Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5834984 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40650 on: July 22, 2015, 08:59:04 AM »
We're not trading Ventura so those rumors are very stupid.

Also, our need for a RF is becoming less and less important as Rios continues to stay hot. He's hitting .345/.483/.880 in July with 8 multi hit games, 5 2B, 1 HR, and 4 SB.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40651 on: July 22, 2015, 08:59:29 AM »
Pretty confident Vargy will be Tommy John for the next year and a half.  I think this event will solidfy the Royals needing an ace for the postseason.  We can't go into the playoffs with Blanton listed as a starting pitcher. 

Some rumors are that Detroit would want Ventura and Holland for Price and Cespedes.  I don't see the Royals doing an inner-division trade.  Hopefully it makes Cueto more desirable and less expensive.  We will need an ace or at the least a #2 guy to have a chance in the World Series.  We also need Ventura to be the 2014 Ventura to have a chance advancing through he playoffs.

Ventura isn't going to be 2014 Ventura until next season at the earliest. Trading him for an ace would greatly improve the team this year. I'd have a hard time supporting that, though.

Especially if it is to Detroit.  We would have to see him for the next 5 years.  I don't mind giving up Holland though.  He is falling off this year and we have great options in the bullpen to fill is void.
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40652 on: July 22, 2015, 09:03:49 AM »
Unfortunately, the problem with going after Cueto and Price is they are most likely a package deal with oscar and Cespedes.  Having an outfielder like Cespedes may not be the worst thing in the world.  He could start LF until Gordo gets back.  Dyson shouldn't be a full time starter anyways.  Send Paulo back down until 40-man opens up. 
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40653 on: July 22, 2015, 09:04:19 AM »
But by all means continue to crush Rios for dropped foul balls.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40654 on: July 22, 2015, 09:15:23 AM »
But by all means continue to crush Rios for dropped foul balls.

A dropped foul ball tends to hurt more than a base hit helps.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40655 on: July 22, 2015, 09:19:02 AM »
But by all means continue to crush Rios for dropped foul balls.

A dropped foul ball tends to hurt more than a base hit helps.
That dropped foul ball led to no runs. His double last night was a crucial hit in a 3 run inning.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40656 on: July 22, 2015, 09:22:49 AM »
But by all means continue to crush Rios for dropped foul balls.

A dropped foul ball tends to hurt more than a base hit helps.
That dropped foul ball led to no runs. His double last night was a crucial hit in a 3 run inning.

Frasor was constantly getting into jams that led to no runs, but I recall you calling him a "C- pitcher". Giving a team 4 outs to work with will more often than not result in a big inning.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40657 on: July 22, 2015, 09:24:20 AM »
For as much crap Rios gets, he's got a beautiful swing. Especially when he connects.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40658 on: July 22, 2015, 09:34:14 AM »
But by all means continue to crush Rios for dropped foul balls.

A dropped foul ball tends to hurt more than a base hit helps.
That dropped foul ball led to no runs. His double last night was a crucial hit in a 3 run inning.

Frasor was constantly getting into jams that led to no runs, but I recall you calling him a "C- pitcher". Giving a team 4 outs to work with will more often than not result in a big inning.
He allowed 31% of inherited runners to score and the league average is 29%, so C- is accurate IMO.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40659 on: July 22, 2015, 10:36:09 AM »
:adios:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40660 on: July 22, 2015, 10:47:18 AM »
100% of the last two WS Champs traded for Jake Peavy midsession. We should do that
:adios:

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40661 on: July 22, 2015, 10:51:16 AM »
What if the Royals traded for James Shields?  We would have him for this year and next.  Think of the rest of this year with Big Game James back in our pocket.  The morale in the clubhouse would be ridiculous and maybe he could help get Ventura back on track?
« Last Edit: July 22, 2015, 10:59:52 AM by WildcatNkilt »
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40662 on: July 22, 2015, 10:55:49 AM »
What if the Royals traded for James Shields?  We would have him for this year and next.  Thing of the rest of this year with Big Game James back in our pocket.  The moral in the clubhouse would be ridiculous and maybe he could help get Ventura back on track?

