Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5841421 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40563
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34975 on: May 06, 2015, 12:02:59 PM »
Today marks the one year anniversary to the last time we lost after taking a lead to the 7th

well here are 3 that took about 1 minute to find

http://espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?id=340525103

http://espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?id=340916107

http://espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=350424104

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88614
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34976 on: May 06, 2015, 12:12:49 PM »
good try emawmeister

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34977 on: May 06, 2015, 12:21:02 PM »
maybe he meant 8th? those games were all 7th inning.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40563
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34978 on: May 06, 2015, 12:27:28 PM »
well he posted it last night and edited this morning and it still says 7th

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34979 on: May 06, 2015, 12:36:43 PM »
It's been a year since the Royals have lost a game where they led after seven. I think he just phrased it incorrectly.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34980 on: May 06, 2015, 12:37:42 PM »
Last year, our starting pitcher ave 6.10 innings.   Our main 5 guys (who started 151 of 162) ave 6.21 innings

2015, our starters ave 5.77 innings per start.   

So that is almost exactly 1/3 of an inning less per start so far this year

I think the 5.77 will improve.  Not sure if we will get to 6.00 by year's end ( we would have to ave 6.04 rest of the way to do that) but I think we will be very close if we dont

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88614
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34981 on: May 06, 2015, 12:39:45 PM »
Last year, our starting pitcher ave 6.10 innings.   Our main 5 guys (who started 151 of 162) ave 6.21 innings

2015, our starters ave 5.77 innings per start.   

So that is almost exactly 1/3 of an inning less per start so far this year

I think the 5.77 will improve.  Not sure if we will get to 6.00 by year's end ( we would have to ave 6.04 rest of the way to do that) but I think we will be very close if we dont

good stats. I'd be curious how the average IP of starters correlates to success recently (because in the olden days all starters went 8 or 9 innings and were weird)

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34982 on: May 06, 2015, 01:13:27 PM »
Last year, our starting pitcher ave 6.10 innings.   Our main 5 guys (who started 151 of 162) ave 6.21 innings

2015, our starters ave 5.77 innings per start.   

So that is almost exactly 1/3 of an inning less per start so far this year

I think the 5.77 will improve.  Not sure if we will get to 6.00 by year's end ( we would have to ave 6.04 rest of the way to do that) but I think we will be very close if we dont

good stats. I'd be curious how the average IP of starters correlates to success recently (because in the olden days all starters went 8 or 9 innings and were weird)


I was a Braves fan growing up, so I looked back 20 years ago at the 95 Braves that had good starting pitching staff and won the World Series.
Atl went 90-54 (shorter season coming off strike year).  Their starting 5 was Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery, and Kent Merker.
Those 5 started 141 of 144 games.   They ave 6.50 Inn per start.  Their combined ERA in those starts was 3.24 (Royals main 5 starters were 3.41 last year in those 151 starts)

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34983 on: May 06, 2015, 01:21:30 PM »
Last year, our starting pitcher ave 6.10 innings.   Our main 5 guys (who started 151 of 162) ave 6.21 innings

2015, our starters ave 5.77 innings per start.   

So that is almost exactly 1/3 of an inning less per start so far this year

I think the 5.77 will improve.  Not sure if we will get to 6.00 by year's end ( we would have to ave 6.04 rest of the way to do that) but I think we will be very close if we dont

good stats. I'd be curious how the average IP of starters correlates to success recently (because in the olden days all starters went 8 or 9 innings and were weird)


I was a Braves fan growing up, so I looked back 20 years ago at the 95 Braves that had good starting pitching staff and won the World Series.
Atl went 90-54 (shorter season coming off strike year).  Their starting 5 was Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery, and Kent Merker.
Those 5 started 141 of 144 games.   They ave 6.50 Inn per start.  Their combined ERA in those starts was 3.24 (Royals main 5 starters were 3.41 last year in those 151 starts)

Man. Also, the MLB Runs per game was 4.85 in 95, 4.07 last year. I know that the Braves are an NL team but damn that's a good staff

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88614
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34984 on: May 06, 2015, 01:23:49 PM »
Last year, our starting pitcher ave 6.10 innings.   Our main 5 guys (who started 151 of 162) ave 6.21 innings

2015, our starters ave 5.77 innings per start.   

