Greatest come back ever?

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63457 on: June 24, 2016, 07:42:33 PM »
Esky really effed this one up

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63458 on: June 24, 2016, 07:55:04 PM »
Ned managing for a win, I like it.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63459 on: June 24, 2016, 09:00:03 PM »
I think Ned was trying to get Volkies confidence back by letting him get through the first.


Royals aren't gonna win 'em all

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63460 on: June 25, 2016, 03:21:58 AM »
if anybody ever says our pitching is the problem then you know that person is a dumb person

Our lack of scoring runs on the road is the main problem

But that does not meen starting pitching isn't an issue.  We  are 24th in Starters ERA, giving up the most HRs (71) in the 4th fewest innings pitched. We allow a HR every 5.1 Inning

Since May 8th, our starters on the road have allowed 78 ER and 35 HRs in 115.2 Innings
That's a 6.07 ERA, giving up a HR every 3.1 Inning.

Powercat Posse, if you told me the royals starting pitchers would double the record for the most home runs given up in a season, and the royals would still finish the season giving up the 2nd fewest runs in the AL, i would be like, 10 year old on christmas morning happy about that.

Powercat Posse, if you told me that the royals batters would double the record for the most home runs hit in a single season, but they would still finish 3rd to last in the AL in runs scored, i would be like, 10 year old whose dog just died sad about that.

I understand what you are trying to point out.   But that doesn't change the fact our starters have been very dissapointing.  Forget the HRs, the ERA is flat out bad.

Cleveland  is the clear #1 in runs allowed per game (3.83).  However there are 6 teams between 4.13-4.28 (KC is now 4.19).   

I don't care how we win the Central or make the playoffs, but scoring 3.18 runs on the road, and having starting pitching give up a 27th ranked 4.97 ERA isn't  gonna help our chances


The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63461 on: June 25, 2016, 09:00:01 AM »
:sdeek:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63462 on: June 25, 2016, 12:23:26 PM »
was kinda hoping springer would get a cycle yesterday, but there's nothing about it on mlb.com, so i guess he didn't.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63463 on: June 25, 2016, 12:31:58 PM »
winning streak starts today fellas

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63464 on: June 25, 2016, 06:26:08 PM »
ALEX!

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63465 on: June 25, 2016, 06:28:09 PM »
:flush:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63466 on: June 25, 2016, 06:35:35 PM »
i've set aside 2.5 hours for today's game so i'm counting on youngsie for six scoreless and on the offense for six not scoreless.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63467 on: June 25, 2016, 06:46:16 PM »

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30445
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63468 on: June 25, 2016, 06:48:24 PM »
Youngsie didn't have it tonight, thankfully the all star break is right around the corner.  This team needs it bad.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63469 on: June 25, 2016, 06:51:18 PM »
eff this crap

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63470 on: June 25, 2016, 06:52:33 PM »
 :buh-bye:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63471 on: June 25, 2016, 06:53:49 PM »
i guess i have a couple of hours free.  maybe i'll use the time to drink some alcohol.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63472 on: June 25, 2016, 06:56:28 PM »
Its hard to justify young ever making another major league start

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63473 on: June 25, 2016, 06:59:11 PM »
is chris young starting more important than the entire good of the kansas city royals?
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #63474 on: June 25, 2016, 06:59:30 PM »
is chris young starting more important than the entire good of the kansas city royals?

yes.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."