We want somebody who can win in October.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40663 on: July 22, 2015, 11:00:22 AM »

What if the Royals traded for James Shields?  We would have him for this year and next.  Thing of the rest of this year with Big Game James back in our pocket.  The moral in the clubhouse would be ridiculous and maybe he could help get Ventura back on track?

Trading for Shields means you thought he wasn't worth the $$ he is getting paid during the offseason, and now you think he is worth that plus players/prospects.
:adios:

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40664 on: July 22, 2015, 11:03:07 AM »

What if the Royals traded for James Shields?  We would have him for this year and next.  Thing of the rest of this year with Big Game James back in our pocket.  The moral in the clubhouse would be ridiculous and maybe he could help get Ventura back on track?

Trading for Shields means you thought he wasn't worth the $$ he is getting paid during the offseason, and now you think he is worth that plus players/prospects.

We also didn't think Ventura would suck and Vargy would be out.  Different circumstances now.  If Vargy has Tommy John, he is out all next year as well.  We would have Shields to fill that void.  Any other pitcher we get will be rented for 3 months. 
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40665 on: July 22, 2015, 11:03:43 AM »
I'd trade Holland for Cespedes. That would be exciting.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40666 on: July 22, 2015, 11:04:55 AM »

What if the Royals traded for James Shields?  We would have him for this year and next.  Thing of the rest of this year with Big Game James back in our pocket.  The moral in the clubhouse would be ridiculous and maybe he could help get Ventura back on track?

Trading for Shields means you thought he wasn't worth the $$ he is getting paid during the offseason, and now you think he is worth that plus players/prospects.

The Royals were dumb to not pay for a front-line starter in the offseason. At least they got a bargain on Volquez.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40667 on: July 22, 2015, 11:07:23 AM »


What if the Royals traded for James Shields?  We would have him for this year and next.  Thing of the rest of this year with Big Game James back in our pocket.  The moral in the clubhouse would be ridiculous and maybe he could help get Ventura back on track?

Trading for Shields means you thought he wasn't worth the $$ he is getting paid during the offseason, and now you think he is worth that plus players/prospects.

The Royals were dumb to not pay for a front-line starter in the offseason. At least they got a bargain on Volquez.

I don't disagree, but I think trading for Shields specifically means admitting that mistake in too direct a way for it to happen.
:adios:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40561
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40668 on: July 22, 2015, 11:09:43 AM »
it's not so much admitting a mistake as it is like hooking up with your ex because your new gf is in a coma. i mean it's still a shitty thing to do
« Last Edit: July 22, 2015, 12:02:54 PM by mocat »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40669 on: July 22, 2015, 11:12:51 AM »
I seriously think Volquez is a legit #1. I mean, is he in the top half? Hell no, but I've really enjoyed him.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40670 on: July 22, 2015, 11:14:29 AM »
I seriously think Volquez is a legit #1. I mean, is he in the top half? Hell no, but I've really enjoyed him.

He was a much better addition than I feared the Royals would make. I figured they would find a Vargas/Guthrie clone.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40671 on: July 22, 2015, 11:14:54 AM »
Sure...shitty to do to Shield, but unexpected circumstances for each team.  Padre's flopped and no longer have a need for Shields.  Shields wants to win a title and has a year left on his contract.  Royals need a #1/#2 caliber pitcher.  Ventura might be on crack.  Vargas is probably going to have Tommy John and will be out for the next 2 years.  Two Royals middle relievers are starters because of Vargas and Ventura.  Duffy is inconsistent.   

This team will not get to the ALCS without a #1/#2 guy.
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40672 on: July 22, 2015, 11:17:35 AM »
And now Guts is probably going to get injured on Verruckt!

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/for-petes-sake/article28264912.html
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40673 on: July 22, 2015, 11:29:52 AM »
Interesting read
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/whats-happened-to-teams-that-traded-for-aces/

i think people don't do the math when thinking about the impact of upgrading a starter.  like with the royals, adding an "ace" in the place of whoever their fourth starter would be might raise their chances of winning the ws from like 19% to 20%.  something along those lines.  it's not a huge difference.

if you need to improve to get into the playoffs, that's a different story.  but the royals pretty much have a spot locked up.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #40674 on: July 22, 2015, 11:36:01 AM »
shields is interesting because they could probably get him for just cash.  not sure that'd be a good use of the cash, but it's potentially an interesting alternative to giving up prospects.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."