So that is almost exactly 1/3 of an inning less per start so far this year

I think the 5.77 will improve.  Not sure if we will get to 6.00 by year's end ( we would have to ave 6.04 rest of the way to do that) but I think we will be very close if we dont

good stats. I'd be curious how the average IP of starters correlates to success recently (because in the olden days all starters went 8 or 9 innings and were weird)


I was a Braves fan growing up, so I looked back 20 years ago at the 95 Braves that had good starting pitching staff and won the World Series.
Atl went 90-54 (shorter season coming off strike year).  Their starting 5 was Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery, and Kent Merker.
Those 5 started 141 of 144 games.   They ave 6.50 Inn per start.  Their combined ERA in those starts was 3.24 (Royals main 5 starters were 3.41 last year in those 151 starts)

Man. Also, the MLB Runs per game was 4.85 in 95, 4.07 last year. I know that the Braves are an NL team but damn that's a good staff

yeah, good stats, but it was a completely different game then. when I say recent I mean in the last 5 years.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34985 on: May 06, 2015, 01:27:17 PM »

Last year, our starting pitcher ave 6.10 innings.   Our main 5 guys (who started 151 of 162) ave 6.21 innings

2015, our starters ave 5.77 innings per start.   

So that is almost exactly 1/3 of an inning less per start so far this year

I think the 5.77 will improve.  Not sure if we will get to 6.00 by year's end ( we would have to ave 6.04 rest of the way to do that) but I think we will be very close if we dont

I'm guessing starters IPS are generally lower in April/May, but I don't have numbers to back that up.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34986 on: May 06, 2015, 01:40:27 PM »
Holland activated. Pino to Omaha.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34987 on: May 06, 2015, 02:50:10 PM »

Last year, our starting pitcher ave 6.10 innings.   Our main 5 guys (who started 151 of 162) ave 6.21 innings

2015, our starters ave 5.77 innings per start.   

So that is almost exactly 1/3 of an inning less per start so far this year

I think the 5.77 will improve.  Not sure if we will get to 6.00 by year's end ( we would have to ave 6.04 rest of the way to do that) but I think we will be very close if we dont

I'm guessing starters IPS are generally lower in April/May, but I don't have numbers to back that up.

For 2014 across the league, average for April / May was 5.875, June-Oct 5.992 IP / start, so it is lower, but only by an out for every three games.
:adios:

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13508
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34988 on: May 06, 2015, 02:52:46 PM »
 :nerd:

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15618
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34989 on: May 06, 2015, 05:46:40 PM »
Ballpark should be primo tonight....possibly back to last year weeknight May attendance...not packed in like sardines like last night's tshirt/Cinco event.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40563
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34990 on: May 06, 2015, 05:48:42 PM »
ah yes, the classic THERE'S TOO MANY PEOPLE AT THE K post

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15618
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34991 on: May 06, 2015, 05:52:37 PM »
ah yes, the classic THERE'S TOO MANY PEOPLE AT THE K post

It's already a classic? Sometimes a bro just wants to kick up his legs across the seat in front of him and arms on both sides.

I'd NEVER complain about too many people out there BTW

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34992 on: May 06, 2015, 07:14:20 PM »
Welcome back, LoCain. Great throw.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16972
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34993 on: May 06, 2015, 07:22:57 PM »
i do kind of miss being able to go to a week night and walk up to behind the dugout with no concerns.

we should go back to being bad.

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6338
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34994 on: May 06, 2015, 07:36:41 PM »
jfc Duffy  :flush:
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67494
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34995 on: May 06, 2015, 07:36:55 PM »
go away duffy
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34996 on: May 06, 2015, 07:38:15 PM »
Rough for Duff so far.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34997 on: May 06, 2015, 07:41:06 PM »
We are going to lose this game 8-2.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34998 on: May 06, 2015, 07:44:03 PM »
Stir the 'pen, Ned.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38015
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #34999 on: May 06, 2015, 07:45:39 PM »
OMFG